Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

RSU assisted reliable relay selection for emergency message routing in intermittently connected VANETs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs), high mobility, high-density, and random distribution of vehicles are crucial factors affecting the performance of a routing scheme. High mobility causes frequent changes in network topology, whereas high-density causes communication congestion due to channel contention. Moreover, routing decisions based on a relay vehicle may be less optimal if we do not consider the stability and predict the position of a relay vehicle in such dynamic environments. In addition, periodic beaconing may not be attractive because it creates channel contention and degrades the message’s reliability. Owing to these factors, designing an efficient routing scheme for emergency messages is a challenging task, especially in the urban environment. In this paper, we propose a reliable relay selection scheme for Emergency Message Routing in Intermittently Connected Networks (EMR-ICN). EMR-ICN is used for both sparse and dense network environments to establish a stable routing path. We use vehicle-to-infrastructure and vehicle-to-vehicle communication models to support routing in dense and sparse networks. We adopt the position prediction and some mobility metrics for relay selection to ensure a stable routing path. By employing relative positions changes among moving vehicles with respect to a time interval, EMR-ICN predicts the relative positions of neighbor vehicles to exclude unstable neighbors from the list of candidate relay vehicles. Moreover, it selects a reliable relay among the candidate relay vehicles based on distance, movement direction, and speed variation. To minimize channel contention, we adjust the beacons interval according to the estimation of link duration between a vehicle and its neighbors. Simulation results show that EMR-ICN outperforms Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) and Maxduration-Minangle-GPSR, in terms of message delivery ratio, latency, and the number of hop count.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ni, Y., He, J., Cai, L., & Bo, Y. (2018). Data uploading in hybrid V2V/V2I vehicular networks: Modeling and cooperative strategy. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(5), 4602–4614. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2018.2796563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ullah, S., Abbas, G., Abbas, Z. H., Waqas, M., & Ahmad, M. (2020). RBO-EM: Reduced broadcast overhead scheme for emergency message dissemination in VANETs. IEEE Access, 8, 175205–175219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mchergui, A., Moulahi, T., Ben Othman, M. T., & Nasri, S. (2020). Enhancing VANETs broadcasting performance with mobility prediction for smart road. Wireless Personal Communications, 112(3), 1629–1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ullah, S., Abbas, G., Waqas, M., Abbas, Z.H., & Tu, S. (2021). Position-based vehicular clustering for emergency messages dissemination in zone of interest. In 2nd Asia symposium on signal processing (ASSP) (pp. 61–66), Beijing, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASSP54407.2021.00018.

  5. Ullah, S., Abbas, G., Waqas, M., Abbas, Z. H., Tu, S., & Hameed, I. A. (2021). EEMDS: An effective emergency message dissemination scheme for urban VANETs. Sensors, 21(5), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fan, X., Yang, B., Yamamoto, R., & Tanaka, Y. (2015). Road side unit assisted stochastic multi-hop broadcast scheme for instant emergency message propagation. In 17th international conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT) (pp. 450–457), PyeongChang, South Korea. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACT.2015.7224909.

  7. Jemili, I., Mosbah, M., Belghith, A., et al. (2021). Infrastructure localization service and tracking scheme in uncovered areas for internet of vehicles. Annals of Telecommunications, 76(9), 647–664.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jalooli, A., Song, M., & Wang, W. (2019). Message coverage maximization in infrastructure-based urban vehicular networks. Vehicular Communications, 16, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao, H., Liu, C., Li, Y., & Yang, X. (2020). V2VR: Reliable hybrid-network-oriented V2V data transmission and routing considering RSUs and connectivity probability. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(6), 3533–3546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ni, Y., He, J., Cai, L., & Bo, Y. (2016). Delay analysis and message delivery strategy in hybrid V2I/V2V networks. In IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1–6), Washington, DC, USA.

  11. Altayeb, M., & Mahgoub, I. (2013). A survey of vehicular ad hoc networks routing protocols. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 3(3), 829–846.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Srivastava, A., Prakash, A., & Tripathi, R. (2020). Location based routing protocols in VANET: Issues and existing solutions. Vehicular Communications, 23, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoo, H., & Kim, D. (2015). ROFF: Robust and fast forwarding in vehicular ad-hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 14(7), 1490–1502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, X., Li, M., Qian, Z., & Di, T. (2018). Improvement of GPSR protocol in vehicular ad hoc network. IEEE Access, 6, 39515–39524. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2853112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Silva, A., Reza, N., & Oliveira, A. (2019). Improvement and performance evaluation of GPSR-based routing techniques for vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Access, 7, 21722–21733. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2898776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karp, B., & Kung, H.-T. (2000). GPSR: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking (pp. 243–254), Boston, USA.

  17. Mostafa, A., Vegni, A. M., Singoria, R., Oliveira, T., Little, T. D. C., & Agrawal, D. P. (2011). A V2X-based approach for reduction of delay propagation in vehicular ad-hoc networks. In 11th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications (pp. 756–761), St. Petersburg, Russia.

  18. Vegni, A. M., & Little, T. D. (2011). Hybrid vehicular communications based on V2V–V2I protocol switching. International Journal of Vehicle Information and Communication Systems, 2(3–4), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Otsuki, S., & Miwa, H. (2015). Contents delivery method using route prediction in traffic offloading by V2X. In Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent networking and collaborative systems (pp. 239–245), Taipei, Taiwan.

  20. Hou, X., Li, Y., Chen, M., Wu, D., Jin, D., & Chen, S. (2016). Vehicular fog computing: A viewpoint of vehicles as the infrastructures. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(6), 3860–3873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Naderi, M., Zargari, F., & Ghanbari, M. (2019). Adaptive beacon broadcast in opportunistic routing for VANETs. Ad Hoc Networks, 86, 119–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abbas, G., Ullah, S., Waqas, M., Abbas, Z. H., & Bilal, M. (2022). A position-based reliable emergency message routing scheme for road safety in VANETs. Computer Networks, 213, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. LeBrun, J., Chuah, C.-N., Ghosal, D., & Zhang, M. (2005). Knowledge-based opportunistic forwarding in vehicular wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 61st Vehicular Technology Conference (pp. 2289–2293), Stockholm, Sweden.

  24. Ahmed, S., & Kanere, S. S. (2006). SKVR: Scalable knowledge-based routing architecture for public transport networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on vehicular ad hoc networks (pp. 92–93), Los Angeles, California, USA.

  25. Shah, S. S., Malik, A. W., Rahman, A. U., Iqbal, S., & Khan, S. U. (2019). Time barrier-based emergency message dissemination in vehicular ad-hoc networks. IEEE Access, 7, 16494–16503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qiu, T., Wang, X., Chen, C., Atiquzzaman, M., & Liu, L. (2018). TMED: A spider-web-like transmission mechanism for emergency data in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(9), 8682–8694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Choi, O., Kim, S., Jeong, J., Lee, H.-W., & Chong, S. (2016). Delay-optimal data forwarding in vehicular sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(8), 6389–6402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mchergui, A., Moulahi, T., & Nasri, S. (2019). Relay selection based on deep learning for broadcasting in VANET. In 15th international wireless communications & mobile computing conference (IWCMC) (pp. 865–870), Tangier, Morocco. https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCMC.2019.8766487.

  29. Mchergui, A., & Moulahi, T. (2022). A novel deep reinforcement learning based relay selection for broadcasting in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Access, 10, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3138903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ji, X., Xu, W., Zhang, C., Yun, T., Zhang, G., Wang, X., Wang, Y., & Liu, B. (2019). Keep forwarding path freshest in VANET via applying reinforcement learning. In IEEE first international workshop on network meets intelligent computations (NMIC) (pp. 13–18), Dallas, TX, USA.

  31. Saravanan, M., & Ganeshkumar, P. (2020). Routing using reinforcement learning in vehicular ad hoc networks. Computational Intelligence, 36(2), 682–697.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang, X., Zhang, W., Lu, H., & Zhao, L. (2020). V2V routing in VANET based on heuristic Q-learning. International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control, 15(5), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yao, L., Wang, J., Wang, X., Chen, A., & Wang, Y. (2018). V2X routing in a VANET based on the hidden Markov model. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(3), 889–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Meenaakshi Sundhari, R., Murali, L., Baskar, S., & Shakeel, P. M. (2021). MDRP: Message dissemination with re-route planning method for emergency vehicle information exchange. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 14(4), 2285–2294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. An, C., & Wu, C. (2020). Traffic big data assisted V2X communications toward smart transportation. Wireless Networks, 26(3), 1601–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Alghamdi, S. A. (2021). Cellular V2X with D2D communications for emergency message dissemination and QoS assured routing in 5G environment. IEEE Access, 9, 56049–56065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Khan, Z., Fan, P., Abbas, F., Chen, H., & Fang, S. (2019). Two-level cluster based routing scheme for 5G V2X communication. IEEE Access, 7, 16194–16205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumari, N. D., & Shylaja, B. (2019). AMGRP: AHP-based multimetric geographical routing protocol for urban environment of VANETs. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 31(1), 72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Alzamzami, O., & Mahgoub, I. (2020). Link utility aware geographic routing for urban VANETs using two-hop neighbor information. Ad Hoc Networks, 106, 102213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bhavani, M. M., & Valarmathi, A. (2021). Smart city routing using GIS & VANET system. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12, 5679–5685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Senouci, O., Aliouat, Z., & Harous, S. (2021). Geo-SID: A new geocast safety information dissemination protocol in VANET for urban areas. In 2nd International Conference on Computation, Automation and Knowledge Management (ICCAKM) (pp. 287–292), Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

  42. Mershad, K., Artail, H., & Gerla, M. (2012). Roamer: Roadside units as message routers in VANETs. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(3), 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen, C., Liu, L., Qiu, T., Wu, D. O., & Ren, Z. (2019). Delay-aware grid-based geographic routing in urban VANETs: A backbone approach. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 27(6), 2324–2337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, S., Huang, C., & Wang, D. (2020). Delay-aware relay selection with heterogeneous communication range in VANETs. Wireless Networks, 26(2), 995–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang, X. M., Chen, K. H., Cao, X. L., & Sung, D. K. (2016). A street-centric routing protocol based on microtopology in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(7), 5680–5694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Benrhaiem, W., Hafid, A., & Sahu, P. K. (2020). Reliable emergency message dissemination scheme for urban vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(3), 1154–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Li, W., Song, W., Lu, Q., & Yue, C. (2020). Reliable congestion control mechanism for safety applications in urban VANETs. Ad Hoc Networks, 98, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rana, K. K., Tripathi, S., & Raw, R. S. (2021). Fuzzy logic-based directional location routing in vehicular ad hoc network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences, 91(1), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Karnadi, F.K., Mo, Z.H., & Lan, K. (2007). Rapid generation of realistic mobility models for VANET. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (pp. 2508–2513), Kowloon, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNC.2007.467.

  50. Krajzewicz, D., Erdmann, J., Behrisch, M., & Bieker, L. (2012). Recent development and applications of SUMO-simulation of urban mobility. International Journal on Advances in Systems and Measurements, 5(3 &4), 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Martinez, F. J., Toh, C. K., Cano, J.-C., Calafate, C. T., & Manzoni, P. (2011). A survey and comparative study of simulators for vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs). Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 11(7), 813–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Krauß, S., Wagner, P., & Gawron, C. (1997). Metastable states in a microscopic model of traffic flow. Physical Review E, 55(5), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami Ullah.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ullah, S., Abbas, G., Waqas, M. et al. RSU assisted reliable relay selection for emergency message routing in intermittently connected VANETs. Wireless Netw 29, 1311–1332 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-022-03159-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-022-03159-7

Keywords

Navigation