Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cloud-based neuro-fuzzy hydro-climatic model for water quality assessment under uncertainty and sensitivity

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

River water quality is a function of various bio-physicochemical parameters which can be aggregated for calculating the Water Quality Index (WQI). However, it is challenging to model the nonlinearity and uncertain behavior of these parameters. When data is deficient and noisy, it creates missing and conflicting parameters within their complex inter-relationships. It is also essential to model how climatic variations and river discharge affect water quality. The present study proposes a cloud-based efficient and resourceful machine learning (ML) modeling framework using an artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and advanced particle swarm optimization (PSO). The framework assesses the sensitivity of five critical water quality parameters namely biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, temperature, and total coliform toward WQI of the River Ganges in India. Monthly datasets of these parameters, river flow, and climate components (rainfall and temperature) for a nine-year (2011–2019) period have been used to build the models. We also propose collecting the data by placing various monitoring sensors in the river and sending the data to the cloud for analysis. This helps in continuous monitoring and analysis. Results indicate that ANN and ANFIS capture the nonlinearity in the relationship among water quality parameters with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 7.5 × 10−7 (0.002%) and 1.02 × 10−5 (0.029%), respectively, while the combined ANN-PSO model gives normalized mean square error (NMSE) of 0.0024. The study demonstrates the role of cloud-based machine learning in developing watershed protection and restoration strategies by analyzing the sensitivity of individual water quality parameters while predicting water quality under changing climate and river discharge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data could be made available on request.

References

  • ACPF (2021) Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF). https://acpf4watersheds.org/about-acpf/. Accessed 25 June 2021.

  • Aghaarabi E, Aminravan F, Sadiq R, Hoorfar M, Rodríguez MJ, Najjaran H (2017) Application of neuro-fuzzy based expert system in water quality assessment. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8(4):2137–2145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghel B, Rezaei A, Mohadesi M (2019) Modeling and prediction of water quality parameters using a hybrid particle swarm optimization–neural fuzzy approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16(8):4823–4832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alizamir M, Sobhanardakani S (2018) An artificial neural network-particle swarm optimization (ANN-PSO) approach to predict heavy metals contamination in groundwater resources. Jundishapur J Health Sci 10(2)

  • Al-Mukhtar M, Al-Yaseen F (2019) Modeling water quality parameters using data-driven models, a case study Abu-Ziriq Marsh in south of Iraq. Hydrology 6(1):24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avand M, Moradi H (2020) Using machine learning models, remote sensing, and GIS to investigate the effects of changing climates and land uses on flood probability. J Hydrol 125663

  • Azad A, Karami H, Farzin S, Mousavi SF, Kisi O (2019) Modeling river water quality parameters using modified adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system. Water Sci Eng 12(1):45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonyadi MR, Michalewicz Z (2016) Impacts of coefficients on movement patterns in the particle swarm optimization algorithm. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 21(3):378–390

    Google Scholar 

  • BWSR (2021). Prioritize target and measure application (PTMApp). https://ptmapp.bwsr.state.mn.us/ (Accessed 23 June 2021)

  • Chatterjee S, Sarkar S, Dey N, Ashour AS, Sen S, Hassanien AE (2017) Application of cuckoo search in water quality prediction using artificial neural network. Int J Comput Intell Stud 6(2–3):229–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WB, Liu WC (2015) Water quality modeling in reservoirs using multivariate linear regression and two neural network models. Adv Artificial Neural Syst 2015.

  • CPCB (2013) Pollution assessment: River Ganga. Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi, India.

  • CPCB (2016) Restoration/rejuvenation of River Ganga Suggestions/proposals for phase-i, segment ‘b’ (Haridwar Down to Kanpur Down). Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), New Delhi, India

  • CPCB (2019) ENVIS Centre on control of pollution water, air and noise, Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), New Delhi, India

  • CWC (2019) Annual report. Ministry of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation, Central Water Commission (CWC), New Delhi, India.

  • Dwivedi S, Mishra S, Tripathi RD (2018) Ganga water pollution: a potential health threat to inhabitants of Ganga basin. Environ Int 117:327–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ENVIS (2016). Status of grossly polluting industries in Uttarakhand. Uttarakhand Environmental Protection and Pollution Control Board.

  • Fu Z, Cheng J, Yang M, Batista J, Jiang Y (2020) Wastewater discharge quality prediction using stratified sampling and wavelet de-noising ANFIS model. Comput Electr Eng 85:106701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Alba J, Bárcena JF, Ugarteburu C, García A (2019) Artificial neural networks as emulators of process-based models to analyse bathing water quality in estuaries. Water Res 150:283–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geetha S, Gouthami SJSW (2016) Internet of things enabled real time water quality monitoring system. Smart Water 2(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haritash AK, Gaur S (2016) Assessment of water quality and suitability analysis of River Ganga in Rishikesh, India. Appl Water Sci 6(4):383–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IMD, 2019. State level climate change trends in India. Indian Meteorological Department, New Delhi, India.

  • Jha MK, Shekhar A, Jenifer MA (2020) Assessing groundwater quality for drinking water supply using hybrid fuzzy-GIS-based water quality index. Water Res 179:115867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juan C, Genxu W, Tianxu M., Xiangyang S (2017) ANN model-based simulation of the runoff variation in response to climate change on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau, China. Adv Meteorol 2017

  • Kadam AK, Wagh VM, Muley AA, Umrikar BN, Sankhua RN (2019) Prediction of water quality index using artificial neural network and multiple linear regression modelling approach in Shivganga River basin, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 5(3):951–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khadr M, Elshemy M (2017) Data-driven modeling for water quality prediction case study: The drains system associated with Manzala Lake, Egypt. Ain Shams Eng J 8(4):549–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O (2015) Streamflow forecasting and estimation using least square support vector regression and adaptive neuro-fuzzy embedded fuzzy c-means clustering. Water Resour Manage 29(14):5109–5127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laanaya F, St-Hilaire A, Gloaguen E (2017) Water temperature modelling: comparison between the generalized additive model, logistic, residuals regression and linear regression models. Hydrol Sci J 62(7):1078–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu H, Ma X (2020) Hybrid decision tree-based machine learning models for short-term water quality prediction. Chemosphere 249:126169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matta G, Nayak A, Kumar A, Kumar P (2020) Water quality assessment using NSFWQI, OIP and multivariate techniques of Ganga River system, Uttarakhand, India. Appl Water Sci 10(9):1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melesse AM, Ahmad S, McClain ME, Wang X, Lim YH (2011) Suspended sediment load prediction of river systems: an artificial neural network approach. Agric Water Manag 98(5):855–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mimikou MA, Baltas E, Varanou E, Pantazis K (2000) Regional impacts of climate change on water resources quantity and quality indicators. J Hydrol 234(1–2):95–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mujere N, Moyce, W (2018) Climate change impacts on surface water quality. In Hydrology and Water Resource Management: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice (pp. 97–115). IGI Global.

  • Nepal S (2016) Impacts of climate change on the hydrological regime of the Koshi River basin in the Himalayan region. J Hydro-Environ Res 10:76–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oladipo JO, Akinwumiju AS, Aboyeji OS, Adelodun AA (2021) Comparison between fuzzy logic and water quality index methods: a case of water quality assessment in Ikare community, Southwestern Nigeria. Environ Challenges 3:100038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poli R, Kennedy J, Blackwell T (2007) Particle swarm optimization. Swarm Intell 1(1):33–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-007-0002-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pramanik N, Panda RK (2009) Application of neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems for river flow prediction. Hydrol Sci J 54(2):247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaee T, Khani S, Ravansalar M (2020) Artificial intelligence-based single and hybrid models for prediction of water quality in rivers: a review. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 200:103978

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sagan V, Peterson KT, Maimaitijiang M, Sidike P, Sloan J, Greeling BA, Maalouf S, Adams C (2020) Monitoring inland water quality using remote sensing: potential and limitations of spectral indices, bio-optical simulations, machine learning, and cloud computing. Earth Sci Rev 205:103187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Şahin M, Erol R (2017) A comparative study of neural networks and ANFIS for forecasting attendance rate of soccer games. Math Comput Appl 22(4):43

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahu M, Mahapatra SS, Sahu HB, Patel RK  (2011) Prediction of water quality index using neuro fuzzy inference system. Water Quality Exposure and Health 3(3–4):175–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-011-0054-7

  • Shah KA, Joshi GS (2017) Evaluation of water quality index for River Sabarmati, Gujarat, India. Appl Water Sci 7(3):1349–1358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shil S, Singh UK, Mehta P (2019) Water quality assessment of a tropical river using water quality index (WQI), multivariate statistical techniques and GIS. Appl Water Sci 9(7)

  • Sotomayor G, Hampel H, Vázquez RF (2018) Water quality assessment with emphasis in parameter optimisation using pattern recognition methods and genetic algorithm. Water Res 130:353–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas R, Singh AP (2018) An integrated fuzzy-based advanced eutrophication simulation model to develop the best management scenarios for a river basin. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(9):9012–9039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas R, Singh AP (2018a) Impact assessment of industrial wastewater discharge in a river basin using interval-valued fuzzy group decision-making and spatial approach. Environ Dev Sustain 20(5):2373–2397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas R, Drewitz M, Magner J (2020a) Evaluating watershed-based optimized decision support framework for conservation practice placement in Plum Creek Minnesota. J Hydro Elsevier 583:124573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas R, Singh AP, Dhadse K (2020b) Hydroclimatic river discharge and seasonal trends assessment model using an advanced spatio-temporal model. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 34:381–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas R, Singh AP, Dhadse K, Garg C (2020c) An evidence based integrated watershed modelling system to assess the impact of non-point source pollution in the riverine ecosystem. J Clean Prod 246:118963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas R, Singh AP, Dhadse K, Garg C, Deshmukh A (2018b) Sustainable management of a river basin by integrating an improved fuzzy based hybridized SWOT model and geo-statistical weighted thematic overlay analysis. J Hydrol 563:92–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas R, Singh AP, Sharma R (2017) A scenario based impact assessment of trace metals on the ecosystem of river Ganges using multivariate analysis coupled with fuzzy decision-making approach. Water Resour Manage 31(13):4165–4185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srisaeng P, Baxter GS, Wild G (2015) An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for forecasting Australia’s domestic low cost carrier passenger demand. Aviation 19(3):150–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stryker J, Wemple B, Bomblies A (2018) Modeling the impacts of changing climatic extremes on streamflow and sediment yield in a northeastern US watershed. J Hydrol: Reg Stud 17:83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutadian AD, Muttil N, Yilmaz AG,  Perera BJC (2016) Development of river water quality indices—a review. Environ Monit Assess 188(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-5050-0

  • Tabbussum R, Dar AQ (2021) Performance evaluation of artificial intelligence paradigms—artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for flood prediction. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(20):25265–25282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari S, Babbar R, Kaur G (2018) Performance evaluation of two ANFIS models for predicting water quality Index of River Satluj (India). Adv Civ Eng 2018

  • Tripathi M, Singal SK (2019) Use of principal component analysis for parameter selection for development of a novel water quality index: a case study of river Ganga India. Ecol Ind 96:430–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ucun Ozel H, Gemici BT, Gemici E, Ozel HB, Cetin M, Sevik H (2020) Application of artificial neural networks to predict the heavy metal contamination in the Bartin River. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(34):42495–42512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UPCB (2020) Sewage treatment plant data. UTTARAKHAND POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, Government Of Uttarakhand, Dehradun, India.

  • Wang Y, Chen Y (2014) A comparison of Mamdani and Sugeno fuzzy inference systems for traffic flow prediction. J Comput 9(1):12–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaseen ZM, Ramal MM, Diop L, Jaafar O, Demir V, Kisi O (2018) Hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy models for Water Quality Index estimation. Water Resour Manage 32(7):2227–2245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanganeh M (2020) Improvement of the ANFIS-based wave predictor models by the particle swarm optimization. J Ocean Eng Sci 5(1):84–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Lai S, Gao X, Xu L (2015) Potential impacts of climate change on water quality in a shallow reservoir in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(19):14971–14982

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zotou I, Tsihrintzis VA, Gikas GD (2020) Water quality evaluation of a lacustrine water body in the Mediterranean based on different water quality index (WQI) methodologies. J Environ Sci Health, Part A 55(5):537–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), the India Central Water Commission (CWC), India, and the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) for providing the water quality, flow, and climate data, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, Rajasthan, India

    Ananya Jain & Srinivas Rallapalli

  2. Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, USA

    Srinivas Rallapalli

  3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, USA

    Dhruv Kumar

Authors
  1. Ananya Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Srinivas Rallapalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dhruv Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AJ: methodology, data curation, software, writing – original draft preparation, investigation. RS: conceptualization, data curation, methodology, software, writing – original draft preparation, investigation, writing – reviewing and editing, visualization, supervision. DK: writing – reviewing and editing, conceptualization, visualization. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Srinivas Rallapalli.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Xianliang Yi

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, A., Rallapalli, S. & Kumar, D. Cloud-based neuro-fuzzy hydro-climatic model for water quality assessment under uncertainty and sensitivity. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 65259–65275 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20385-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20385-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation