Abstract
This paper reviews how recent climate change policies in Korea have affected practices in landscape planning and design. By illuminating the gaps between government policies on climate change and actual practices in planning and design, the study aims to provide useful directions for future research and practices. The primary problems we found are as follows: (1) the government’s recent aggressive climate change policies have partly resulted in an adverse effect on the environment; (2) planning and design tools to implement climate change policies do not tend to consider local characteristics and different biophysical and sociocultural contexts; (3) climate change policies in Korea developed by different governmental departments are not coordinated well enough to effectively meet the policy goals; and (4) design tools or guidelines intended to aid the implementation of climate change policies at site level must be improved through the use of creative ideas and empirical tests. For future research, we recommend hunting for critical evidence as to why climate change policies are not implemented effectively in a particular local context, and determining how such failures can be overcome by applying adequate measures in planning and design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“Green growth” first emerged as an alternative path that goes beyond the sustainable development rhetoric at the Fifth Ministerial Conference on Environment and Development (MCED) held in 2005 in Seoul (UNESCAP 2008). The green growth approach seeks to harmonize economic growth with environmental sustainability, while improving the eco-efficiency of economic growth. Green growth strategies aim to guide the process of mainstreaming climate resilience and low carbon development into key sectors of the economy (UNSDKP 2014). In 2008, partly in response to the Global Financial Crisis, Korea adopted Low Carbon, Green Growth as the country’s new development vision, which was followed by the release in 2009 of the National Strategy for Green Growth and 5-Year Plan for Green Growth (accompanied by the enactment of the Framework Act on Low Carbon Green Growth).
References
Alcoforado M, Andrade H, Lopes A, Vasconcelos J (2009) Application of climatic guidelines to urban planning: the example of Lisbon (Portugal). Landsc Urban Plan 90(1–2):56–65
Choi MA (2011) Renewable energy in dilemma. Kyunghyang Newspaper 30 May 2011
Choi HS, Choi JK, Park JH (2012) A study on the change of land development policy and direction for development of the spatial environment policy. Korea Environment Institute, Seoul (in Korean with English abstract)
Friel S, Hancock T, Kjellstrom T, McGranahan G, Monge P, Roy J (2011) Urban health inequities and the added pressure of climate change: an action-oriented research agenda. J Urban Health 88:886–895
Helm D (2008) Climate-change policy: why has so little been achieved? Oxf Rev Econ Policy 24(2):211–238
Hwang JJ, Chang WR (2010) Policy progress in mitigation of climate change in Taiwan. Energy Policy 39:1113–1122
Jo JH, Golden JS, Shin SW (2009) Incorporating built environment factors into climate change mitigation strategies for Seoul, South Korea: a sustainable urban systems framework. Habit Int 33:267–275
Kang JE, Lee MJ, Goo YS, Cho KW, Lee JW (2011) Urban renewal strategy for adapting to climate change: use of green infrastructure on flood mitigation. Korea Environment Institute, Seoul (in Korean with English abstract)
Lee JS, Yoo SH (2009) Measuring the environmental costs of tidal power plant construction: a choice experiment study. Energy Policy 37(12):5069–5074
Oliveira JAP (2009) The implementation of climate change related policies at the subnational level: an analysis of three countries. Habitat Int 33:253–259
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) (2008) Annual report 24 May 2007–30 April 2008. UNESCAP, Bangkok
United Nations Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform (UNSDKP) (2014) Green growth and climate resilience. http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=724&menu=35. Accessed 2 Feb 2014
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2013) Low impact development (LID). http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/green. Accessed 17 Nov 2013
Yi J, Hacking T (2011) Incorporating climate change into environmental impact assessment: perspectives from urban development projects in South Korea. Proced Eng 21:907–914
Acknowledgement
This work was carried out with the support of "Cooperative Research Program for Agricultural Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ00996001)" Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, JO., Suh, JH. A review of climate change adaptation policies applied to landscape planning and design in Korea. Landscape Ecol Eng 12, 171–177 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-014-0261-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-014-0261-z