Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adaptive Optimization of Control Parameters for Feed-Forward Software Defined Equalization

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we briefly describe the design, implementation, and evaluation of a novel adaptive optimization approach for the feed-forward software defined equalization (FFSDE) method using the least mean squared (LMS) algorithm. In our design, we adaptively change the filter length (N) and step size (\(\mu\)) to achieve the optimal bit error rate value. We used a vector signal generator RF PXI-5670 and a vector signal analyzer (VSA) RF PXI-5660 to test the validity of our approach. We implemented our method for the M-ary quadrature amplitude modulation (M-QAM) scheme in the VSA (which served as a receiver). The experimental results showed that we achieved high convergence speed and accuracy for rapidly changing transmitter channel characteristics. The automatic optimal setting feature of the LMS Algorithm parameters N and \(\mu\), enabled us to solve the hardware configuration problem for the FFSDE method. Determination of the LMS Algorithm training sequence size for the particular M-QAM allowed us to eliminate redundant data of the training sequence and increase the throughput.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agilent Technologies: Option AYA Flexible Modulation Analysis 89600 Vector Signal Analysis Software (2011). http://www.tevetllc.com/documents/pdf/manuals/89601B/89600-AYA-demo.pdf

  2. Al-Wohaishi, M., Martinek, R., & Zidek, J. (2011). Analysis of m-qam data communication system using 3d eye diagram. In V. Snasel, J. Platos & E. El-Qawasmeh (Eds.), Digital information processing and communications (vol. 189, pp. 337–348). Berlin: Springer.

  3. Arslan, H. (2007). Cognitive radio, software defined radio, and adaptive wireless systems (Vol. 10). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Arslan, M. Y., Sundaresan, K., & Rangarajan, S. (2015). Software-defined networking in cellular radio access networks: Potential and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(1), 150–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Civicioglu, P., & Besdok, E. (2013). A conceptual comparison of the cuckoo-search, particle swarm optimization, differential evolution and artificial bee colony algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 39(4), 315–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eliaz, A. (2015). Feed forward equalization for highly-spectrally-efficient communications. US Patent 9,166,833

  7. Ge, X., Cheng, H., Guizani, M., & Han, T. (2014). 5G wireless backhaul networks: Challenges and research advances. IEEE Network, 28(6), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gui, G., Peng, W., & Adachi, F. (2013). Improved adaptive sparse channel estimation based on the least mean square algorithm. In Wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), 2013 IEEE (pp. 3105–3109). IEEE.

  9. Hassun, R., Flaherty, M., Matreci, R., & Taylor, M. (1997). Effective evaluation of link quality using error vector magnitude techniques. In Proceedings of wireless communications conference (pp. 89–94). IEEE.

  10. Hossain, E., Rasti, M., Tabassum, H., & Abdelnasser, A. (2014). Evolution toward 5G multi-tier cellular wireless networks: An interference management perspective. IEEE Wireless Communications, 21(3), 118–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koudelka, P., Latal, J., Siska, P., Vitasek, J., Liner, A., Martinek, R., et al. (2014). Indoor visible light communication: modeling and analysis of multi-state modulation. In SPIE optical engineering+applications (pp. 92241I–92241I). International Society for Optics and Photonics.

  12. Koudelka, P., Soltys, P., Martinek, R., Latal, J., Siska, P., Kepak, S., et al. (2014). Utilization of m-qam modulation during optical wireless car to car communication. In 2014 Optoelectronics and communication conference and Australian Conference on optical fibre technology (pp. 452–454). IEEE.

  13. Lee, J., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu, J., Letaief, K. B., Chuang, J. C. I., & Liou, M. L. (1999). M-psk and m-qam ber computation using signal-space concepts. IEEE Transactions on communications, 47(2), 181–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Luby, M., Vicisano, L., Gemmell, J., Rizzo, L., Handley, M., & Crowcroft, J. (2002). The use of forward error correction (FEC) in reliable multicast. Technical report

  16. Marriwala, N., Sahu, O., & Vohra, A. (2013). 8-QAM software defined radio based approach for channel encoding and decoding using forward error correction. Wireless Personal Communications, 72(4), 2957–2969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martinek, R., Vanus, J., Bilik, P., Al-Wohaishi, M., & Zidek, J. (2016). The implementation of equalization algorithms for real transmission channels. In International instrumentation and measurement technology conference (I2MTC), Taipei, Taiwan.

  18. Martinek, R., & Zidek, J. (2013). The implementation of channel coding into the digital transmission chain consisting of VSG PXI-5670-VSA PXI-5661. Przeglad Elektrotchniczny, 89(7), 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martinek, R., & Zidek, J. (2014). The real implementation of anfis channel equalizer on the system of software-defined radio. IETE Journal of Research, 60(2), 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martinek, R., Zidek, J., & Tomala, K. (2013). BER measurement in software defined radio systems. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny, 89(2b), 205–210.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martinek, R., et al. (2016). Modelling of wireless fading channels with RF impairments using virtual instruments. In IEEE wireless and microwave technology conference, Clearwater Beach, Florida.

  22. Medbo, J., Börner, K., Haneda, K., Hovinen, V., Imai, T., Järvelainen, J., et al. (2014). Channel modelling for the fifth generation mobile communications. In 2014 8th European conference on antennas and propagation (EuCAP) (pp. 219–223). IEEE.

  23. Radek, M., & Zidek, J. (2013). The implementation of channel coding into the digital transmission chain consisting of VSG PXI-5670-VSA PXI-5661. Przeglad Elektrotchniczny, 89(7), 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Soldani, D., Barani, B., Tafazolli, R., Manzalini, A., & Chih-Lin, I. (2015). Software defined 5G networks for anything as a service [guest editorial]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(9), 72–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tang, X., Alouini, M. S., & Goldsmith, A. J. (1999). Effect of channel estimation error on M-QAM BER performance in rayleigh fading. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 47(12), 1856–1864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, C. X., Haider, F., Gao, X., You, X. H., Yang, Y., Yuan, D., et al. (2014). Cellular architecture and key technologies for 5G wireless communication networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(2), 122–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wei, H., Huang, Y., Zhang, T., & Li, L. (2016). An universal MMSE channel estimator for OFDM receiver. Wireless Personal Communications. doi:10.1007/s11277-016-3643-8.

  28. Wortmann, F., Flüchter, K., et al. (2015). Internet of things. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(3), 221–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xia, F., Yang, L. T., Wang, L., & Vinel, A. (2012). Internet of things. International Journal of Communication Systems, 25(9), 1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang, M., Li, Y., Jin, D., Zeng, L., Wu, X., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015). Software-defined and virtualized future mobile and wireless networks: A survey. Mobile Networks and Applications, 20(1), 4–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the project SP2017/158, Development of algorithms and systems for control, measurement and safety applications III of Student Grant System, VSB-TU Ostrava and by the project SP2017/128 of the Student Grant System, VSB-TU Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FEI, VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 2172/15, 70833, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic

    Radek Martinek, Jaromir Konecny, Petr Koudelka & Jan Zidek

  2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas, 500 W University Ave, El Paso, TX, 79968, USA

    Homer Nazeran

Authors
  1. Radek Martinek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaromir Konecny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Petr Koudelka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jan Zidek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Homer Nazeran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radek Martinek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martinek, R., Konecny, J., Koudelka, P. et al. Adaptive Optimization of Control Parameters for Feed-Forward Software Defined Equalization. Wireless Pers Commun 95, 4001–4011 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4036-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4036-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation