Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are the Brazilian prevention values for copper and zinc in soils suitable for protecting earthworms against metal toxicity?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current Brazilian copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) prevention values (PV) for soil quality do not take into account the ecotoxicological impacts on soil organisms, which suggests these guiding values may not be protective of soil ecological trophic levels. This study assessed the acute (mortality) and chronic toxicity (reproduction), as well as the cumulative (bioaccumulation) potential of Cu and Zn (pseudo-total and available fractions) for earthworms Eisenia andrei in a Tropical Artificial Soil (TAS) and two tropical field soils (Oxisol and Alfisol). Toxicity data based on pseudo-total fractions were compared to PV. The Lowest Observed Effect Concentrations (LOEC) for the mortality endpoint were found at Cu and Zn concentrations higher than their PV (60 and 300 mg kg−1, respectively), regardless of the soil type. However, concentrations lower than PV reduced the reproduction of E. andrei by 20% (compared to the controls) for Cu in all tested soils (EC20s from 31.7 to 51.2 mg kg−1) and by 50% for Zn in Oxisol and Alfisol (EC50s = 225 and 283 mg kg−1, respectively). In TAS, only the EC20 (273 mg kg−1) for Zn was lower than PV. Increases of Cu in earthworm tissues occurred at concentrations higher than PV in all tested soils (LOEC values from 70 to 107 mg kg−1). The same was observed for Zn in TAS (LOEC = 497 mg kg−1), while in the field soils, the increases of Zn in earthworm tissues were lower than PV (LOEC = 131 and 259 mg kg−1 in Alfisol and Oxisol, respectively). We suggest the following: (1) The current Brazilian PV for Cu and Zn are not protective for earthworms (E. andrei) in the field soils tested; (2) PV derived from ecotoxicological assays in artificial soil cannot be representative for Brazilian field soils; (3) Using PV based on the pseudo-total fraction, without a soil-type normalizing factor, may limit the representativeness of this threshold for different soil types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available and should be requested by e-mail.

References

Download references

Funding

TGM received support from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) through a Post-Doctoral fellowship (Process: 2013/22162–2). EJBNC received support from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) as a Research Productivity Grant (Process: 305193/2016–3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TGM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Writing—original draft; PRLA: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing—original draft; EJBNC: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Roger Lopes Alves.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted (Brazilian regimentation for the scientific use of animals—Law no. 11.794). Consent to participate and publication is not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Chris Lowe

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Messias, T.G., Alves, P.R.L. & Cardoso, E.J.B.N. Are the Brazilian prevention values for copper and zinc in soils suitable for protecting earthworms against metal toxicity?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 40641–40653 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-25106-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-25106-x

Keywords

Navigation