Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling and prediction of water quality parameters using a hybrid particle swarm optimization–neural fuzzy approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work focuses on the correlations among water quality parameters such as total hardness, total dissolved solids, electrical conductivity and total alkalinity with water parameters pH, temperature and the sum of mill equivalents of cations and anions in water reservoir in Kermanshah province (located in the middle of the western part of Iran). The data of water quality of monitoring sites were collected over year 2015. To predict and simulate water quality parameters, two data-driven models, i.e., adaptive neural fuzzy inference system and a hybrid adaptive neural fuzzy inference system structure trained by particle swarm optimization technique, were used. The main advantages of these methods are their high accuracy and very fast computational speed to predict unknown data. The results indicated that implementation of two models is highly satisfactory for predicting inorganic indicators of water quality. However, the flexibility of particle swarm optimization–adaptive neural fuzzy inference system method in modeling is better than adaptive neural fuzzy inference system approach. To prove this, the correlation coefficient, mean absolute error, root mean square error and t statistics were calculated as the error criterion. The overall (training and testing) mean relative error percentage, mean absolute error, root mean square error, correlation coefficient and t statistics obtained by the proposed particle swarm optimization–adaptive neural fuzzy inference system model are less than 3.50, 11.60, 18.90, 0.95 and 0.38%, respectively. The results provide a useful approach that uses water parameters to estimate water quality in water reservoir for water treatment and pollution management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afshar A, Shafii M, Haddad OB (2011) Optimizing multi-reservoir operation rules: an improved HBMO approach. J Hydroinform 13:121–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras E, Toğan V, Berkun M (2007) River water quality management model using genetic algorithm. Environ Fluid Mech 7:439–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bashir ZA, El-Hawary ME (2009) Applying wavelets to short-term load forecasting using PSO-based neural networks. IEEE T Power Syst 24:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behmel S, Damour M, Ludwig R, Rodriguez MJ (2016) Water quality monitoring strategies—a review and future perspectives. Sci Total Environ 571:1312–1329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borjian H (2017) Kermanshah i. geography, Encyclopædia Iranica, XVI/3, pp. 316–319

  • Chen WB, Liu WC (2015) Water quality modeling in reservoirs using multivariate linear regression and two neural network models. Adv Artif Neur Syst 2015:521721

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpla I, Benmarhnia T, Lebel A, Levallois P, Rodriguez MJ (2015) Investigating social inequalities in exposure to drinking water contaminants in rural areas. Environ Pollut 207:88–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erle E, Pontius R (2007) Land-use and land-cover change. Encyclopedia of Earth (eds) Cutler J. Cleveland (Washington, DC: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment), Last Retrieved January, 19, 2008

  • Fallah-Mehdipour E, Haddad OB, Mariño MA (2013) Developing reservoir operational decision rule by genetic programming. J Hydroinform 15:103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergel SE, Turner MG, Miller JR, Melack JM, Stanley EH (2002) Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems. Aquat Sci 64:118–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad OB, Moradi-Jalal M, Mariño MA (2011) Design–operation optimisation of run-of-river power plants. P I Civil Eng Wat Manag 164:463–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang JS, Sun CT (1995) Neuro-fuzzy modeling and control. P IEEE 83:378–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang JSR, Sun CT, Mizutani E (1997) Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing, a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence

  • Jones AS, Stevens DK, Horsburgh JS, Mesner NO (2011) Surrogate measures for providing high frequency estimates of total suspended solids and total phosphorus concentrations. J Am Wat Resour Assoc 47:239–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jonnalagadda SB, Mhere G (2001) Water quality of the Odzi River in the eastern highlands of Zimbabwe. Wat Res 35:2371–2376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kang JH, Lee SW, Cho KH, Ki SJ, Cha SM, Kim JH (2010) Linking land-use type and stream water quality using spatial data of fecal indicator bacteria and heavy metals in the Yeongsan river basin. Wat Res 44:4143–4157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, and Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks

  • Kisi O, Shiri J (2011) Precipitation forecasting using wavelet-genetic programming and wavelet-neuro-fuzzy conjunction models. Wat Resour Manag 25:3135–3152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenat DR, Crawford JK (1994) Effects of land use on water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina Piedmont streams. Hydrobiologia 294:185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu WC, Chung CE (2014) Enhancing the predicting accuracy of the water stage using a physical-based model and an artificial neural network-genetic algorithm in a river system. Wat 6:1642–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda J, Krishnakumar G (2015) Microalgal diversity in relation to the physicochemical parameters of some Industrial sites in Mangalore South India. Environ Monit Assess 187:664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi SJ, Ponnambalam K, Karray F (2007) Inferring operating rules for reservoir operations using fuzzy regression and ANFIS. Fuzzy Set Syst 158:1064–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naddafi K, Honari H, Ahmadi M (2007) Water quality trend analysis for the Karoon River in Iran. Environ Monit Assess 134:305–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Najah A, El-Shafie A, Karim OA, Jaafar O, El-Shafie AH (2011) An application of different artificial intelligences techniques for water quality prediction. Int J Phys Sci 6:5298–5308

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngoye E, Machiwa JF (2004) The influence of land-use patterns in the Ruvu river watershed on water quality in the river system. Phys Chem Earth 29:1161–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salerno F, Viviano G, Carraro E, Manfredi EC, Lami A, Musazzi S, Marchetto A, Guyennon N, Tartari G, Copetti D (2014) Total phosphorus reference condition for subalpine lakes: a comparison among traditional methods and a new process-based watershed approach. J Environ Manag 145:94–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sibanda T, Chigor VN, Koba S, Obi CL, Okoh AI (2014) Characterisation of the physicochemical qualities of a typical rural-based river: ecological and public health implications. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:1771–1780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suen JP, Eheart JW (2003) Evaluation of neural networks for modeling nitrate concentrations in rivers. J Water Resour Plan Manag 129:505–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson MY, Brandes D, Kney AD (2012) Using electronic conductivity and hardness data for rapid assessment of stream water quality. J Environ Manag 104:152–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viviano G, Salerno F, Manfredi EC, Polesello S, Valsecchi S, Tartari G (2014) Surrogate measures for providing high frequency estimates of total phosphorus concentrations in urban watersheds. Wat Res 64:265–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woli KP, Nagumo T, Kuramochi K, Hatano R (2004) Evaluating river water quality through land use analysis and N budget approaches in livestock farming areas. Sci Total Environ 329:61–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (1996) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, vol 2, 2nd edn. WHO, Geneva, p 991

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2004) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, vol 1, 3rd edn. WHO, Geneva, pp 143–220

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of Rural Water and Sewage Company of Kermanshah Province for this research under Grant No. 94/8012.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Mohadesi.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.

The authors wish to express their thanks to rural water and Sewage Company of Kermanshah Province for their sincere help throughout this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aghel, B., Rezaei, A. & Mohadesi, M. Modeling and prediction of water quality parameters using a hybrid particle swarm optimization–neural fuzzy approach. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 4823–4832 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1896-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1896-3

Keywords

Navigation