Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental impacts and improvement implications for industrial meatballs manufacturing: scenario in a developing country

  • LCA FOR ENERGY SYSTEMS AND FOOD PRODUCTS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this article was to perform a life cycle assessment (LCA) of industrial meatballs produced in Malaysia, for evaluating the environmental impacts and discussing the adoption of circular economy (CE) principles. It attempted to fill the research gaps of very less related work reported, unavailability of environmental performance data and less discussion on improvement implications for food production in developing countries.

Methods

To achieve the objectives, the midpoint environmental impacts of beef meatballs manufacturing were assessed and analyzed. Primary data were collected from a small- and medium-sized food manufacturing company located in Malaysia. The environmental assessment was grounded on the production of food raw materials and packaging materials and industry-based manufacturing of processed food items as the system boundary. The LCA was conducted using SimaPro 7.3.3 as a software tool and CML-IA baseline V3.05 as an impact evaluation method.

Results and discussion

The results found that the farm-based production and industrial cooking of beef are the major sources responsible for the environmental burdens. Comparatively, food-based raw materials were having more damaging impact on the environment than the packaging materials. The use of natural gas for meatballs cooking was found to be another environmental hotspot. In addition, from the packaging viewpoint, polystyrene material was the major contributor towards environmental impacts. Based on the results, the potential solutions and CE principles were recommended and discussed in order to improve the environmental performance.

Conclusions

By using LCA, this study identified the environmental hotspots for industrial meatballs production in Malaysia and discussed the potential adoption of CE principles in order to reduce the environmental burdens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data and material availability

The data and materials that support the results of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request and with permission of the case company.

References

  • Ahmad MS, Subramaniam V, Mohammad H, Mokhtar A, Ismail B (2014) Life cycle assessment for oil palm based plywood. Am J Environ Sci 10:86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Sahid I, Subramaniam V, Muhamad H, Mokhtar A (2013) Life cycle inventory for palm based plywood: a gate-to-gate case study. UKM FST Postgraduate Colloquium. AIP Publishing Selangor, Malaysia, pp 569–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Wong KY, Elahi H (2017) Sustainability assessment and analysis of Malaysian food manufacturing sector—a move towards sustainable development. Adv Sci Lett 23:8942–8946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Wong KY (2018) Sustainability assessment in the manufacturing industry: a review of recent studies. BIJ 25:3162–3179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Wong KY, Ahmad R (2019) Life cycle assessment for food production and manufacturing: recent trends, global applications and future prospects. Procedia Manuf 34:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Wong KY, Butt SI (2022) Status of sustainable manufacturing practices: literature review and trends of triple bottom-line-based sustainability assessment methodologies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–28

  • Al Amin M, Rahman MM, Razimi MSA, Chowdhury ZZ, Hussain MNM, Desa MNM (2020) Screening of commercial meat products from supermarket chains for feline derivatives using SP-PCR-RLFP and lab-on-a-chip. J Food Compos Anal 92:103565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida C, Vaz S, Ziegler F (2015) Environmental life cycle assessment of a canned sardine product from Portugal. J Ind Ecol 19:607–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amienyo D, Gujba H, Stichnothe H, Azapagic A (2013) Life cycle environmental impacts of carbonated soft drinks. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:77–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amrina E, Yusof SM (2011) Key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing evaluation in automotive companies, International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Singapore, pp 1093–1097

  • Amrina E, Yusof SRM (2013) An AHP based-model for sustainable manufacturing performance evaluation in automotive industry, 12th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow C, Morgan D (2013) Polymer film packaging for food: an environmental assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 78:74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bimpizas-Pinis M, Santagata R, Kaiser S, Liu Y, Lyu Y (2022) Additives in the food supply chain: environmental assessment and circular economy implications. Environ Sustain Indic 14:100172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas WK, Naude G (2016) A life cycle assessment of processed meat products supplied to Barrow Island: a Western Australian case study. J Food Eng 180:48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderón LA, Iglesias L, Laca A, Herrero M, Díaz M (2010) The utility of life cycle assessment in the ready meal food industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:1196–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerutti AK, Bruun S, Donno D, Beccaro GL, Bounous G (2013) Environmental sustainability of traditional foods: the case of ancient apple cultivars in Northern Italy assessed by multifunctional LCA. J Clean Prod 52:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colley TA, Birkved M, Olsen SI, Hauschild MZ (2020) Using a gate-to-gate LCA to apply circular economy principles to a food processing SME. J Clean Prod 251:119566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran MA (2013) Life cycle assessment: a review of the methodology and its application to sustainability. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2:273–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng Y, Achten WM, Van Acker K, Duflou JR (2013) Life cycle assessment of wheat gluten powder and derived packaging film. Biofuel Bioprod Biorefin 7:429–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dorr E, Koegler M, Gabrielle B, Aubry C (2021) Life cycle assessment of a circular, urban mushroom farm. J Clean Prod 288:125668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egilmez G, Kucukvar M, Tatari O, Bhutta MKS (2014a) Supply chain sustainability assessment of the US food manufacturing sectors: a life cycle-based frontier approach. Resour Conserv Recycl 82:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egilmez G, Gumus S, Kucukvar M, Tatari O (2016) A fuzzy data envelopment analysis framework for dealing with uncertainty impacts of input–output life cycle assessment models on eco-efficiency assessment. J Clean Prod 129:622–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013) Towards the circular economy. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation-Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2022

  • Ernstoff A, Tu Q, Faist M, Del Duce A, Mandlebaum S, Dettling J (2019) Comparing the environmental impacts of meatless and meat-containing meals in the United States. Sustain 11:6235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan W, Goggins J, Clifford E, Zhan X (2017) Environmental impacts of milk powder and butter manufactured in the Republic of Ireland. Sci Total Environ 579:159–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Floros JD, Newsome R, Fisher W, Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Chen H, Dunne CP, German JB, Hall RL, Heldman DR, Karwe MV (2010) Feeding the world today and tomorrow: the importance of food science and technology. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 9:572–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foo K, Hameed B (2010) Insight into the applications of palm oil mill effluent: a renewable utilization of the industrial agricultural waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:1445–1452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foster C, Green K, Bleda M (2007) Environmental impacts of food production and consumption: final report to the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, Manchester Business School, London

  • Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Doka G, Dones R, Hischier R, Hellweg S, Margni M, Nemecek T, Spielmann M (2003) Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods, Swiss Centre for LCI., Duebendorf, Switzerland

  • Geissdoerfer M, Savaget P, Bocken NM, Hultink EJ (2017) The circular economy–a new sustainability paradigm? J Clean Prod 143:757–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisellini P, Setti M, Ulgiati S (2016) Energy and land use in worldwide agriculture: an application of life cycle energy and cluster analysis. Environ Dev Sustain 18:799–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egilmez G, Kucukvar M, Omer Tatari M, Bhutta KS (2014b) Supply chain sustainability assessment of the US food manufacturing sectors: a life cycle-based frontier approach. Resour Conserv Recycl 82:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-García S, Castanheira ÉG, Dias AC, Arroja L (2013) Using life cycle assessment methodology to assess UHT milk production in Portugal. Sci Total Environ 442:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinee JB (2001) Life cycle assessment: an operational guide to the ISO standards, Center of Environmental Science - (CML), Leiden University

  • Gutierrez MM, Meleddu M, Piga A (2017) Food losses, shelf life extension and environmental impact of a packaged cheesecake: a life cycle assessment. Food Res Int 91:124–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall GM, Howe J (2012) Energy from waste and the food processing industry. Process Saf Environ Prot 90:203–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasnan NN, Aziz NA, Zulkifli N, Taip FS (2014) Food factory design: reality and challenges faced by Malaysian SMEs. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 2:328–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassini E, Surti C, Searcy C (2012) A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. Int J Product Econ 140:69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haupt M, Zschokke M (2017) How can LCA support the circular economy?—63rd discussion forum on life cycle assessment, Zurich, Switzerland, November 30, 2016. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:832–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild MZ, Rosenbaum RK, Olsen SI (2018) Life cycle assessment. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hospido A, Moreira M, Feijoo G (2003) Simplified life cycle assessment of Galician milk production. Int Dairy J 13:783–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinpour A, Peng Q, Gu P (2015) A benchmark-based method for sustainable product design. BIJ 22:643–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huda N, Shen YH, Huey YL (2009) Proximate composition, colour, texture profile of Malaysian chicken balls. Pak J Nutr 8:1555–1558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MA, Steinmann ZJ, Elshout PM, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira M, Zijp M, Hollander A, van Zelm R (2017) ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingrao C, Saja C, Primerano P (2021) Application of life cycle assessment to chemical recycling of post-use glass containers on the laboratory scale towards circular economy implementation. J Clean Prod 307:127319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006a) ISO 14040, Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • ISO (2006b) ISO 14044, Environmental management-life cycle assessment-requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Khan O, Daddi T, Iraldo F (2020) The role of dynamic capabilities in circular economy implementation and performance of companies. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 27:3018–3033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D, Thoma G, Ulrich R, Nutter D, Milani F (2014) Life cycle assessment of cheese manufacturing in the United States, 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector, San Francisco, USA 634–640

  • Kirchherr J, Reike D, Hekkert M (2017) Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions. Resour Conserv Recycl 127:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulak M, Nemecek T, Frossard E, Chable V, Gaillard G (2015) Life cycle assessment of bread from several alternative food networks in Europe. J Clean Prod 90:104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kum WH, Zahari MW (2011) Utilisation of oil palm by-products as ruminant feed in Malaysia. J Oil Palm Res 23:1029–1035

