Abstract
Purpose
The social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) methodology needs to advance in its methodological development, mainly regarding the impact assessment phase, in which a widely accepted method is missing. The goal of this study is to introduce a social metric to evaluate the human development of workers in production chains and economic sectors.
Methods
The applied characterization model of the proposed social metric was inspired by the Human Development Index (HDI), whose significance and wide use make it a good proxy to express human prosperity. Similar to HDI, our indicator called Workers’ Human Development Index (W-HDI) is derived from the geometric mean of the three dimensions of HDI, covering education, income, and health aspects of workers in different economic sectors linked to a given production chain. W-HDI proposal was tested by performing a case study from the sugarcane industry in Brazil, considering different sugarcane biorefinery configurations, including a couple of first-generation ethanol options and an integrated first- and second-generation ethanol production system (1G2G).
Results and discussion
The proposed metric was used to address the social impacts of different biorefinery scenarios. The scenario representing the first-generation ethanol production with basic technology achieved the lowest W-HDI score mostly because of the manual sugarcane harvesting system that contributed to a higher rate of occupational accidents (lower health dimension), fewer years of education, and lower wages than the other biorefinery scenarios. The highest W-HDI was obtained by the 1G2G scenario, mainly due to a more advanced technology reflected by the higher educational profile (more years of schooling) required to the workers and better wages. Additionally, our proposed W-HDI was applied in the assessment of Brazilian economic sectors, and most of them (84%) obtained medium or high development levels.
Conclusions
The present study contributes to the development of sustainability assessment tools by providing advances in the social life cycle assessment methodology. More specifically, the W-HDI is proposed to address the impact assessment phase with an indicator that can be applied in many sectors and production chains.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azadi H, De Jong S, Derudder B et al (2012) Bitter sweet: how sustainable is bio-ethanol production in Brazil? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:3599–3603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.015
Barata RB, Ribeiro MCSA, Moraes JC (2000) Acidentes de trabalho referidos por trabalhadores moradores em área urbana no interior do Estado de São Paulo em 1994. Inf Epidemiológico Do SUS 9:199–210. The article can be accessed in http://scielo.iec.gov.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-16732000000300005
Benoit-Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G (2012) Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4:1946–1965. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4091946
Benoit-Norris C, Norris GA (2015) Chapter 8: the social hotspots database. In: The sustainability practitioner’s guide to social analysis and assessment. pp 52–73
Bocoum I, Macombe C, Revéret JP (2015) Anticipating impacts on health based on changes in income inequality caused by life cycles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:405–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0835-x
Bonomi A, Cavalett O, Cunha MP et al (2016) Virtual biorefinery. Springer International Publishing, London
Brasil. PDET (2019) Base de dados online. In: Programa Disseminação das Estastísticas do Trab. (PDET). http://pdet.mte.gov.br/acesso-online-as-bases-de-dados. Accessed 15 Jan 2019
Brasil. Secretaria de Previdêcia (2009) AEAT 2009 - Anuário Estatístico de Acidentes do Trabalho 2009. https://www.gov.br/previdencia/pt-br/assuntos/saude-e-seguranca-do-trabalhador/dados-de-acidentes-do-trabalho/aeat-2009. Accessed 8 Apr 2019
Cardoso TDF, Cavalett O, Chagas MF et al (2013) Technical and economic assessment of trash recovery in the sugarcane bioenergy production system. Sci Agric v 70:353–360
Cavalett O, Junqueira TL, Dias MOS et al (2012) Environmental and economic assessment of sugarcane first generation biorefineries in Brazil. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14:399–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-011-0424-7
Chhipi-Shrestha GK, Hewage K, Sadiq R (2015) “Socializing” sustainability: a critical review on current development status of social life cycle impact assessment method. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:579–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0841-5
CONAB (2019) Safra 2019/20 - N.3 - Terceiro levantamento. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB)
Cordeiro R, Sakate M, Clemente APG et al (2005) Subnotificação de acidentes do trabalho não fatais em Botucatu, SP, 2002. Rev Saude Publica 39:254–260
Costanza R, Kubiszewski I, Giovannini E et al (2014) Time to leave GDP behind. Nature 505:283–285. https://doi.org/10.1038/505283a
Custodio D, Schorr M (2000) Acidentes de trabalho na indústria da construção: estatísticas extraídas dos anexos I e II da NR-18. In: Anais do Seminário nacional estatísticas sobre doenças e acidentes de trabalho no Brasil: situação e perspectivas. PRODAT FUNDACENTRO, São Paulo
Dias MOS, Junqueira TL, Sampaio ILM, et al (2016) Use of the VSB to Assess Biorefinery Strategies. In: Bonomi A, Cavalett O, Pereira da Cunha M, Lima MAP (eds) Virtual biorefinery: an optimization strategy for renewable carbon valorization. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 186–256
DIEESE (2020) Salário Mínimo Nominal e Necessário. In: Pesqui. Nac. da Cesta Básica Aliment. Dep. Intersind. Estatística e Estud. Socioeconômicos. https://www.dieese.org.br/analisecestabasica/salarioMinimo.html#2009. Accessed 7 Jul 2020
Duckett B (1999) Yearbook of labour statistics 57th edition. International Labor Organization (ILO)
Feschet P, MacOmbe C, Garrabé M et al (2013) Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway: the case of banana industry in Cameroon. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:490–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0490-z
Fontes J, Tarne P, Traverso M, Bernstein P (2018) Product social impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:547–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1125-6
Hämäläinen P, Takala J, Saarela KL (2006) Global estimates of occupational accidents. Saf Sci 44:137–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.08.017
Ho JJ, Hwang JS, Wang JD (2006) Estimation of reduced life expectancy from serious occupational injuries in Taiwan. Accid Anal Prev 38:961–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.03.007
Huberman M, Lewchuk W (1999) Globalization and worker welfare in late nineteenth century Europe
ILO (2009) Health and life at work: a basic human right. International Labour Organization (ILO)
Jonker JGG, van der Hilst F, Junginger HM et al (2015) Outlook for ethanol production costs in Brazil up to 2030, for different biomass crops and industrial technologies. Appl Energy 147:593–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.090
Jørgensen A (2013) Social LCA - A way ahead? Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:296–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0517-5
Klugman J, Rodriguez F, Choi H-J (2011) The HDI 2010: new controversies, old critiques. J Econ Inequal 9:249–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-011-9178-z
Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Chang YJ, Finkbeiner M (2015) Social organizational LCA (SOLCA)—a new approach for implementing social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1586–1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0960-1
Martins TTD (2011) Diagnóstico situacional das doenças relacionadas ao trabalho em profissionais de enfermagem do Hospital de Base Dr. Ary Pinheiro, Porto Velho. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - FIOCRUZ
Ramirez KPS, Petti L, Haberland NT, Ugaya CML (2014) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment . Part 1 : methodological framework. 1515–1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0761-y
Ribeiro BE (2013) Beyond commonplace biofuels: social aspects of ethanol. Energy Policy 57:355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.004
Saboia J (2009) Descentralização industrial no Brasil na década de noventa: um processo dinâmico e diferenciado regionalmente. Nov Econ 11:
Saboia J, Kubrusly L (2008) Diferenciais regionais e setoriais na indústria brasileira. Econ Apl 12:125–149
Souza A, Watanabe MDB, Cavalett O et al (2018) Social life cycle assessment of first and second-generation ethanol production technologies in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:617–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1112-y
Sureau S, Mazijn B, Garrido SR, Achten WMJ (2018) Social life-cycle assessment frameworks: a review of criteria and indicators proposed to assess social and socioeconomic impacts. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:904–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1336-5
UNDP (2016) Human development report 2016: human development for everyone. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New York
UNDP (2018a) Human Development indices and indicators 2018: statistical update. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New York
UNDP (1990) Human development report 1990. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New York
UNDP (2018b) Life expectancy index. In: Hum. Dev. Data (1990–2017). United Nations Dev. Program. http://hdr.undp.org/en/data. Accessed 8 Dec 2018
UNDP (2019) Human development report 2019 technical notes. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), New York
UNEP (2020) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products and organizations 2020. United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP)
UNEP, SETAC (2009) Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC)
Watanabe MDB, Pereira LG, Chagas MF et al (2016) Sustainability assessment methodologies. Virtual biorefinery: an optimization strategy for renewable carbon valorization. Springer, London, pp 155–168
Funding
FAPESP (2012/15359–1 — Economic input–output life cycle assessment as a tool for virtual sugarcane biorefinery), CAPES/CNPEM (Process 23038.006737/2012–56 — Applying of the social life cycle assessment in the sugarcane chain in Brazil), and the Global Environment Facility — GEF (BRA/10/G31 — Sugarcane renewable electricity — SUCRE) provided financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Marzia Traverso.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Souza, A., Watanabe, M.D.B., Cavalett, O. et al. A novel social life cycle assessment method for determining workers’ human development: a case study of the sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 26, 2072–2084 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01936-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01936-8