Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Screening of socio-economic indicators for sustainability assessment: a combined life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis approach

  • LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The combination of life cycle assessment (LCA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) has recently been proposed to integrate operational, environmental and, to a lesser extent, socio-economic aspects when evaluating multiple similar entities known as decision-making units (DMUs). While labour has already been proven to be an appropriate parameter for implementation in LCA + DEA studies, this article aims to increase the current range of socio-economic indicators suitable for their integration into this novel framework.

Methods

A sustainability-oriented LCA + DEA method is presented in this article. Furthermore, according to the singular features of the methodological approach, a set of four criteria is defined in order to test the suitability of 40 relevant socio-economic indicators for LCA + DEA implementation. These criteria include quantifiability, DMU specificity, data availability and data quality. Based on the degree of fulfilment of these criteria, the implementability of the indicators is classified as straightforward, likely, unlikely or excluded.

Results and discussion

According to the proposed criteria, 12 out of 40 socio-economic indicators are found to be suitable, i.e. their implementability in the LCA + DEA framework is considered either straightforward or likely. The difficulty in finding suitable LCA + DEA indicators is found to increase when considering stakeholders with a scope beyond the DMU level. Concerns about the suitability of socio-economic indicators for LCA + DEA as well as potentials and limitations of the approach as a sustainability assessment methodology are discussed.

Conclusions

A significant improvement in the socio-economic dimension of LCA + DEA studies for sustainability assessment is achieved. The method proposed is concluded to be a feasible approach for the sustainability assessment of multiple entities, but still with further potentials to be explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernier E, Maréchal F, Samson R (2013) Life cycle optimization of energy-intensive processes using eco-costs. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1747–1761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J (2007) Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: applicability, usefulness and policy implications. Environ Hazard 7:20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond AJ, Morrison-Saunders A (2011) Re-evaluating sustainability assessment: aligning the vision and the practice. Environ Impact Assess 31:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen JE (1995) Population growth and Earth’s human carrying capacity. Science 269:341–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (2011) Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdessen JC, Pascucci S (2013) Data envelopment analysis of sustainability indicators of European agricultural systems at regional level. Agric Syst 118:78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Zamagni A, Masoni P, Buonamici R, Ekvall T, Rydberg T (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol 45:90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hara K, Uwasu M, Yabar H, Zhang H (2009) Sustainability assessment with time-series scores: a case study of Chinese provinces. Sustain Sci 4:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R (2010) Ecodesign—carbon footprint—life cycle assessment—life cycle sustainability analysis—a flexible framework for a continuum of tools. Sci J Riga Tech Univ Environ Clim Technol 4:42–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertwich EG (2005) Consumption and the rebound effect—an industrial ecology perspective. J Ind Ecol 9:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm SO, Englund G (2009) Increased ecoefficiency and gross rebound effect: evidence from USA and six European countries 1960–2002. Ecol Econ 68:879–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu M, Kleijn R, Bozhilova-Kisheva KP, Di Maio F (2013) An approach to LCSA: the case of concrete recycling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1793–1803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iribarren D (2010) Life cycle assessment of mussel and turbot aquaculture: application and insights. University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela

    Google Scholar 

  • Iribarren D, Martín-Gamboa M (2014) Enhancing the economic dimension of LCA + DEA studies for sustainability assessment. In: Proceedings of the 4th World Sustainability Forum. MDPI, Basel

  • Iribarren D, Vázquez-Rowe I (2013) Is labor a suitable input in LCA + DEA studies? Insights on the combined use of economic, environmental and social parameters. Soc Sci 2:114–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iribarren D, Vázquez-Rowe I, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2010) Further potentials in the joint implementation of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. Sci Total Environ 408:5265–5272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iribarren D, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2011) Benchmarking environmental and operational parameters through eco-efficiency criteria for dairy farms. Sci Total Environ 409:1786–1798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iribarren D, Martín-Gamboa M, Dufour J (2013) Environmental benchmarking of wind farms according to their operational performance. Energy 61:589–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iribarren D, Vázquez-Rowe I, Rugani B, Benetto E (2014a) On the feasibility of using energy analysis as a source of benchmarking criteria through data envelopment analysis: a case study for wind energy. Energy 67:527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iribarren D, Martín-Gamboa M, O’Mahony T, Dufour J (2014b) More than just a phrase: the benchmarking of sustainability performance for industry and policy-makers. In: Abstract book SETAC Europe 24th Annual Meeting. SETAC Europe, Brussels

