Abstract
Although anaerobic reactors are an excellent alternative in the treatment of domestic effluents, they have the disadvantage of requiring post-treatment. Many technologies have been studied and, recently, rapid filtration systems have been presented as a viable alternative for post-treatment. This work compared post-treatment techniques for anaerobic upflow sludge blanket (UASB) reactors by rapid filtration systems (double filtration (DF); triple filtration with clinoptilolite (TFc); and triple filtration with activated carbon (TFac)) to conventional systems (facultative pond (FP); biological filter (BF); biological filter with recirculation and decantation (BFD)), verifying their potential for improvement of the final effluent quality. The UASB effluent post-treatments by FP, BF, BFD, DF, TFc, and TFac were evaluated. The removal of turbidity in both BFD and FP post-treatments was below 75%. The DF, TFc, and TFac treatments showed over 99% removal of the same parameters. COD removal in the FP, BF, and BFD post-treatments was over 10%, while in the DF, TFc, and TFac treatments, it was over 80%. The greatest total phosphorus removal was observed in TFc and TFac, whose values were over 99%. The best removal of ammoniacal nitrogen, 99% was observed in the TFc treatment. Regarding Al, Cd, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn removal, all rapid filtration systems showed better performance when compared to conventional systems. The DF, TFc, and TFac systems showed over 90% removal of most metals evaluated, while the FP and BF treatments presented values below 50% for most metals, and in the BFD system, the removal values were below 80% for most metals. The results indicate that rapid filtration systems were better at removing all evaluated parameters when compared to conventional systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- BF:
-
Biological filter
- BFD:
-
Biological filter with recirculation and decantation
- COD:
-
Chemical oxygen demand
- DF:
-
Double filtration
- DSF:
-
Downward sand filter
- FP:
-
Facultative pond
- TFac:
-
Triple filtration with activated carbon
- TFc:
-
Triple filtration with clinoptilolite
- UGF:
-
Upward gravel filter
References
Abdulrazak S, Hussaini K, Sani HM (2017) Evaluation of removal efficiency of heavy metals by low-cost activated carbon prepared from African palm fruit. Appl Water Sci 7:3151–3155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0460-x
Aghel B, Mohadesi M, Gouran A, Razmegir MH (2019) Use of modified Iranian clinoptilolite zeolite for cadmium and lead removal from oil refinery wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Technol 17:1239–1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02466-5
Al-Hawash AB, Dragh MA, Li S et al (2018) Principles of microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in the environment. Egypt J Aquat Res 44:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2018.06.001
ANA (2017) Atlas esgoto. In: Agencia Nac. Águas-Brazil. https://bit.ly/35HsW9I. Accessed 17 Mar 2019
Baird RB, Eaton AD, Rice EW (eds) (2017) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 23rd edn. Washington, APHA, AWWA, WEF
Bora AJ, Dutta RK (2019) Removal of metals (Pb, Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni, and Co) from drinking water by oxidation-coagulation-absorption at optimized pH. J Water Process Eng 31:100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100839
Bratby J (ed) (2016) Coagulation and flocculation in water and wastewater treatment, 3rd edn. IWA publishing, London
Capodaglio AG, Hlavínek P, Raboni M (2015) Physico-chemical technologies for nitrogen removal from wastewaters: a review. Rev Ambient e Agua 10:445–458. https://doi.org/10.4136/1980-993X
Cavallini GS, de Sousa Vidal CM, de Souza JB, de Campos SX (2016) Post-treatment of anaerobic reactor effluent using coagulation/oxidation followed by double filtration. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:6244–6252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5836-1
CETESB (2011) National guide for collection and preservation of samples: water, sediment, aquatic communities and liquid effluents. https://bit.ly/3saFVID. Accessed 3 Feb 2021
CONAMA (2005) Resolução 357/05. https://bit.ly/325xvIf. Accessed 23 Jan 2019
Davidson J, Helwig N, Summerfelt ST (2008) Fluidized sand biofilters used to remove ammonia, biochemical oxygen demand, total coliform bacteria, and suspended solids from an intensive aquaculture effluent. Aquac Eng 39:6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2008.04.002
Dhoble YN, Ahmed S (2018) Sustainability of wastewater treatment in subtropical region: aerobic vs anaerobic process. Int J Eng Res Dev 14:2267–2278
Edokpayi JN, Odiyo JO, Popoola OE, Msagati TAM (2021) Evaluation of contaminants removal by waste stabilization ponds: A case study of Siloam WSPs in Vhembe District, South Africa. Heliyon 7:e06207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06207
El Samrani AG, Lartiges BS, Villiéras F (2008) Chemical coagulation of combined sewer overflow: heavy metal removal and treatment optimization. Water Res 42:951–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.09.009
Ezechi EH, Affam AC, Muda K (2020) Principles of electrocoagulation and application in wastewater treatment. In: Affam AC, Ezechi EH (eds) Handbook of Research on Resource Management for Pollution and Waste Treatment. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, USA, pp 404–431
Faust SD, Aly OM (eds) (2018) Chemistry of water treatment, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Gonçalves RF, Chernicharo CAL, Andrade Neto CO et al (2001) Pós-tratamento de efluentes de reatores anaeróbios por reatores com biofilme. Pós-tratamento de efluentes de reatores anaeróbios 1:171–278
Hargreaves AJ, Constantino C, Dotro G, Cartmell E, Campo P (2018) Fate and removal of metals in municipal wastewater treatment: a review. Environ Technol Rev 7:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622515.2017.1423398
Henrique IN, de Sousa JT, de Ceballos BSO, Brasil DP (2010) Biological phosphorus removal in sequencing batch reactors with different solid retention times. Eng Sanit e Ambient 15:197–204
Hoslett J, Massara TM, Malamis S, Ahmad D, van den Boogaert I, Katsou E, Ahmad B, Ghazal H, Simons S, Wrobel L, Jouhara H (2018) Surface water filtration using granular media and membranes: a review. Sci Total Environ 639:1268–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.247
Huang H, Xiao X, Yan B, Yang L (2010) Ammonium removal from aqueous solutions by using natural Chinese (Chende) zeolite as adsorbent. J Hazard Mater 175:247–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.156
Inglezakis VJ, Doula MK, Aggelatou V, Zorpas AA (2010) Removal of iron and manganese from underground water by use of natural minerals in batch mode treatment. Desalin Water Treat 18:341–346. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1102
Inglezakis VJ, Elaiopoulos K, Aggelatouc V, Zorpas AA (2012) Treatment of underground water in open flow and closed-loop fixed bed systems by utilizing the natural minerals clinoptilolite and vermiculite. Desalin Water Treat 39:215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.669178
Karapinar N (2009) Application of natural zeolite for phosphorus and ammonium removal from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater 170:1186–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.094
Kazemian H, Mallah MH (2006) Elimination of Cd2+ and Mn2+ from wastewaters using natural clinoptilolite and synthetic zeolite P. Iran J Chem Chem Eng 25:91–94
Kumar S, Prasad S, Yadav KK, Shrivastava M, Gupta N, Nagar S, Bach QV, Kamyab H, Khan SA, Yadav S, Malav LC (2019) Hazardous heavy metals contamination of vegetables and food chain: Role of sustainable remediation approaches - a review. Environ Res 179:108792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108792
Lin L, Lei Z, Wang L, Liu X, Zhang Y, Wan C, Lee DJ, Tay JH (2013) Adsorption mechanisms of high-levels of ammonium onto natural and NaCl-modified zeolites. Sep Purif Technol 103:15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.10.005
Liu W, Singh RP, Jothivel S, Fu D (2019) Evaluation of groundwater hardness removal using activated clinoptilolite. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:17541–17549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06193-9
Luo Y, Guo W, Ngo HH, Nghiem LD, Hai FI, Zhang J, Liang S, Wang XC (2014) A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 473–474:619–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.065
Malik A (2004) Metal bioremediation through growing cells. Environ Int 30:261–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2003.08.001
Miwa ACP, Freire RHF, Calijuri M d C (2007) Nitrogen dynamic in waste stabilization ponds systems in the Ribeira’s Valley region (São Paulo – Brasil). Eng Sanit e Ambient 12:169–180
Moazeni M, Parastar S, Mahdavi M, Ebrahimi A (2020) Evaluation efficiency of Iranian natural zeolites and synthetic resin to removal of lead ions from aqueous solutions. Appl Water Sci 10:60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1135-1
Montalvo S, Huiliñir C, Borja R, Sánchez E, Herrmann C (2020) Application of zeolites for biological treatment processes of solid wastes and wastewaters – a review. Bioresour Technol 301:122808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122808
Mungray AK, Murthy ZVP, Tirpude AJ (2010) Post treatment of up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket based sewage treatment plant effluents: a review. Desalin Water Treat 22:220–237. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1788
Nakhla G, Farooq S (2003) Simultaneous nitrification-denitrification in slow sand filters. J Hazard Mater 96:291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00219-4
Naz I, Saroj DP, Mumtaz S, Ali N, Ahmed S (2015) Assessment of biological trickling filter systems with various packing materials for improved wastewater treatment. Environ Technol 36:424–434
Obaid SS, Gaikwad DK, Sayyed MI, al-Rashdi K, Pawar PP (2018) Heavy metal ions removal from waste water bythe natural zeolites. Mater Today Proc 5:17930–17934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.122
Pandit AB, Kumar JK (2019) Drinking water treatment for developing countries. The Royal Society of Chemistry
Patel H (2020) Batch and continuous fixed bed adsorption of heavy metals removal using activated charcoal from neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf powder. Sci Rep 10:16895. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72583-6
Pinto ACA, Rodrigues LS, Oliveira PR, Sperling MV, Crisóstomo CM, Silva IJ (2014) Efficiency of a polishing pond for the post-treatment of the effluent from UASB reactor treating swine wastewater. Arq Bras Med Veterinária e Zootec 66:360–366
Reeve PJ, Fallowfield HJ (2018) Natural and surfactant modified zeolites: a review of their applications for water remediation with a focus on surfactant desorption and toxicity towards microorganisms. J Environ Manag 205:253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.077
Sahinkaya E, Uçar D, Kaksonen AH (2017) Bioprecipitation of metals and metalloids. In: Rene ER, Sahinkaya E, Lewis A, Lens PNL (eds) Sustainable Heavy Metal Remediation. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 199–231
Sekomo CB, Rousseau DPL, Saleh SA, Lens PNL (2012) Heavy metal removal in duckweed and algae ponds as a polishing step for textile wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 44:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.03.003
Seremeta DCH, da Silva CP, Zittel R, de Campos SX (2019) Pb 2+ adsorption by a compost obtained from the treatment of tobacco from smuggled cigarettes and industrial sewage sludge. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:797–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3655-x
Shahrokhi-Shahraki R, Benally C, El-Din MG, Park J (2021) High efficiency removal of heavy metals using tire-derived activated carbon vs commercial activated carbon: Insights into the adsorption mechanisms. Chemosphere 264:128455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128455
Silva CP, Pedroso CR, Zarpellon DI et al (2019) Post-treatment of anaerobic reactor effluent for reuse using a triple filtration system. J Environ Manag 233:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.030
Silva CP, Seremeta DCH, Pedroso CR et al (2020) Effects of different filtration techniques on quality and toxicology of post treatment effluent from an anaerobic reactor. Sci Total Environ 723:138030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138030
Stylianou MA, Inglezakis VJ, Loizidou M (2015) Comparison of Mn, Zn, and Cr removal in fluidized- and fixed-bed reactors by using clinoptilolite. Desalin Water Treat 53:3355–3362. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.934103
Thaçi BS, Gashi ST (2019) Reverse osmosis removal of heavy metals from wastewater effluents using biowaste materials pretreatment. Pol J Environ Stud 28:337–341. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/81268
Tufaner F (2020) Post-treatment of effluents from UASB reactor treating industrial wastewater sediment by constructed wetland. Environ Technol 41:912–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1514073
Tuszynska A, Kolecka K, Quant B (2013) The influence of phosphorus fractions in bottom sediments on phosphate removal in semi-natural systems as the 3rd stage of biological wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 53:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.068
UNESCO (2018) Nature-based solutions. In: United Nations World Water Dev. Report. https://bit.ly/3o1SXqv. Accessed 30 Dec 2020
US.EPA (1996) Acid digestion of sendiments, sludges and soils: Method 3050-B
USEPA (2002) Wastewater technology fact sheet-facultative lagoons. EPA 832-F-02-2014
USEPA (2017) National Recommended Water Quality Criteria - Aquatic Life Criteria. https://bit.ly/3dnQOCY. Accessed 6 Apr 2020
Vendramelli RA, Vijay S, Yuan Q (2016) Phosphorus removal mechanisms in a facultative wastewater stabilization pond. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-3130-6
Wang D, Li X, Yang Q, Zeng GM, Liao DX, Zhang J (2008) Biological phosphorus removal in sequencing batch reactor with single-stage oxic process. Bioresour Technol 99:5466–5473
Wang Y, Song X, Li H, Ding Y (2019) Removal of metals from water using a novel high-rate algal pond and submerged macrophyte pond treatment reactor. Water Sci Technol 79:1447–1457. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.140
Yuna Z (2016) Review of the natural, modified, and synthetic zeolites for heavy metals removal from wastewater. Environ Eng Sci 33:443–454
Ziolko D, Martin OV, Scrimshaw MD, Lester JN (2011) An evaluation of metal removal during wastewater treatment: the potential to achieve more stringent final effluent standards. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41:733–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380903140299
Acknowledgements
The authors received financial support from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – Finance Code 001 and Programa Paranaense de Pesquisas em Saneamento Ambiental (Fundação Araucaria/SANEPAR) – Finance Code 198/2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Cleber Pinto da Silva: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, resources, formal analysis, writing - original draft, writing - reviewing & editing. Sandro Xavier de Campos: supervision, funding acquisition, writing - reviewing & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Gerald Thouand
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
da Silva, C.P., de Campos, S.X. The effects of anaerobic reactor post-treatments by rapid filtration systems and conventional techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 61870–61880 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16350-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16350-8