Abstract
Coal is the major fossil fuel used for power generation. Coal mining activities lead to environmental changes to a large extent, such as degradation in the quality of air, water, and soil, changes in landform, land use/land cover, and vegetation distribution. Evaluating the environmental quality is therefore essential to study the nature and impact of mining activities on the environment. The present study attempts to use the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to assess the environmental quality of Rujigou coalfield that lacked previous such analysis. The criteria used for evaluation were selected through a literature review and extensive field survey. A photo tour of the study area shows the current ground conditions. Weights were assigned to these criteria based on expert opinions, recommendations from published literature, and field investigation. The results indicate that mining activities in the study region most significantly impact the air quality, followed by soil, water, landform, and vegetation. The knowledge of environmental quality can forewarn policymakers and mine managers about impending environmental problems and improve their ability to manage and resolve them. Moreover, the systematic methodological process described in this research can be applied to any study area with similar features to the one investigated in this paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All the data has been included in the manuscript.
References
Adibee N, Osanloo M, Rahmanpour M (2013) Adverse effects of coal mine waste dumps on the environment and their management. Environ Earth Sci 70:1581–1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2243-0
Al-Rashdan D, Al-Kloub B, Dean A, Al-Shemmeri T (1999) Environmental impact assessment and ranking the environmental projects in Jordan. Eur J Oper Res 118:30–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00079-9
Aryafar A, Yousefi S, DoulatiArdejani F (2013) The weight of interaction of mining activities: groundwater in environmental impact assessment using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP). Environ Earth Sci 68:2313–2324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1910-x
Bascetin A (2004) Technical note: An application of the analytic hierarchy process in equipment selection at Orhaneli open pit coal mine. Min Technol 113:192–199. https://doi.org/10.1179/037178404225004968
Bascetin A (2007) A decision support system using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for the optimal environmental reclamation of an open-pit mine. Environ Geol 52:663–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0495-7
Deng J, Ge S, Qi H et al (2021) Underground coal fire emission of spontaneous combustion, Sandaoba coalfield in Xinjiang, China: investigation and analysis. Sci Total Environ 777:146080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146080
Dos Santos PH, Neves SM, Sant’Anna DO et al (2019) The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: an overview of applications. J Clean Prod 212:119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.270
European Environment Agency (2004) Environmental quality. https://www.eea.europa.eu/help/glossary/eea-glossary/environmental-quality. Accessed 12 Sep 2021
Gupta S, Kumar U (2012) An analytical hierarchy process (AHP)-guided decision model for underground mining method selection. Int J Min Reclam Environ 26:324–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480930.2011.622480
Gurram MK, Bulusu LD, Kinthada NR (2015) Urban environmental quality assessment at ward level using AHP based GIS multi-criteria modeling – a study on Hyderabad City, India. Asian J Geoinf 15:16–29
He F, Gu L, Wang T, Zhang Z (2017) The synthetic geo-ecological environmental evaluation of a coastal coal-mining city using spatiotemporal big data: a case study in Longkou, China. J Clean Prod 142:854–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.011
Ishizaka A, Labib A (2011) Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst Appl 38:14336–14345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143
Jankovic I, Djenadic S, Ignjatovic D et al (2019) Multi-criteria approach for selecting optimal dozer type in open-cast coal mining. Energies 12:2245. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12122245
Karan SK, Samadder SR, Singh V (2018) Groundwater vulnerability assessment in degraded coal mining areas using the AHP-modified DRASTIC model. Land Degrad Dev 29:2351–2365. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2990
Kuenzer C, Zhang J, Tetzlaff A et al (2007) Uncontrolled coal fires and their environmental impacts: Investigating two arid mining regions in north-central China. Appl Geogr 27:42–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2006.09.007
Kumar A, Krishna AP (2018) Assessment of groundwater potential zones in coal mining impacted hard-rock terrain of India by integrating geospatial and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Geocarto Int 33:105–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1232314
Kursunoglu N, Onder M (2015) Selection of an appropriate fan for an underground coal mine using the analytic hierarchy process. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 48:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.02.005
Li C-M, Nie R (2017) An evaluating system for scientific mining of China’s coal resources. Resour Policy 53:317–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.07.012
Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis | Wiley. Wiley, New York
Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 20:703–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810600661508
Mutambo V, Kangwa S, Fisonga M (2022) Mining method selection for extracting moderately deep ore body using analytical hierarchy process at mindola sub-vertical shaft, Zambia. Cogent Eng 9:2062877. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2062877
Narimisa MR, Narimisa MR (2016) The research of environmental impact assessment for oil refineries in Iran based on AHP and GIS. Int J Humanit Cult Stud 1:1396–1416
Osanloo M, Hekmat A, Aghajani A (2006) Reclamation of granite stone quarry ⎯ a case study in Jostan granite mine, Tehran, Iran. Perth, pp 269–277
Partovi FY (2007) An analytical model of process choice in the chemical industry. Int J Prod Econ 105:213–227
Ramanathan R (2001) A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. J Environ Manag 63:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0455
Rosema A, Genderen JL van, Veld H et al (1999) Manual of coal fire detection and monitoring : report of the project: development and implementation of a coal fire monitoring and fighting system in China. The Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience (NITG)
Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psych 15:234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty TL (1986) Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Manag Sci 32:841–855
Saaty TL (2000) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburg
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1994) Decision making in economic, political, social, and technological environments with the analytic hierarchy process, 1st edn. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
Saini V (2018) Impact of coal mining and mine fires on the local environment in Jharia coalfield, Jharkhand. Everyman’s Sci LIII:18–22
Saini V, Gupta RP, Arora MK (2016) Environmental impact studies in coalfields in India: a case study from Jharia coal-field. Renew Sust Energ Rev 53:1222–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.072
Saini V, Gupta RP, Arora M (2015) Assessing the environmental impacts of coal mining using analytical hierarchy process : a case study of Jharia coalfield, India. In: Bulucea, A. (Ed.), Advances in environmental and geological science and engineering, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Environmental and Geological Science and Engineering. WSEAS Press, Salerno, Italy, pp 281–289
Saini V (2016) Remote Sensing based geo-ecological studies in Jharia coal-field India. PhD Thesis (Unpublished)
Sarupria M, Manjare SD, Girap M (2019) Environmental impact assessment studies for mining area in Goa, India, using the new approach. Environ Monit Assess 191:18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7135-z
Si H, Bi H, Li X, Yang C (2010) Environmental evaluation for sustainable development of coal mining in Qijiang, Western China. Int J Coal Geol 81:163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2009.11.004
Singh AK, Mondal GC, Kumar S et al (2007) Precipitation chemistry and occurrence of acid rain over Dhanbad, coal city of India. Environ Monit Assess 125:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9243-4
Sipahi S, Timor M (2010) The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Manag Decis 48:775–808. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011043920
Stracher GB (2004) Coal fires burning around the world: a global catastrophe. Int J Coal Geol 59:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2004.01.001
Stracher GB, Taylor TP (2004) Coal fires burning out of control around the world: thermodynamic recipe for environmental catastrophe. Int J Coal Geol 59:7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2003.03.002
Subramanian N, Ramanathan R (2012) A review of applications of analytic hierarchy process in operations management. Int J Prod Econ 138:215–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.036
Uberman R, Ostrega A (2005) Applying the analytic hierarchy process in the revitalisation of post-mining areas field. Honolulu, Hawaii, pp 1–10
Vaidya OS, Kumar S (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res 169:1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. CATENA 72:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2007.01.003
Zeng Q, Dong J, Zhao L (2018) Investigation of the potential risk of coal fire to local environment: a case study of Daquanhu coal fire, Xinjiang region, China. Sci Total Environ 640–641:1478–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.135
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant No. 51850410504). The access granted to the coalfields for our field investigation is also acknowledged with thanks. The authors thank the USGS (http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/) for providing the Landsat data used in this work free of cost through the internet. Due acknowledgement is provided to the anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant No. 51850410504).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualisation: [Varinder Saini]; Data curation: [Varinder Saini, Yinan Yang, Jinsong Li]; Formal analysis: [Varinder Saini]; Funding acquisition: [Jun Li]; Investigation: [Varinder Saini, Jun Li, Yinan Yang, Jinsong Li]; Methodology: [Varinder Saini]; Project administration: [Jun Li]; Resources: [Jun Li]; Software: [Varinder Saini]; Supervision: [Jun Li]; Visualisation: [Varinder Saini]; Writing—original draft: [Varinder Saini]. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Saini, V., Li, J., Yang, Y. et al. Evaluating environmental quality in Rujigou coalfield, China, using analytic hierarchy process. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 1841–1853 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22340-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22340-1