Skip to main content
Log in

Comparisons of urea or ammonium on growth and fermentative metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in ethanol fermentation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work was mainly about the understanding of how urea and ammonium affect growth, glucose consumption and ethanol production of S. cerevisiae, in particular regarding the basic physiology of cell. The basic physiology of cell included intracellular pH, ATP, NADH and enzyme activity. Results showed that fermentation time was reduced by 19% when using urea compared with ammonium. The maximal ethanol production rate using urea was 1.14 g/L/h, increasing 30% comparing with the medium prepared with ammonium. Moreover, urea could decrease the synthesis of glycerol from glucose by 26% comparing with ammonium. The by-product of acetic acid yields decreased from 40 mmol/mol of glucose (with urea) to 24 mmol/mol of glucose (with ammonium). At the end of ethanol fermentation, cell number and pH were greater with urea than ammonium. Comparing with urea, ammonium decreased the intracellular pH by 14% (from 7.1 to 6.1). Urease converting urea into ammonia resulted in a more than 50% lower of ATP when comparing with ammonium. The values of NADH/DCW were 0.21 mg/g and 0.14 mg/g respectively with urea and ammonium, suggesting a 33% lower NADH. The enzyme activity of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was 0.0225 and 0.0275 U/mg protein respectively with urea and ammonium, which was consistent with the yields of glycerol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azmat U, Gayathri C, Stanley B et al (2013) Yeast adaptation to weak acids prevents futile energy expenditure. Front Microbiol 4(142):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg A, Adler L (1989) Roles of glycerol and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD+) in acquired osmotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 171(2):1087–1092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brett CL, Donowitz M, Rao R (2006) Does the proteome encode organelle pH. FEBS Lett 580(3):717–719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TG, Sumrada R (1975) Urea transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 121(2):571–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edgley M, Brown AD (1983) Yeast water relations---physiological-changes induced by solute stress in Saccharomyces-cerevisiae  and Saccharomyces-rouxii. Microbiology 129(11):3453–3463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elberry HM, Majumdar ML, Cunningham TS, Sumrada RA, Cooper TG (1993) Regulation of the urea active transporter gene (DUR3) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 175(15):4688–4698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eva Albers CL, Gunnar Lide N, Niklasson C, Gustafsson L (1996) Influence of the nitrogen source on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3187–3195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godard P, Urrestarazu A, Vissers S, Kontos K, Bontempi G, Helden JV, André B (2007) Effect of 21 different nitrogen sources on global gene expression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 27(8):3065–3086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hensing MCM, Bangma KA, Raamsdonk LM, Hulster ED, Dijken JPV, Pronk JT (1995) Effects of cultivation conditions on the production of heterologous α-galactosidase by Kluyveromyces lactis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43(1):58–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hou J, Lages NF, Oldiges M, Vemuri GN (2009) Metabolic impact of redox cofactor perturbations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 11(4–5):253–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemsawasd V, Viana T, Ardö Y, Arneborg N (2015) Influence of nitrogen sources on growth and fermentation performance of different wine yeast species during alcoholic fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(23):10191–10207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kok SD, Kozak BU, Pronk JT, Maris AJAV (2012) Energy coupling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae : selected opportunities for metabolic engineering. FEMS Yeast Res 12(4):387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne N, Luttik MA, Cueto Rojas HF, Wahl A, van Maris AJ, Pronk JT, Daran JM (2015) Functional expression of a heterologous nickel-dependent, ATP-independent urease in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 30:130–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley HL, Island MD, Hausinger RP (1995) Molecular biology of microbial ureases. Microbiol Rev 59(3):451–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orij R, Postmus J, Ter Beek A, Brul S, Smits GJ (2009) In vivo measurement of cytosolic and mitochondrial pH using a pH-sensitive GFP derivative in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a relation between intracellular pH and growth. Microbiology 155(1):268–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schure EGT, Riel NAWV, Verrips CT (2000) The role of ammonia metabolism in nitrogen catabolite repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24(1):67–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumrada R, Gorski M, Cooper T (1976) Urea transport-defective strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 125(3):1048–1056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sunya S, Gorret N, Delvigne F (2012) Real-time monitoring of metabolic shift and transcriptional induction of yciG::luxCDABE E. coli reporter strain to a glucose pulse of different concentrations. J Biotechnol 157(3):379–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Mao Z, Zhang C, Zhang J, Zhang H, Tang L (2012) Influence of nitrogen sources on ethanol fermentation in an integrated ethanol-methane fermentation system. Bioresour Technol 120:206–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong KH, Hynes MJ, Davis MA (2008) Recent advances in nitrogen regulation: a comparison between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Filamentous fungi. Eukaryot Cell 7(6):917–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Bean WD, Wilson SR (2006) Ethanol production from pearl millet by using saccharomyces. Cereal Chem 83:127–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng X, Chen XS, Ren XD, Liu QR, Wang L, Sun QX, Tang L, Mao ZG (2014) Insights into the role of glucose and glycerol as a mixed carbon source in the improvement of epsilon-poly-L-lysine productivity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 173(8):2211–2224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Chen X (2008) Improve ethanol yield through minimizing glycerol yield in ethanol fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chin J Chem Eng 16(4):620–625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Zou H, Chen J, Du G, Zhou J (2016) The modification of Gat1p in nitrogen catabolite repression to enhance non-preferred nitrogen utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci Rep 6:21603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Zou H, Fu J, Chen J, Zhou J, Du G (2013) Nitrogen regulation involved in the accumulation of urea in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 30(11):437–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y, Yang ST (2004)  Effect of pH on metabolic pathway shift in fermentation of xylose by Clostridium tyrobutyricum.  J Biotechnol 110(2):143-157

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the following projects: (1) Shandong postdoctoral innovation project. (2) Doctor’s fund of University of Jinan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinchao Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, X., Yang, Y., Huang, J. et al. Comparisons of urea or ammonium on growth and fermentative metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in ethanol fermentation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 37, 98 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-021-03056-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-021-03056-9

Keywords

Navigation