  • Iribarren D, Marvuglia A, Hild P, Guiton M, Popovici E, Benetto E (2015) Life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis approach for the selection of building components according to their environmental impact efficiency: a case study for external walls. J Clean Prod 87:707–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006a) ISO 14040:2006 environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006b) ISO 14044:2006 environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2012) ISO 14045:2012 environmental management—eco-efficiency assessment of product systems—principles, requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeswani HK, Azapagic A, Schepelmann P, Ritthoff M (2010) Options for broadening and deepening the LCA approaches. J Clean Prod 18:120–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse SA, Flysjö A, Kasperczyk N, Scholz AJ (2009) Socioeconomic indicators as a complement to life cycle assessment—an application to salmon production systems. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurka T, Blackwood D (2013) Participatory selection of sustainability criteria and indicators for bioenergy developments. Renew Sust Energ Rev 24:92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labuschagne L, Brent AC (2006) Social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano S, Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2009) The link between operational efficiency and environmental impacts: a joint application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. Sci Total Environ 407:1744–1754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano S, Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2010) Environmental impact efficiency in mussel cultivation. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:1269–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Chang YJ, Finkbeiner M (2015) Social organizational LCA (SOLCA)—a new approach for implementing social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1586–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi A, Rafiee S, Jafari A, Dalgaard T, Knudsen MT, Keyhani A, Mousavi-Avval SH, Hermansen JE (2013) Potential greenhouse gas emission reductions in soybean farming: a combined use of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. J Clean Prod 54:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris GA (2001) Integrating life cycle cost analysis and LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:118–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret JP (2013) Revisiting the role of LCA and SLCA in the transition towards sustainable production and consumption. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1642–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier N, Ustaoglu E, Benoit C, Norris G (2013) Social sustainability in trade and development policy. European Commission, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala S, Farioli F, Zamagni A (2012a) Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: part 1. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1653–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala S, Farioli F, Zamagni A (2012b) Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1686–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidheiny S (1992) Changing course: a global business perspective on development and the environment. MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt I, Meurer M, Sailing P, Kicherer A, Reuter W, Gensch C (2004) SEEbalance—managing sustainability of products and processes with the socio-eco-efficiency analysis by BASF. Greener Manag Int 45:79–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Simões CL, Pinto LMC, Simoes R, Bernardo CA (2013) Integrating environmental and economic life cycle analysis in product development: a material selection case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1734–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2012) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic 15:281–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza RG, Rosenhead J, Salhofer SP, Valle RAB, Lins MPE (2015) Definition of sustainability impact categories based on stakeholder perspectives. J Clean Prod 105:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen A, Schneider L (2012) Life cycle sustainability dashboard. J Ind Ecol 16:680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC (2011) Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2007) Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdivia S, Ugaya CML, Hildenbrand J, Traverso M, Mazijn B, Sonnemann G (2013) A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio + 20. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1673–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Iribarren D (2015) Review of life-cycle approaches coupled with data envelopment analysis: launching the CFP + DEA method for energy policy making. Sci World J 813921:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2010) Combined application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis as a methodological approach for the assessment of fisheries. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:272–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Iribarren D, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2011) Computation of operational and environmental benchmarks within selected Galician fishing fleets (NW Spain). J Ind Ecol 15:776–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Villanueva-Rey P, Iribarren D, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2012) Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis of grape production for vinification in the Rías Baixas appellation (NW Spain). J Clean Prod 27:92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP (2006) The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarime M, Trencher G, Mino T, Scholz RW, Olsson L, Ness B, Frantzeskaki N, Rotmans J (2012) Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations. Sustain Sci 7:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni A, Amerighi O, Buttol P (2011) Strengths or bias in social LCA? Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:596–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni A, Pesonen HL, Swarr T (2013) From LCA to life cycle sustainability assessment: concept, practice and future directions. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1637–1641

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Tadhg O’ Mahony would like to thank the Marie Curie Actions AMAROUT-II (PEOPLECOFUND).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Systems Analysis Unit, Instituto IMDEA Energía, 28935, Móstoles, Spain

    Diego Iribarren, Mario Martín-Gamboa, Tadhg O’Mahony & Javier Dufour

  2. Department of Chemical and Energy Technology, ESCET, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28933, Móstoles, Spain

    Javier Dufour

Authors
  1. Diego Iribarren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mario Martín-Gamboa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tadhg O’Mahony
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Javier Dufour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Iribarren.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Ian Vázquez-Rowe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iribarren, D., Martín-Gamboa, M., O’Mahony, T. et al. Screening of socio-economic indicators for sustainability assessment: a combined life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21, 202–214 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-1002-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-1002-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation