Abstract
The rapid urbanization and industrialization of India have caused a demand–supply gap in the electrical sector, leading to higher electric bills. Lower-income households face the worst energy poverty in the country. Sustainable strategies like corporate social responsibility are the most effective way to combat the energy crisis. This study aims to assess the contribution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) to energy poverty alleviation (EPA) by developing the role of mediating variables such as assessment of renewable energy resource (RER), feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SES), and sustainable energy development (SED). We used hybrid research methodology such as partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to analyze the collected data from professionals, economic experts, and directors in the country in 2022. The study proved that CSR directly affects energy poverty alleviation. Besides, the findings suggest RER, SES, and SED significantly lead the energy poverty alleviation. The findings of this study will divert the attention of policymakers, stakeholders, and economists toward the corporate social responsibility to mitigate the energy crisis in Indian context. A mediating role of a renewable energy resource (RER) as a value-added contribution to this study can be strengthened more in future research. Based on the results, the study illustrates that CSR acts as a catalyst to alleviate energy poverty.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Currently, environmental pressure has significantly increased due to the economic growth and industrialization processes of some nations, making climate change the most significant problem that various countries are currently facing (Adebayo et al. 2022; Alola et al. 2021; Miao et al. 2022). The corporate social responsibility (CSR) approach has more than a 50-year history (Giffari et al. 2021) and has global concerns (Giffari et al. 2021). CSR is a business model that balances economic interests and environmental and social needs (Behringer and Szegedi 2016). Previous researchers also described CSR as an integral part of corporate strategy, as it helps maintain the reputation of the company in the market (Androniceanu 2019; Siyal et al. 2022). Until the turn of the millennium, CSR was mainly understood as a voluntary corporate social engagement built on charity and stewardship principles (Peña-Miranda et al. 2022). Handelman and Arnold (1999) argued that a CSR initiative is a crucial instrument of company use to show its commitment to stakeholder norms and expectations (Handelman and Arnold 1999). CSR integrates environmental and social responsibilities into business activity; a social entrepreneur resolves a social or ecological problem by applying a business model and establishing a positive social change (Barauskaite and Streimikiene 2021; Priede et al. 2014; Tiurina et al. 2023). In addition, CSR means the ethical behavior of a company toward society (Carroll 2021; Davis et al. 2017; García-Rosell et al. 2023; Singh and Misra 2022). Orlitzky et al. (2011) analyzed that CSR is a source of financial performance (Orlitzky et al. 2011), such as boosting sales revenue and reducing business risks (Barauskaite and Streimikiene 2021; Nizam et al. 2019). Corporate environmental commitment positively affects stakeholder and customer relationship management (Tong 2022). Therefore, cooperation is necessary to succeed over a sustained period (Adebayo and Kirikkaleli 2021; Jain et al. 2022).
In current situations, enterprise acts as a social cell and a significant development driver. Without social responsibility, businesses fail to attract and retain customers (Le 2022; Sharma 2019). Socially responsible enterprises should build trust with customers, investors, and communities to reduce risk and improve credit (Lu et al. 2022). Customers will keep buying from these companies and adopting their new technologies. As a result, enterprises can remain profitable and competitive (Ali Basah 2012; Tapang and Bassey 2017). Furthermore, the competitive company needs a viable strategy, good technology, and original perspectives. The firms that engage in CSR practice fulfil their environmental commitments, maintain their market position, and ensure further expansion (Boma-Siaminabo 2022; D’Cruz et al. 2022).
Energy drives economic growth because it is needed for all production and consumption (Destek et al. 2021). It is integral to socio-economic development because it raises living standards through GDP growth (Kumar 2020). Therefore, increasing renewable energy sources is essential to combat energy poverty in rural regions (Batool et al. 2022). Energy poverty alleviation is one of the main objectives of the Millennium Development Goals (Wang and Lin 2022). In India, most poor people still reside in those places where energy poverty is a significant issue. Therefore, advanced and affordable energy is required to boost employment in rural areas. In addition, it increases work prospects and raises living standards (Batool et al. 2022). Energy poverty refers to a lack of reliable and affordable access to energy sources (Halkos and Gkampoura 2021). The alleviation of energy poverty and achieving the MDGs internationally and domestically depend on corporate investment (Ehsanullah et al. 2021). Thus, corporations can promote this agenda more effectively than individuals. Business executives are encouraged to promote sustainable development by providing renewable energy technologies to low-income communities (Sesan et al. 2013). Renewable energy sources are the most effective solution to eliminate energy poverty (Hamed and Peric 2020).
The current energy supply–demand inequity threatens the economy and society (Perera et al. 2019). Sustainable energy can satisfy the current demands without negatively impacting the future. Ecology, business, politics, and culture all fall under the umbrella of sustainable development. Sustainable energy development helps to mitigate climate change, affordable energy access, energy security, and economic growth (Ainou et al. 2022). Sustainable development requires low-cost, reliable, modern, and renewable energy (Lecka et al. 2022). Renewable energy sources include geothermal, biofuel, wind, wave, solar, and tidal power (Dawn et al. 2019; Rahman et al. 2022).
India, the country studied in this research, has a population of 1.3 billion people and will overtake China by 2025 (Bansal 2021). India is the seventh-largest country, with an area of 3,287,263 sq. km. In addition, India is 3214 km north-to-south and 2993 km east-to-west; its land border is 15,200 km long, its coastline is 7,517 km long, and it has seven union territories and 28 states (Bhasin 2012). The country has been facing substantial challenges in producing enough energy at an affordable price. India has excellent renewable energy potential; however, energy poverty is severe in the country. CSR could be the most effective tool to alleviate energy poverty because it promotes the consumption of renewable energy sources (Nurunnabi et al. 2020).
Renewable energy is vital for future energy needs in rural and urban areas (Perišić et al. 2022). The sustainability of energy development is linked to the sustainability of energy consumption across the entire energy system, including sustainable energy supplies, processes, and technology. Furthermore, it requires these aspects, such as technological innovation, a varied range of renewable resources, customer availability, and price affordability (Saad and Taleb 2018). Energy sustainability has become a serious issue all around the world. Many countries are shifting towards a greener economy after reducing their reliance on fossil fuels and incorporating renewable energy into their national energy mix (Gansukh 2021). Furthermore, these conventional fuels are polluting and expensive and contribute to global warming (Al-Ghussain 2019). In contrast, effective renewable energy can reduce pollution caused due inefficient energy use; therefore, green technology is required to overcome this worldwide problem (Saqib et al. 2022; Sharif et al. 2023).
The term “sustainable transition” states to the fundamental change toward a sustainable society that might restructure production and consumption systems (Grin et al. 2010). Transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources has led to sustainable energy (Mutezo and Mulopo 2021; Philo and Happer 2013). Thus, developed and developing countries should employ renewable technology to combat energy poverty (J. Zhao et al. 2022a, b).
India, the seventh-largest country, has a population of 1.3 billion (Bansal 2021). Even though we live in the twenty-first century, energy poverty is still in its worst condition because the global population is growing, and economic growth is unstable (Hamed and Peric 2020; Hassan et al. 2022). Sustainable energy is a promising strategy for alleviating energy poverty and financial stability (Nasir et al. 2022). The sustainability of energy resources is a primary concern for energy safety, productivity, and environmental protection in countries, regions, and the world. Sustainable energy is the efficient use of energy throughout the entire energy system, including energy service delivery, energy transportation, energy storage, processes, and technology for converting energy resources into usable forms. Therefore, renewable energy is essential for stable and sustainable energy supply (Tiep et al. 2021a).
Renewable energy resources include solar power, biogas energy, wind energy, hydro energy, and geothermal energy. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution requires uninterrupted electricity; hence, the country requires maximum renewable energy generation. Renewable energy started in the late 1990s; however, its contribution to generating electricity in India is 20%. The lockdown at COVID-19 caused Indian families to use more power; therefore, a sustainable energy supply was needed to satisfy all consumers (Stephan et al. 2022). India enjoys sun radiation all year round; hence, more solar power plants are needed to alleviate the poor energy crisis. Renewable purchase obligation (RPO) helps India to maximize electricity from renewable energy sources (Pachauri 2022). Therefore, the feasibility of renewable energy supply is the best source to alleviate energy poverty (Biernat-Jarka et al. 2021).
Sustainable development meets present requirements without compromising future basic needs (Tiep et al. 2021a); however, sustainable development relies heavily on good governance and natural resources (Safdar et al. 2022). In addition, poor energy development enhances the CO2 emissions that affect economic sustainability and global warming (Khan et al. 2018; Wangzhou et al. 2022; Yu et al. 2022). In contrast, sustainable energy development mitigates global threats like carbon emissions, energy crises, starvation, and instability (Lu et al. 2019). During the last few periods, the energy utility industry experienced various environmental and social challenges (Hoang et al. 2021); all the risks outlined, including environmental, health, and safety concerns, hinder energy development. As a result, energy companies, particularly public utilities, are expected to meet more demanding performance requirements, including environmental considerations (Stjepcevic and Siksnelyte 2017). All aspects of the supply chain, including power generation, commerce, transmission, and distribution, are undergoing significant changes (Pollitt 2012). Due to climate change, renewable energy sources (RES) are needed in power generation, heating and cooling, transportation, and construction. In addition, renewable energy sources can generate four-fifths of global electricity by 2050 and reduce global warming (Ahmad et al. 2022). “Energy transition” is crucial to many national and regional political goals and objectives (Weder et al. 2019). Transformation is a term used to describe a continuous process characterized by structural and non-linear changes across time (Khmara and Kronenberg 2020). It is a protracted transition from one economic system with limited resources to another (Carley et al. 2018). The EU has set sustainable energy development goals for 2020 to 2030, and three primary criteria link 2050: improving energy efficiency, increasing renewable energy use, lowering emissions, and technical innovation (Burja and Burja 2014).
According to previous researchers, lower-income households facing the worse energy poverty in India (Amin et al. 2022; Chien et al. 2021; Fraser et al. 2023; Jessel et al. 2019; Lan et al. 2022; Nguyen et al. 2023; Sharma et al. 2019; Sovacool 2012; Streimikiene and Kyriakopoulos 2023). This research aimed to identify particular societal enablers in the Indian context that would catalyze sustainable energy development to mitigate the severe energy crisis. Corporate social responsibility is a brilliant initiative and focuses on four categories: ethical, philanthropic, environmental, and economic responsibility. The government of India enacted the initial step of mandating a CSR policy. This study explored that third parties like CSR foundation companies can alleviate energy poverty by implementing energy-related projects in the country. No prior study was conducted to determine the role of CSR in combating energy issues. This study is unique because it comprehensively analyzes the three mediators: assessment of renewable energy resource (RER), feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SES), and sustainable energy development (SED), which performs the mediating role between the corporate social responsibility (CSR) and energy poverty alleviation (EPA). Furthermore, this research contributes to the extensive literature in the context of India. This research will attract the attention of policymakers, entrepreneurs, contractors, shareholders, companies, stakeholders, agencies, and research scientists to understand the CSR-related driving forces for the higher consumption of renewable energy resources to alleviate energy poverty.
The rest of the paper is structured as follows: “Literature review” includes the literature review, and “Model of proposed study” presents the model of proposed study. “Research methodology” provides the research methodology, followed by the results and discussion in “Result and discussions.” “Conclusions and policy recommendations” consisted of the conclusion, policy recommendations, and research limitations.
Literature review
The literature review starts with defining the term “energy poverty” in India. Further, we construct some hypotheses based on the existing literature to evaluate the potential of the study to reveal the impact of CSR on reducing energy poverty.
A demand-based approach for defining energy poverty in India
According to the theory of energy poverty, health will be negatively impacted due to inefficient energy consumption. We consider cost, availability, and social impact in determining what percentage of expenses go toward energy and other categories. Electricity prices rise, forcing customers to limit food expenditure, which is terrible for everyone. The amount of energy consumption may go down, even if the budget were increased. There is a broad spectrum of price, efficiency, and usefulness. As a result, it puts a strain on household budgets. Rather than energy expenditures, the demand for energy services should be used to characterize the function of energy use in household well-being. Establishing a causality assessment methodology is necessary for determining the impact of household income and non-energy consumption on energy usage. Socio-economic affect household energy demand and consumption. The energy costs of the household will rise if its energy consumption rises (for example, if more kerosene lanterns or more electricity are purchased) or if new energy equipment (such as electric irons, lights, or fans) is purchased (e.g., TVs, refrigerators, VCRs, and air conditioners) (Khandker et al. 2010).
Modern energy methods can damage dwellings directly and indirectly; therefore, preventive measures should be adopted before using them. In addition, there is a correlation between well-being, financial status, and energy usage; the presence of light is a sign of success and wellness. Electricity-based lighting is one hundred times more efficient than kerosene-based (kupi) (Khandker et al. 2014). In addition, extra time in the office may be possible if the lights are good enough. Workers can be facilitated from a brighter home or office environment to increase their salary, and children might be more focused and attentive if classrooms are brightened (Jokhan et al. 2022). The researcher examined the correlation between household income and energy consumption to determine the standard lifestyle (Arshed et al. 2022; Lang et al. 2022). Furthermore, rural households’ energy consumption depends on energy prices, village infrastructure, prevailing wage structure, and commodity prices. Like many other countries, India has faced the challenge of energy poverty (Sy and Mokaddem 2022). One in three Indian people lack electricity, raising the question of how energy-poor the country is (Mukherjee and Karmakar 2022).
Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
CSR is a brilliant initiative; it means doing something for everyone, but not always the same (Barbarossa et al. 2022). Carroll’s pyramid focuses on four categories: ethical, philanthropic, environmental, and economic responsibility (Carroll 2021). Furthermore, CSR is called volunteer success sponsored to perform social welfare activities. Corporations should focus on beneficial business outcomes and practice CSR to reduce environmental health risk factors that attract investors and customers (Carroll and Shabana 2010; Partalidou et al. 2020; Xue et al. 2022). The most notable example of CSR institutionalization was the 1992 establishment of the group business for social responsibility (BSR), which initially included 51 companies to become a “power for positive social change”—a force that would conserve and restore natural resources, uphold human dignity and justice, and function transparently (Agudelo et al. 2019). Following an April 2014 amendment to the Companies Act 2013, India was the first country to mandate CSR (Jain 2015); as a part of any CSR enforcement, companies should spend their income on poverty, education, hunger, gender inequality, etc. (Dixit 2023). In addition, organizations should establish specific policies, plans, and priorities for their CSR programs and create separate budgets to fund them. These services focus on well-defined societal views and align with organizations’ business spheres (Kaur and Tandon 2017). The Ministry of Corporate Affairs announced enterprise expenditures to battle COVID-19; it will be valid under CSR initiatives. Furthermore, COVID-19 funds can be used for several programs, including preventive health care and disaster risk management (Patel et al. 2020).
CSR can improve environmental sustainability and socio-economic development (Márquez and Pérez 2015). Corporate social responsibility drives sustainable energy development, benefiting the climate, environment, communities, and economy (Kuah et al. 2022). Measuring and addressing CSR problems in sustainable energy development can help energy sectors, companies, and investors keep consumer costs low while migrating to energy-saving technology and a renewable energy portfolio. Corporations have strongly supported ecological transition (Liu et al. 2023). Furthermore, CSR-related energy efficiency improvements, renewable energy source use, and GHG emission reduction “contribute to long-term energy development” (Lu et al. 2019).
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and renewable energy assessment (REA)
India has excellent renewable energy potential; however, the country has severe energy poverty and power shortfalls (Lazanyuk et al. 2023). CSR is the most effective method to alleviate energy poverty because it promotes renewable energy consumption (Nurunnabi et al. 2020). Researchers argued that CSR-practicing energy companies contribute more renewable energy sources to reduce the heavy dependency on fossil fuels; it protects the environment by lowering greenhouse gas emissions (Khan et al. 2019). Furthermore, companies should innovate energy-saving products in the context of corporate social responsibility (CSR) because the results could be meaningful for the economy, society, and the environment. To alleviate energy poverty, CSR-practicing companies should invest in renewable energy projects that increase energy sustainability (Lecka et al. 2022; Mastropietro 2022; Nisipeanu et al. 2011). Based on the above reviews, the first hypothesis is formulated as follows:
-
Hypothesis 1: corporate social responsibility (CSR) is significantly associated with renewable energy assessment (REA).
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SES)
Companies are under pressure to provide a sustainable energy supply through corporate social responsibility (Agudelo et al. 2020). CSR in India has evolved from Mahatma Gandhi’s “Trusteeship model” to a statute in the Companies Act of 2013. However, this shift from voluntary to mandatory is in process. From the middle of the 1850s until the present, CSR has been practiced in India, focusing on the CSR mandate (Mitra and Schmidpeter 2017). CSR practical contribution is maintaining a sustainable energy supply to alleviate energy poverty and promote socio-economic development while protecting the environment and boosting social life (Lecka et al. 2022; Tiep et al. 2021a). Modern lifestyles require a reliable, long-term, and sustainable energy supply. Energy firms must prioritize CSR to control carbon emissions, such as CSR looking at social, environmental, and business-related factors. Using renewable energy resources, also known as sustainable energy sources, is crucial in reducing energy poverty and meeting the growing electricity demand (Gigauri and Vasilev 2022; Li et al. 2021). Based on the above reviews, the second hypothesis is formulated as follows:
-
Hypothesis 2: corporate social responsibility (CSR) is significantly associated with the feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SES).
Assessment of renewable energy resources (RER) and feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SES)
The transition from using non-renewable energy sources (gas, coal, oil, etc.) to renewable energy sources (wind energy, solar power, bioenergy, hydro energy, thermal power, etc.) leads to a sustainable energy supply (Philo and Happer 2013). Renewable energy reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; however, it is important to consider the financial benefits while establishing sustainable power generation microgrids (Kiehbadroudinezhad et al. 2022). Biogas and solar microgrids can generate the cost-effective and reliable electricity to fulfil the energy need of consumers, particularly in remote areas (Nawab et al. 2022). Consequently, the assessment of renewable energy resources has the potential to maintain a sustainable energy supply. Therefore, innovative strategies should be explored to optimize the size of renewable energy power generation systems for energy efficiency (Kiehbadroudinezhad et al. 2022). Based on the above reviews, the third hypothesis is formulated as follows:
-
Hypothesis 3: assessment of renewable energy resources (RER) is significantly associated with the feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SES).
Assessment of renewable energy resources (RER) and feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SED)
Sustainable development becomes a reality with the help of sustainable energy (Guzović et al. 2022). Sustainable energy development is achieved when consumers access affordable and efficient energy sources. Assessment of renewable energy has the potential to maintain economic growth and reduce carbon emissions (Feng et al. 2023; Majid 2020; Zheng et al. 2023). Sustainable transition is a change towards a sustainable society that may restructure production and consumption systems (Berkowitz and Gadille 2022). In addition, energy and environmental challenges are interconnected and require a transition to maintaining sustainable energy. Renewable energy sources replaced fossil fuels due to public concerns about energy security and efficiency.
Furthermore, switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy decreases health hazards and preserves sustainable energy development (Farhan Bashir et al. 2022; Li et al. 2023; Tiep et al. 2021a). Transitioning to more sustainable energy sources can reduce the global carbon footprint (Sharif et al. 2021; Xie et al. 2022). Therefore, policymakers, stakeholders, and investors are trying to promote renewable energy power generation. Fortunately, these resources are becoming affordable to accelerate sustainable energy. All developing countries can be economically strong by using renewable strategic resources. Furthermore, technological innovation and the power market revolution can potentially reduce renewable energy costs (Amir and Khan 2022; Sharif et al. 2022). Renewable energy resource assessment can maintain a sustainable energy supply to meet rising demand and preserve vital resources for future generations (Tiep et al. 2021a). Based on the above reviews, the fourth hypothesis is formulated as follows:
-
Hypothesis 4: assessment of renewable energy resources (RER) is significantly associated with sustainable energy development (SED).
Feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SES) and sustainable energy development (SED)
Environmentally friendly energy sources are essential to maintain a sustainable energy supply (Ainou et al. 2022). Sustainable energy development requires innovative and affordable energy sources. Renewable energy sources can maintain a sustainable energy supply to develop sustainable energy (Tiep et al. 2021a). Affordable access to contemporary energy services, sustainable energy supply, sustainable energy use, and energy security lead the sustainable energy development (Gunnarsdottir et al. 2021). Sustainable energy development is a practical approach to mitigate future climate change and increase economic growth (Kung and McCarl 2018). Based on the above reviews, the fifth hypothesis is formulated as follows:
-
Hypothesis 5: feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SES) is significantly associated with sustainable energy development (SED).
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainable energy development (SED)
CSR is a dynamic cooperative tool in promoting environmental sustainability by boosting an industry perception of CSR actual value and improving company behavior to effectively adapt to the socio-economic context of the country to ensure ecological sustainability and maintain the socio-economic development (Márquez and Pérez 2015; Pai and Chandra 2022). Most energy-related companies struggle with the best strategies to achieve sustainable development goals. Furthermore, many companies have different perceptions of CSR regarding its practical value and how it relates to sustainable development from both a demand and supply perspective. In addition, investors should improve their CSR strategy and energetic performance to preserve the environment through the contributions of renewable energy sources (Lu et al. 2019). Corporate social responsibility allows companies to address sustainable development issues like climate change (Fallah Shayan et al. 2022; Sidhoum and Serra 2017). Most energy companies know the value of CSR in attaining sustainability; however, they are still struggling to connect their CSR strategy to their core business (Weder et al. 2019).
Furthermore, CSR effectively eliminates corruption to achieve sustainability (Gigauri and Vasilev 2022; Krishnamurti et al. 2018). Long-term economic growth and renewable energy consumption promote sustainable development (Saad and Taleb 2018; Sharma et al. 2021). CSR initiatives and sustainable energy development have significant associations (Mapelli et al. 2016; Tiep et al. 2021a). Based on the above reviews, the sixth hypothesis is formulated as follows:
-
Hypothesis 6: CSR is significantly associated with sustainable energy development (SED).
Assessment of renewable energy resources (RER) and energy poverty alleviation (EPA)
Technology advancements in the field of renewable energy resources contribute to the alleviation of energy poverty (Wang et al. 2022). Energy poverty has become a serious issue worldwide (Liu et al. 2022; X. Zhao et al. 2022a, b). Incorporating renewable energy into their national energy mix is the best solution to alleviate energy poverty (J. Zhao et al. 2022a, b). Furthermore, the effective deployment of renewable energy resources will combat global warming (Dogan et al. 2023). Therefore, affordability and adaptation of renewable energy technologies should be part of government policies to alleviate energy poverty. Additionally, accepting renewable energy is a vital transition from fossil fuels to mitigate the energy crisis (Agyekum 2020; Batool et al. 2022; Emodi and Boo 2015). Based on the above reviews, the seventh hypothesis is formulated as follows:
-
Hypothesis 7: assessment of renewable energy resources (RER) leads to energy poverty alleviation (EPA).
Feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SES) and energy poverty alleviation (EPA)
A sustainable energy supply is essential to the fight against energy poverty (Kyprianou et al. 2019). Affordable access to modern energy services, sustainable energy supply, sustainable energy use, and energy security lead to energy poverty alleviation (Awan and Bilgili 2022; Wang et al. 2017). Furthermore, a sustainable energy supply must include eco-friendly energy sources, such as environmentally friendly renewable energy sources, which can assist in sustainable energy development (Abdullah-Al-Mahbub et al. 2022; Saqib et al. 2023). Thus, a sustainable energy supply can be an effective approach to mitigating future climate change (González-Eguino 2015; Papantonis et al. 2022). The following eighth hypothesis is developed in light of the reviews above:
-
Hypothesis 8: feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SES) leads to energy poverty alleviation (EPA).
Sustainable energy development (SED) and energy poverty alleviation (EPA)
Energy availability is necessary for economic growth at the national and global levels (Fankhauser and Jotzo 2018; Ning et al. 2022). Sustainable energy development requires access to clean, inexpensive, and reliable energy sources (Irfan et al. 2019). The term “energy poverty” refers to the situation in which the people of a country do not have sufficient access to power to meet fundamental needs such as lighting and cooking (Batool et al. 2022). Energy poverty still exists in India; although India possesses renewable energy sources potential, the country can utilize them effectively to combat the energy issues (Rafi et al. 2021). Furthermore, energy inefficiency threatens the economy, society, and ecosystem (Hassan et al. 2023; Jiao et al. 2022). Therefore, policymakers and stakeholders should transition their attention from non-renewable to renewable energy.
Sustainable energy development is the best tool to alleviate energy poverty (Diaz-Barriga and Barnhart 2022). CSR foundation companies should promote renewable energy-related projects to create a reliable and sustainable energy supply (Gigauri and Vasilev 2022). Every country needs affordable, reliable, and eco-friendly energy sources for sustainable energy development (Gigauri and Vasilev 2022; Tiep et al. 2021a). In addition, sustainable energy development policymakers focus on expanding renewable energy sources to improve energy efficiency and mitigate carbon emissions (Li et al. 2022). The maintenance of sustainable energy development ensures energy security; therefore, European economic policy prioritizes renewable energy development to clean output (Brodny and Tutak 2021; Centurelli 2011; Emodi and Boo 2015; Georgiev 2022). Based on the above reviews, the ninth hypothesis is formulated as follows:
-
Hypothesis 9: sustainable energy development (SED) leads to energy poverty alleviation (EPA).
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and energy poverty alleviation (EPA)
Lack of access to reliable energy is a serious problem in India (Sharma and Sood 2022). Like many other developing countries, India is also facing poverty issues; as a result, it cannot maintain its energy levels to lead the sustainable development goals (Gupta et al. 2020). Third parties like CSR foundation companies can alleviate energy poverty by implementing energy-related projects (Gigauri and Vasilev 2022). Corporate social responsibility programs significantly reduce energy poverty (Lecka et al. 2022; Sesan et al. 2013). Therefore, CSR contribution toward sustainable energy development is the best way to reduce the energy crisis in India. Based on the above reviews, the tenth hypothesis is formulated as follows:
-
Hypothesis 10: corporate social responsibility (CSR) leads to energy poverty alleviation (EPA).
Model of proposed study
CSR is linked to energy poverty alleviation through restructuring renewable energy resources to sustainable energy development as a comprehensive solution for society, the economy, and the environment. Additionally, this research generalizes the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR), assessment of renewable energy resources (RER), feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SES), and sustainable energy development (SED) and energy poverty alleviation (EPA). The model suggests that CSR practice led to RER, SES, and SED; these three variables also act as mediators between CSR and EPA. This study employed CSR as a driving force to alleviate energy poverty in India. The author conducted this model to cover the gap in the existing literature regarding the relationships between corporate social responsibility, energy poverty alleviation, and mediators (RER, SES, and SED). The researcher collected the data from respondents in the first phase to evaluate their research objectives. In the second phase, the researcher analyzed the received data by Smart-PLS 4 and described the results. This study concluded the findings and suggested possible strategies for future research. Figure 1 illustrates a study model after an in-depth literature review to describe the study framework. CSR acts as a catalyst to alleviate energy poverty, and their relations are interconnected. EPA is dependent on CSR, RER, SES, and SED.
The variables for this study were built with the following item counts: CSR has 5, RER has 4, SES has 5, SED has 4, and EPA has 4. This model comprises a total of 22 items, including one independent variable (CSR), three mediating variables (SES, RER, and SED), and one dependent variable (EPA). The constructs of this model are listed in Table 1.
Research methodology
In this model, CSR is the independent variable, EPA is the dependent variable, and RER, SES and SED are the mediating variables. This study examined CSR items to alleviate energy poverty. This study methodology used a five-point Likert Scale to assess the performance of selected elements, with “strongly disagree” equal to one and “strongly agree” equal to five. This study evaluated how CSR variable impacts model variable interaction and learned more about CSR and SES, RER improvement, and SED maintenance to energy poverty alleviation in India. Researchers conducted the survey and collected responses to examine the reliability of the research questions.
Researchers used random sampling techniques to generate and distribute an updated version of the self-structured research questionnaires of selected elements to the target population. The researcher first described to respondents about the research objectives and assured them that data would be kept confidential. The questionnaire had two sections: section first evaluated the general information of respondents, such as gender, age, and education, and the second consisted of questions related to the respondents' perceptions of the practices of corporate social responsibility and how assessment of RER, the feasibility of SES and maintenance of SED mediates the relationship between CSR and EPA. The researcher distributed the questionnaires to 399 respondents through WhatsApp and LinkedIn to receive the required data and focused strictly on CSR foundations companies from the states of Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Uttarakhand in India. There are a lot of CSR foundation companies in these states; therefore, the authors selected these states and collected the data to meet their objectives.
Researchers offered the respondents three weeks to understand and complete the questionnaires; however, experts responded late. Researchers evaluated all questionnaires after receiving responses from the participants. Based on accurate responses, researchers collected 302 questionnaires and tested them for accuracy. The response rate from the selected respondents was satisfactory (75.7%). The information is imported into Excel and analyzed the data by using smart-PLS 4.0.8.4. Additionally, 11 experts from CSR foundations companies, who had already contributed to the pilot study, were invited to offer their expertise and opinions on the results by interview.
Due to the unique nature of companies such as CSR foundation companies, the snowball sampling method was used to collect the data to meet the research objectives. To do this, researchers surveyed between June and September 2022, when the fourth wave of the delta coronavirus (COVID-19) had almost finished; however, moving from one country to another was a considerable risk. Therefore, the researcher preferred to distribute the questionnaires via WhatsApp and LinkedIn. Moreover, each expert has knowledge about CSR potential to alleviate energy poverty (see Table 14, Appendix).
Furthermore, Smart-PLS is the best model to measure the effect of CSR and energy poverty alleviation. The mediating effect of SES, RER, and SED is part of the satisfaction nexus and mitigates the energy poverty issues. In this study, PLS-SEM software was used, and the extensive application of this software in subsequent studies is evidence of its validity. For modeling, SEM is preferable than traditional statistical methods. The structural equation modeling (SEM) method is a multivariate analytic approach that can explore many variables simultaneously. Poor application of analytical methods can lead to inaccurate findings in social science research. However, a reliable and valid statistical approach is very important.
PLS-SEM is two-stage: testing the measurement model and structure model. The measurement model, also called the inner model, was used to evaluate the convergent validity via composite reliability (C.R.) and average variance extracted (AVE). Furthermore, this model was used to evaluate the discriminant validity via the Fornell–Larcker criterion, cross-loading, and heterotrait–monotrait ratio. Path analysis was used to evaluate the hypothesis in the structure model, also called the inner model. The interdependencies between the variables were discovered through bootstrapping analysis (Ali et al. 2023).
Result and discussions
A demographic analysis of the respondents showed that male participants (195) were in the majority (64.5%), while the number of female respondents was (35.4%). The majority of respondents were 26–30 years old (30.1%), and the lowest participants were > 41 years old (0.08%). The majority of participants were M.Phil. (44.7%) and bachelor degree holders (35.8%), while Ph.D. degree holders (19.5%), as shown in Table 2. Figure 2 of the measurement assessment model shows the variable influence loadings. All factor loading values are greater than 0.5, and each convergent validity of each item in this model is valid.
Measurement assessment model—outer model
The measurement model uses reliability analysis to examine the consistency of various measured variables (Hair et al. 2020). In this model, Cronbach’s alpha and the composite reliability index have been used to evaluate the reliability of each factor of productivity values.
The reliability analysis can be interpreted using the rule of Thumb as shown in Table 3. The analysis’ findings demonstrate that all variables have Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of more than 0.8, including CSR (0.923), EPA (0.905), RER (O.805), SED (0.834), and SES (0.901). The results depict that the measuring scale of this study model is good. For further analyses, the authors used a composite reliability value to strongly confirm the scale’s reliability. The analysis results demonstrate that all variables have composite reliability coefficients of more than 0.8, CSR (0.927), EPA (0.907), RER (O.81), SED (0.835), and SES (0.901). Overall, this analysis showed that the reliability scale is satisfactory and good. The findings from this analysis are summarized in Table 4. Furthermore, the findings of the outer loading were also investigated to confirm the indicator reliability. The outer loading results showed that each indicator is reliable, as each value is more than 0.7 (see Table 5).
Convergent and discriminant validity are established to evaluate construct validity (Kersey et al. 2022). Convergent validity occurs when measured items converge on the underlying construct; AVE > 0.50 indicates convergent statistical validity (Hair et al. 2021). According to Götz et al. (2010), convergence is evaluated using average variance extracted (AVE) and external loading factor (Götz et al. 2010). After the analysis, results show that EVA values are more than 0.5, such as CSR (0.764), EPA (0.778), RER (0.63), SED (0.667), and SES (0.717), and external loading factors values are all greater than 0.7 (as shown in Table 6).
These results are higher than those mentioned above, demonstrating high convergent validity, which shows a latent variable account for more than half the variation compared to its corresponding indicators. The Fornell–Larcker criterion is used to verify discriminant validity measurement models. The square root of a construct average variance must be greater than its correlation with another construct. This requirement establishes discriminant validity (Ursule et al. 2022). Table 7 shows that the discriminating test is valid as the square root of AVE values is greater than the inter-construct correlation.
Cross loadings indicate that items should have greater loadings on their parent construct than other constructs. There are discriminant validity difficulties if an item loads well on another construct against its parent construct. Table 8 bold numbers show that the items have a high correlation, while the remaining elements have a poor correlation. These findings indicate that there is a genuine connection between the variables that have discriminant validity. Items with cogency and factor loadings exceeding 0.5 are both acceptable.
Numerous studies have criticized the Fornell–Larcker criterion; therefore, the heterotrait–monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT) is also used to measure discriminant validity. It is confirmed if the discriminant validity value is less than 0.85 or 0.90 (Ali et al. 2023). The HTMT ratio was used in this study to evaluate how different variables interacted. HTMT data show that the values are less than 0.9 (see Table 9). According to the values of variables, values indicating a link with the variable are more significant than values indicating a connection with other variables.
Structural model—inner model
Structural models, often called “inner models,” describe the relationship between latent variables (Ardi and Isnayanti 2020). This model focuses on the interaction between exogenous and endogenous variables. The structural model and the accuracy of model predictions are assessed using the R2 value. R-squared measures the goodness-of-fit of a structural model and the effect of the exogenous latent variable on the endogenous latent variable (Ardi and Isnayanti 2020). All endogenous variables R2 range refers to the degree to which each endogenous variable is specified. Falk and Miller (1992) said that the R2 value must be satisfactory, meaning both must be larger than 0.1 for the model to be considered excellent (Muhammad et al. 2022). The results of Table 10 demonstrate R2 values and R2 adjusted values, in which the R2 value of RER (0.11), SED (0.435), EPA (0.251), and SES (0.052). The R2 value of SES is just less than 0.1, although overall, the inner model has been considered satisfactory.
The path coefficients of the study models’ variables are also included in Table 11. It shows that among the relationships of CSR with other variables, CSR on RER has the strongest positive effect, with a path coefficient of 0.332, while that between CSR and SES is at 0.166, and that between CSR and SED is at 0.06, is the lowest. Regarding the remaining factors, RER has the highest positive impact on EPA at 0.171, SES on EPA at 0.299, and SES on SED at 0.598. It suggests that in the framework of CSR foundations companies in India, promoting renewable energy resources is crucial for developing sustainable energy systems and reducing energy poverty. Additionally, CSR implementation is an independent factor in promoting renewable energy sources and energy efficiency. Therefore, CSR foundation companies in India should concentrate on CSR strategic activity that adds value for the company’s stakeholders in society, the community, and the government, while encouraging renewable energy consumption for efficient energy development to stay proactive and competitive to alleviate the energy poverty.
In the next step, evaluate the variance inflation factors (VIF) to test for multicollinearity for each predictor latent variable. Collinearity occurs when the independent variables are substantially connected. The most cited threshold values for detecting multicollinearity are 10, 5, and 3.3, respectively, indicating that a VIF equal to or greater than the threshold value would indicate the presence of collinearity among the variables. A VIF value above 10 is generally accepted as a threshold (Abbas et al. 2019; Hair et al. 2012; Tiep et al. 2021a). All VIF values in this study is below 10, indicating that the research model revealed no multicollinearity issues. The VIF values for this model are summarized in Table 12
The bootstrapping approach used 5000 subsamples and a significance level of 5% (two-tailed) to assess the significance of the hypotheses. The bootstrapping result demonstrates that the statistical t-value greater than 1.96 and P value is less than 0.05, which support the hypotheses of the study model, respectively. The total positive effect of CSR on RER, CSR on SES, CSR on SED, CSR on EPA, RER on SED and EPA, and SES on SED and EPA are supported in this study. At the same time, RER has no significant impact on SES. On the other hand, overall results confirmed the suitability of this study model. Figure 3 and Table 13 depict the results of bootstrapping.
The findings of this study supported hypothesis (H1), which states that CSR is positively correlated with the assessment of renewable energy resources. It suggests that that overall companies in India should know their social responsibility and the benefits of CSR to stakeholders, the environment, and the national economy, as businessman should incorporate CSR into their core business operations by changing the composition of their energy resources to increase the supply of green energy and alleviate energy poverty in India. Previous researches also support this alignment; CSR firms should invest in renewable energy projects to alleviate energy poverty (Lecka et al. 2022; Mastropietro 2022; Nisipeanu et al. 2011). Additionally, the findings of this research support the acceptance of hypothesis (H2), which states a positive and statistically significant connection between CSR and SES. It suggests that when a company in the energy sector executes its CSR strategy well, it is possible to maintain the energy supply from a safety perspective. Previous work also supports this fact; CSR’s functional role is to ensure a sustainable energy supply to alleviate energy poverty, promote socio-economic development, protect the environment, and boost social life (Lecka et al. 2022; Tiep et al. 2021a).
Furthermore, the third hypothesis (H3) is not supported; there is no positive correlation between the assessment of renewable energy resources (RER) and the feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SES). These findings are supported by prior research; renewable and non-renewable energy resources are necessary (Opeyemi 2021). The findings of this study supported hypothesis (H4), there is a significant correlation between the assessment of renewable energy resources (RER) and sustainable energy development (SED). Renewable energy resources can potentially maintain sustainable energy development for future generations in India. Furthermore, it can boost economic growth, energy security, energy access, and carbon emissions. A previous work also supports this fact; policymakers and stakeholders’ priorities renewable energy. These resources are potentially inexpensive, enabling an immediate transition to sustainable energy. Consequently, a renewable strategic plan may assist all emerging countries economically, and technical innovative power markets can reduce energy costs (Amir and Khan 2022; Sun et al. 2022; Tiep et al. 2021b).
The results of this study supported the fifth hypothesis (H5), which stated that a sustainable energy supply (SES) has a satisfactory correlation with sustainable energy development (SED). Access to affordable modern energy services, a sustainable energy supply, sustainable energy usage, and energy security are the driving forces to develop a sustainable energy system to combat the energy issues of the Indian population. These findings are supported by prior research of (Gunnarsdottir et al. 2021; Tiep et al. 2021b). The findings of this study supported hypothesis (H6), which states that corporate social responsibility (CSR) is significantly associated with sustainable energy development (SED). Corporate social responsibility helps marketers to address sustainable development challenges, such as climate change. Most energy companies know about CSR to maintain sustainable development but struggle to link their CSR strategy to their core business. Renewable energy sources and economic growth ultimately facilitate sustainable energy development. This finding supports the conclusion reached by (Mapelli et al. 2016; Tiep et al. 2021a; Tsalis et al. 2020; Ye et al. 2022).
The findings of this study supported hypothesis (H7); there is a significant correlation between the assessment of renewable energy resources (RER) and energy poverty alleviation (EPA). The lack of access to energy has become a major problem in India. The best way to reduce energy poverty is to incorporate renewable energy into the Indian energy mix. However, efficient and clean utilization of renewable energy sources will reduce energy problems. Therefore, government policies should include the affordability and adaption of renewable energy technologies to alleviate energy poverty. Accepting and promoting renewable energy projects is crucial to alleviate energy poverty. Previous works also support this fact; technical innovations in renewable energy resources contribute best to alleviating energy poverty (Emodi and Boo 2015; Wang et al. 2022). The results of this study supported the fifth hypothesis (H8), the feasibility of sustainable energy supply (SES) leads to energy poverty alleviation (EPA). Previous works also support this fact; a sustainable energy supply is vital to alleviate energy poverty (Biernat-Jarka et al. 2021), and eco-friendly energy sources are essential for long-term energy infrastructure in India (Villanthenkodath and Mahalik 2022). Consequently, a sustainable energy supply is an effective force to mitigate future climate change (González-Eguino 2015; Papantonis et al. 2022).
The findings of this study supported hypothesis (H9), there is a significant correlation between sustainable energy development (SED and energy poverty alleviation (EPA). Sustainable development depends on an energy strategy, including the availability of renewable energy sources that enhance energy effectiveness and lower carbon emissions in India. Furthermore, maintaining sustainable energy sources is the most effective strategy to combat energy issues, and energy security is necessary for developing sustainable energy. This finding supports the conclusion reached by (Brodny and Tutak 2021; Centurelli 2011; Emodi and Boo 2015; Georgiev 2022). Additionally, the hypothesis (H10) is supported; there is a significant correlation between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and energy poverty alleviation (EPA). However, CSR contributions toward sustainable energy development are the best way to reduce the energy crisis in India. Third parties like CSR foundations companies can alleviate energy poverty by implementing energy-related projects. Previous works also support this fact; there is a positive relationship between CSR practices and efforts to alleviate energy poverty (Ahmed and Gasparatos 2020; Lecka et al. 2022; Sesan et al. 2013).
Overall, there is current literature on a study relating CSR to energy poverty. The assessment of RER, feasibility of SES, and SED performs the mediating role between relationships between CSR and EPA. According to the overall conclusions of this study, CSR and EPA have a significant relationship. This study is unique because it comprehensively analyzes the relationship between CSR, RER, SES, SED, and EPA. This research also contributes to the literature in the context of India.
Conclusions and policy recommendations
Conclusions
This study has made some truly noteworthy contributions to the energy field—first, understanding CSR and its useful function in energy poverty alleviation. The second contribution discusses the potential sustainable strategies for reducing energy poverty from a supply and demand perspective. This study illustrates the potential of renewable energy sources to meet the rising energy demand in India. The assessment of renewable energy resources (RER), sustainable energy supply (SES), and sustainable energy development (SED) performing the meditating roles between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and energy poverty alleviation (EPA) is the most significant contribution to the literature.
Assessment of renewable energy sources has a significant correlation with corporate social responsibility. In India, investors should generally integrate CSR into their core business operations by changing the composition of their energy resources to enhance the supply of green energy, such as assessing renewable energy resources as efficient and economical. It could be the best alternative solution to overcome energy poverty in India. CSR and SES are statistically linked; when an energy company implements its CSR strategy appropriately, it can maintain a sustainable energy supply to the target populations. There is no positive correlation between the assessment of RER and feasibility of SES; renewable and non-renewable resources are needed to ensure a sustainable energy supply. However, there is a positive correlation between the assessment of RER and SED. Renewable energy can ensure future energy sustainability by boosting economic growth and mitigating carbon emissions. SES leads the SED; inexpensive energy services, a sustainable energy source, clean energy consumption, and energy security drive a sustainable energy supply. Furthermore, CSR is linked to SED, as it helps marketers address challenges related to sustainable development, such as global warming issues. The lack of affordable energy access is the most problematic issue in India, and renewable energy resources could be the ideal solution to combat the energy crisis as the country have the potential for renewable energy sources such as biogas, wind, and solar power. Sustainable energy development enhance renewable energy sources, improves energy efficiency, and reduces carbon emissions. Sustainable energy development is the effective driving force to mitigate the energy crisis. Finally, there is a significant correlation between corporate social responsibility and energy poverty alleviation. Consequently, third parties like CSR foundation companies can alleviate energy poverty by implementing energy-related projects in India. Except hypothesis (H3), all other hypotheses (H1, H2, H4, H5, H6, H7, H8, H9, and H10) are supported and accepted. Following the above arguments and acceptance of the hypothesis, the findings show that CSR acts as a catalyst to alleviate energy poverty.
Policy recommendations
After this conclusion, the researcher suggested some recommendations that CSR foundation companies should promote energy-related projects to alleviate energy poverty. CSR is a brilliant initiative. For the best practice, address CSR problems to sustainable energy development. Companies that engage in CSR initiatives could increase energy efficiency and consumption of renewable energy sources and uphold the development of sustainable energy sources to alleviate energy poverty. To maintain sustainable development goals 7, boost the CSR activities to promote energy-related projects. A single person, group, or country cannot achieve sustainable energy development. Donations at the national and international levels are necessary as part of CSR efforts to combat energy poverty. Government should encourage CSR performance to achieve sustainable development goals for businesses, their stakeholders, and the country.
Companies should practice CSR in their core business activities. A powerful society depicts a powerful country. Social responsibility and business ethics are often considered the same term, as business ethics is also known as corporate ethics. Poverty, climate change, and energy resource depletion should be controlled to boost business progress. The World Business Council for Sustainable Development predicted that both countries and companies could improve their attractiveness through CSR implementation. To behave as socialists, not just economists, as empty promises lack constancy; real commitment means real revolution. Performance in social responsibility also attracts investors and customers. Lack of clean energy leads to energy poverty. Like poverty, energy poverty is a hurdle to sustainable development. The stakeholders and government should also take innovative steps to access clean, affordable energy in India.
Research limitations
The conventional survey technique of distributing questionnaires cannot be employed in this study due to the COVID-19 pandemic and government restrictions to prevent its spread (such as protective human-to-human contact). Consequently, the information was collected via WhatsApp and LinkedIn. The survey questionnaire was constructed for statistical measurement from 399 respondents of CSR foundation companies; data collection takes time, and we just received 302 responses. The hybrid research approach should be used in future studies to learn more about the perspective of CSR-engaged businesses on sustainable energy development to energy poverty alleviation. Due to these limitations, the future study will be able to contribute to the existing body of literature on CSR and its impact on the EPA in various research situations. Further study should be conducted in the locations where CSR initiatives have been successfully implemented, measuring the ratio of energy poverty before and after implementing the CSR energy-related projects. Furthermore, it should be conducted to determine the barriers behind CSR’s low performance towards the specific goal, such as alleviating energy poverty.
Data availability
The data supporting to findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- BSR:
-
Business for social responsibility
- CSR:
-
Corporate social responsibility
- EPA:
-
Energy poverty alleviation
- MDGs:
-
Millennium Development Goals
- RER:
-
Renewable energy resource
- RPO:
-
Renewable purchase obligation
- SDGs:
-
Sustainable Development Goals
- SED:
-
Sustainable energy development
- SES:
-
Sustainable energy supply
- TBL:
-
Triple bottom line
- UN:
-
United Nations
References
Abbas J, Mahmood S, Ali H, Raza MA, Ali G, Aman J, Bano S, Nurunnabi M (2019) The effects of corporate social responsibility practices and environmental factors through a moderating role of social media marketing on sustainable performance of business firms. Sustain 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11123434
Abdullah-Al-Mahbub M, Islam ARMT, Almohamad H, Al Dughairi AA, Al-Mutiry M, Abdo HG (2022) Different forms of solar energy progress: the fast-growing eco-friendly energy source in Bangladesh for a sustainable future. Energies 15:6790. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186790
Adebayo TS, Kirikkaleli D (2021) Impact of renewable energy consumption, globalization, and technological innovation on environmental degradation in Japan: application of wavelet tools. Environ Dev Sustain 23:16057–16082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01322-2
Adebayo TS, Awosusi AA, Rjoub H, Agyekum EB, Kirikkaleli D (2022) The in fl uence of renewable energy usage on consumption-based carbon emissions in MINT economies. Heliyon 8:e08941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08941
Agudelo MAL, Jóhannsdóttir L, Davídsdóttir B (2019) A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. Int J Corp Soc Responsib 4:1–23
Agudelo MAL, Johannsdottir L, Davidsdottir B (2020) Drivers that motivate energy companies to be responsible A systematic literature review of Corporate Social Responsibility in the energy sector. J Clean Prod 247:119094
Agyekum EB (2020) Energy poverty in energy rich Ghana: a SWOT analytical approach for the development of Ghana’s renewable energy. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments 40:100760
Ahmad US, Usman M, Hussain S, Jahanger A, Abrar M (2022) Determinants of renewable energy sources in Pakistan: an overview. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:29183–29201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18502-w
Ahmed A, Gasparatos A (2020) Multi-dimensional energy poverty patterns around industrial crop projects in Ghana: enhancing the energy poverty alleviation potential of rural development strategies. Energy Policy 137:111123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111123
Ainou FZ, Ali M, Sadiq M (2022) Green energy security assessment in Morocco: green finance as a step toward sustainable energy transition. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19153-7
Al-Ghussain L (2019) Global warming: review on driving forces and mitigation. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 38:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13041
Ali Basah M (2012) Corporate social responsibility and natural environmental risk management in the context of the banking sector of Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff University)
Ali S, Yan Q, Razzaq A, Khan I, Irfan M (2023) Modeling factors of biogas technology adoption: a roadmap towards environmental sustainability and green revolution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:11838–11860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22894-0
Alola AA, Adebayo TS, Onifade ST (2021) Examining the dynamics of ecological footprint in China with spectral Granger causality and quantile-on-quantile approaches. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 29:263–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1990158
Amin A, Wang Z, Shah AH, Chandio AA (2022) Exploring the dynamic nexus between renewable energy, poverty alleviation, and environmental pollution: fresh evidence from E-9 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:25773–25791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23870-4
Amir M, Khan SZ (2022) Assessment of renewable energy: status, challenges, COVID-19 impacts, opportunities, and sustainable energy solutions in Africa. Energy Built Environ 3:348–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2021.03.002
Androniceanu A (2019) Social responsibility, an essential strategic option for a sustainable development in the field of bio-economy. Amfiteatru Econ 21:503–519. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2019/52/503
Ardi N, Isnayanti (2020) Structural equation modelling-partial least square to determine the correlation of factors affecting poverty in Indonesian provinces. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 846:012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/846/1/012054
Arshed N, Hameed K, Saher A, Yazdani N (2022) The cultural differences in the effects of carbon emissions—an EKC analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:63605–63621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20154-9
Awan A, Bilgili F (2022) Energy poverty trends and determinants in Pakistan: empirical evidence from eight waves of HIES 1998–2019. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 158:112157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112157
Bansal A (2021) Potential and achievement of renewable energy sources in India. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 9:376–383. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.38800
Barauskaite G, Streimikiene D (2021) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: the puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 28:278–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2048
Barbarossa C, Chen Y, Romani S, Korschun D (2022) Not all CSR initiatives are perceived equal: the influence of CSR domains and focal moralities on consumer responses to the company and the cause. J Clean Prod 380:134949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134949
Batool K, Zhao ZY, Atif F, Dilanchiev A (2022) Nexus between energy poverty and technological innovations: a pathway for addressing energy sustainability. Front Environ Sci 10:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.888080
Behringer K, Szegedi K (2016) The role of CSR in achieving sustainable development-theoretical approach. Eur Sci J 12(22):10. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n22p10
Berkowitz H, Gadille M (2022) Meta-organizing clusters as agents of transformative change through responsible actorhood. In: Clusters and sustainable regional development: a meta-organisational approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003215066-6
Bhasin BB (2012) Assessing and mitigatingbusiness risks in India. Business Expert Press
Biernat-Jarka A, Trebska P, Jarka S (2021) The role of renewable energy sources in alleviating energy poverty in households in Poland. Energies 14:2957. Energy Supply within Sustain. Agric Prod 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102957
Boma-Siaminabo H (2022) Corporate social responsibility and administrative integrity. BW Acad J 12
Brodny J, Tutak M (2021) Assessing sustainable energy development in the central and eastern European countries and analyzing its diversity. Sci Total Environ 801:149745
Burja V, Burja C (2014) Sustainable energy for supporting the sustainable development: empirical approach for Romania. Ann Univ Apulensis Ser Oeconomica 16:70–80
Carley S, Evans TP, Konisky DM (2018) Adaptation, culture, and the energy transition in American coal country. Energy Res Soc Sci 37:133–139
Carroll AB (2021) Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the COVID-19 pandemic: organizational and managerial implications. J Strateg Manag 14:315–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2021-0145
Carroll AB, Shabana KM (2010) The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice. Int J Manag Rev 12:85–105
Centurelli R (2011) Energy poverty: can we make modern energy access universal-focus on financing appropriate sustainable energy technologies. Colo J Int’l Envtl l Pol’y 22:219
Chien F, Hsu C-C, Zhang Y, Vu HM, Nawaz MA (2021) Unlocking the role of energy poverty and its impacts on financial growth of household: is there any economic concern. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:13431–13444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16649-6
D’Cruz P, Du S, Noronha E, Parboteeah KP, Trittin-Ulbrich H, Whelan G (2022) Technology, megatrends and work: thoughts on the future of business ethics. J Bus Ethics 180(3):879–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05240-9
Davis SL, Rives LM, de Maya SR (2017) Introducing personal social responsibility as a key element to upgrade CSR. Spanish J Mark 21:146–163
Dawn S, Gope S, Das A, Bhowmik D, Koley I (2019) Tidal energy as emergent energy source: a review. Int J Comput Intell IoT 2:340–345
Dell’Anna F (2021) Green jobs and energy efficiency as strategies for economic growth and the reduction of environmental impacts. Energy Policy 149:112031
Destek MA, Sarkodie SA, Asamoah EF (2021) Does biomass energy drive environmental sustainability? An SDG perspective for top five biomass consuming countries. Biomass Bioenerg 149:106076
Diaz-Barriga VB, Barnhart A (2022) Sustainable energy through design: an approach to alleviate energy poverty in vulnerable communities on the US–Mexico border region, in: design for vulnerable communities. Springer, pp 423–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96866-3_22
Dixit S (2023) Corporate social responsibility: a critical appraisal. World J Adv Res Rev 17:421–429
Dogan E, Hodžić S, Šikić TF (2023) Do energy and environmental taxes stimulate or inhibit renewable energy deployment in the European Union? Renew. Energy 202:1138–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.11.107
Dong K, Ren X, Zhao J (2021) How does low-carbon energy transition alleviate energy poverty in China? A nonparametric panel causality analysis. Energy Econ 103:105620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105620
Ehsanullah S, Tran QH, Sadiq M, Bashir S, Mohsin M, Iram R (2021) How energy insecurity leads to energy poverty? Do environmental consideration and climate change concerns matters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(39):55041–55052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14415-2
Emodi NV, Boo KJ (2015) Sustainable energy development in Nigeria: overcoming energy poverty. Int J Energy Econ Policy 5:580–597
Fallah Shayan N, Mohabbati-Kalejahi N, Alavi S, Zahed MA (2022) Sustainable development goals (SDGs) as a framework for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Sustainability 14:1222
Fankhauser S, Jotzo F (2018) Economic growth and development with low-carbon energy. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 9:e495
Farhan Bashir M, Sadiq, M., Talbi, B., Shahzad, L., Adnan Bashir, M., 2022. An outlook on the development of renewable energy, policy measures to reshape the current energy mix, and how to achieve sustainable economic growth in the post COVID-19 era. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 1–12.
Feng C-Y, Yang X, Afshan S, Irfan M (2023) Can renewable energy technology innovation promote mineral resources’ green utilization efficiency? Novel insights from regional development inequality. Resour Policy 82:103449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103449
Fraser T, Chapman AJ, Shigetomi Y (2023) Leapfrogging or lagging? Drivers of social equity from renewable energy transitions globally. Energy Res Soc Sci 98:103006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103006
Gansukh Z (2021) Mongol dream beyond fossil fuels: prosperity of greenification. Renew Energy 171:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.079
García-Rosell J-C, Moisander J, Mäkinen J (2023) Conceptual framework for understanding the ethical dimension of corporate social responsibility. From Prod Purp Art, Fash Wine Lexingt. Books 1–15
Garvi M, Blankinship B (2021) Energy poverty: an opportunity for CSR and social impact? The Case of DOMI Earth in Taiwan, in: SAGE Business Cases. SAGE Publications: SAGE Business Cases Originals
Georgiev G (2022) Energy poverty alleviation–a step for sustainable energy transition. J Econ Dev Environ People 11:43–57
Giffari A, Samoda D, Lee HH, Khalisa M, Ramadanti A (2021) Corporate social responsibilities: business responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, in: Conference Towards ASEAN Chairmanship 2023 (TAC 23 2021). Atlantis Press, pp 213–219
Gigauri I, Vasilev V (2022) Corporate social responsibility in the energy sector: towards sustainability, in: Energy Transition. Springer 267–288
González-Eguino M (2015) Energy poverty: an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47:377–385
Götz O, Liehr-Gobbers K, Krafft M (2010) Evaluation of structural equation models using the partial least squares (PLS) approach, in: Handbook of partial least squares. Springer, pp 691–711
Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J (2010) Transitions to sustainable development: new directions in the study of long term transformative change. Routledge
Gunnarsdottir I, Davidsdottir B, Worrell E, Sigurgeirsdottir S (2021) Sustainable energy development: history of the concept and emerging themes. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 141:110770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110770
Gupta S, Gupta E, Sarangi GK (2020) Household energy poverty index for India: an analysis of inter-state differences. Energy Policy 144:111592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111592
Guzović Z, Duic N, Piacentino A, Markovska N, Mathiesen BV, Lund H (2022) Recent advances in methods, policies and technologies at sustainable energy systems development. Energy 245:123276 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123276
Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Mark Sci 40:414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
Hair JF, Howard MC, Nitzl C (2020) Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. J Bus Res 109:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Danks NP, Ray S (2021) Evaluation of reflective measurement models. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Springer, Cham, pp 75–90
Halkos GE, Gkampoura E-C (2021) Evaluating the effect of economic crisis on energy poverty in Europe. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 144:110981
Hamed TA, Peric K (2020) The role of renewable energy resources in alleviating energy poverty in Palestine. Renew Energy Focus 35:97–107
Handelman JM, Arnold SJ (1999) The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: appeals to the institutional environment. J Mark 63:33–48
Hassan ST, Batool B, Zhu B, Khan I (2022) Environmental complexity of globalization, education, and income inequalities: new insights of energy poverty. J Clean Prod 340:130735
Hassan ST, Wang P, Khan I, Zhu B (2023) The impact of economic complexity, technology advancements, and nuclear energy consumption on the ecological footprint of the USA: towards circular economy initiatives. Gondwana Res 113:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.11.001
Hoang AT, Nižetić S, Olcer AI, Ong HC, Chen W-H, Chong CT, Thomas S, Bandh SA, Nguyen XP (2021) Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the global energy system and the shift progress to renewable energy: opportunities, challenges, and policy implications. Energy Policy 154:112322
Irfan M, Zhao ZY, Ahmad M, Batool K, Jan A, Mukeshimana MC (2019) Competitive assessment of Indian wind power industry: a five forces model. J Renew Sustain Energy 11:063301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5116237
Jain MK (2015) Is Companies Act 2013 forcing corporate to do charity?: a critical analysis of CSR regime of new corporate legislature of India
Jain N, Thomas A, Gupta V, Ossorio M, Porcheddu D (2022) Stimulating CSR learning collaboration by the mentor universities with digital tools and technologies–an empirical study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Manag Decis. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2021-1679
Jessel S, Sawyer S, Hernández D (2019) Energy, poverty, and health in climate change: a comprehensive review of an emerging literature. Front Public Heal 7:357. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00357
Jiao X, Zhang P, He L, Li Z (2022) Business sustainability for competitive advantage: identifying the role of green intellectual capital, environmental management accounting and energy efficiency. Econ Res Istraživanja 36:2125035. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2125035
Jokhan A, Chand AA, Singh V, Mamun KA (2022) Increased digital resource consumption in higher educational institutions and the artificial intelligence role in informing decisions related to student performance. Sustainability 14:2377. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042377
Kaur S, Tandon N (2017) The role of corporate social responsibility in India. Res J Commer Behav Res 6:29–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740500284524
Kersey J, Terhorst L, Heinemann AW, Hammel J, Baum C, McCue M, Skidmore ER (2022) Construct validity of the enfranchisement scale of the community participation indicators. Clin Rehabil 36:263–271
Khan SAR, Zhang Y, Anees M, Golpîra H, Lahmar A, Qianli D (2018) Green supply chain management, economic growth and environment: a GMM based evidence. J Clean Prod 185:588–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.226
Khan SAR, Jian C, Zhang Y, Golpîra H, Kumar A, Sharif A (2019) Environmental, social and economic growth indicators spur logistics performance: from the perspective of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod 214:1011–1023
Khandker SR, Barnes DF, Samad HA (2010) Energy poverty in rural and urban India: are the energy poor also income poor? The World Bank Policy Research. Working Paper 5463
Khandker SR, Samad HA, Sadeque ZKM, Asaduzzaman M, Yunus M, Haque AKE (2014) Surge in solar-powered homes: experience in off-grid rural Bangladesh. World Bank Publ. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0374-1
Khmara Y, Kronenberg J (2020) Degrowth in the context of sustainability transitions: in search of a common ground. J Clean Prod 267:122072
Kiehbadroudinezhad M, Merabet A, Abo-Khalil AG, Salameh T, Ghenai C (2022) Intelligent and optimized microgrids for future supply power from renewable energy resources: a review. Energies 15:3359. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093359
Krishnamurti C, Shams S, Velayutham E (2018) Corporate social responsibility and corruption risk: a global perspective. J Contemp Account Econ 14:1–21
Kuah ATH, Xia Y, Wang P (2022) How Do corporate social responsibility engagements drive consumer–company identification in Singapore? Sustainability 14:6080. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106080
Kumar M (2020) Social, economic, and environmental impacts of renewable energy resources. Wind Solar Hybrid Renew Energy Syst. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89494
Kung C-C, McCarl BA (2018) Sustainable energy development under climate change. Sustainability 10:3269
Kyprianou I, Serghides DK, Varo A, Gouveia JP, Kopeva D, Murauskaite L (2019) Energy poverty policies and measures in 5 EU countries: a comparative study. Energy Build 196:46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.003
Lan J, Khan SU, Sadiq M, Chien F, Baloch ZA (2022) Evaluating energy poverty and its effects using multi-dimensional based DEA-like mathematical composite indicator approach: findings from Asia. Energy Policy 165:112933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112933
Lang M, Lane R, Zhao K, Raven R (2022) Energy efficiency in the private rental sector in Victoria, Australia: when and why do small-scale private landlords retrofit? Energy Res Soc Sci 88:102533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102533
Lazanyuk I, Ratner S, Matyushok V (2023) Prospects and barriers for renewable microgeneration in India. Int J Energy Econ Policy 13:307. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.13857
Le TT (2022) Corporate social responsibility and SMEs’ performance: mediating role of corporate image, corporate reputation and customer loyalty. Int J Emerg Mark. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2021-1164/FULL/PDF
Lecka I, Gudowski J, Wołowiec T (2022) CSR in Poland and the implementation of sustainable development goals in the energy sector during the COVID-19 pandemic. Energies 15:7057
Li W, Chien F, Hsu CC, Zhang YQ, Nawaz MA, Iqbal S, Mohsin M (2021) Nexus between energy poverty and energy efficiency: estimating the long-run dynamics. Resour Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102063
Li M, Trencher G, Asuka J (2022) The clean energy claims of BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell: a mismatch between discourse, actions and investments. PLoS One 17:e0263596. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263596
Li S, Samour A, Irfan M, Ali M (2023) Role of renewable energy and fiscal policy on trade adjusted carbon emissions: evaluating the role of environmental policy stringency. Renew Energy 205:156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.047
Liu J, Jain V, Sharma P, Ali SA, Shabbir MS, Ramos-Meza CS (2022) The role of sustainable development goals to eradicate the multidimensional energy poverty and improve social Wellbeing’s. Energy Strateg Rev 42:100885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100885
Liu D, Wang G, Sun C, Majeed MT, Andlib Z (2023) An analysis of the effects of human capital on green growth: effects and transmission channels. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:10149–10156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24812-w
Lu J, Ren L, Yao S, Qiao J, Strielkowski W, Streimikis J (2019) Comparative review of corporate social responsibility of energy utilities and sustainable energy development trends in the Baltic states. Energies 12:3417. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12183417
Lu H, Liu X, Falkenberg L (2022) Investigating the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on risk management practices. Bus Soc 61:496–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320928981
Majid MA (2020) Renewable energy for sustainable development in India: current status, future prospects, challenges, employment, and investment opportunities. Energy Sustain Soc 10:1–36
Mapelli F, Arena M, Azzone G (2016) What drivers determine CSR strategies in the energy industry? Evidence from Italy, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Sustainability, Energy & the Environment
Márquez DI, Pérez BF (2015) Corporate social responsibility: The role of codes of conduct in fostering environmental sustainability in Latin America, in: DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting. Sveučilište u Dubrovniku 113–126
Mastropietro P (2022) Energy poverty in pandemic times: fine-tuning emergency measures for better future responses to extreme events in Spain. Energy Res Soc Sci 84:102364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102364
Miao Y, Razzaq A, Adebayo TS, Awosusi AA (2022) Do renewable energy consumption and financial globalisation contribute to ecological sustainability in newly industrialized countries? Renew Energy 187:688–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.073
Mitra N, Schmidpeter R (2017) The why, what and how of the CSR mandate: the India story, in: Corporate Social Responsibility in India. Springer, 1–8
Muhammad JA, Shittu AA, Mohammed YD, Ebohimen J (2022) Development of model for implementation of safety measures for small and medium sized construction firms in Abuja, Nigeria using partial least square-structural equation modelling
Mukherjee S, Karmakar AK (2022) Modelling energy poverty and energy inequality into India’s energy policy, in: The United Nations and sustainable development goals. Springer, pp 223–236
Mutezo G, Mulopo J (2021) A review of Africa’s transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy using circular economy principles. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 137:110609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110609
Nasir MH, Wen J, Nassani AA, Haffar M, Igharo AE, Musibau HO, Waqas M (2022) Energy security and energy poverty in emerging economies: a step towards sustainable energy efficiency. Front Energy Res 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.834614
Nawab F, Abd Hamid AS, Arif M, Khan TA, Naveed A, Sadiq M, Imad Ud din S, Ibrahim A (2022) Solar–biogas microgrid: a strategy for the sustainable development of rural communities in Pakistan. Sustainability 14:11124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811124
Nguyen LT, Ratnasiri S, Wagner L (2023) Does income affect climbing the energy ladder? A new utility-based approach for measuring energy poverty. Energy J 44(4). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.44.4.lngu
Ning Y, Cherian J, Sial MS, Álvarez-Otero S, Comite U, Zia-Ud-Din M (2022) Green bond as a new determinant of sustainable green financing, energy efficiency investment, and economic growth: a global perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-18454-7/TABLES/10
Nisipeanu S, Damian G-S, Cârtâna C, Bantaş A, Serafim A (2011) CSR contribution to sustainable development in the energetic sector. J Sustain Energy 2:97–102
Nizam E, Ng A, Dewandaru G, Nagayev R, Nkoba MA (2019) The impact of social and environmental sustainability on financial performance: a global analysis of the banking sector. J Multinatl Financ Manag 49:35–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2019.01.002
Nurunnabi M, Esquer J, Munguia N, Zepeda D, Perez R, Velazquez L (2020) Reaching the sustainable development goals 2030: energy efficiency as an approach to corporate social responsibility (CSR). GeoJournal 85:363–374
Opeyemi BM (2021) Path to sustainable energy consumption: the possibility of substituting renewable energy for non-renewable energy. Energy 228:120519
Orlitzky M, Siegel DS, Waldman DA (2011) Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Bus Soc 50:6–27
Pachauri MY (2022) Status of renewable purchase obligations (RPOS) in India: an effective tool to indorse solar energy. J Posit Sch Psychol 9336–9351
Pai V, Chandra S (2022) Exploring factors influencing organizational adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives. Pacific Asia J Assoc Inf Syst 14:4
Papantonis D, Tzani D, Burbidge M, Stavrakas V, Bouzarovski S, Flamos A (2022) How to improve energy efficiency policies to address energy poverty? Literature and stakeholder insights for private rented housing in Europe. Energy Res Soc Sci 93:102832
Partalidou X, Zafeiriou E, Giannarakis G, Sariannidis N (2020) The effect of corporate social responsibility performance on financial performance: the case of food industry. Benchmarking an Int J 27:2701–2720. https://doi.org/10.6226/NTUMR.202008_30(2).0007
Pata UK (2021) Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: a sustainability perspective. Renew Energy 173:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2021.03.125
Patel CSD, Patel NK, Patel NK (2020) COVID-19 and corporate governance (India): practical issues, implications and new relief measures. COVID-19 Corp. Gov. Pract. Issues, Implic. New Reli. Meas. (September 11, 2020)
Peña-Miranda DD, Guevara-Plaza A, Fraiz-Brea JA, Camilleri MA (2022) Corporate social responsibility model for a competitive and resilient hospitality industry. Sustain Dev 30:433–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2259
Perera S, Dissanayake S, Fernando D, De Silva S, Rankothge W (2019) Supply and demand planning of electricity power: a comprehensive solution, in: 2019 IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technology. IEEE, pp 1–6
Perišić M, Barceló E, Dimic-Misic K, Imani M, Spasojević Brkić V (2022) The role of bioeconomy in the future energy scenario: a state-of-the-art review. Sustainability 14:560. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010560
Philo G, Happer C (2013) Communicating climate change and energy security: new methods in understanding audiences. Routledge
Pollitt MG (2012) The role of policy in energy transitions: lessons from the energy liberalisation era. Energy Policy 50:128–137
Priede T, Hilliard I, López-Cózar C (2014) Parallel paths—a comparison of CSR firms and social enterprises. J US-China Public Adm 11:852–861
Rafi M, Naseef M, Prasad S (2021) Multidimensional energy poverty and human capital development: empirical evidence from India. Energy Econ 101:105427
Rahman A, Farrok O, Haque MM (2022) Environmental impact of renewable energy source based electrical power plants: solar, wind, hydroelectric, biomass, geothermal, tidal, ocean, and osmotic. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 161:112279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112279
Saad W, Taleb A (2018) The causal relationship between renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from Europe. Clean Technol Environ Policy 20:127–136
Safdar S, Khan A, Andlib Z (2022) Impact of good governance and natural resource rent on economic and environmental sustainability: an empirical analysis for South Asian economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21401-9
Saqib N, Sharif A, Razzaq A, Usman M (2022) Integration of renewable energy and technological innovation in realizing environmental sustainability: the role of human capital in EKC framework. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16372–16385 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23345-6
Saqib N, Ozturk I, Usman M, Sharif A, Razzaq A (2023) Pollution haven or halo? How European countries leverage FDI, Energy, and human capital to alleviate their ecological footprint. Gondwana Res 116:136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.12.018
Sesan T, Raman S, Clifford M, Forbes I (2013) Corporate-led sustainable development and energy poverty alleviation at the bottom of the pyramid: the case of the CleanCook in Nigeria. World Dev 45:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.10.009
Sharif A, Bhattacharya M, Afshan S, Shahbaz M (2021) Disaggregated renewable energy sources in mitigating CO2 emissions: new evidence from the USA using quantile regressions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:57582–57601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13829-2
Sharif A, Saqib N, Dong K, Khan SAR (2022) Nexus between green technology innovation, green financing, and CO2 emissions in the G7 countries: the moderating role of social globalisation. Sustain Dev 30(6):1934–1946.
Sharif A, Kartal MT, Bekun FV, Pata UK, Foon CL, Depren SK (2023) Role of green technology, environmental taxes, and green energy towards sustainable environment: insights from sovereign Nordic countries by CS-ARDL approach. Gondwana Res 117:194–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.01.009
Sharma E (2019) A review of corporate social responsibility in developed and developing nations. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 26:712–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1739
Sharma S, Sood YR (2022) Microgrids: a review of status, technologies, software tools, and issues in Indian power market. IETE Tech Rev 39:411–432
Sharma SV, Han P, Sharma VK (2019) Socio-economic determinants of energy poverty amongst Indian households: a case study of Mumbai. Energy Policy 132:1184–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.068
Sharma GD, Tiwari AK, Erkut B, Mundi HS (2021) Exploring the nexus between non-renewable and renewable energy consumptions and economic development: evidence from panel estimations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 146:111152
Sidhoum AA, Serra T (2017) Corporate social responsibility and dimensions of performance: an application to US electric utilities. Util Policy 48:1–11
Singh K, Misra M (2022) The evolving path of CSR: toward business and society relationship. J Econ Adm Sci 38:304–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-04-2020-0052
Siyal S, Ahmad R, Riaz S, Xin C, Fangcheng T (2022) The impact of corporate culture on corporate social responsibility: role of reputation and corporate sustainability. Sustainability 14:10105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610105
Sovacool BK (2012) The political economy of energy poverty: a review of key challenges. Energy Sustain Dev 16:272–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.05.006
Stephan T, Al-Turjman F, Ravishankar M, Stephan P (2022) Machine learning analysis on the impacts of COVID-19 on India’s renewable energy transitions and air quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:79443–79465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20997-2
Stjepcevic J, Siksnelyte I (2017) Corporate social responsibility in energy sector. Transform Bus Econ 16:40
Streimikiene D, Kyriakopoulos GL (2023) Energy poverty and low carbon energy transition. Energies 16:610. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020610
Sun Y, Chang H, Vasbieva DG, Andlib Z (2022) Economic performance, investment in energy resources, foreign trade, and natural resources volatility nexus: evidence from China’s provincial data. Resour Policy 78:102913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102913
Sy SA, Mokaddem L (2022) Energy poverty in developing countries: a review of the concept and its measurements. Energy Res Soc Sci 89:102562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102562
Tapang AT, Bassey BE (2017) Effect of corporate social responsibility performance on stakeholder’s perception of telecommunication companies in Nigeria (a study of MTN, Globalcom & Etisalat). J Bus Manag 19:39–55. https://doi.org/10.9790/487x-1906053955
Tiep LT, Huan NQ, Hong TTT (2021a) Role of corporate social responsibility in sustainable energy development in emerging economy. Int J Energy Econ Policy 11:172–186. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10774
Tiep NC, Wang M, Mohsin M, Kamran HW, Yazdi FA (2021b) An assessment of power sector reforms and utility performance to strengthen consumer self-confidence towards private investment. Econ Anal Policy 69:676–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.01.005
Tiurina A, Petrunenko I, Guliyeva S, Qazizade E, Aliyeva T (2023) Social responsibility and modern business during the global crisis: threat or opportunity for the GUAM member countries. J East Eur Cent Asian Res 10:201–212
Tong SC (2022) Public relations practice in the digital era: trust and commitment in the interplay of interactivity effects and online relational strategies. J Mark Commun 28:799–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2021.1951814
Tsalis TA, Malamateniou KE, Koulouriotis D, Nikolaou IE (2020) New challenges for corporate sustainability reporting: United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for sustainable development and the sustainable development goals. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 27:1617–1629. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1910
Tsao Y-C, Thanh V-V, Chang Y-Y, Wei H-H (2021) COVID-19: Government subsidy models for sustainable energy supply with disruption risks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 150:111425
Ursule FO, Judith H, Clara NT (2022) A Systematic PLS-SEM Approach to an assessment of unemployment among university graduates in Madagascar. Adv Appl Sociol 12:423–438
Villanthenkodath MA, Mahalik MK (2022) Does overseas eco-friendly innovation collaboration matter for environmental quality sustainability in India? OPEC Energy Rev 46:250–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/opec.12232
Wang Y, Lin B (2022) Can energy poverty be alleviated by targeting the low income? Constructing a multidimensional energy poverty index in China. Appl Energy 321:119374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119374
Wang B, Li H-N, Yuan X-C, Sun Z-M (2017) Energy poverty in China: a dynamic analysis based on a hybrid panel data decision model. Energies 10:1942. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10121942
Wang W, Xiao W, Bai C (2022) Can renewable energy technology innovation alleviate energy poverty? Perspective from the marketization level. Technol Soc 68:101933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101933
Wangzhou K, Wen JJ, Wang Z, Wang H, Hao C, Andlib Z (2022) Revealing the nexus between tourism development and CO2 emissions in Asia: does asymmetry matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:79016–79024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21339-y
Weder F, Koinig I, Voci D (2019) Antagonistic framing of sustainability by energy suppliers: dissecting corporate CSR messages in a cross-cultural comparison. Corp Commun An Int J 24(2):368–390
Wu B, Liu S, Wang J, Tahir S, Patwary AK (2021) Assessing the mechanism of energy efficiency and energy poverty alleviation based on environmental regulation policy measures. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:40858–40870
Xie Q, Adebayo TS, Irfan M, Altuntaş M (2022) Race to environmental sustainability: Can renewable energy consumption and technological innovation sustain the strides for China? Renew. Energy 197:320–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.138
Xue Y, Jiang C, Guo Y, Liu J, Wu H, Hao Y (2022) Corporate social responsibility and high-quality development: do green innovation, environmental investment and corporate governance matter? Emerg Mark Financ Trade 58:3191–3214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2022.2034616
Ye J, Al-Fadly A, Huy PQ, Ngo TQ, Hung DDP, Tien NH (2022) The nexus among green financial development and renewable energy: investment in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. http://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=rero20&page=instructions; https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2035241
Yu L, Gao X, Lyu J, Feng Y, Zhang S, Andlib Z (2022) Green growth and environmental sustainability in China: the role of environmental taxes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:22702–22711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23355-4
Zhao J, Dong K, Dong X, Shahbaz M (2022a) How renewable energy alleviate energy poverty? A Global Analysis Renew Energy 186:299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.005
Zhao X, Ramzan M, Sengupta T, Deep Sharma G, Shahzad U, Cui L, (2022b) Impacts of bilateral trade on energy affordability and accessibility across Europe: does economic globalization reduce energy poverty? Energy Build 262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112023
Zheng S, Irfan M, Ai F, Al-Faryan MAS (2023) Do renewable energy, urbanisation, and natural resources enhance environmental quality in China? Evidence from novel bootstrap Fourier Granger causality in quantiles. Resour Policy 81:103354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103354
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Kiran Batool: writing—original draft, formal analysis, data handling, variable construction, and methodology. Zhen-Y Zhao: conceptualization and supervision. Muhammad Irfan: software and writing review and editing. Justyna Żywiołek: writing review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This research study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines. The Institutional Review Board of North China Electric Power University has approved (protocol code 00437–8 on 27 March 2022) the study.
Consent for publication
Informed consent was obtained from all respondents belonging to this research study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Table 14
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Batool, K., Zhao, ZY., Irfan, M. et al. Assessing the role of sustainable strategies in alleviating energy poverty: an environmental sustainability paradigm. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 67109–67130 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27076-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27076-0