Abstract
A stable and complete agricultural horizontal ecological compensation (AHEC) is an essential means of reconciling agricultural ecosystem protection and regional development and is also the key to the sustainable use of agricultural water and land resources. Unlike previous methods of studying agricultural ecological compensation (AEC), this study analysed the direction and amount of net transfer of agricultural land and water use along with inter-provincial trade. In conjunction with the value of ecosystem services embedded in agricultural land and water resources, this study calculated AHEC standards and estimated payments/reimbursements from each province. We found that agricultural land and water resources continued to flow from the underdeveloped inland provinces to the developed coastal provinces in 2017. In addition, the value of agricultural ecosystem in the central and coastal areas can be further enhanced by reducing the negative value of their cropland. Even though the ecological compensation standards for virtual agricultural water use (AWU) was much lower than the ecological compensation standards for virtual agricultural land use (ALU), the integrated AHEC in 31 provinces was more reasonable than considering only virtual ALU and virtual AWU. These findings are of great theoretical and application significance for the government to establish a systematic and feasible framework for inter-provincial AHEC and serve as a reference for other countries to conduct related research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this manuscript.
Code availability
Not applicable
Abbreviations
- AEC:
-
Agricultural ecological compensation
- AHEC :
-
Agricultural horizontal ecological compensation
- AVEC:
-
Agricultural vertical ecological compensation
- MRIO:
-
Multiregional input-output model
- ESV:
-
Ecosystem services value
- ALU:
-
Agricultural land use
- AWU:
-
Agricultural water use
- PES:
-
Payment for ecosystem services
- mh:
-
Million hectares
References
Bennett MT, Xu JT (2008) China’s sloping land conversion program: institutional innovation or business as usual? Ecol Econ 65(4):699–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.017
Cai B, Hubacek K, Feng K, Zhang W, Wang F, Liu Y (2020) Tension of agricultural land and water use in China’s trade: tele-connections, hidden drivers and potential solutions. Environ Sci Technol 54(9):5365–5375. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00256
Chen GQ, Han MY (2015) Virtual land use change in China 2002–2010: internal transition and trade imbalance. Land Use Policy 47:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.017
Chen XJ, Wang J (2021) Quantitatively determining the priorities of regional ecological compensation for cultivated land in different main functional areas: a case study of Hubei province, China. Land 10(3):247. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030247
Chen T, Zeng X, Hu Q (2002) Utilisation efficiency of chemical fertilisers among different counties in China. Acta Geograph Sin 57(5):531–538 (in Chinese)
Concepción ED, Díaz M, Baquero RA (2007) Effects of landscape complexity on the ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes. Landsc Ecol 23(2):135–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9150-2
Costanza R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neil RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Van Den Belt M (1998) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econ 25(1):3–15
Ding ZM, Yao SB (2022) Theory and valuation of cross-regional ecological compensation for cultivated land: a case study of Shanxi province, China. Ecol Indic 136:108609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108609
Dong HJ, Geng Y, Fujita T, Fujii M, Hao D, Yu X (2014) Uncovering regional disparity of China’s water footprint and inter-provincial virtual water flows. Sci Total Environ 500:120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.094
Dong HJ, Geng Y, Hao D, Yu YH, Chen YH (2019) Virtual water flow feature of water-rich province and the enlightenments: case of Yunnan in China. J Clean Prod 235:328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.305
Fan M, Chen L (2019) Spatial characteristics of land uses and ecological compensations based on payment for ecosystem services model from 2000 to 2015 in Sichuan province, China. Ecol Inform 50:162–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.01.001
Fan PF, Liang LT, Xu MJ, Zhang SY (2018) Study on inter-provincial cultivated land ecological compensationfrom perspective of virtual cultivated land flow. China Popul Resour Environ 28(1):91–101 (in Chinese)
Fan M, Chen L, Wang Q (2019) Assessing the high impacts of land use change: spatial characteristics of land uses and ecological compensation based on payment for ecosystem services model in a mountainous area, China. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 24(8):1431–1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09858-5
Fu Y, Du X, Ruan B, Liu L, Zhang J (2017) Agro-ecological compensation of watershed based on emergy. Water Sci Technol 76(9-10):2830–2841. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.455
Gao Y, Han Z, Cui Y, Zhang H, Liu L (2019) Determination of the agricultural eco-compensation standards in ecological fragile poverty areas based on emergy synthesis. Sustainability 11(9):2548. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092548
Gao X, Huang B, Hou Y, Xu W, Zheng H, Ma D, Ouyang Z (2020) Using ecosystem service flows to inform ecological compensation: theory & application. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 17(9):3340. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093340
Guo S, Shen GQ (2015) Multiregional input-output model for China’s farm land and water use. Environ Sci Technol 49(1):403–414. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503637f
Guo S, Shen GQ, Chen ZM, Yu R (2014) Embodied cultivated land use in China 1987–2007. Ecol Indic 47:198–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.019
Hausknost D, Grima N, Singh SJ (2017) The political dimensions of payments for ecosystem services (PES): cascade or stairway? Ecol Econ 131:109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.024
He K, Zhang J, Zeng Y, Zhang L (2016) Households’ willingness to accept compensation for agricultural waste recycling: taking biogas production from livestock manure waste in Hubei, P. R. China as an example. J Clean Prod 131:410–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.009
He K, Zhang J, Wang X, Zeng Y, Zhang L (2018) A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in agricultural ecological compensation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(17):16522–16532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2160-6
Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM (2009) Water footprint manual: state of the art 2009. Water footprint report. Water Footprint Network, Enschede. http://doc.utwente.nl/77211/1/Hoekstra09WaterFootprintManual.pdf
Hou L, Xia F, Chen Q, Huang J, He Y, Rose N, Rozelle S (2021) Grassland ecological compensation policy in China improves grassland quality and increases herders’ income. Nat Commun 12(1):4683. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24942-8
Huang GH, Chen GX, Wu J, Huang B, Yu KW (1995) N2O and CH4 fluxes from typical upland fields in northeast China. J Appl Sci 6(4):383–386 (in Chinese)
Jin JJ, Jiang C, Li L (2013) The economic valuation of cultivated land protection: a contingent valuation study in wenling city, China. Landsc Urban Plan 119:158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.010
Leontief W (1970) Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. Rev Econ Stat 52:262–271
Li J, Li L, Li K (2022) Inter-provincial agricultural ecological compensation standards in China from the perspective of embodied water pollution. Issues Agric Econ (6):106–121. https://doi.org/10.13246/j.cnki.iae.20220215.002 (in Chinese)
Liang LT, Gao P, Liu LK (2019) The “Two Horizon” inter-regional agro-ecological compensation standard and cross-regional financial transfer mechanism: a study based on virtual cultivated land. Acta Ecologica Sinica 39(24). https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201810282324
Liu GD (2004) Method and applications to evaluate the environmental impacts of regional agiculture. In: Doctor. China Agricultural University, Beijing
Liu LH, Yang BR (2019) Research on ecological compensation of provincial cultivated land in China. China Popul Resour Environ 29(2):52–62 (in Chinese)
Lv CM, Li HQ, Ling MH, Guo X, Wu ZN, Gu CK, Li Y (2021) An innovative emergy quantification method for eco-economic compensation for agricultural water rights trading. Water Resour Manag 35(3):775–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02717-y
Munksgaard J, Wier M, Lenzen M, Dey C (2005) Using input-output analysis to measure the environmental pressure of consumption at different spatial levels. J Ind Ecol 9(1-2):169–185
Pan XL, Xu LY, Yang ZF, Yu B (2017) Payments for ecosystem services in China: policy, practice, and progress. J Clean Prod 158:200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.127
Qi XF (2013) Spatial and temporal change of positive and negative services value and its impact factors inregional farmland ecosystem: a case study in shandong province. Reas Agric Modern 34(5):622–626 (in Chinese)
Schupbach B, Zgraggen K, Szerencsits E (2008) Incentives for low-input land-use types and their influence on the attractiveness of landscapes. J Environ Manag 89(3):222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.060
Sheng JC, Qiu WG, Han X (2020) China’s pes-like horizontal eco-compensation program: combining market-oriented mechanisms and government interventions. Ecosyst Serv 45:101164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101164
Su K, Sun XT, Guo HQ, Long QQ, Li S, Mao XQ, Niu T, Yu Q, Wang YR, Yue DP (2020) The establishment of a cross-regional differentiated ecological compensation scheme based on the benefit areas and benefit levels of sand-stabilisation ecosystem service. J Clean Prod 270:122490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122490
Sun Y, Li H (2021) Data mining for evaluating the ecological compensation, static and dynamic benefits of returning farmland to forest. Environ Res 201:111524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111524
Sun XZ, Zhou HL, Xie GD (2007) Ecological services and their values of chinese agro-ecosystem. China Popul Resour Environ 17(4):55–60 (in Chinese)
Sun LN, Lu WX, Yang QC, Martin JD, Li D (2013) Ecological compensation estimation of soil and water conservation based on cost-benefit analysis. Water Resour Manag 27(8):2709–2727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0268-5
Sun SK, Yin YL, Wu PT, Wang YB, Luan XB, Li C (2019) Geographical evolution of agricultural production in China and its effects on water stress, economy, and the environment: the virtual water perspective. Water Resour Res 55(5):4014–4029. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr023379
Sun X, Liu X, Zhao S, Zhu Y (2021) An evolutionary systematic framework to quantify short-term and long-term watershed ecological compensation standard and amount for promoting sustainability of livestock industry based on cost-benefit analysis, linear programming, WTA and WTP method. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(14):18004–18020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11769-x
Wang ZP (1997) Estimation of nitrous oxide emission of farmland in China. J Eco Rur Enviro 13(2):52–56 (in Chinese)
Wang MX, Li J, Zheng XH (1998) Methane emission and mechanisms of methane production,oxidation , transportation in the rice fields. Chin J Atmos Sci 22(4):218–230 (in Chinese)
Wang X, Li XB, Xin LG, Tan MH, Li SF, Wang RJ (2016) Ecological compensation for winter wheat abandonment in groundwater over-exploited areas in the north China plain. J Geogr Sci 26(10):1463–1476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1338-4
Wang K, Ou M, Wolde Z (2020) Regional differences in ecological compensation for cultivated land protection: an analysis of Chengdu, Sichuan province, China. Int J Env Res Pub He 17(21):8242. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218242
Xie GD, Lu CX, Leng YF, Zheng D, Li SC (2003) Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan plateau. J Nat Resour 18(2):189–196 (in Chinese)
Xie GD, Xiao Y, Zhen L (2005) Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chin J Eco-Agric 13(3):10–13 (in Chinese)
Xie GD, Zhang CX, Zhang LM, Chen WH, Li SM (2015) Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem servicevalue based on per unit area. J Nat Resour 30(8):1243–1254 (in Chinese)
Yang X, Burton M, Cai YY, Zhang AL (2015) Exploring heterogeneous preference for farmland non-market values in Wuhan, central China. Sustainability 8(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010012
Yang X, Zhang F, Luo C, Zhang A (2019) Farmland ecological compensation zoning and horizontal fiscal payment mechanism in Wuhan agglomeration, China, from the perspective of ecological footprint. Sustainability 11(8):2326. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082326
Yu KW, Chen GX, Yang SJ (1995) Role of several upland crops in N2O emission from farmland and its response. Chin J Appl Ecol 6(4):387–391 (in Chinese)
Yuan Y, Liu JT, Jin ZZ (2011) An integrated assessment of positive and negative effects of high-yielding cropland ecosystem services in Luancheng county, Hebei province of north China. Chin J Ecol 30(12):2809–2814. https://doi.org/10.13292/j.1000-4890.2011.0412 (in Chinese)
Zheng HR, Zhang ZK, Wei WD, Song ML, Dietzenbacher E, Wang XY, Meng J, Shan YL, Ou JM, Guan DB (2020) Regional determinants of China’s consumption-based emissions in the economic transition. Environ Res Lett 15(7):074001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab794f
Zhou Y, Zhou QB, Zhou XY, Gan SW, Yang XP (2015) Research progress of contingent valuation method for application to agricultural ecological compensation. Acta Ecol Sin 35(24):7955–7964 (in Chinese)
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to Dr. Philippe Garrigues and the anonymous reviewers of Environmental Science and Pollution Research who provided very valuable feedback on an earlier manuscript of this paper.
Funding
This research is supported by the Joint Fund for Regional Innovation and Development of National Natural Science Foundation of China (U19A2051;, the Natural Resources Research Project of Hunan Province, China (2021-37); and the Construction Program for First-Class Disciplines (Geography) of Hunan Province, China (5010002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ting Wang: Methodology, Conceptualization, Data Curation, Visualisation, Writing-Original draft, Writing-Reviewing and Editing; Dehua Mao: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing-Reviewing and Editing, Funding acquisition; Ziliang Jiang: Methodology, Conceptualization, Data Curation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, T., Mao, D. & Jiang, Z. Quantitative assessment of agricultural horizontal ecological compensation in China, from the perspective of virtual land and virtual water. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 22885–22899 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23220-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23220-4