Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inclusion of prevention scenarios in LCA of construction waste management

  • LCA OF WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been applied extensively for the environmental evaluation of solid waste management. However, there are only a limited number of approaches based on the LCA perspective to deal with waste prevention, which constitutes the first and overriding principle of the waste management hierarchy, both in relation to solid waste in general and to construction waste (CW) in particular. This paper explores the possibilities of the LCA for the evaluation of CW management that includes prevention activities.

Methods

Based on literature, the functional unit and system boundaries used in the traditional LCA of CW management are redefined to include prevention scenarios; this leads to two methodological options (options 1 and 2). From the above, general and simplified models were developed. The general model evaluates CW management scenarios composed of several CW fractions, while the simplified model is applicable to the analysis of one separated CW fraction. A case study was carried out on new buildings in Spain. Optimization and substitution measures of prevention were developed and four CW management scenarios were compared using the general model. The simplified model was applied to the management of concrete waste.

Results and discussion

Several environmental impact categories were evaluated. The redefinition of the functional unit and the system boundaries allowed the assessment of prevention scenarios in the traditional LCA of CW management, confirming the findings of previous studies. Prevention was the most favorable scenario, since, in addition to reducing 60% of the amount of CW generated, it would have also reduced at least 60% of all impacts of the categories analyzed.

Conclusions

Most CW prevention studies in the reviewed literature are focused on the reduction of the quantities of waste. The methodological approaches in this study allow a greater insight into the effects of prevented CW on the environment. The proposed models could support the preparation of national waste programs and could serve as an instrumental tool to simulate the environmental impacts of CW management scenarios that include waste prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andalusian Government (2016) Grants for research on housing and architecture. 2009 grant call. “-CDWs = + ECO-efficiency. Waste reduction in the design and construction of dwellings in Andalusia” Spain. Accessed 28 May 2015

  • Balazs S, Antonini E, Tarantitni M (2001) Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology for valorization of building demolition materials and products. SPIE – Int Soc Opt Eng 4193:382–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin A, Poon C-S, Shen L-Y et al (2006) Designing out waste in high-rise residential buildings: analysis of precasting and prefabrication methods and traditional construction. Proc. Int. Conf. Asia-European Sustain. Urban Dev.

  • Banias G, Achillas C, Vlachokostas C, Moussiopoulos N, Papaioannou I (2011) A web-based decision support system for the optimal management of construction and demolition waste. Waste Manag 31:2497–2502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bizcocho N (2014) Aplicación del Análisis de Ciclo de Vida a la gestión de los Residuos de Construcción (Application of the life cycle assessment to the management of construction waste). Ph.D Thesis. University of Seville, Spain

  • Blengini GA (2009) Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: a case study in Turin, Italy. Build Environ 44:319–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blengini GA, Garbarino E (2010) Resources and waste management in Turin (Italy): the role of recycled aggregates in the sustainable supply mix. J Clean Prod 18(10–11):1021-1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butera S, Christensen TH, Astrup TF (2015) Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management. Waste Manag 44:196–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2011) EN 15978. Sustainability of construction works. Assessment of environmental performance of buildings. Calculation method. European Committee for Standardization

  • Cleary J (2010) The incorporation of waste prevention activities into life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: methodological issues. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:579–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary J (2014) A life cycle assessment of residential waste management and prevention. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1607–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coventry, S., Guthrie P (1998) Waste minimization and recycling in construction: design manual. CIRIA SP134

  • Craighill A, Powell J (1999) A lifecycle assessment and evaluation of construction and demolition waste

  • Dainty ARJ, Brooke RJ (2004) Towards improved construction waste minimisation: a need for improved supply chain integration? Struct Surv 22:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DECCW (2010) Environmental benefits of recycling. Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, Sydney

  • Ekanayake LL, Ofori G (2004) Building waste assessment score: design-based tool. Build Environ 39:851–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall T, Assefa G, Bjorklund A et al (2007) What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. Waste Manag 27:989–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) Directive 2008/98/CE of the European Parliament and of the council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives. Official Journal of the European Union L312, 0003

  • Eurostat (2013) Energy, transport and environment indicators, 2013 edition. In: Eur. Communities. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-DK-13-001/EN/KS-DK-13-001-EN.PDF. Accessed 28 May 2015

  • Eurostat (2015) Waste statistics, April, 2015. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Waste_statistics. Accessed 28 May 2015

  • Finnveden G (1999) Methodological aspects of life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management systems. Resour Conserv Recycl 26:173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 91:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G, Spielmann M (2005) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:3–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gentil EC, Gallo D, Christensen TH (2011) Environmental evaluation of municipal waste prevention. Waste Manag 31:2371–2379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb A (2001) Standardization and customization in construction: a review of recent and current industry and research initiatives on standardization and customization in construction

  • Gobierno de España M de la P (2008) Real Decreto 105/2008, por el que se regula la producción y gestión de los RCDPlan Nacional de Residuos de Construcción y Demolición 2001-2006. BOE 038:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant T, James KL (2005) Life cycle impact data for resource recovery from C&I and C&D waste in Victoria final report. Centre for Design at RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria

  • Greenwood R (2003) Construction waste minimization—good practice guide

  • Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, et al (2001) Life cycle assessment-an operational guide to the ISO standards—parts 1, 2 and 3. In: Hague Minist. housing, Spat. Plan. Environ. Cent. Environ. Sci. (CML)

  • Hylands K (2004) Designing waste out of the construction process. In: Engineer NC (ed) Proceedings of Minimizing Construction Waste Conference: Developing Resource Efficiency and Waste Minimization in Design and Construction. London, United Kingdom

  • Innes S (2004) Developing tools for designing out waste pre-site and onsite. In: New Civil Engineer (ed) Proceedings of Minimizing Construction Waste Conference: Developing Resource Efficiency and Waste Minimization in Design and Construction. London, United Kingdom

  • ISO (2006a) International Standard ISO 14040: environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO-International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • ISO (2006b) International Standard ISO 14044: environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. ISO-International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Jaillon L, Poon CS, Chiang YH (2009) Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong. Waste Manag 29:309–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • JRC-IES (2011) Supporting environmentally sound decisions for waste management—a technical guide to life cycle thinking (LCT) and life cycle assessment (LCA) for waste experts and LCA practitioners. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartam N, Al-Mutairi N, Al-Ghusain I, Al-Humoud J (2004) Environmental management of construction and demolition waste in Kuwait. Waste Manag 24:1049–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellenberger D, Althaus H-J, Jungbluth N, Künniger T (2007) Life cycle inventories of building products

  • Laurent A, Bakas I, Clavreul J, Bernstad A, Niero M, Gentil E, Hauschild MZ, Christensen TH (2014) Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems—part I: lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Manag 34:573–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llatas C (2011) A model for quantifying construction waste in projects according to the European waste list. Waste Manag 31:1261–1276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Llatas C, Osmani M (2016) Development and validation of a building design waste reduction model. Waste Manag 56:318–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Yuan H (2011) A framework for understanding waste management studies in construction. Waste Manag 31:1252–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez E, Nuñez Y, Sobaberas E (2013) End of life of buildings: three alternatives, two scenarios. A case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1082–1088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mercante IT, Bovea MD, Ibanez-Fores V, Arena AP (2012) Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management systems: a Spanish case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:232–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nessi S, Rigamonti L, Grosso M (2013) Discussion on methods to include prevention activities in waste management LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1358–1373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz O, Pasqualino JC, Castells F (2010) Environmental performance of construction waste: comparing three scenarios from a case study in Catalonia, Spain. Waste Manag 30:646–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osmani M, Glass J, Price ADF (2008) Architects’ perspectives on construction waste reduction by design. Waste Manag 28:1147–1158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poon CS (2007) Reducing construction waste. Waste Manag 27:1715–1716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poon CS, Yu ATW, Jaillon L (2004) Reducing building waste at construction sites in Hong Kong. Constr Manag Econ 22:461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivela B, Hospido A, Moreira T, Feijoo G (2006) Life cycle inventory of particleboard: a case study in the wood sector (8 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):106-113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skoyles ER, Skoyles JR (1987) Waste prevention on site. Mitchell, London

  • Spanish Government (2015) Building construction data 2009–2013. In: Ser. Stat. Minist. Dev. Madrid, Spain. http://www.fomento.gob.es/NR/rdonlyres/97E44F6E-61C2-470F-B8E4-903EC04F8B6A/125816/ConstruccionEdificios2013.pdf%3E. Accessed 28 May 2015

  • Tojo N, Fischer C (2011) Europe as a recycling society. European recycling policies in relation to the actual recycling achieved. European Topic Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production

  • Yano J, Sakai S (2016) Waste prevention indicators and their implications from a life cycle perspective: a review. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18:38–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Consejería de Vivienda y Ordenación del Territorio de la Junta de Andalucía (Department of Housing and Regional Planning of the Andalusian Government) for subsidizing the Research Project “- C&D waste = + ECO-efficiency. Waste Reduction in the Design and Construction of Dwellings in Andalusia” (Andalusian Government 2016). The authors are also grateful for the help and support from various companies and individuals during the case study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Mecánica de Medios Continuos y Teoría de Estructuras. Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Avda. de la Universidad 30, 28911, Leganés, Spain

    Nuria Bizcocho

  2. Departamento de Construcciones Arquitectónicas I, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad de Sevilla, Reina Mercedes 2, 41012, Seville, Spain

    Carmen Llatas

Authors
  1. Nuria Bizcocho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carmen Llatas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuria Bizcocho.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Shabbir Gheewala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bizcocho, N., Llatas, C. Inclusion of prevention scenarios in LCA of construction waste management. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24, 468–484 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1462-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1462-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation