Abstract
Before discussing how to balance and decide on environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) and traditional revenue enhancement projects, it is crucial to clarify the relationship between corporate financial performance (CFP) and ESG. However, little attention has been paid to the nexus of ESG and CFP. This paper attempts firstly to investigate the bidirectional causality of ESG and CFP, followed by the micro-foundations, and finally, the moderating effect of intrinsic factors. A GMM-PVAR method was used to examine the research hypotheses, which can effectively deal with endogenous problems that have been ignored by traditional literature. The findings of this research demonstrate that CFP promoted ESG growth, but ESG did not boost CFP. This asymmetric causality was because CFP had a supportive effect on the environment and society pillars, while the social pillar cannot promote CFP, and the environment pillar negatively affects CFP. The relationship between ESG and CFP was moderated by total quality management, environmental sensitivity, and the pay gap. Furtherly, a panel threshold model was constructed to access the threshold effects of ESG on CFP, showing an inverted U-shape. Based on these findings, the theoretical implications, managerial prescriptions, and limitations are also discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data are available in the main text and mentioned in the references.
References
Abbas J (2020) Impact of total quality management on corporate green performance through the mediating role of corporate social responsibility. J Clean Prod 242:118458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118458
Aboud A, Diab A (2018) The impact of social, environmental and corporate governance disclosures on firm value: evidence from Egypt. J Account Emerg Econ 8(4):442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-08-2017-0079
Abrigo MRM, Love I (2016) Estimation of panel vector autoregression in Stata. Stata J 16(3):778–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1601600314
Adegbite E, Guney Y, Kwabi F, Tahir S (2019) Financial and corporate social performance in the UK listed firms: the relevance of non-linearity and lag effects. Rev Quant Finance Account 52(1):105–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0705-x
Aguilera-Caracuel J, Guerrero-Villegas J, Vidal-Salazar MD, Delgado-Márquez BL (2015) International cultural diversification and corporate social performance in multinational enterprises: the role of slack financial resources. Manag Int Rev 55(3):323–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-014-0225-4
Ahmad N, Ullah Z, AlDhaen E, Han H, Araya-Castillo L, Ariza-Montes A (2022) Fostering hotel-employee creativity through micro-level corporate social responsibility: a social identity theory perspective. Front Psychol 13 https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.853125
Ahmed MF, Gao Y, Satchell S (2021) Modeling demand for ESG. Eur J Financ 27(16):1669–1683. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1924216
Al Amosh H, Khatib SFA (2023) ESG performance in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: cross-country evidence. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-25050-w
Albloushi B, Alharmoodi A, Jabeen F, Mehmood K, Farouk S (2022) Total quality management practices and corporate sustainable development in manufacturing companies: the mediating role of green innovation. Manag Res Rev. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2021-0194
Albuquerque R, Koskinen Y, Zhang C (2019) Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence. Manag Sci 65(10):4451–4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043
Ali W, Frynas JG, Mahmood Z (2017) Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: a literature review. Corp Soc Respon Environ Manag 24(4):273–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1410
Amor-Esteban V, Galindo-Villardón M-P, García-Sánchez I-M (2018) Industry mimetic isomorphism and sustainable development based on the X-STATIS and HJ-biplot methods. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(26):26192–26208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2663-1
Andrews DWK, Lu B (2001) Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models. J Econom 101(1):123–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00077-4
Atan R, Alam MM, Said J, Zamri M (2018) The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: panel study of Malaysian companies. Manag Environ Qual 29(2):182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033
Banker RD, Bu D, Mehta MN (2016) Pay gap and performance in China. Abacus 52(3):501–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12082
Bardos KS, Ertugrul M, Gao LS (2020) Corporate social responsibility, product market perception, and firm value. Finance 62:101588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101588
Behl A, Kumari PSR, Makhija H, Sharma D (2021) Exploring the relationship of ESG score and firm value using cross-lagged panel analyses: case of the Indian energy sector. Ann Oper Res 313(1):231–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04189-8
Borghesi R, Chang K, Li Y (2019) Firm value in commonly uncertain times: the divergent effects of corporate governance and CSR. Appl Econ 51(43):4726–4741. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1597255
Broadstock DC, Managi S, Matousek R, Tzeremes NG (2019) Does doing “good” always translate into doing “well”? An eco-efficiency perspective. Bus Strategy Environ 28(6):1199–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2311
Broadstock DC, Matousek R, Meyer M, Tzeremes NG (2020) Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. J Bus Res 119:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.014
Buchanan B, Cao CX, Chen C (2018) Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership. Finance 52:73–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.07.004
Canova F, Ciccarelli M (2013) Panel vector autoregressive models: a survey. Adv Econom 31. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0731-9053(2013)0000031006
Carey RB (2018) What is a quality management system, and why should a microbiologist adopt one? Clin Microbiol Newsl 40(22):183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2018.10.004
Chatzitheodorou K, Skouloudis A, Evangelinos K, Nikolaou I (2019) Exploring socially responsible investment perspectives: a literature mapping and an investor classification. Sustain Prod Consum 19:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.03.006
Chollet P, Sandwidi BW (2018) CSR engagement and financial risk: a virtuous circle ? International evidence. Glob Financ J 38:65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2018.03.004
Connelly BL, Haynes KT, Tihanyi L, Gamache DL, Devers CE (2016) Minding the gap: antecedents and consequences of top management-to-worker pay dispersion. J Manage 42(4):862–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503015
Deng X, Huang B, Zheng Q, Ren X (2022) Can environmental governance and corporate performance be balanced in the context of carbon neutrality? — a quasi-natural experiment of central environmental inspections. Front Energy Res 10:852286 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2022.852286
Ding DK, Ferreira C, Wongchoti U (2016) Does it pay to be different? Relative CSR and its impact on firm value. Int Rev Financ Anal 47:86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2016.06.013
Doğanalp N, Ozsolak B, Aslan A (2021) The effects of energy poverty on economic growth: a panel data analysis for BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(36):50167–50178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14185-x
Drempetic S, Klein C, Zwergel B (2020) The influence of firm size on the ESG score: corporate sustainability ratings under review. J Bus Ethics 167(2):333–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1
Du X (2015) Is corporate philanthropy used as environmental misconduct dressing? Evidence from Chinese family-owned firms. J Bus Ethics 129(2):341–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2163-2
Duque-Grisales E, Aguilera-Caracuel J (2021) Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. J Bus Ethics 168(2):315–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w
Emma G-M, Jennifer M-F (2021) Is SDG reporting substantial or symbolic? An examination of controversial and environmentally sensitive industries. J Clean Prod 298:126781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126781
Friedman M (2007) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In: Zimmerli WC, Holzinger M, Richter K (eds) Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance. Springer, pp 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14
Gallego JM, Gutiérrez Ramírez LH (2021) Quality certification and firm performance. The mediation of human capital. Int J Product Perform Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2020-0643
Gaol FAL, Harjanto K (2019) Impact of selected factors towards corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure: evidence from Indonesia. Pol J Manag Stud 20(1):181–191. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.20.1.16
Garcia AS, Mendes-Da-Silva W, Orsato RJ (2017) Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: evidence from emerging markets. J Clean Prod 150:135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180
Gillan SL, Koch A, Starks LT (2021) Firms and social responsibility: a review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Finance 66:101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
Godfrey PC, Merrill CB, Hansen JM (2009) The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strateg Manag J 30(4):425–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.750
Guo F, Zou B, Zhang X, Bo Q, Li K (2020) Financial slack and firm performance of SMMEs in China: moderating effects of government subsidies and market-supporting institutions. Int J Prod Econ 223:107530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107530
Hategan C-D, Curea-Pitorac R-I (2017) Testing the correlations between corporate giving, performance and company value. Sustainability 9(7):1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071210
Herzog L (2017) No company is an island. Sector-related responsibilities as elements of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 146(1):135–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2923-7
Huang DZX (2021) Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: a review and consolidation. Account Finance 61(1):335–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12569
Ims KJ, Pedersen LJT, Zsolnai L (2014) How economic incentives may destroy social, ecological and existential values: the case of executive compensation. J Bus Ethics 123(2):353–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1844-6
IPCC. (2022).Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. September 2022, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/.
Ivascu L, Domil A, Sarfraz M, Bogdan O, Burca V, Pavel C (2022) New insights into corporate sustainability, environmental management and corporate financial performance in European Union: an application of VAR and Granger causality approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(55):82827–82843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21642-8
Jensen MC (2010) Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. J Appl Corp Financ 22(1):32–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2010.00259.x
Jo H, Harjoto MA (2011) Corporate governance and firm value: the impact of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 103(3):351–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0869-y
Karaman AS, Orazalin N, Uyar A, Shahbaz M (2021) CSR achievement, reporting, and assurance in the energy sector: does economic development matter? Energy Policy 149:112007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112007
Kim I, Wan H, Wang B, Yang T (2019) Institutional investors and corporate environmental, social, and governance policies: evidence from toxics release data. Manag Sci 65(10):4901–4926. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3055
Kluza K, Ziolo M, Spoz A (2021) Innovation and environmental, social, and governance factors influencing sustainable business models—meta-analysis. J Clean Prod 303:127015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127015
Kong X, Jiang F, Zhu L (2022) Business strategy, corporate social responsibility, and within-firm pay gap. Econ Model 106:105703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105703
La Torre M, Leo S, Panetta IC (2021) Banks and environmental, social and governance drivers: follow the market or the authorities? Corp Soc Respon Environ Manag 28(6):1620–1634. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2132
Lee WJ, Choi SU (2021) Internal and external corporate social responsibility activities and firm value: evidence from the shared growth in the supply chain. Borsa Istanbul Rev 21:S57–S69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.007
Leins S (2020) ‘Responsible investment’: ESG and the post-crisis ethical order. Econ Soc 49(1):71–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2020.1702414
Lenz I, Wetzel HA, Hammerschmidt M (2017) Can doing good lead to doing poorly? Firm value implications of CSR in the face of CSI. J Acad Mark Sci 45(5):677–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0510-9
Lewandowski S (2017) Corporate carbon and financial performance: the role of emission reductions. Bus Strategy Environ 26(8):1196–1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1978
Li Y, Chen R, Xiang E (2022) Corporate social responsibility, green financial system guidelines, and cost of debt financing: evidence from pollution-intensive industries in China. Corp Soc Respon Environ Manag 29(3):593–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2222
Lin WL, Law SH, Ho JA, Sambasivan M (2019) The causality direction of the corporate social responsibility – corporate financial performance nexus: application of panel vector autoregression approach. N Am J Econ Finance 48:401–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2019.03.004
Littlewood D, Decelis R, Hillenbrand C, Holt D (2018) Examining the drivers and outcomes of corporate commitment to climate change action in European high emitting industry. Bus Strategy Environ 27(8):1437–1449. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2194
Liu H, Peng C, Chen L (2022) The impact of OFDI on the energy efficiency in Chinese provinces: based on PVAR model. Energy Rep 8:84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.150
Love I, Zicchino L (2006) Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: evidence from panel VAR. Q Rev Econ Finance 46(2):190–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2005.11.007
Manchiraju H, Rajgopal S (2017) Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) create shareholder value? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013. J Account Res 55(5):1257–1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12174
McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad Manage Rev 26(1):117–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/259398
Mitchell RK, Weaver GR, Agle BR, Bailey AD, Carlson J (2016) Stakeholder agency and social welfare: pluralism and decision making in the multi-objective corporation. Acad Manage Rev 41(2):252–275. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0486
Nazir M, Akbar M, Akbar A, Poulovo P, Hussain A, Qureshi MA (2022) The nexus between corporate environment, social, and governance performance and cost of capital: evidence from top global tech leaders. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(15):22623–22636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17362-0
Nirino N, Santoro G, Miglietta N, Quaglia R (2021) Corporate controversies and company’s financial performance: exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technol Forecast Soc Change 162:120341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120341
Nollet J, Filis G, Mitrokostas E (2016) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: a nonlinear and disaggregated approach. Econ Model 52:400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.019
Odriozola MD, Baraibar-Diez E (2017) Is corporate reputation associated with quality of CSR reporting? Evidence from Spain. Corp Soc Respon Environ Manag 24(2):121–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1399
Pan X, Wan X, Wang H, Li Y (2020) The correlation analysis between salary gap and enterprise innovation efficiency based on the entrepreneur psychology. Front Psychol 11 https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01749
Pan X, Wang Y, Tian M, Feng S, Ai B (2023) Spatio-temporal impulse effect of foreign direct investment on intra- and inter-regional carbon emissions. Energy 262:125438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125438
Para-González L, Mascaraque-Ramírez C (2019) The importance of official certifications in globalized companies’ performance: an empirical approach to the shipbuilding industry. Corp Soc Respon Environ Manag 26(2):408–415. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1692
Peng B, Yan W, Elahi E, Wan A (2022) Does the green credit policy affect the scale of corporate debt financing? Evidence from listed companies in heavy pollution industries in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(1):755–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15587-7
Petitjean M (2019) Eco-friendly policies and financial performance: was the financial crisis a game changer for large US companies? Energy Econ 80:502–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.01.028
Porter ME, Kramer MR (2019) Creating shared value. In: Lenssen GG, Smith NC (eds) Managing Sustainable Business: An Executive Education Case and Textbook. Springer, Netherlands, pp 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_16
Przychodzen W, Gómez-Bezares F (2021) CEO–employee pay gap, productivity and value creation. J Risk Finance Manag 14(5):196. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14050196
Quintana-García C, Marchante-Lara M, Benavides-Chicón CG (2018) Social responsibility and total quality in the hospitality industry: does gender matter? J Sustain Tour 26(5):722–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1401631
Ruan L, Liu H (2021) Environmental, social, governance activities and firm performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability 13(2):767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020767
Sabherwal R, Sabherwal S, Havaknor T, Steelman Z (2019) How does strategic alignment affect firm performance? The roles of information technology investment and environmental uncertainty. MIS Q 43:453–474. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13626
Sari Y, Wibisono E, Wahyudi RD, Lio Y (2017) From ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015: significant changes and their impacts to aspiring organizations. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 273:012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/1/012021
Sen S, Bhattacharya CB, Korschun D (2006) The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. J Acad Mark Sci 34(2):158–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284978
Serafeim, G., Zochowski, T. R., & Downing, J. (2019). Impact-weighted financial accounts: the missing piece for an impact economy. White Paper, Harvard Business School. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=59129
Shabbir MS, Aslam E, Irshad A, Bilal K, Aziz S, Abbasi BA, Zia S (2020) Nexus between corporate social responsibility and financial and non-financial sectors’ performance: a nonlinear and disaggregated approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(31):39164–39179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09972-x
Sharma GD, Tiwari AK, Talan G, Jain M (2021) Revisiting the sustainable versus conventional investment dilemma in COVID-19 times. Energy Policy 156:112467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112467
Sparkes R, Cowton CJ (2004) The maturing of socially responsible investment: a review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 52(1):45–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033106.43260.99
Tortorella G, Giglio R, Fogliatto FS, Sawhney R (2019) Mediating role of learning organization on the relationship between total quality management and operational performance in Brazilian manufacturers. J Manuf Technol Manag 31(3):524–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-05-2019-0200
Troilo G, De Luca LM, Atuahene-Gima K (2014) More innovation with less? A strategic contingency view of slack resources, information search, and radical innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 31(2):259–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12094
Tzeremes P, Dogan E, Alavijeh NK (2023) Analyzing the nexus between energy transition, environment and ICT: a step towards COP26 targets. J Environ Manage 326:116598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116598
Vanacker T, Collewaert V, Zahra SA (2017) Slack resources, firm performance, and the institutional context: evidence from privately held European firms. Strateg Manag J 38(6):1305–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2583
Wang Q, Dou J, Jia S (2016) A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: the moderating effect of contextual factors. Bus Soc 55(8):1083–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315584317
Wang Y, Lu T, Qiao Y (2021) The effect of air pollution on corporate social responsibility performance in high energy-consumption industry: evidence from Chinese listed companies. J Clean Prod 280:124345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124345
Wang Z, Sarkis J (2017) Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. J Clean Prod 162:1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.142
Xie J, Nozawa W, Fujii H, Yagi M (2018) Do environmental, social and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Bus Strategy Environ 28(2):286–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224
Yang Q, Du Q, Razzaq A, Shang Y (2022) How volatility in green financing, clean energy, and green economic practices derive sustainable performance through ESG indicators? A sectoral study of G7 countries. Resour Policy 75:102526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102526
Ye Y, Li K (2021) Impact of family involvement on internal and external corporate social responsibilities: evidence from Chinese publicly listed firms. Corp Soc Respon Environ Manag 28(1):352–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2053
Yu EP, Guo CQ, Luu BV (2018) Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value. Bus Strategy Environ 27(7):987–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2047
Zapechelnyuk A (2020) Optimal quality certification. Am Econ Rev 2(2):161–176. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20190387
Zhang Y, Tong L, Li J (2020) Minding the gap: asymmetric effects of pay dispersion on stakeholder engagement in corporate environmental (Ir)responsibility. Corp Soc Respon Environ Manag 27(5):2354–2367. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2003
Zhao Q, Wang Y (2018) Pay gap, inventor promotion and corporate technology innovation. China Finance Rev Int 9(2):154–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-06-2017-0073
Zhong M, Zhao W, Shahab Y (2022) The philanthropic response of substantive and symbolic corporate social responsibility strategies to COVID-19 crisis: evidence from China. Corp Soc Respon Environ Manag 29(2):339–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2204
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 72274185 and 71874163).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Rong Zhou: conceptualization, formal analysis, data curation, software, and writing—original draft; Jundong Hou: conceptualization, formal analysis, visualization, and writing (review and editing); Fei Ding: conceptualization, methodology, and writing (review and editing).
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See Tables 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, R., Hou, J. & Ding, F. Understanding the nexus between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and financial performance: evidence from Chinese-listed companies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 73231–73253 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27449-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27449-5