Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

What drives responsible innovation in polluting small and medium enterprises?: an appraisal of leather manufacturing sector

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Responsible innovation (RI) has always been a major topic in discussions about environmental concerns, such as the depletion of natural resources, economic advancement, climate change, and social responsibility. Still, its incorporation in the business field is in its early stages, particularly among small and medium enterprises (SMEs). This research aims to investigate the influence of internal and external drivers on RI and sustainable competitive advantage (SCA). The hypotheses of the study are examined through the Structural equation modeling (SEM) technique, and data were gathered from 291 owners/managers of leather manufacturing SMEs through simple random sampling. The study found that external drivers significantly and positively impact RI strategies, whereas internal drivers have an insignificant relationship with RI strategies. Furthermore, RI strategies have a significant and positive relationship with SCA. This study adds to the existing literature by focusing on predictors that impact SCA. This initial study examines the influence of external and internal drivers on RI and SCA using dynamic capability theory and institutional theory. On these bases, relevant recommendations have been made to promote RI from the perspective of the government and SMEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data is available with authors and available on reasonable request.

References

  • Abbasi KR, Hussain K, Haddad AM, Salman A, Ozturk I (2022) The role of financial development and technological innovation towards sustainable development in Pakistan: fresh insights from consumption and territory-based emissions. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 176:121444

    Google Scholar 

  • Abd Aziz NN, Samad S (2016) Innovation and competitive advantage: moderating effects of firm age in foods manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia Econ Financ 35:256–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Adomako S, Tran MD (2022) Environmental collaboration, responsible innovation, and firm performance: the moderating role of stakeholder pressure. Bus Strat Environ 31:1695–1704

  • Afshan S, Yaqoob T (2022) The potency of eco-innovation, natural resource and financial development on ecological footprint: a quantile-ARDL-based evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:50675–50685

  • Agan Y, Acar MF, Borodin A (2013) Drivers of environmental processes and their impact on performance: a study of Turkish SMEs. J Clean Prod 51:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Alaskari O, Pinedo-Cuenca R, Ahmad M (2021) Framework for implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): a case study. Procedia Manufact 55:424–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Albino V, Dangelico RM, Pontrandolfo P (2012) Do inter-organizational collaborations enhance a firm’s environmental performance? A study of the largest US companies. J Clean Prod 37:304–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali S, Dogan E, Chen F, Khan Z (2021) International trade and environmental performance in top ten-emitters countries: the role of eco-innovation and renewable energy consumption. Sustain Dev 29(2):378–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Alola AA, Ozturk I, Bekun FV (2021) Is clean energy prosperity and technological innovation rapidly mitigating sustainable energy-development deficit in selected sub-Saharan Africa? A Myth or Reality Energy Policy 158:112520

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer A, Jarmai K (2018) Implementing responsible research and innovation practices in SMEs: insights into drivers and barriers from the Austrian medical device sector. Sustainability 10(1):17

    Google Scholar 

  • Avram DO, Kühne S (2008) Implementing responsible business behavior from a strategic management perspective: developing a framework for Austrian SMEs. J Bus Ethics 82(2):463–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayuso S, Rodríguez MÁ, Ricart JE (2006) Using stakeholder dialogue as a source for new ideas: a dynamic capability underlying sustainable innovation. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society

  • Bacq S, Aguilera RV (2022) Stakeholder governance for responsible innovation: a theory of value creation, appropriation, and distribution. J Manage Stud 59(1):29–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahena-Álvarez IL, Cordón-Pozo E, Delgado-Cruz A (2019) Social entrepreneurship in the conduct of responsible innovation: analysis cluster in Mexican SMEs. Sustainability 11(13):3714

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker WE, Sinkula JM (2005) Environmental marketing strategy and firm performance: effects on new product performance and market share. J Acad Mark Sci 33(4):461–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakos J, Siu M, Orengo A, Kasiri N (2020) An analysis of environmental sustainability in small & medium-sized enterprises: Patterns and trends. Bus Strateg Environ 29(3):1285–1296

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian S, Shukla V, Mangla S, Chanchaichujit J (2021) Do firm characteristics affect environmental sustainability? A literature review-based assessment. Bus Strateg Environ 30(2):1389–1416

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee SB, Iyer ES, Kashyap RK (2003) Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. J Mark 67(2):106–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker J-M, Cheah J-H, Gholamzade R, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2022) PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management (ahead-of-print)

  • Bell S, Teima G (2015) Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) finance. The World Bank available at: www.worldbank.org/en/topic/financialsector/brief/smes-finance (accessed 18 August 2016)

  • Blackman A, Bannister GJ (1998) Community pressure and clean technology in the informal sector: an econometric analysis of the adoption of propane by traditional Mexican brickmakers. J Environ Econ Manag 35(1):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Borah PS, Iqbal S, Akhtar S (2022) Linking social media usage and SME’s sustainable performance: the role of digital leadership and innovation capabilities. Technol Soc 68:101900

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghesi S, Crespi F, D’Amato A, Mazzanti M, Silvestri F (2015) Carbon abatement, sector heterogeneity and policy responses: evidence on induced eco innovations in the EU. Environ Sci Policy 54:377–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer S, Hoejmose S, Marchant K (2012) Environmental management in SME s in the UK: practices, pressures and perceived benefits. Bus Strateg Environ 21(7):423–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlea-Schiopoiu A, Mihai LS (2019) An integrated framework on the sustainability of SMEs. Sustainability 11(21):6026

    Google Scholar 

  • Buysse K, Verbeke A (2003) Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strateg Manag J 24(5):453–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai W, Li G (2018) The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 176:110–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan C, Ananthram S (2020) A neo-institutional perspective on ethical decision-making. Asia Pac J Manag 37(1):227–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S, Chaudhuri R, Vrontis D (2021) Antecedents and consequence of frugal and responsible innovation in Asia: through the lens of organization capabilities and culture. Asia Pac J Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09797-3

  • Chen Y-S, Lai S-B, Wen C-T (2006) The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. J Bus Ethics 67(4):331–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiou T-Y, Chan HK, Lettice F, Chung SH (2011) The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transp Res Part E: Log Transp Rev 47(6):822–836

    Google Scholar 

  • Colantoni A, Recchia L, Bernabei G, Cardarelli M, Rouphael Y, Colla G (2017) Analyzing the environmental impact of chemically-produced protein hydrolysate from leather waste vs. enzymatically-produced protein hydrolysate from legume grains. Agriculture 7(8):62

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrey AL, Lee HB (1992) A first course in factor analysis. Psychology press, New York

  • Dangelico RM, Pujari D, Pontrandolfo P (2017) Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: a sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Bus Strateg Environ 26(4):490–506

    Google Scholar 

  • de Guimaraes JCF, Severo EA, de Vasconcelos CRM (2018) The influence of entrepreneurial, market, knowledge management orientations on cleaner production and the sustainable competitive advantage. J Clean Prod 174:1653–1663

    Google Scholar 

  • DiBella J, Forrest N, Burch S, Rao‐Williams J, Ninomiya SM, Hermelingmeier V, Chisholm K (2022) Exploring the potential of SMEs to build individual, organizational, and community resilience through sustainability‐oriented business practices. Bus Strateg Environ

  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (2000) The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In Economics meets sociology in strategic management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited 17:143–66

  • Epede MB, Wang D (2022) Global value chain linkages: an integrative review of the opportunities and challenges for SMEs in developing countries. Int Bus Rev 31:101993

  • Fraaije A, Flipse SM (2020) Synthesizing an implementation framework for responsible research and innovation. J  Res Inn 7(1):113–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge B, Yang Y, Jiang D, Gao Y, Du X, Zhou T (2018) An empirical study on green innovation strategy and sustainable competitive advantages: path and boundary. Sustainability 10(10):3631

    Google Scholar 

  • Giotopoulos I, Kontolaimou A, Korra E, Tsakanikas A (2017) What drives ICT adoption by SMEs? Evidence from a large-scale survey in Greece. J Bus Res 81:60–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales-Gemio C, Cruz-Cázares C, Parmentier MJ (2020) Responsible innovation in smes: a systematic literature review for a conceptual model. Sustainability 12(24):10232

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Pakistan (2021–2022) Pakistan Economic Survey. Islamabad: Ministry of Finance

  • Guoyou Q, Saixing Z, Chiming T, Haitao Y, Hailiang Z (2013) Stakeholders’ influences on corporate green innovation strategy: a case study of manufacturing firms in China. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 20(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta G, Bose I (2019) Strategic learning for digital market pioneering: Examining the transformation of Wishberry’s crowdfunding model. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 146:865–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürlek M, Tuna M (2018) Reinforcing competitive advantage through green organizational culture and green innovation. Serv Ind J 38(7–8):467–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadj TB (2020) Effects of corporate social responsibility towards stakeholders and environmental management on responsible innovation and competitiveness. J Clean Prod 250:119490

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2014) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications, London

  • Hall BH, Moncada-Paternò-Castello P, Montresor S, Vezzani A (2016) Financing constraints, R&D investments and innovative performances: new empirical evidence at the firm level for Europe. Eco Inn N Tech 5:183–196

  • Halme M, Korpela M (2014) Responsible innovation toward sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises: a resource perspective. Bus Strateg Environ 23(8):547–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan MN, Anastasiadis S, Spence LJ (2021) Polluting SMEs and the construction of their environmental behaviours: evidence from Bangladesh. Bus Strat Dev 4(2):109–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43(1):115–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesterly W, Barney J (2008) Strategic management and competitive advantage. In: Essex: Pearson Education Limited. Retrieved from: www.pearson.com/us

  • Iqbal S, Moleiro Martins J, Nuno Mata M, Naz S, Akhtar S, Abreu A (2021) Linking entrepreneurial orientation with innovation performance in SMEs; the role of organizational commitment and transformational leadership using smart PLS-SEM. Sustainability 13(8):4361

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D, Lund-Thomsen P, Khara N (2017) CSR institutionalized myths in developing countries: an imminent threat of selective decoupling. Bus Soc 56(3):454–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanda W, Hjelm O, Clausen J, Bienkowska D (2018) Roles of intermediaries in supporting eco-innovation. J Clean Prod 205:1006–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan SH, Majid A, Yasir M, Javed A, Shah HA (2021) The role of social capital in augmenting strategic renewal of SMEs: does entrepreneurial orientation and organizational flexibility really matter? World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development 17:227–245

  • Kraus S, Rehman SU, García FJS (2020) Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: the mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 160:120262

    Google Scholar 

  • Küçükoğlu MT, Pınar Rİ (2015) Positive influences of green innovation on company performance. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 195:1232–1237

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuleto V, Stanescu M, Ranković M, Šević NP, Păun D, Teodorescu S (2021) Extended reality in higher education, a responsible innovation approach for generation y and generation z. Sustainability 13(21):11814

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee V-H, Foo AT-L, Leong L-Y, Ooi K-B (2016) Can competitive advantage be achieved through knowledge management? A case study on SMEs. Expert Syst Appl 65:136–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenox M, Ehrenfeld J (1997) Organizing for effective environmental design. Bus Strateg Environ 6(4):187–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingyan M, Zhao Z, Malik HA, Razzaq A, An H, Hassan M (2022) Asymmetric impact of fiscal decentralization and environmental innovation on carbon emissions: evidence from highly decentralized countries. Energy Environ 33(4):752–782

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Fan B (2022) Roles of institutions and dynamic capability in the relationship between collaboration and performance in emergency management: evidence from 110 cases in Shanghai. J Chin Govern. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2022.2131988

  • Lubberink R, Blok V, Van Ophem J, Omta O (2017) Lessons for responsible innovation in the business context: a systematic literature review of responsible, social and sustainable innovation practices. Sustainability 9(5):721

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Thomsen P, Jamali D, Vives A (2014) CSR in SMEs: an analysis of donor-financed management tools. Soc Res J 10:602–619

  • Mady K, Abdul Halim MAS, Omar K, Abdelkareem RS, Battour M (2022) Institutional pressure and eco-innovation: the mediating role of green absorptive capacity and strategically environmental orientation among manufacturing SMEs in Egypt. Cogent Bus Manag 9(1):2064259

    Google Scholar 

  • Mady K, Halim MASA, Omar K (2021) Drivers of multiple eco-innovation and the impact on sustainable competitive advantage: evidence from manufacturing SMEs in Egypt. Int J Innov Sci 14(1):40–61

  • Mahlouji H, Anaraki NK (2009) Corporate social responsibility towards social responsible innovation: a dynamic capability approach. Int Rev Bus Res Pap 5(6):185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrucci L, Corcelli F, Daddi T, Iraldo F (2022) Using a life cycle assessment to identify the risk of “circular washing” in the leather industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 185:106466

    Google Scholar 

  • Moktadir MA, Rahman MM (2022) Energy production from leather solid wastes by anaerobic digestion: a critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 161:112378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Müller JM, Buliga O, Voigt K-I (2021) The role of absorptive capacity and innovation strategy in the design of industry 4.0 business Models-A comparison between SMEs and large enterprises. Eur Manag J 39(3):333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.002

    Google Scholar 

  • Murad MW, Alam MM, Noman AHM, Ozturk I (2019) Dynamics of technological innovation, energy consumption, energy price and economic growth in Denmark. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 38(1):22–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muralidharan V, Palanivel S, Balaraman M (2022) Turning problem into possibility: a comprehensive review on leather solid waste intra-valorization attempts for leather processing. J Clean Prod 367:133021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133021

  • Nasco SA, Toledo EG, Mykytyn PP Jr (2008) Predicting electronic commerce adoption in Chilean SMEs. J Bus Res 61(6):697–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (2002) Evolutionary theorizing in economics. J Econ Perspect 16(2):23–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbeibu S, Pereira V, Burgess J, Gaskin J, Emelifeonwu J, Tarba SY, Arslan A (2021) Responsible innovation in organisations–unpacking the effects of leader trustworthiness and organizational culture on employee creativity. Asia Pac J Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09784-8

  • Olmos L, Ruester S, Liong S-J (2012) On the selection of financing instruments to push the development of new technologies: application to clean energy technologies. Energy Policy 43:252–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Padda IUH, Asim M (2019) What determines compliance with cleaner production? An appraisal of the tanning industry in Sialkot, Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(2):1733–1750

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrilli MD, Balavac-Orlić M, Radicic D (2022) Environmental innovation across SMEs in Europe. Technovation 102541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102541

  • Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Prajogo D, McDermott CM (2014) Antecedents of service innovation in SMEs: comparing the effects of external and internal factors. J Small Bus Manage 52(3):521–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratono AH, Darmasetiawan NK, Yudiarso A, Jeong BG (2019) Achieving sustainable competitive advantage through green entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation: The role of inter-organizational learning. The Bottom Line 32:2–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-10-2018-0045

  • Quaye D, Mensah I (2019) Marketing innovation and sustainable competitive advantage of manufacturing SMEs in Ghana. Manag Decis 57(7):1535–1553. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2017-0784

  • Rehman SU, Kraus S, Shah SA, Khanin D, Mahto RV (2021) Analyzing the relationship between green innovation and environmental performance in large manufacturing firms. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 163:120481

    Google Scholar 

  • Reverte C, Gomez-Melero E, Cegarra-Navarro JG (2016) The influence of corporate social responsibility practices on organizational performance: evidence from Eco-Responsible Spanish firms. J Clean Prod 112:2870–2884

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers C (2010) Sustainable entrepreneurship in SMEs: a case study analysis. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 17(3):125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo MV, Fouts PA (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad Manag J 40(3):534–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Sáez-Martínez FJ, Díaz-García C, González-Moreno Á (2016) Factors promoting environmental responsibility in European SMEs: the effect on performance. Sustainability 8(9):898

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanni M (2018) Drivers of eco-innovation in the manufacturing sector of Nigeria. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 131:303–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarin S, Mahajan V (2001) The effect of reward structures on the performance of cross-functional product development teams. J Mark 65(2):35–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiessl D, Korelo JC, Cherobim APMS (2022) Corporate social responsibility and the impact on economic value added: the role of environmental innovation. Eur Bus Rev 34(3):396–410. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-03-2021-0071

  • Sellitto MA, Camfield CG, Buzuku S (2020) Green innovation and competitive advantages in a furniture industrial cluster: a survey and structural model. Sustain Prod Consump 23:94–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Aragón-Correa JA, Rueda-Manzanares A (2007) The contingent influence of organizational capabilities on proactive environmental strategy in the service sector: an analysis of North American and European ski resorts. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L’administration 24(4):268–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson M, Taylor N, Barker K (2004) Environmental responsibility in SMEs: does it deliver competitive advantage? Bus Strateg Environ 13(3):156–171

    Google Scholar 

  • SMEDA (2009) “SME sector genesis, challenges and prospects”. Retrieved December 25 from www.smeda.org/index.php?option=com_phocadownload&view=category&id=46:smeda-publications&Itemid=566/. Accessed 29 June 2021

  • SMEDA (2022) Estimating SMEs contribution to manufacturing sector GDP employment and exports Accessed 21 June 2022

  • Stahl BC (2022) Responsible innovation ecosystems: ethical implications of the application of the ecosystem concept to artificial intelligence. Int J Inf Manage 62:102441

    Google Scholar 

  • Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42(9):1568–1580

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby R, Seidl D, Lê JK (2013) Strategy-as-practice meets neo-institutional theory. Strat Org 11(3):329–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013497618

  • Sun Y, Bi K, Yin S (2020) Measuring and integrating risk management into green innovation practices for green manufacturing under the global value chain. Sustainability 12(2):545

    Google Scholar 

  • Surya B, Menne F, Sabhan H, Suriani S, Abubakar H, Idris M (2021) Economic growth, increasing productivity of SMEs, and open innovation. J Open Innov: Technol, Market, Complex 7(1):20

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manag J 28(13):1319–1350

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian H, Tian J (2021) The mediating role of responsible innovation in the relationship between stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance in times of crisis: evidence from selected regions in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(14):7277

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari M, Tiwari T, Sam Santhose S, Mishra L, MR, R, Sundararaj V (2021) Corporate social responsibility and supply chain: a study for evaluating corporate hypocrisy with special focus on stakeholders. Int J Fin Econ. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2483

  • Tran HT, Santarelli E, Wei WX (2022) Open innovation knowledge management in transition to market economy: Integrating dynamic capability and institutional theory. Econ Innov New Technol 31(7):575–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu Y, Wu W (2021) How does green innovation improve enterprises’ competitive advantage? The role of organizational learning. Sustain Prod Consum 26:504–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullah S, Ozturk I, Majeed MT, Ahmad W (2021) Do technological innovations have symmetric or asymmetric effects on environmental quality? Evidence from Pakistan. J Clean Prod 316:128239

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Poel I, Asveld L, Flipse S, Klaassen P, Scholten V, Yaghmaei E (2017) Company strategies for responsible research and innovation (RRI): a conceptual model. Sustainability 9(11):2045

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Song N, Tiep NC, van Tien D, Van Ha T, Phuong NTM, Mai TTH (2022) The role of public-private partnership investment and eco-innovation in environmental abatement in USA: evidence from quantile ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(8):12164–12175

    Google Scholar 

  • Verjel A-M, Schmid J (2015) Possibilities of increasing business sustainability in the context of globalization. The case of the SMEs. Procedia Econ Financ 32:716–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Voegtlin C, Scherer AG (2017) Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: governing sustainable development in a globalized world. J Bus Ethics 143(2):227–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahga AI, Blundel R, Schaefer A (2017) Understanding the drivers of sustainable entrepreneurial practices in Pakistan’s leather industry: a multi-level approach. Int J Entrep Behav Res 24(2):382–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0263

  • Waldron TL, Navis C, Karam EP, Markman GD (2022) Toward a theory of activist-driven responsible innovation: how activists pressure firms to adopt more responsible practices. J Manage Stud 59(1):163–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Du Y, Wang Z, Yu F, Zheng C (2022) Survey of manufacturing systems in SMEs: a focus on cell management. Procedia CIRP 107:1491–1496

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaven S, Quach S, Thaichon P, Frazer L, Billot K, Grace D (2021) Surviving an economic downturn: dynamic capabilities of SMEs. J Bus Res 128:109–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei Z, Lihua H (2022) Effects of tourism and eco-innovation on environmental quality in selected ASEAN countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17541-z

  • Xiang D, Zhao T, Zhang N (2022) How can government environmental policy affect the performance of SMEs: Chinese evidence. J Clean Prod 336:130308

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav PL, Han SH, Kim H (2017) Sustaining competitive advantage through corporate environmental performance. Bus Strateg Environ 26(3):345–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan Y, Chen Y, Miao J (2022) Eco-innovation in SMEs: a scientometric review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:48105–48125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20657-5

  • Yu Y-S, Zhang X, Liu J-W, Lee Y, Li X-S (2021) Natural gas hydrate resources and hydrate technologies: a review and analysis of the associated energy and global warming challenges. Energy Environ Sci 14(11):5611–5668

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zahoor N, Khan H, Khan Z, Akhtar P (2022) Responsible innovation in emerging markets’ SMEs: The role of alliance learning and absorptive capacity. Asia Pac J Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09843-8

  • Zhang SX, Choudhury A, He L (2019) Responsible innovation: the development and validation of a scale. Acad Manag Proc 2019(1):12437. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Liang G, Feng T, Yuan C, Jiang W (2020) Green innovation to respond to environmental regulation: how external knowledge adoption and green absorptive capacity matter? Bus Strateg Environ 29(1):39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Xu Y, Ma L (2022b) Research on successful factors and influencing mechanism of the digital transformation in SMEs. Sustainability 14(5):2549

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Yang J, Liu M (2022c) Enterprises’ energy-saving capability: Empirical study from a dynamic capability perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 162:112450

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Xu X, Wang F, Zhang J (2022a) Does cooperation stimulate firms’ eco-innovation? Firm-level evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:78052–78068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21296-6

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hailey College of Commerce, University of the Punjab, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan

    Adil Riaz & Fouzia Hadi Ali

Authors
  1. Adil Riaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fouzia Hadi Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by R, A and A, F. The first draft of the manuscript was written by R A and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fouzia Hadi Ali.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

All authors give consent to publish.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5

Table 5 Operationalization of variables
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riaz, A., Ali, F.H. What drives responsible innovation in polluting small and medium enterprises?: an appraisal of leather manufacturing sector. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 43536–43553 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25354-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25354-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation