Abstract
As an important construct in the cognitive process, comprehension monitoring has received much scholarly attention. Researchers have recognized comprehension monitoring as an ability closely linked with children’s reading comprehension ability and working memory capacity. Evidence is also abundant to prove that comprehension monitoring skill develops with age. It remains unclear, however, how these factors interact during reading, particularly in low-grade children. Many previous empirical studies have only employed online or offline measurements to examine children’s monitoring performance, which might lead to unsolid conclusions. In this study, we utilized both online eye-tracking measures and offline probe interviews to quantify the developmental features (i.e., evaluation and regulation) of comprehension monitoring skills among Chinese beginning readers. The results indicated that the comprehension monitoring performance, as quantified by eye-tracking measures, was positively related to their reading comprehension ability and working memory capacity. Moreover, the first-graders’ performances lacked online regulation skills during the error-detecting tasks, while second-graders had relatively developed online monitoring performance. Additionally, the eye-tracking measures were found as a predictor for children’s performances in probe interviews, as the readers with high comprehension ability and working memory capacity successfully reported more errors embedded in the self-designed reading materials. Therefore, the findings support the claim that children’s comprehension monitoring is a developing skill associated with reading comprehension and working memory capacity and further question the existence of comprehension monitoring skills in beginning readers, especially first-graders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data can be made available upon request to the corresponding author under a formal data-sharing agreement.
References
Acheson, D. J., & Hagoort, P. (2013). Stimulating the brain’s language network: Syntactic ambiguity resolution after TMS to the inferior frontal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(10), 1664–1677. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00430
Artuso, C., Carretti, B., & Palladino, P. (2019). Short-term training on working memory updating and metacognition in primary school: The effect on reading comprehension. School Psychology International, 40(6), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034319881671
August, D. L., Flavell, J. H., & Clift, R. (1984). Comparison of comprehension monitoring of skilled and less skilled readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/747650
Baker, L. (1984). Children’s effective use of multiple standards for evaluating their comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.588
Baker, L. (1985). Differences in the standards used by college students to evaluate their comprehension of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/748020
Baker, L., & Anderson, R. I. (1982). Effects of inconsistent information on text processing: Evidence for comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(2), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/747487
Baker, L., & Brown, A. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, M. L. Kamil, R. Barr, & P. B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). Longman.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Eigen and S4. R Package. In (Version 1.1-6.).
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
Calvo, M. G. (2001). Working memory and inferences: Evidence from eye fixations during reading. Memory (Hove, England), 9(4–6), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210143000083
Calvo, M. G. (2005). Relative contribution of vocabulary knowledge and working memory span to elaborative inferences in reading. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2004.07.002
Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2020). Is all formulaic language created equal? Unpacking the processing advantage for different types of formulaic sequences. Language and Speech, 63(1), 95–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918823230
Carrol, G., & Littlemore, J. (2020). Resolving figurative expressions during reading: The role of familiarity, transparency, and context. Discourse Processes, 57(7), 609–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1729041
Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146816306400801
Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 49, 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
Connor, C. M., Phillips, B. M., Kaschak, M., Apel, K., Kim, Y. S., & Lonigan, C. J. (2014). Comprehension tools for teachers: Reading for understanding from prekindergarten through fourth grade. Educational Psychology Review, 26(3), 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9267-1
Connor, C. M., Radach, R., Vorstius, C., Day, S. L., McLean, L., & Morrison, F. J. (2015). Individual differences in fifth graders’ reading and language predict their comprehension monitoring development: An eye-movement study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(2), 114–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.943905
Currie, N. K., Francey, G., Davies, R., Gray, S., Bridges, M. S., Restrepo, M. A., Thompson, M. S., Ciraolo, M. F., Hu, J., & Cain, K. (2021). The process and product of coherence monitoring in young readers: Effects of reader and text characteristics. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1831503
de Bruïne, A., Jolles, D., & van den Broek, P. (2021). Minding the load or loading the mind: The effect of manipulating working memory on coherence monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 118, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104212
Doebel, S., Rowell, S. F., & Koenig, M. A. (2016). Young children detect and avoid logically inconsistent sources: The importance of communicative context and executive function. Child Development, 87(6), 1956–1970. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12563
Gambrell, L. B., & Bales, R. J. (1986). Mental imagery and the comprehension-monitoring performance of fourth-and fifth-grade poor readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 454–464. https://doi.org/10.2307/747616
Grammer, J. K., Carrasco, M., Gehring, W. J., & Morrison, F. J. (2014). Age-related changes in error processing in young children: A school-based investigation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2014.02.001
Helder, A., Van Leijenhorst, L., & van den Broek, P. (2016). Coherence monitoring by good and poor comprehenders in elementary school: Comparing offline and online measures. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.008
Hessel, A. K., & Schroeder, S. (2022). Word processing difficulty and executive control interactively shape comprehension monitoring in a second language: An eye-tracking study. Reading and Writing, 35(10), 2287–2312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10269-3
Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University Press.
Hyönä, J., & Nurminen, A.-M. (2006). Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports. British Journal of Psychology, 97(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712605X53678
Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 29–54). Elsevier.
Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347
Kim, Y. S., & Phillips, B. (2014). Cognitive correlates of listening comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.74
Kim, Y. S. G., Vorstius, C., & Radach, R. (2018). Does online comprehension monitoring make a unique contribution to reading comprehension in beginning readers? Evidence from eye movements. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(5), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1457680
Kinnunen, R., & Vaurast, M. (1995). Comprehension monitoring and the level of comprehension in high and low-achieving primary school children’s reading. Learning and Instruction, 5, 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(95)00009-R
Kinnunen, R., Vauras, M., & Niemi, P. (1998). Comprehension monitoring in beginning readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(4), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0204_4
Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-incrementation model. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
Ko, H. W., & Chan, Y. L. (2007). Reading comprehension screening test for 2nd grade to 6th grade elementary school students. Ministry of Education.
Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B., Scheepers, C., & Strube, G. (1997). The role of lexical heads in parsing: Evidence from german. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(2–3), 307–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909697386871
Kristensen, M., & Hansen, T. (2004). Statistical analyses of repeated measures in physiological research: A tutorial. Advances in Physiology Education, 28(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00042.2003
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Laberge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
Language and Reading Research Consortium (LARRC). (2017). Oral language and listening comprehension: Same or different constructs? Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 60(5), 1273–1284. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0039
Magezi, D. A. (2015). Linear mixed-effects models for within-participant psychology experiments: An introductory tutorial and free, graphical user interface (LMMgui). Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00002
Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2016). Effects of text-belief consistency and reading task on the strategic validation of multiple texts. European Journal of the Psychology of Education, 31, 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0270-9
Muhid, A., Amalia, E. R., Hilaliyah, H., Budiana, N., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategies implementation on students’ reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 847–862.
Nassif, L., Huntley, E., & Mohamed, A. (2022). Attention to verbal morphology in L2 arabic reading: An eye-movement study. Foreign Language Annals, 55(3), 769–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12644
Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
Oakhill, J., Hartt, J., & Samols, D. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7–9), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-rostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
Paris, S. G., & Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968109547390
Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1239
R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 3-900051-07-0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Ruffman, T. (1996). Do children understand the mind by means of simulation or a theory? Evidence from their understanding of inference. Mind & Language, 11(4), 388–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1996.tb00053.x
Schotter, E. R., Tran, R., & Rayner, K. (2014). Don’t believe what you read (only once): Comprehension is supported by regressions during reading. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1218–1226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614531148
Skarakis-Doyle, E. (2002). Young Children’s detection of violations in familiar stories and emerging comprehension monitoring. Discourse Processes, 33(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3302_04
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.
Soto, C., Gutiérrez de Blume, A. P., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., & Riffo, B. (2019). Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1565067. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1565067
Spencer, J. P. (2020). The development of working memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(6), 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420959835
Sutiyatno, S. (2019). A survey study: The correlation between metacognitive strategies and reading achievement. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 9(4), 438–444. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0904.11
Teng, F. (2020). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy, 54(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12181
Teng, M. F., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Development of children’s metacognitive knowledge, reading, and writing in English as a foreign language: Evidence from longitudinal data using multilevel models. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 1202–1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12413
Tighe, E. L., Kaldes, G., Talwar, A., Crossley, S. A., Greenberg, D., & Skalicky, S. (2022). Do struggling adult readers monitor their reading? Understanding the role of online and offline comprehension monitoring processes during reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 56(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194221081473
Tzeng, S. J. (1999). Working memory, phonological processing, and naming speed of chinese poor readers. In H. W. Ko (Ed.), The identification and diagnosis of reading difficulties (pp. 5–28). National Chung-Cheng University.
van der Schoot, M., Reijntjes, A., & van Lieshout, E. C. (2012). How do children deal with inconsistencies in text? An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in good and poor reading comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 25(7), 1665–1690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9337-4
Weiss, A. F., Kretzschmar, F., Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Staub, A. (2018). Comprehension demands modulate re-reading, but not first pass reading behavior. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1307862
Yan, G., Xiong, J., Zang, C., Yu, L., Cui, L., & Bai, X. (2013). Review of eye-movement measures in reading research. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(4), 589–605. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00589
Yuill, N., Oakhill, J., & Parkin, A. (1989). Working memory, comprehension ability and the resolution of text anomaly. British Journal of Psychology, 80(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02325.x
Zabrucky, K., & Moore, D. (1989). Children’s ability to use three standards to evaluate their comprehension of text. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(3), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.2307/747773
Zabrucky, K., & Ratner, H. H. (1989). Effects of Reading ability on children’s comprehension evaluation and regulation. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968909547659
Zabrucky, K., & Ratner, H. H. (1992). Effects of passage type on comprehension monitoring and recall in good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24(3), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969209547782
Zargar, E., Adams, A., & Connor, C. M. (2020). The relations between children’s comprehension monitoring and their reading comprehension and vocabulary knowledge: An eye-movement study. Reading and Writing, 33(3), 511–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09966-3
Zhao, A., Guo, Y., & Dinnesen, M. S. (2021). The direct and indirect effects of language and cognitive skills on chinese reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 35(3), 539–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10192-z
Funding
This research was supported by grants from National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC 101-2420-H-008-001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, K., Ku, YM., Ma, C. et al. Development of comprehension monitoring skill in Chinese children: evidence from eye movement and probe interviews. Metacognition Learning 19, 103–121 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09354-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09354-x