Abstract
Classroom-based knowledge building requires advanced pedagogies and collaborative technologies. It qualifies as disruptive innovation: progressively more impressive accounts of what students and teachers can accomplish alter beliefs regarding developmental, demographic, and cultural barriers. To establish knowledge-building communities requires effort from within as well as from outside the classroom. The Knowledge Building International Project (KBIP) has been rooted in school-university-government (SUNG) partnerships, along with their locally based networks of innovation. The chapter starts with a conceptualization of professional development in the digital era, and the main constituents of the Remote Networked School (RNS) initiative are presented. Next, a description of the SUNG partnerships follows. Emphasis is on agency, as it was observed in the RNS and in the SUNG dynamics of partnerships for classroom-based knowledge building: knowledge building as a shared vision, symmetric knowledge advancement, and multilevel, research-based innovation. Following is a descriptive analysis of the Knowledge Building International Project (KBIP 2007–2014) using Engeström’s (1987) third-generation activity theory framework (Engeström and Sannino 2010). Referring to Engeström’s expansive learning cycle (1987), further analysis is provided regarding the overcoming of double binds for KBIP expansion as an activity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allaire, S., & Lusignan, G. (2011). Enseigner et apprendre en réseau: collaborer entre écoles distantes à l’aide des TIC. Anjou/Montréal: Éditions CEC.
Allaire, S., Beaudoin, J., Breuleux, A., Hamel, C., Inchauspé, P., Laferrière, T., & Turcotte, S. (2006). L’école éloignée en réseau: Rapport de recherche, phase II. Québec: CEFRIO. Retrieved February 2014, from http://www.eer.qc.ca/publications.php
Bereiter, C. (Ed.). (2002a). Learning technology innovation in Canada. TeleLearning-NCE Special Issue of the Journal of Distance Education, 17(3).
Bereiter, C. (2002b). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Bereiter, C. (2014). Principled practical knowledge: Not a bridge but a ladder. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 4–17.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.
Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (2006). Technology as a catalyst for fostering knowledge-creating communities. In A. M. O’Donnell, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & G. Erkens (Eds.), Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology (pp. 37–60). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Breuleux, A., Erickson, G., Laferrière, T., & Lamon, M. (2002). Devis sociotechniques pour l’établissement de communautés d’apprentissage en réseau: Principes de conception et conditions de réussite résultant de plusieurs cycles d’intégration pédagogique des TIC/Building networked learning communities: Design principles and the conditions for successful pedagogical integration of ICTs in teacher education. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 28(2), 411–434.
Chan, C. K. K. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 147–186. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9121-0.
Coburn, C. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Postcapitalist society. New York: HerperCollins Publishers.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analysing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377–406). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2006). Interactive expertise studies in distributed working intelligence. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education, 1992 ISBN 951-45-6146-5. Retrieved February 2014, from https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10224/3666/engestrom1-105.pdf?sequence=2
Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory and Psychology, 21(5), 598–628.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.
Fishman, B., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2013). Design-based implementation research: An emerging model for transforming the relationship of research and practice. New York: Teachers College Press. http://nsse-chicago.org/Chapter.asp?uid=3062. Accessed 27 Aug 2013.
Hamel, C. (2011). Prise de décisions individuelles et partagées des intervenants participant à l’École éloignée en réseau en matière d’innovation technologique, organisationnelle et sociale en région. Doctoral dissertation, Université Laval, Québec.
Hamel, C., Allaire, S., & Turcotte, S. (2012). Just-in-time online professional development activities for an innovation in small rural schools. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 38(3). http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/641. Accessed 17 Feb 2014.
Hamel, C., Laferrière, T., Turcotte, S., & Allaire, S. (2013). Un regard rétrospectif sur le développement professionnel des enseignants dans le modèle de l’École éloignée en réseau. Science et Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication pour l’Éducation et la Formation, 20, Available: http://sticef.univ-lemans.fr/num/vol2013/20-hamel-cren/sticef_2013_NS_hamel_20.htm
Hartnell-Young, E. (2009). Learning for teaching: Building professional knowledge on a national scale. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35(1). Retrieved February 2014, from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/516/246
Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow’s schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools. East Lansing: Holmes Group.
Laferrière, T., & Allaire, S. (2010). Développement professionnel d’enseignantes et d’enseignants: les passeurs de frontière qui façonnent l’École éloignée en réseau. Éducation et formation, e293, mai, 102–120.
Laferrière, T., & Breuleux, A. (2011). Collaborative design (CODE) as a teacher professional development model in francophone and anglophone Quebec. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.), CSCL 2011: Computer-supported collaborative learning. Connecting research to policy and practice. Conference proceedings (Vol. 3, pp. 1178–1181). International Society of the Learning Sciences & Center for Information Technology in Education, University of Hong Kong.
Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., & Bracewell, R. (1998). TACT: The knowledge-building web of a TeleLearning community of support and communication for professional development. In Worldwide network of learning: Opportunities, challenges, and contrasts. The fifteenth international conference on technology and education proceedings (pp. 424–426). Sante Fe, New Mexico: International Conferences on Technology and Education.
Laferrière, T., Allaire, S., Breuleux, A., Hamel, C., Turcotte, S., Gaudreault-Perron, J., Inchauspé, P., & Beaudoin, J. (2008). L’école éloignée en réseau: L’apprentissage des élèves: Rapport de recherche, phase III. Québec: CEFRIO. Available: http://www.eer.qc.ca/doc/2009/EER_rapport-synthese_phase-3.pdf
Laferrière, T., Montane, M., Gros, B., Alvarez, I., Bernaus, M., et al. (2010). Partnerships for knowledge building: An emerging model. Second special edition on knowledge building, edited by M. Scardamalia & B. Egnetoff. Canadian Journal of Learning Technologies, 36(1), 1–20.
Laferrière, T., Hamel, C., Allaire, S., Turcotte, S., Breuleux, A., Beaudoin, J., & Gaudreault-Perron, J. (2011a). L’école éloignée en réseau (ÉÉR), un modèle: Rapport-synthèse. Retrieved February 2014. Quebec: CEFRIO. from http://www.cefrio.qc.ca/media/uploader/L_Ecole_eloignee_en_reseau_Phase3_Final_isbn.pdf
Laferrière, T., Perreault, C., Boutin, P. A., Law, N., Yuen, J., Montané, M., Hernandez, O., Boluda, P., & Blancafort, M. (2011b). Knowledge building international project: Designs for deep understanding. In Proceedings of CSCL 2011 (pp. 414–421). Center for Information Technology in Education, University of Hong Kong.
Laferrière, T., & Breuleux, A. (2011c). Collaborative Design (CODE) as a teacher professional development model in Francophone and Anglophone Quebec. In Proceedings of CSCL 2011 (pp. 1134–1138). Hong Kong: Center for Information Technology in Education, University of Hong Kong.
Laferrière, T., Law, N., & Montané, M. (2012a). An international knowledge building network for sustainable curriculum and pedagogical innovation. International Education Studies, 5(3), 148–160.
Laferrière, T., Barma, S., Gervais, F., Hamel, C., Allaire, S., & Breuleux, A. (2012b). Teaching, learning, and knowledge building: The case of the remote networked school initiative. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 40(1), 96–113.
Laferrière, T., Hamel, C., Allaire, S., Breuleux, A., & Turcotte, S. (2012c). The remote networked schools model for sustainable and scalable collaborative learning and knowledge building. Paper short-listed for award, and presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Vancouver.
Laferrière, T., Hamel, C., & Searson, M. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of technology integration in educational settings: A case study. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 29(5), 463–473.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Le Cornu, R., & Ewing, R. (2008). Reconceptualising professional experiences in pre-service teacher education… reconstructing the past to embrace the future. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1799–1812. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.008.
Leithwood, K. (2014). LSA theory of action. Toronto: Leading Student Achievement: Networks for Learning. Available at https://sites.google.com/site/pqp2cat/the-principal-in-action---resa
Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 221–227.
Lieberman, A., & Grolnick, M. (1996). Networks and reform in American education. Teachers College Record, 98(1), 7–45.
Looi, C. K., So, H.-J., Toh, Y., & Chen, W. (2011). The Singapore experience: Synergy of national policy, classroom practice and design research. International Journal of CSCL, 6(1), 9–37.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2001). Standards for Professional Development Schools (NCATE). Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. Retrieved May 12, 2014, from http://www.ncate.org
Nunes, C. (2013). Epic innovations in large scale: the search for excellence. Retrieved February 2, 2014, from http://pt.slideshare.net/cesaraanunes/cesar-nunes-virtualeducacolombia
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337.
Riel, M. (1990). Cooperative learning across classrooms in electronic learning circles. Instructional Science, 19, 445–466.
Riel, M. (2004a). Learning Circles. In A. DiStefano, K. E. Rudestam, & R. J. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp. 281–284). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Riel, M. (2004b). Building communities of learners online. In G. Kearsley (Ed.), Online learning: Personal reflections on the transformation of education (pp. 309–320). Englewood Cliffs: Education Technology Publications.
Riel, M. (2013). The learning circle model: Building knowledge through collaborative projects. Retrieved on Feb 14, 2014, from https://sites.google.com/site/onlinelearningcircles/Home/learning-circles-defined
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Sannino, A. (2008). Sustaining a non-dominant activity in school: Only a utopia? Journal of Educational Change, 9(4), 329–338.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Analyzing collaborative discourse. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 187–204). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 1370–1373). New York: Macmillan Reference.
Scardamalia, M., & collaborators. (2014). Societal human resource development in an open informational world: Opening doors and closing gaps. Knowledge Building International, internal document.
Seng, C. T., So, H. J., & Yeo, J. (2014). Knowledge creation in education. New York: Springer.
Sun, D., Looi, C.-K., Y. C. J., & Phua. (2013). Design and Evaluation of a Collaborative Inquiry Environment to Enhance Science Learning. ICCE 2013, Bali.
Turcotte, S., Laferrière, T., Hamel, C., & Breuleux, A. (2009). Multilevel innovation in remote networked schools (RNS). Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(4), 285–299.
UNESCO. (2011). ICT competency framework for teachers. Paris: Author. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002134/213475e.pdf
United States Department of Education. (2010). National Educational Technology Plan (NETP). http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010. Accessed 25 Oct 2013.
van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175–220.
Virkkunen, J. (2006). Dilemmas in building shared transformative agency. Activités, 3(1), 44–66, http://www.activites.org/v3n1/virkkunen-en.pdf. Accessed 2 Sept 2013.
Virkkunen, J., & Shelley Newnham, D. (2013). The change laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education (p. 4). Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Voogt, J., Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R., Hickey, D. T., & McKenney, S. (2015). Collaborative (re-)design as a form of professional development: Teacher learning by design. Instructional Science.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wiske, M. S. (2005). Teaching for understanding with technology with Kristi Rennebohm Franz and Lisa Breit. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environments. New York: Springer.
Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C., & Morley, E. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307. doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.528317.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all the teachers and the members of the research-intervention team for their intentional proactive participation in KBIP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laferrière, T. et al. (2015). The Knowledge Building International Project (KBIP): Scaling Up Professional Development Using Collaborative Technology. In: Looi, CK., Teh, L. (eds) Scaling Educational Innovations. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-537-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-537-2_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-536-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-537-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)