Abstract
A plethora of bacteria–fungal interactions occur on the extended fungal hyphae network in soil. The mycosphere of saprophytic fungi can serve as a bacterial niche boosting their survival, dispersion, and activity. Such ecological concepts can be converted to bioproducts for sustainable agriculture. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that the well-characterised beneficial bacterium Serratia marcescens UENF-22GI can enhance plant growth-promoting properties when combined with Trichoderma longibrachiatum UENF-F476. The cultural and cell interactions demonstrated S. marcescens and T. longibrachiatum mutual compatibility. Bacteria cells were able to attach, forming aggregates to biofilms and migrating through the fungal hyphae network. Long-distance bacterial migration through growing hyphae was confirmed using a two-compartment Petri dishes assay. Fungal inoculation increased the bacteria survival rates into the vermicompost substrate over the experimental time. Also, in vitro indolic compound, phosphorus, and zinc solubilisation bacteria activities increased in the presence of the fungus. In line with the ecophysiological bacteria fitness, the bacterium–fungal combination boosted tomato and papaya plantlet growth when applied into the plant substrate under nursery conditions. Mutualistic interaction between mycosphere-colonizing bacterium S. marcescens UENF-22GI and the saprotrophic fungi T. longibrachiatum UENF-F467 increased the ecological fitness of the bacteria alongside with beneficial potential for plant growth. A proper combination and delivery of mutual compatible beneficial bacteria–fungal represent an open avenue for microbial-based products for the biological enrichment of plant substrates in agricultural systems.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The taxonomic affiliation sequences were deposited in the NCBI database under submission code MF497762.
References
Ambrosini A, Souza R, Passaglia L (2016) Ecological role of bacterial inoculants and their potential impact on soil microbial diversity. Plant Soil 400:193–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2727-7
Anandham R et al (2015) Cultivable bacterial diversity and early plant growth promotion by the traditional organic formulations prepared using organic waste materials. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 4:279–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-015-0107-1
Artursson V, Finlay RD, Jansson JK (2006) Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria and their potential for stimulating plant growth. Environ Microbiol 8:1–10
Bai Y, Eijsink VG, Kielak AM, van Veen JA, de Boer W (2016) Genomic comparison of chitinolytic enzyme systems from terrestrial and aquatic bacteria. Environ Microbiol 18:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12545
Baldani JI, Reis VM, Videira SS, Boddey LH, Baldani VLD (2014) The art of isolating nitrogen-fixing bacteria from non-leguminous plants using N-free semi-solid media: a practical guide for microbiologists. Plant Soil 384:413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2186-6
Baldotto LEB, Olivares FL (2008) Phylloepiphytic interaction between bacteria and different plant species in a tropical agricultural system. Can J Microbiol 54:918–931
Ballhausen M-B, de Boer W (2016) The sapro-rhizosphere: carbon flow from saprotrophic fungi into fungus-feeding bacteria. Soil Biol Biochem 102:14–17
Bashan Y, de Bashan LE, Prabhu SR, Hernandez J-P (2014) Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: formulations and practical perspectives (1998–2013). Plant Soil 378:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1956-x
Bejarano A, Sauer U, Preininger C (2017) Design and development of a workflow for microbial spray formulations including decision criteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101:7335–7346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8447-6
Bonfante P, Anca I-A (2009) Plants, mycorrhizal fungi, and bacteria: a network of interactions. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:363–383
Braz RR, Nahas E (2012) Synergistic action of both Aspergillus niger and Burkholderia cepacea in co-culture increases phosphate solubilisation in growth medium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 332:84–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02580.x
Caesar-Tonthat TC (2002) Soil binding properties of mucilage produced by a basidiomycete fungus in a model system. Mycol Res 106:930–937. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756202006330
de Boer W, Folman LB, Summerbell RC, Boddy L (2005) Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:795–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.11.005s
Deveau A et al (2015) Pairwise transcriptomic analysis of the interactions between the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor S238N and three beneficial, neutral and antagonistic soil bacteria. Microb Ecol 69:146–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0445-y
Druzhinina IS, Komoń-Zelazowska M, Ismaiel A, Jaklitsch W, Mullaw T, Samuels GJ, Kubicek CP (2012) Molecular phylogeny and species delimitation in the section Longibrachiatum of Trichoderma. Fungal Genet Biol 49:358–368
Ferreira JS, Baldani JI, Baldani VLD (2010) Seleção de inoculantes à base de turfa contendo bactérias diazotróficas em duas variedades de arroz. Acta Sci Agron 32:179–185
Filipe M et al (2018) Additional file 1: genome sequencing and assessment of plant growth-promoting properties of a Serratia marcescens strain isolated from vermicompost. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7216415.v1
Flemming HC, Wingender J (2010) The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:623–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2415
Haq IU, Zhang M, Yang P, van Elsas JD (2014) The interactions of bacteria with fungi in soil: emerging concepts. Adv Appl Microbiol 89:185–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800259-9.00005-6
Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M (2004) Trichoderma species—opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:43–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro797
Hermosa M, Grondona I, Et I, Diaz-Minguez J, Castro C, Monte E, Garcia-Acha IJAEM (2000) Molecular characterization and identification of biocontrol isolates of Trichoderma spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1890–1898
Hover T et al (2016) Mechanisms of bacterial (Serratia marcescens) attachment to, migration along, and killing of fungal hyphae. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:2585. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04070-15
Kramer S et al (2016) Resource partitioning between bacteria, fungi, and protists in the detritusphere of an agricultural soil. Front Microbiol 7:1524. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01524
Kumar V, Narula N (1999) Solubilisation of inorganic phosphates and growth emergence of wheat as affected by Azotobacter chroococcum mutants. Biol Fertil Soil 28:301–305
Lang E, Kleeberg I, Zadrazil F (1997) Competition of Pleurotus sp. and Dichomitus squalens with soil microorganisms during lignocellulose decomposition. Bioresour Technol 60:95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00016-3
Lee S-K et al (2016) Evaluation of the effects of different liquid inoculant formulations on the survival and plant-growth-promoting efficiency of Rhodopseudomonas palustris strain PS3. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:7977–7987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7582-9
LLC DT (2017) Biological control global market overview
López-Bucio J, Pelagio-Flores R, Herrera-Estrella A (2015) Trichoderma as biostimulant: exploiting the multilevel properties of a plant beneficial fungus. Sci Hortic 196:109–123
Mallon CA, Elsas JDV, Salles JF (2015) Microbial invasions: the process, patterns, and mechanisms. Trends Microbiol 23:719–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2015.07.013
Matteoli FP et al (2018) Genome sequencing and assessment of plant growth-promoting properties of a Serratia marcescens strain isolated from vermicompost. BMC Genome 19:750
Miguel DL, Moreira FMS (2001) Influência do pH do meio de cultivo e da turfa no comportamento de estirpes de Bradyrhizobium. Rev Bras Cienc Solo 25:873–883
Nazir R, Warmink JA, Boersma H, van Elsas JD (2010) Mechanisms that promote bacterial fitness in fungal-affected soil microhabitats. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 71:169–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00807.x
Nazir R, Warmink JA, Voordes DC, van de Bovenkamp HH, van Elsas JD (2013) Inhibition of mushroom formation and induction of glycerol release—ecological strategies of Burkholderia terrae BS001 to create a hospitable niche at the fungus Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten. Microb Ecol 65:245–254
Nazir R, Tazetdinova DI, van Elsas JD (2014) Burkholderia terrae BS001 migrates proficiently with diverse fungal hosts through soil and provides protection from antifungal agents. Front Microbiol 5:598. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00598
Nazir R, Mazurier S, Yang P, Lemanceau P, van Elsas JD (2017) The ecological role of type three secretion systems in the interaction of bacteria with fungi in soil and related habitats is diverse and context-dependent. Front Microbiol 8:38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00038
Nylander J, Zoology S, Posada D (2008) MrModeltest version 2.3 README 22:2008
Olivares FL, Busato JG, de Paula AM, da Silva LL, Aguiar NO, Canellas LP (2017) Plant growth-promoting bacteria and humic substances: crop promotion and mechanisms of action. Chem Biol Technol Agric 4:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-017-0112-x
Pantoja-Guerra M, Valero-Valero N (2020) Design of a bio-conditioner prototype for the treatment of degraded soils: biomass production and lignite formulation for Microbacterium sp. CSB3. Chem Biol Technol Agric 7:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-019-0167-y
Purahong W et al (2016) Life in leaf litter: novel insights into community dynamics of bacteria and fungi during litter decomposition. Mol Ecol 25:4059–4074. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13739
Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie D, Drummond AJ (2014) Tracer v1.6. Program distributed by the author
Rannala B, Yang Z (1996) Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J Mol Evol 43:304–311
Rashid MI, Mujawar LH, Shahzad T, Almeelbi T, Ismail IMI, Oves M (2016) Bacteria and fungi can contribute to nutrients bioavailability and aggregate formation in degraded soils. Microbiol Res 183:26–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.007
Riddell RW (1950) Permanent stained mycological preparations obtained by slide culture. Mycology 42:265–270
Roesch LF et al (2007) Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity. ISME J 1:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2007.53
Ronquist F et al (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542
Rousk J, Demoling LA, Bahr A, Baath E (2008) Examining the fungal and bacterial niche overlap using selective inhibitors in soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 63:350–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00440.x
Royer JC, Nakas JP (1989) Xylanase production by Trichoderma longibrachiatum. Enzyme Microb Technol 11:405–410
Rudnick MB, Van Veen JA, De Boer W (2015) Baiting of rhizosphere bacteria with hyphae of common soil fungi reveals a diverse group of potentially mycophagous secondary consumers. Soil Biol Biochem 88:73–82
Santos PHD et al (2017) Phylogeography and population structure analysis reveals diversity by mutations in Lasiodiplodia theobromae with distinct sources of selection. Genet Mol Res. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr16029681
Sarwar M, Kremer RJ (1995) Determination of bacterially derived auxins using a microplate method. Lett Appl Microbiol 20:282–285
Seneviratne G, Jayasinghearachchi HS (2003) Mycelial colonisation by bradyrhizobia and azorhizobia. J Biosci 28:243–247
Stopnisek N et al (2016) Molecular mechanisms underlying the close association between soil Burkholderia and fungi. ISME J 10:253–264. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.73
Velmourougane K, Prasanna R, Saxena AK (2017) Agriculturally important microbial biofilms: present status and future prospects. J Basic Microbiol 57:548–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201700046
Warmink JA, van Elsas JD (2009) Migratory response of soil bacteria to Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten in soil microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2820–2830. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02110-08
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, vol 18. Academic, New York, pp 315–322
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by FAPERJ Grant nº E-26/203.003/2017, CNPq Grant nº 314263/2018-7, Newton Fund Grant BB/N013476/1 “Understanding and Exploiting Biological Nitrogen Fixation for Improvement of Brazilian Agriculture,” co-funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and the Conselho Nacional das Fundações Estaduais de Amparo à Pesquisa (CONFAP) and FINEP-PLURICANA financially supported this study. Also, we are grateful for the strong support of Dr. Vicente Mussi Dias (LEF/UENF) with the morphological taxonomy of the fungal and Dr. Roselaine Sanchez da Silva de Oliveira that isolate the fungi. This study is part of the first author (RJAR) PhD, grateful for the fellowship conceded by CAPES.
Funding
The research leading to these results received funding from Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) under Grant Agreement No. E-26/203.003/2017, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) under Grant Agreement No. 314263/2018-7, Newton Fund under Grant Agreement No. BB/N013476/1 “Understanding and Exploiting Biological Nitrogen Fixation for Improvement of Brazilian Agriculture,” co-funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and the Conselho Nacional das Fundações Estaduais de Amparo à Pesquisa (CONFAP). This study is part of the first author (RJAR) PhD, grateful for the fellowship conceded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FLO: conceptualization, methodology, writing, original draft, funding acquisition, supervision; RJAR: investigation, formal analysis, original draft; AFA: microscopy formal analysis; LOR: formal analysis, visualization, data curation; PHDS: investigation, formal analysis, validation, visualization for fungal taxonomy position; LPC: conceptualization, resources, formal analysis, writing—review and editing; SFS: conceptualization, writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Andrade Reis, R.J., Alves, A.F., dos Santos, P.H.D. et al. Mutualistic interaction of native Serratia marcescens UENF-22GI with Trichoderma longibrachiatum UENF-F476 boosting seedling growth of tomato and papaya. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 37, 211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-021-03179-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-021-03179-z