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lei H, Li L, Yang W, Bian Y, Li C-Q (2021) An analytical review on application of life cycle assessment in circular economy for built environment. J Build Eng 44:103374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liguori R, Amore A, Faraco V (2013) Waste valorization by biotechnological conversion into added value products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:6129–6147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucchetti MG, Paolotti L, Rocchi L, Boggia A (2019) The role of environmental evaluation within circular economy: an application of life cycle assessment (LCA) method in the detergents sector. Rigas Tehniskas Universitates Zinatniskie Raksti 23:238–257

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monsiváis-Alonso R, Mansouri SS, Román-Martínez A (2020) Life cycle assessment of intensified processes towards circular economy: Omega-3 production from waste fish oil. Chem Eng Process 158:108171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss B (2008) Water pollution by agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:659–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mungkung R, De Haes HU, Clift R (2006) Potentials and limitations of life cycle assessment in setting ecolabelling criteria: a case study of thai shrimp aquaculture product (5 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2022) World Economic Situation and Prospects 2022, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Economic Analysis, New York, USA

  • Niero M, Olsen SI (2016) Circular economy: to be or not to be in a closed product loop? A Life Cycle Assessment of aluminium cans with inclusion of alloying elements. Resour Conserv Recycl 114:18–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niero M, Rivera XCS (2018) The role of life cycle sustainability assessment in the implementation of circular economy principles in organizations. Procedia CIRP 69:793–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noya LI, Vasilaki V, Stojceska V, González-García S, Kleynhans C, Tassou S, Moreira MT, Katsou E (2018) An environmental evaluation of food supply chain using life cycle assessment: a case study on gluten free biscuit products. J Clean Prod 170:451–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes FA, Seferin M, Maciel VG, Flôres SH, Ayub MAZ (2016) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from rice production systems in Brazil: a comparison between minimal tillage and organic farming. J Clean Prod 139:799–809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo LA (2018) Applying fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS technique in identifying the content strategy of sustainable manufacturing for food production. Environ Dev Sustain 1–27

  • PEMANDU (2010) The economic transformation programme: a roadmap for Malaysia. 9789671002650, Performance Measurement and Delivery Unit (PEMANDU), Malaysia

  • Point E, Tyedmers P, Naugler C (2012) Life cycle environmental impacts of wine production and consumption in Nova Scotia, Canada. J Clean Prod 27:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recanati F, Marveggio D, Dotelli G (2018) From beans to bar: a life cycle assessment towards sustainable chocolate supply chain. Sci Total Environ 613–614:1013–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renouf MA, Pagan RJ, Wegener MK (2011) Life cycle assessment of Australian sugarcane products with a focus on cane processing. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:125–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy P, Nei D, Orikasa T, Xu Q, Okadome H, Nakamura N, Shiina T (2009) A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. J Food Eng 90:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellahewa J, Martindale W (2010) The impact of food processing on the sustainability of the food supply chain. In: Martindale W (Editor), Delivering food security with supply chain led innovations: understanding supply chains, providing food security, delivering choice. Association of Applied Biologists, Egham, UK, pp 91–97

  • Shirai Y, Wakisaka M, Yacob S, Ali Hassan M, Si S (2003) Reduction of methane released from palm oil mill lagoon in Malaysia and its countermeasures. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 8:237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solazzo R, Donati M, Tomasi L, Arfini F (2016) How effective is greening policy in reducing GHG emissions from agriculture? Evidence from Italy. Sci Total Environ 573:1115–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stone TF, Thompson JR, Rosentrater KA, Nair A (2021) A life cycle assessment approach for vegetables in large-, mid-, and small-scale food systems in the midwest US. Sustain 13:11368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Clark M (2014) Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature 515:518–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Passel S (2013) Food miles to assess sustainability: a revision. Sustain Dev 21:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Stijn A, Eberhardt LM, Jansen BW, Meijer A (2021) A circular economy life cycle assessment (CE-LCA) model for building components. Resour Conserv Recycl 174:105683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Villanueva-Rey P, Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012) Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis of grape production for vinification in the Rías Baixas appellation (NW Spain). J Clean Prod 27:92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabaniotou A, Kassidi E (2003) Life cycle assessment applied to egg packaging made from polystyrene and recycled paper. J Clean Prod 11:549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zufia J, Arana L (2008) Life cycle assessment to eco-design food products: industrial cooked dish case study. J Clean Prod 16:1915–1921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan

    Shamraiz Ahmad

  2. Institute of Management, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33, 56127, Pisa, Italy

    Shamraiz Ahmad

  3. Department of Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Skudai, Malaysia

    Kuan Yew Wong

  4. Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sarawak Branch, Kota Samarahan, Malaysia

    Ahmad Faiz Abd Rashid

  5. Mechanical Engineering Department, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, 31952, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia

    Mushtaq Khan

Authors
  1. Shamraiz Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kuan Yew Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmad Faiz Abd Rashid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mushtaq Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shamraiz Ahmad or Kuan Yew Wong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by Giovanni Mondello.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmad, S., Wong, K.Y., Rashid, A.F.A. et al. Environmental impacts and improvement implications for industrial meatballs manufacturing: scenario in a developing country. Int J Life Cycle Assess (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02146-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02146-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation