Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recent trends and future directions of congestion management strategies for routing in IoT-based wireless sensor network: a thematic review

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT) has paved the way for the development of smart systems, with Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) serving as the underlying infrastructure. While it exists in a miniature form, IoT-based WSN today stands as the revolution of the future, promising tremendous influence on society. However, the limited resources of these networks pose various challenges, particularly in routing, with congestion being a significant issue that affects their efficiency. Although previous studies are available on congestion management in WSNs, research specifically focused on IoT-based WSNs and addressing the root causes of congestion is none. In order to address this gap, this article conducts a thematic review of the current literature to identify congestion management strategies and forecast future trends. The search identified 86 studies, among which 47 articles were analyzed. The six final themes were discovered: artificial intelligence approach, customized classical method, hybrid approach, cross-layering approach, SDN-based approach, and RPL routing advancement. The findings establish a comprehensive taxonomy model as a conceptual framework for future research in congestion management strategies for IoT-based WSNs routing. This taxonomy aids academic researchers as well as industrial practitioners and highlights crucial areas for future research on congestion issues from the perspective of Industry 4.0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Majid, M., et al. (2022). Applications of wireless sensor networks and internet of things frameworks in the industry revolution 4.0: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 22(6), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22062087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yadav, S. L., & Ujjwal, R. L. (2020). Mitigating congestion in wireless sensor networks through clustering and queue assistance: a survey. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 9, 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01640-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Horvat, G., Zagar, D., & Vlaovic, J. (2017). Evaluation of quality of service provisioning in large-scale pervasive and smart collaborative wireless sensor and actor networks. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 33, 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tabaa, M., Monteiro, F., Bensag, H., & Dandache, A. (2020). Green Industrial Internet of Things from a smart industry perspectives. Energy Reports, 6(June), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Soliman, F., & Youssef, M. A. (2003). Internet-based e-commerce and its impact on manufacturing and business operations. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(8–9), 546–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570310497594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodríguez, A., Del-Valle-Soto, C., & Velázquez, R. (2020). Energy-efficient clustering routing protocol for wireless sensor networks based on yellow saddle goatfish algorithm. Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8091515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kavitha, V. (2021). “Privacy preserving using multi-hop dynamic clustering routing protocol and elliptic curve cryptosystem for WSN in IoT environment. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 14(2), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-020-01038-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bagdadee, A. H., Hoque, M. Z., & Zhang, L. (2020). IoT based wireless sensor network for power quality control in smart grid. Procedia Computer Science, 167(2019), 1148–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Da Xu, L., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941–2962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Faheem, M., Butt, R. A., Raza, B., Ashraf, M. W., Ngadi, M. A., & Gungor, V. C. (2019). A multi-channel distributed routing scheme for smart grid real-time critical event monitoring applications in the perspective of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 32(4), 236. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAHUC.2019.103264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guravaiah, K., & Velusamy, R. L. (2019). Prototype of home monitoring device using internet of things and river formation dynamics-based multi-hop routing protocol (RFDHM). IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 65(3), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2019.2920086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alavi, A. H., Jiao, P., Buttlar, W. G., & Lajnef, N. (2018). Internet of Things-enabled smart cities: State-of-the-art and future trends. Measurement, 129, 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.07.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ketu, S., & Mishra, P. K. (2021). Internet of healthcare things: A contemporary survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 192, 103179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bai, Y. (2018). Industrial Internet of things over tactile Internet in the context of intelligent manufacturing. Cluster Computing, 21(1), 869–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-0925-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar, K. A. (2010). IMCC protocol in heterogeneous wireless sensor network for high quality data transmission in military applications. In 2010 First International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC 2010), Oct 2010, pp. 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1109/PDGC.2010.5679973

  16. Muduli, L., Mishra, D. P., & Jana, P. K. (2018). Application of wireless sensor network for environmental monitoring in underground coal mines: A systematic review. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 106, 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.12.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jino Ramson, S. R., & Jackuline Moni, D. (2017). Applications of wireless sensor networks—A survey. ICIEEIMT, 17(978), 325–329.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vijayakumar, V., & Balakrishnan, N. (2021). Artificial intelligence-based agriculture automated monitoring systems using WSN. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12(7), 8009–8016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02530-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shah, S. A., Nazir, B., & Khan, I. A. (2017). Congestion control algorithms in wireless sensor networks: Trends and opportunities. Journal of King Saud University Computer and Information Sciences, 29(3), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2015.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaur, M., Verma, V., & Malik, A. (2018). A comparative analysis of various congestion control schemes in wireless sensor networks. In 2018 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence), Jan 2018, pp. 14–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONFLUENCE.2018.8442449.

  21. Zhao, J., Wang, L., Li, S., Liu, X., Yuan, Z., & Gao, Z. (2010). A survey of congestion control mechanisms in wireless sensor networks. In Proc.—2010 6th Int. Conf. Intell. Inf. Hiding Multimed. Signal Process. IIHMSP 2010, pp. 719–722. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIHMSP.2010.182.

  22. Arthi, K., Vijayalakshmi, A., & Ranjan, P. V. (2013). Critical event based multichannel process control monitoring using WSN for industrial applications. Procedia Engineering, 64, 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Awan, K. M., et al. (2019). A priority-based congestion-avoidance routing protocol using IoT-based heterogeneous medical sensors for energy efficiency in healthcare wireless body area networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 15(6), 155014771985398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147719853980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Boddu, N., Boba, V., & Vatambeti, R. (2022). A novel georouting potency based optimum spider monkey approach for avoiding congestion in energy efficient mobile ad-hoc network. Wireless Personal Communications, 127(2), 1157–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08571-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Agnihotri, S., & Ramkumar, K. R. (2020). Advances in Computational Intelligence, Security and Internet of Things (Vol. 1192). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Khan, A., Aurangzeb, K., Ul, E., Qazi, H., & Rahman, A. U. (2020). Energy-aware scalable reliable and void-hole mitigation routing for sparsely deployed underwater acoustic networks. Applied Sciences, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ploumis, S. E., Sgora, A., Kandris, D., & Vergados, D. D., (2012) Congestion avoidance in wireless sensor networks: A survey. In 2012 16th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, Oct 2012, pp. 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1109/PCi.2012.83.

  28. Kafi, M. A., Djenouri, D., Ben-Othman, J., & Badache, N. (2014). Congestion control protocols in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 16(3), 1369–1390. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2014.021714.00123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sergiou, C., Antoniou, P., & Vassiliou, V. (2014). A comprehensive survey of congestion control protocols in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 16(4), 1839–1859. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2014.2320071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ghaffari, A. (2015). Congestion control mechanisms in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 52, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jan, M. A., Jan, S. R. U., Alam, M., Akhunzada, A., & Rahman, I. U. (2018). A comprehensive analysis of congestion control protocols in wireless sensor networks. Mobile Networks and Applications, 23(3), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-018-1018-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Narawade, V. E., & Kolekar, U. D. (2016). Congestion avoidance and control in wireless sensor networks: A survey. In 2016 International Conference on ICT in Business Industry & Government (ICTBIG), Nov 2016, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTBIG.2016.7892701.

  33. Lim, C. (2019). A survey on congestion control for RPL-based wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 19(11), 2567. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19112567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nawaz, B., Mahmood, K., Khan, J., Ul, M., Munir, A., & Kashif, M. (2019). Congestion control techniques in WSNs: A review. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(4), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pandey, D., & Kushwaha, V. (2020). An exploratory study of congestion control techniques in wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 157, 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.04.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bohloulzadeh, A., & Rajaei, M. (2020). A survey on congestion control protocols in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 27(3), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-020-00479-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chouhan, N., & Jain, S. C. (2020). Tunicate swarm Grey Wolf optimization for multi-path routing protocol in IoT assisted WSN networks. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02657-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yue, W., Li, C., Chen, Y., Duan, P., & Mao, G. (2021). What is the root cause of congestion in urban traffic networks: Road infrastructure or signal control? IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3085021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., & Cayirci, E. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 38(4), 393–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(01)00302-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Estrin, D., Govindan, R., Heidemann, J., & Kumar, S. (1999) Next century challenges: Scalable coordination in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking, Aug 1999, pp. 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/313451.313556.

  41. Warneke, B., Last, M., Liebowitz, B., & Pister, K. S. J. (2001). Smart Dust: communicating with a cubic-millimeter computer. Computer (Long Beach Calif), 34(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.895117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., & Culler, D. (2005). Telos: Enabling ultra-low power wireless research. In 2005 4th Int. Symp. Inf. Process. Sens. Networks, IPSN 2005, vol. 2005, pp. 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPSN.2005.1440950.

  43. Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787–2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhao, L., Yin, S., Liu, L., Zhang, Z., & Wei, S. (2011). A crop monitoring system based on wireless sensor network. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 11(1), 558–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wood, A. et al., ALARM-NET: Wireless sensor networks for assisted-living and residential monitoring. Univ Virginia Comput Sci Dep Tech Rep, pp. 2–5 (2006).

  46. Akyildiz, I. F., Melodia, T., & Chowdhury, K. R. (2007). A survey on wireless multimedia sensor networks. Computer Networks, 51(4), 921–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2006.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lee, I., & Lee, K. (2015). The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Business Horizons, 58(4), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mekki, K., Bajic, E., Chaxel, F., & Meyer, F. (2019). A comparative study of LPWAN technologies for large-scale IoT deployment. ICT Express, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2017.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Li, J. Q., Yu, F. R., Deng, G., Luo, C., Ming, Z., & Yan, Q. (2017). Industrial internet: A survey on the enabling technologies, applications, and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 19(3), 1504–1526. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2691349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., & Xu, L. (2016). Edge computing: Vision and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(5), 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Fordal, J. M., Schjølberg, P., Helgetun, H., Skjermo, T. Ø., Wang, Y., & Wang, C. (2023). Application of sensor data based predictive maintenance and artificial neural networks to enable Industry 4.0. Advanced Manufacturing, 11(2), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-022-00433-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kanoun, O., et al. (2021). Energy-aware system design for autonomous wireless sensor nodes: A comprehensive review. Sensors, 21(2), 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bongomin, O., Yemane, A., Kembabazi, B., & Malanda, C. (2020). The hype and disruptive technologies of industry 4. 0 in major industrial sectors: A state of the art. Preprints, 1(June), 1–68. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202006.0007.v1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Shelke, M. P., Malhotra, A., & Mahalle, P. (2018). PSO_based congestion free critical data transmission in health monitoring system. In 2018 IEEE Punecon, Nov 2018, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/PUNECON.2018.8745433.

  55. Dubey, A. K., & Sinha, A. (2015). Congestion control for self similar traffic in wireless sensor network. In 2015 Eighth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3), Aug 2015, pp. 331–335. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2015.7346702.

  56. Elappila, M., Chinara, S., & Parhi, D. R. (2018). Survivable path routing in WSN for IoT applications. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 43, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2017.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. He, Z., Chen, L., Li, F., & Jin, G. (2023). Congestion avoidance in intelligent transport networks based on WSN-IoT through controlling data rate of zigbee protocol by learning automata.

  58. Gao, C., Wang, Z., Chen, Y., & Tian, Z. (2020). A scalable two-hop multi-sink wireless sensor network for data collection in large-scale smart manufacturing facilities. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 36(4), 795–819. https://doi.org/10.6688/JISE.202007_36(4).0007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Alaloul, W. S., Qureshi, A. H., Musarat, M. A., & Saad, S. (2021). Evolution of close-range detection and data acquisition technologies towards automation in construction progress monitoring. Journal of Building Engineering, 43, 102877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Polonelli, T., Bentivogli, A., Comai, G., & Magno, M. (2022) Self-sustainable IoT wireless sensor node for predictive maintenance on electric motors. In 2022 IEEE Sensors Appl. Symp. SAS 2022 - Proc. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS54819.2022.9881349.

  61. Yadav, S. L., Ujjwal, R. L., Kumar, S., Kaiwartya, O., Kumar, M., & Kashyap, P. K. (2021). Traffic and energy aware optimization for congestion control in next generation wireless sensor networks. Journal of Sensors, 2021, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5575802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zairul, M. (2020). A thematic review on student-centred learning in the studio education. J. Crit. Rev., 7(02), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.02.95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning associate professor in sexuality studies. Psychologist, 26(2), 120–123.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kurniati, A. P., Johnson, O., Hogg, D., & Hall, G. (2016). Process mining in oncology: A literature review. In 2016 6th International Conference on Information Communication and Management (ICICM), Oct 2016(i), pp. 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOMAN.2016.7784260.

  65. Zairul, M. (2021). The recent trends on prefabricated buildings with circular economy (CE) approach. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 4, 100239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mutlag, A. A., Abd Ghani, M. K., Arunkumar, N., Mohammed, M. A., & Mohd, O. (2019). Enabling technologies for fog computing in healthcare IoT systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 90, 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.07.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Carvalho, G., Cabral, B., Pereira, V., & Bernardino, J. (2021). Edge computing: Current trends, research challenges and future directions. Computing, 103(5), 993–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-020-00896-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Kim, H.-S., Paek, J., & Bahk, S. (2015). QU-RPL: Queue utilization based RPL for load balancing in large scale industrial applications. In 2015 12th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON), pp. 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAHCN.2015.7338325.

  70. Tall, H., Chalhoub, G., & Misson, M. (2015). CoLBA: A collaborative load balancing algorithm to avoid queue overflow in WSNs. In Proceedings—2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Data Intensive Systems; 8th IEEE International Conference Cyber, Physical and Social Computing; 11th IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and 8th IEEE Inte, pp. 682–687. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSDIS.2015.107.

  71. Moghadam, M. N., Taheri, H., & Karrari, M. (2015). Multi-class multipath routing protocol for low power wireless networks with heuristic optimal load distribution. Wireless Personal Communications, 82(2), 861–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-2257-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Jin, Y., Gormus, S., Kulkarni, P., & Sooriyabandara, M. (2016). Content centric routing in IoT networks and its integration in RPL. Computer Communications, 89–90, 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2016.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Twayej, W., Khan, M., & Al-Raweshidy, H. S. (2017). Network performance evaluation of M2M with self organizing cluster head to sink mapping. IEEE Sensors Journal, 17(15), 4962–4974. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2017.2711660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Al-Kashoash, H. A. A., Amer, H. M., Mihaylova, L., & Kemp, A. H. (2017). Optimization based hybrid congestion alleviation for 6LoWPAN networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4(6), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2754918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Jabbar, W. A., Saad, W. K., & Ismail, M. (2018). MEQSA-OLSRv2: A multicriteria-based hybrid multipath protocol for energy-efficient and QoS-aware data routing in MANET-WSN convergence scenarios of IoT. IEEE Access, 6, 76546–76572. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2882853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Manshahia, M. S. (2019). Grey wolf algorithm based energy-efficient data transmission in internet of things. Procedia Computer Science, 160, 604–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Bennis, I., Fouchal, H., Piamrat, K., & Ayaida, M. (2018). Efficient queuing scheme through cross-layer approach for multimedia transmission over WSNs. Computer Networks, 134, 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.01.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Ahmed, G., Zhao, X., & Fareed, M. M. S. (2019). A hybrid energy equating game for energy management in the internet of underwater things. Sensors, 19, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19102351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Gheisari, S., & Tahavori, E. (2019). CCCLA: A cognitive approach for congestion control in Internet of Things using a game of learning automata. Computer Communications, 147, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2019.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Chowdhury, S., Benslimane, A., & Giri, C. (2020). Noncooperative gaming for energy-efficient congestion control in 6LoWPAN. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(6), 4777–4788. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2969272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Homaei, M. H., Soleimani, F., Shamshirband, S., Mosavi, A., Nabipour, N., & Varkonyi-Koczy, A. R. (2020). An enhanced distributed congestion control method for classical 6LowPAN protocols using fuzzy decision system. IEEE Access, 8, 20628–20645. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Hosahalli, D., & Srinivas, K. G. (2020). Cross-layer routing protocol for event-driven M2M communication in IoT-assisted smart city planning and management: CWSN-eSCPM. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-wss.2018.5198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Adil, M. (2021). Congestion free opportunistic multipath routing load balancing scheme for Internet of Things (IoT). Computer Networks, 184, 107707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Birurviswanath, S., Muddenahallinagendrappa, T., & Venkatesh, K. R. (2021). JSMCRP: Cross-layer architecture based joint-synchronous MAC and routing protocol for wireless sensor network. ECTI Transactions on Electrical Engineering, Electronics, and Communications, 19(1), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.37936/ecti-eec.2021191.240719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Jagannathan, P., Gurumoorthy, S. & Stateczny, A. (2021). Collision-aware routing using multi-objective seagull.

  86. Shiny, S. S. G., & Murugan, K. (2021). TSDN-WISE: Automatic threshold-based low control-flow communication protocol for SDWSN. IEEE Sensors Journal, 21(17), 19560–19569. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3088604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Ali, M. T., et al. (2018). Dist-Coop: Distributed cooperative transmission in UWSNs using optimization congestion control and opportunistic routing. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(6), 356–368. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.090649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Alghazzawi, D., Bamasaq, O., Bhatia, S., Kumar, A., Dadheech, P., & Albeshri, A. (2021). Congestion control in cognitive IoT-based WSN network for smart agriculture. IEEE Access, 9, 151401–151420. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3124791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Benzerbadj, A., Kechar, B., Bounceur, A., & Pottier, B. (2018). Cross-layer greedy position-based routing for multihop wireless sensor networks in a real environment. Ad Hoc Networks, 71, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Sharif, A., Potdar, V. M., & Rathnayaka, A. J. D. (2010). Dependency of transport functions on IEEE802.11 and IEEE802.15.4 MAC/PHY layer protocols for WSN. International Journal of Business Data Communications and Networking, 6(3), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/jbdcn.2010070101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Gogate, U., & Bakal, J. W. (2016). Smart healthcare monitoring system based on wireless sensor networks. In 2016 Int Conf Comput Anal Secur Trends, pp. 594–599. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAST.2016.7915037.

  92. Rezaee, A. A., Yaghmaee, M. H., Rahmani, A. M., & Mohajerzadeh, A. H. (2014). HOCA: Healthcare aware optimized congestion avoidance and control protocol for wireless sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 37(1), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2013.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Shelke, M., Malhotra, A., & Mahalle, P. N. (2018). Congestion-aware opportunistic routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 77, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5544-7_7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Karunanithy, K., & Velusamy, B. (2020). Cluster-tree based energy efficient data gathering protocol for industrial automation using WSNs and IoT. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 19, 100156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2020.100156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Yang, T., Xiang, W., & Ye, L. (2013). A distributed agents QoS routing algorithm to transmit electrical power measuring information in last mile access wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 9(11), 525801. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/525801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Nath, S., & Sarkar, S. K. (2021). Metaheuristics-based routing optimisation, balanced workload distribution and security strategy in IoT environment. International Journal of Advanced Intelligence Paradigms, 19(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAIP.2021.114586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Medjek, F., Tandjaoui, D., Djedjig, N., & Romdhani, I. (2021). Multicast DIS attack mitigation in RPL-based IoT-LLNs. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 61, 102939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2021.102939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Barkaoui, M., Berger, J., & Boukhtouta, A. (2008). A hybrid genetic approach for the dynamic vehicle routing problem with time windows. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 28(1–2), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2008.10737721

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  99. Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Ma, Y., & Chen, M. (2015). PWDGR: Pair-wise directional geographical routing based on wireless sensor network. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2014.2367116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Ma, C., Sheu, J.-P., & Hsu, C.-X. (2016). A game theory based congestion control protocol for wireless personal area networks. Journal of Sensors. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6168535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Kim, H.-S., Kim, H., Paek, J., & Bahk, S. (2017). Load balancing under heavy traffic in RPL routing protocol for low power and lossy networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 16(4), 964–979. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2016.2585107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Sasidharan, D., & Jacob, L. (2018). Improving network lifetime and reliability for machine type communications based on LOADng routing protocol. Ad Hoc Networks, 73, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Schaerer, J., Zhao, Z., Braun, T. (2018). DTARp: A dynamic traffic aware routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In RealWSN 2018—Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Real-World Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks, Part of SenSys 2018, pp. 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/3277883.3277885.

  104. Manshahia, M. S. (2018). Swarm intelligence-based energy-efficient data delivery in WSAN to virtualise IoT in smart cities. IET Wireless Sensor Systems, 8(6), 256–259. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-wss.2018.5143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Fathallah, K., Abid, M. A., & Ben Hadj-Alouane, N. (2018). PA-RPL: A partition aware IoT routing protocol for precision agriculture. In 2018 14th International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), Jun 2018, pp. 672–677. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCMC.2018.8450396.

  106. Kiruthiga, V. & Srinivasan, N. (2018). Emergency data identification and sending data with high priority. In 2018 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP), pp. 416–419. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSP.2018.8524406.

  107. Ullah, I., & Youn, H. Y. (2018). Statistical multipath queue-wise preemption routing for zigbee-based WSN. Wireless Personal Communications, 100(4), 1537–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5652-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Sunitha, G. P., Kumar, S. M. D., & Kumar, B. P. V. (2019). Energy efficient hierarchical multi-path routing protocol to alleviate congestion in WSN. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 32(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAHUC.2019.101826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Jaiswal, K. & Anand, V. (2019). An Optimal QoS-aware multipath routing protocol for IoT based wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Electronics and Communication and Aerospace Technology, ICECA 2019, pp. 857–860. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA.2019.8822173.

  110. Butt, S. A., et al. (2019). Exploiting layered multi-path routing protocols to avoid void hole regions for reliable data delivery and efficient energy management for IoT-enabled underwater WSNs. Sensors (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19030510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Yogeesh, A. C., Patil, S. B., Patil, P., & Roopashree, H. R. (2019). DSP-IR: Delay sensitive protocol for intelligent routing with medium access control. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 765, 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91192-2_39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Hosahalli, D., & Srinivas, K. G. (2020). Enhanced reinforcement learning assisted dynamic power management model for internet-of-things centric wireless sensor network. IET Communications, 14(21), 3748–3760. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2020.0026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Soundari, A. G., & Jyothi, V. L. (2020). Energy efficient machine learning technique for smart data collection in wireless sensor networks. Circuits Systems and Signal Processing, 39(2), 1089–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-019-01181-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Chanak, P., & Banerjee, I. (2020). Congestion free routing mechanism for IoT-enabled wireless sensor networks for smart healthcare applications. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 66(3), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2020.2987433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Charles, A. S. J., & Palanisamy, K. (2020). Neo-hybrid composite routing metric for RPL. Procedia Computer Science, 171, 1819–1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Alejandrino, J., Concepcion, R., Lauguico, S., Flores, R., Bandala, A., & Dadios, E. (2020). Application-based cluster and connectivity-specific routing protocol for smart monitoring system. In 2020 IEEE 12th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM), 2020, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/HNICEM51456.2020.9400107.

  117. Donta, P. K., Amgoth, T. & Rao Annavarapu, C. S. (2020). Congestion-aware data acquisition with Q-learning for wireless sensor networks. In 2020 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS), Sep 2020, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMTRONICS51293.2020.9216379.

  118. Ganesh, D. R., Patil, K. K., & Suresh, L. (2020). Fault-resilient and QoS centric dynamic network sensitive routing protocol for mobile-WSNs. International Journal of Autonomous and Adaptive Communications Systems, 13(1), 23–54. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAACS.2020.104166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Vallati, C., Righetti, F., Tanganelli, G., Mingozzi, E., & Anastasi, G. (2020). Analysis of the interplay between RPL and the congestion control strategies for CoAP. Ad Hoc Networks, 109(Oct 2019), 102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2020.102290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Wang, B. (2021). Wireless sensor network routing algorithm based on traffic prediction for internet of thing. In 2021 International Conference on Electronic Communications, Internet of Things and Big Data (ICEIB), 2021, pp. 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEIB53692.2021.9686397

  121. Hassani, A. E., Sahel, A., & Badri, A. (2021). FTC-OF: Forwarding traffic consciousness objective function for RPL routing protocol. International Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering & Telecommunications, 10(3), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijeetc.10.3.168-175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Shreyas, J., Ajmani, S., Udayaprasad, P., Chouhon, D., & Dilip Kumar, M. S. (2021). Dynamic routing scheme for linking wireless sensor network towards internet of things. https://doi.org/10.1109/EICT54103.2021.9733501.

  123. Violettas, G., Petridou, S., & Mamatas, L. (2019). Evolutionary software defined networking-inspired routing control strategies for the internet of things. IEEE Access, 7, 132173–132192. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2940465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Kumar, N., & Vidyarthi, D. P. (2018). A green routing algorithm for iot-enabled software defined wireless sensor network. IEEE Sensors Journal, 18(22), 9449–9460. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2018.2869629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Samra, N. K., & Kaur, R. (2019). A fuzzy based methods in wireless body area network for controlling congestion. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(9S), 721–725. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.I1116.0789S19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Jagannath, J., Furman, S., Jagannath, A., Ling, L., Burger, A., & Drozd, A. (2019). HELPER: Heterogeneous efficient low power radio for enabling ad hoc emergency public safety networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 89, 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2019.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Faheem, M., & Gungor, V. C. (2018). MQRP: Mobile sinks-based QoS-aware data gathering protocol for wireless sensor networks-based smart grid applications in the context of industry 4.0-based on internet of things. Future Generation Computer Systems, 82, 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Zinonos, Z., Chrysostomou, C., & Vassiliou, V. (2014). Wireless sensor networks mobility management using fuzzy logic. Ad Hoc Networks, 16(2014), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2013.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Sharavana Kumar, M. G., & Sarma Dhulipala, V. R. (2020). Fuzzy allocation model for health care data management on IoT assisted wearable sensor platform. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 166, 108249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Chen, Y. L., & Lai, H. P. (2014). A fuzzy logical controller for traffic load parameter with priority-based rate in wireless multimedia sensor networks. Applied Soft Computing, 14(Part C), 594–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2013.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Kapitanova, K., Son, S. H., & Kang, K. D. (2012). Using fuzzy logic for robust event detection in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(4), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2011.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Guan, X., Wu, H., & Bi, S. (2011). A game theory-based obstacle avoidance routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 11(10), 9327–9343. https://doi.org/10.3390/s111009327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Sheu,J.-P., Hsu, C.-X., & Ma, C. (2015). A game theory based congestion control protocol for wireless personal area networks. In 39th Annual IEEE Computers, Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC 2015), Vol. 2, pp. 659–664, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2015.21.

  134. Najm, I. A., Hamoud, A. K., Lloret, J., & Bosch, I. (2019). Machine learning prediction approach to enhance congestion control in 5G IoT environment. Electronics, 8(6), 607. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8060607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Shelke, M., Malhotra, A., & Mahalle, P. N. (2019). Fuzzy priority based intelligent traffic congestion control and emergency vehicle management using congestion-aware routing algorithm. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01523-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. IqbalMalik, K., & Mateen Yaqoob, M. (2014). An analytical survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor network (WSN). International Journal of Computers and Applications, 107(18), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.5120/18855-0555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Bernard, M. S., Pei, T., Li, Z., & Li, K. (2019). QoS strategies for wireless multimedia sensor networks in the context of IoT. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST, vol. 275. College of Information Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, pp. 228–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16042-5_21

  138. Sunitha, G. P., Kumar, D., & Vijay Kumar, B. P. (2014) Classical and soft computing based congestion control protocols in WSNS: A survey and comparison. International Journal of Computers and Applications 975–8887

  139. Jaiswal, K., & Anand, V. (2020). EOMR: An energy-efficient optimal multi-path routing protocol to improve QoS in wireless sensor network for IoT applications. Wireless Personal Communications, 111(4), 2493–2515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-07000-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Ghazi, M. U., Naqvi, S. S. H., Yamin, K., & Humayun, O. (2018). Congestion-Aware Routing Algorithm Based on Traffic Priority in Wireless Sensor Networks. In 2018 15th International Conference on Smart Cities: Improving Quality of Life Using ICT & IoT (HONET-ICT), Oct 2018, pp. 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1109/HONET.2018.8551337.

  141. Shreyas, J., Singh, H., Tiwari, S., Srinidhi, N. N., & Dilip Kumar, S. M. (2021). CAFOR: congestion avoidance using fuzzy logic to find an optimal routing path in 6LoWPAN networks. Journal on Reliable Intelligent Environments. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-021-00134-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Fathallah, K., Abid, M. A., & Ben Hadj-Alouane, N. (2020). Enhancing energy saving in smart farming through aggregation and partition aware IOT routing protocol. Sensors (Switzerland), 20, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Schaerer, J., Zhao, Z., & Braun, T. (2018). DTARP: A dynamic traffic aware routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Real-World Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks, Nov 2018, pp. 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/3277883.3277885.

  144. Ateeq, M., Ishmanov, F., Afzal, M. K., & Naeem, M. (2019). Predicting delay in IoT using deep learning: A multiparametric approach. IEEE Access, 7, 62022–62031. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2915958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Rekik, J. D., Baccouche, L., & Ben Ghezala, H. (2011). Performance evaluation and impact of weighting factors on an energy and delay aware dynamic source routing protocol. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 3(4), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijcsit.2011.3418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Shah, B., et al. (2020). Guaranteed lifetime protocol for IoT based wireless sensor networks with multiple constraints. Ad Hoc Networks, 104, 102158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2020.102158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Umar, I. A., Hanapi, Z. M., & Adnan, A. I. (2016). Performance analysis of state-free geographic forwarding protocols for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Engineering &Technology, 8(6), 3065–3072. https://doi.org/10.21817/ijet/2016/v8i6/160806404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Farooq, H., & Tang Jung, L. (2013). Energy, traffic load, and link quality aware ad hoc routing protocol for wireless sensor network based smart metering infrastructure. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/597582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Faheem, et al. (2019). QoSRP: A cross-layer QoS channel-aware routing protocol for the internet of underwater acoustic sensor networks. Sensors, 19(21), 4762. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Yukun, Y., Jiangbing, L., Dongliang, X., Zhi, R., & Qing, H. (2017). Centralized congestion control routing protocol based on multi-metrics for low power and lossy networks. Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 24(5), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1005-8885(17)60231-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Long, N. B., Tran-Dang, H., & Kim, D.-S. (2018). Energy-aware real-time routing for large-scale industrial internet of things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(3), 2190–2199. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2827050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. El-Mougy, A., & Ibnkahla, M. (2013). A cross-layer framework for network management in wireless sensor networks using weighted cognitive maps. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 9(3), 568580. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/568580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Raja, G. P., & Mangai, S. (2019). Firefly load balancing based energy optimized routing for multimedia data delivery in wireless mesh network. Cluster Computing, 22(S5), 12077–12090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1557-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Ghayvat, H., Mukhopadhyay, S., Gui, X., & Suryadevara, N. (2015). WSN- and IOT-based smart homes and their extension to smart buildings. Sensors, 15(5), 10350–10379. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150510350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Alinaghipour, N., Yousefi, H., Yeganeh, M. H., & Movaghar, A. (2011). Long lifetime real-time routing in unreliable wireless sensor networks. IFIP Wireless Days, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/WD.2011.6098213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Umar, I. A., Hanapi, Z. M., Sali, A., & Zulkarnain, Z. A. (2018). Towards overhead mitigation in state-free geographic forwarding protocols for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 6, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-017-1651-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Haseeb, K., Almogren, A., Islam, N., Ud Din, I., & Jan, Z. (2019). An energy-efficient and secure routing protocol for intrusion avoidance in IoT-based WSN. Energies, 12(21), 4174. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12214174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Lenka, R. K., Kolhar, M., Mohapatra, H., Al-Turjman, F., & Altrjman, C. (2022). Cluster-based routing protocol with static hub (CRPSH) for WSN-assisted IoT networks. Sustainability, 14, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. El-Fouly, F. H., Kachout, M., Alharbi, Y., Alshudukhi, J. S., Alanazi, A., & Ramadan, R. A. (2023). Environment-aware energy efficient and reliable routing in real-time multi-sink wireless sensor networks for smart cities applications. Applied Sciences, 13, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Qadir, J., Ali, A., Yau, K.-L.A., Sathiaseelan, A., & Crowcroft, J. (2015). Exploiting the power of multiplicity: A holistic survey of network-layer multipath. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 17(4), 2176–2213. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2453941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Zonouz, A. E., Xing, L., Vokkarane, V. M., & Sun, Y. L. (2014). Reliability-oriented single-path routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 14(11), 4059–4068. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2014.2332296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Macit, M., Gungor, V. C., & Tuna, G. (2014). Comparison of QoS-aware single-path vs. multi-path routing protocols for image transmission in wireless multimedia sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 19, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2014.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Radi, M., Dezfouli, B., Bakar, K. A., & Lee, M. (2012). Multipath routing in wireless sensor networks: Survey and research challenges. Sensors, 12(1), 650–685. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120100650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Shanthamallu,U. S., Spanias, A., Tepedelenlioglu, C., & Stanley, M. (2017). A brief survey of machine learning methods and their sensor and IoT applications. In 2017 8th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA), Aug 2017, vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IISA.2017.8316459.

  165. Sadat, A., Karmakar, G., & Green, D. (2012). Joint optimization of number and allocation of clusters for wireless sensor networks. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Jun 2012, pp. 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2012.6364567.

  166. Kumar, G., Mehra, H., Seth, A. R., Radhakrishnan, P., Hemavathi, N., & Sudha, S. (2014). An hybrid clustering algorithm for optimal clusters in Wireless sensor networks. In 2014 IEEE Students’ Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science, Mar 2014, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCEECS.2014.6804442.

  167. Justus, J. J. & Sekar, A. C. (2016). Congestion control in wireless sensor network using hybrid epidermic and DAIPaS approach. In 2016 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT), Aug 2016, vol. 2016, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/INVENTIVE.2016.7830078

  168. Yousefi, H., Malekimajd, M., Ashouri, M., & Movaghar, A. (2015). Fast aggregation scheduling in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(6), 3402–3414. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2015.2405060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Rahmanian, A., Omranpour, H., Akbari, M., & Raahemifar, K. (2011). A novel genetic algorithm in LEACH-C routing protocol for sensor networks. In 2011 24th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), May 2011, pp. 001096–001100. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2011.6030631

  170. Khalil, E. A., & Attea, B. A. (2011). Energy-aware evolutionary routing protocol for dynamic clustering of wireless sensor networks. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 1(4), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2011.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Kushwaha, A., & Doohan, N. V. (2016). M-EALBM: A modified approach energy aware load balancing multipath routing protocol in MANET. In 2016 Symposium on Colossal Data Analysis and Networking (CDAN), Mar 2016, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDAN.2016.7570940

  172. Chithaluru, P., Tiwari, R., & Kumar, K. (2019). AREOR–Adaptive ranking based energy efficient opportunistic routing scheme in Wireless Sensor Network. Computer Network, 162, 106863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2019.106863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  173. Akan, O. B., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2005). Event-to-sink reliable transport in wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 13(5), 1003–1016. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2005.857076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  174. Raman, C. J., & James, V. (2019). FCC: Fast congestion control scheme for wireless sensor networks using hybrid optimal routing algorithm. Cluster Computing, 22(S5), 12701–12711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-1744-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. Tan, J., et al. (2019). An efficient information maximization based adaptive congestion control scheme in wireless sensor network. IEEE Access, 7(1), 64878–64896. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2915385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  176. Indira, K., & Sakthi, U. (2019). Security issues, countermeasures and dynamic queue scheduling for SDWSN. In 2019 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSPC), Mar 2019, pp. 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPC46172.2019.8976844.

  177. Demers, A., Keshav, S., & Shenker, S. (1989). Analysis and simulation of a fair queueing algorithm. In Symposium Proceedings on Communications architectures & protocols—SIGCOMM’89, 1989, vol. 25(1), pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/75246.75248.

  178. Bin Yin, D., & Xie, J. Y. (2006). Probability based weighted fair queueing algorithm with adaptive buffer management for high-speed network. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 4222 LNCS, pp. 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/11881223_52.

  179. Zawodniok, M., & Jagannathan, S. (2007). Predictive congestion control protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(11), 3955–3963. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2007.051035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  180. Chakravarthi, R. & Gomathy, C. (2010). IPD: Intelligent packet dropping algorithm for congestion control in wireless sensor network. In Trendz in Information Sciences & Computing (TISC2010), 2010, pp. 222–225. https://doi.org/10.1109/TISC.2010.5714644.

  181. Rathnayaka, A. J. D., Potdar, V. M., Sharif, A., Sarencheh, S., & Kuruppu, S. (2010). Wireless sensor network transport protocol—a state of the art. In 2010 International Conference on Broadband, Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications, pp. 812–817. https://doi.org/10.1109/BWCCA.2010.177.

  182. Sridevi, S., Usha, M., & Lithurin, G. P. A. (2012) Priority based congestion control for heterogeneous traffic in multipath wireless sensor networks. In 2012 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCI.2012.6158873

  183. Vaiyapuri, T., Parvathy, V. S., Manikandan, V., Krishnaraj, N., Gupta, D., & Shankar, K. (2021). A novel hybrid optimization for cluster-based routing protocol in information-centric wireless sensor networks for IoT based mobile edge computing. Wireless Personal Communications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08088-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

“This work is supported by Geran Putra Berimpak Universiti Putra Malaysia (9659400)”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Seri Kembangan, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

    D. A. Zainaddin, Z. M. Hanapi, Mohamed Othman, Zuriati Ahmad Zukarnain & Muhammad Daniel Hafiz Abdullah

Authors
  1. D. A. Zainaddin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Z. M. Hanapi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamed Othman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zuriati Ahmad Zukarnain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muhammad Daniel Hafiz Abdullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Zainaddin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zainaddin, D.A., Hanapi, Z.M., Othman, M. et al. Recent trends and future directions of congestion management strategies for routing in IoT-based wireless sensor network: a thematic review. Wireless Netw (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03598-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03598-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation