Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

LCA for assessing environmental benefit of eco-design strategies and forest wood short supply chain: a furniture case study

  • WOOD AND OTHER RENEWABLE RESOURCES
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Eco-innovation strategies are increasingly adopted to ensure the minimization of environmental impacts. Nonetheless, only a comprehensive integrated assessment along the life cycle stages of a product may ensure a robust analysis of the benefit of the innovation. The object of the present study is the environmental assessment of furniture prototypes produced using certified wood and integrating eco-design criteria in their conception. The aim of the study was twofold: firstly, to evaluate the environmental profile of the furniture, highlighting possible hot spots of impacts, and secondly, to evaluate the capability of life cycle assessment (LCA) to identify the environmental benefit associated to the adoption of eco-innovation strategies, such as the following: ensuring short supply chain from raw material to production; using wood coming from certified forests (according to PEFC scheme); and the implementation of eco-design principles, also associated with green public procurement requirements.

Methods

LCA has been applied in a case study related to the wood furniture sector in the alpine region of Northern Italy. Every activity was modeled using primary data, related to the inputs and outputs of the processes, provided directly by the designers and by woodworking firms. Input data related to forestry activities and wood extraction were collected and processed in a previous phase of the study. The life cycle of a prototype school desk from the cradle-to-gate perspective was analyzed. A woodworking plant was examined in detail, dividing the whole manufacturing process into four phases: panels production, woodworking, painting and steel parts processing. The system boundaries included all the activities which take place inside the plant as well as energy inputs, transports and ancillary products used.

Results and discussion

The results highlighted that the working phases showing the greatest environmental burdens were the production of solid wood panels and the processing of iron parts. No concerns about chemicals, glues and paints were raised, due to the eco-design principles implemented in the production of the furniture. The choice of a short supply chain allowed for drastic reductions in the impacts associated to long-distance transports. Three sensitivity analyses were carried out to test the robustness of results concerning the following: (1) glue options, (2) drying phase and VOC emissions, and (3) transport options.

Conclusions

This study proves to which extent eco-design criteria implemented in practice improve the environmental performance of products. All positive effects due to decisions taken in school desk design and conception were supported by evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babarenda Gamage G, Boyle C, McLaren SJ, McLaren J (2008) Life cycle assessment of commercial furniture: a case study of Formway LIFE chair. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumman H, Tillman AM (2004) The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA. An orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. Studentenlitteratur, Lund, ISBN 9144023642

    Google Scholar 

  • Bol B, Lenstra G, van Liebergen H, Paardekooper L (1995) Environment related comparative study on garden chairs (in German). Tebodin, B.V. im Auftrag des Fachverbandes Kunststoff-Konsumwaren im GKV, Frankfurt a.M.

  • Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, Gracey K, Iha K, Larson J, Lazarous E, Morales JC, Wackernagel M, Galli A (2013) Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: the National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Indicators 24:518–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovea MD, Vidal R (2004) Materials selection for sustainable product design: a case study of wood based furniture eco-design. Mater Des 25:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2008) Green Public Procurement (GPP) product sheet—furniture. Available on: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/toolkit/furniture_GPP_product_sheet.pdf

  • EC (2012) Wood, paper, printing. Woodworking industry. Last update 2nd February, 2012. Available on: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/toolkit/furniture_GPP_product_sheet.pdf

  • EC-JRC (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook—general guide for life cycle assessment—detailed guidance. EUR 24708 EN. Luxembourg. Publications Office of the European Union

  • Ecofuture eco-friendly furniture (2004) The LIFE Environment project and the furniture sector. Available on: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.showFile&rep=file&fil=LIFE04_ENV_IT_000588_LAYMAN.pdf. Last update 29th March, 2004 (accessed September 2012)

  • European Commission (EC) (2007) Reference document on Best Available Techniques on surface treatment using organic solvents. BREF IPPC BUREAU. Available at: http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/BREF/sts_bref_0807.pdf (accessed June 2012)

  • Federlegno Arredo (2010) Environmental report, third edition. Milano. In Italian, available on: http://www.federlegnoarredo.it/ContentsFiles/0000109913_RapportoA2010.pdf

  • Glover J, White DO, Langrish TAG (2002) Wood versus concrete and steel in house construction: a life cycle assessment. J Forest 100(8):34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop MJ, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, Van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008, a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level; First edition Report I: Characterisation; 6 January 2009, http://www.lcia-recipe.net. (accessed July 2012)

  • Gonzalez-Garcia S, Feijoo G, Widsten P, Kandelbauer A, Zikulnig-Rusch E, Moreira MT (2009) Environmental performance assessment of hardboard manufacture. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:456–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Garcia S, Silva FJ, Moreira MT, Castilla Pascual R, Garcia Lozano R, Gabarrel X, Rieredavalla i Pons J, Feijoo G (2011) Combined application of LCA and eco-design for the sustainable production of wood boxes for wine bottles storage. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:224–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-García S, García Lozano R, Moreira MT, Gabarrell X, Feijoo G, Murphy RJ (2012) Eco-innovation of a wooden childhood furniture set: an example of environmental solutions in the wood sector. Sci Total Environ 426:318–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellrigl B (2006) Elementi di xiloenergetica. In Italian, available on: http://www.aiel.cia.it/immagini/upload/ELEMENTIdiXILOENERGETICA_low.pdf accessed June 2012

  • ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeswiet J, Hauschild M (2004) EcoDesign and future environmental impacts. Mater Des 26:629–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marra M, Castellani V, Mirabella N, Sala S, Negri M, Guercini S (2011) Technological characteristics and sustainability assessment of short forestry-wood chain for alpine hardwood furniture. 3rd International Scientific Conference on Hardwood Processing (ISCHP2011). October 16–18, 2011 Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA (peer reviewed)

  • Michelsen O, Magerholm A (2010) Using eco-efficiency in sustainable supply chain management; a case study of furniture production. Clean Techn Environ Policy 12:561–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milota M (2000) Emissions from wood drying. Forests Prod J 50(6):10–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mirabella N, Castellani V, Sala S (2014) Forestry operations in the alpine context. Life cycle assessment to support the integrated assessment of forest wood short supply chain. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0756-8

  • Nedermark R (1998) Ecodesign at Bang & Olufsen. In: Klostermann J, Tukker A (eds) Product innovation and eco-efficiency; twenty three industry efforts to reach the factor 4. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccazzo C (2006) Uso ecologico del legno. Corso di Principi di Ecodesign. Facoltà di Architettura, Università di Genova. In Italian, available on: http://www.arch.unige.it/did/l1/disegnoind/terzo0607/ecodesign/materialedid/usolegno.pdf accessed June 2012

  • Puettman M, Bergman R, Hubbard S, Johnson L, Lippke B, Oneil E, Wagner FG (2010) Cradle-to-gate life-cycle inventory of US wood products production: CORRIM phase I and phase II products. Wood Fiber Sci 42(CORRIM special issue):15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivela B, Hospido A, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2006) Life cycle inventory of particleboard: a case study in the wood sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivela B, Moreira MT, Feijoo G (2007) Life cycle inventory of medium density fibreboard. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:143–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SEMCo, The Swedish Environmental Management Council (2003) Product-specific requirements (PSR) for preparing an environmental product declaration (EPD) for Product Group. Wood particleboards. PSR 2003:8. Available at: www.environdec.com

  • Straka TJ, Layton PA (2010) Natural resources management: life cycle assessment and forest certification and sustainability issues. Sustainability 2:604–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarantini M, Dominici Loprieno A, Porta PL (2011) A life cycle approach to green public procurement of building materials and elements: a case study on windows. Energy 36:2473–2482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogtländer J, van der Lugt P, Brezet H (2010) The sustainability of bamboo products for local and Western European applications. LCAs and land-use. J Clean Prod 18:1260–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner F, Nebel B (2007) Wood & other renewable resources. Int J Life Cycle Assesess 12(7):462–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werner F, Richter K (2007) Wooden building products in comparative LCA. A literature review. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(7):470–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contribution of the technical project partner, Progetto Lissone, to the scientific discussion and data collection. This work has been done as a research project called ‘BOMO’ financed by Regione Lombardia—Agricultural Department.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milan—Bicocca, piazza della Scienza 1, 20126, Milan, Italy

    Nadia Mirabella, Valentina Castellani & Serenella Sala

  2. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Sustainability Assessment Unit, Ispra, Italy

    Serenella Sala

Authors
  1. Nadia Mirabella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Valentina Castellani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Serenella Sala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia Mirabella.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Jörg Schweinle

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 215 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirabella, N., Castellani, V. & Sala, S. LCA for assessing environmental benefit of eco-design strategies and forest wood short supply chain: a furniture case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19, 1536–1550 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0757-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0757-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation