Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding communities’ perceptions, demographics and uses of wetlands in Vhembe Biosphere Reserve, South Africa

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetlands are amongst the world’s most important ecosystems, providing direct and indirect benefits to local communities. However, wetlands worldwide continue to be degraded due to unsustainable use and improper resource management. In this paper, we assess the perceptions, importance, management and utilisation of wetlands among local community members using a household questionnaire and field observations within the seven Thulamela municipality wetlands, Vhembe Biosphere Reserve in South Africa. Seven wetlands were chosen for the study, with 140 household respondents randomly selected for a questionnaire survey. The study indicated that wetlands were beneficial in supporting local communities through resource provisioning. The unemployment rate and household respondents’ income were the main contributors to increased wetland dependency and utilisation. We found that urban and rural developments, unregulated use and extensive agricultural practices (i.e., cultivation, livestock grazing) have resulted in wetland degradation. We observed that the local communities around the wetlands were interested in the benefits they receive from wetlands when compared to their conservation. Furthermore, the study observed poor wetland co-management or collaboration among the local stakeholders. This has resulted in a lack of openly known, active platforms to discuss wetlands management issues. These results highlight that centralized, top–down approaches to wetland use are insufficient for maintaining and managing wetland ecosystems, posing a challenge to sustainable wetland management. Therefore, there is a need to develop a shared understanding through bottom-up approaches to wetland management nested within national regulatory frameworks, ideally combined with awareness building and knowledge sharing on ecological benefits and management of wetlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available as they are part of larger study that is currently on-going but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Adekola O, Whanda S, Ogwu F (2012) Assessment of policies and legislation that affect management of wetlands in Nigeria. Wetlands 32(4):665–677

  • Adwok J (2015) Probability sampling—a guideline for quantitative health care research. Ann Afr Surg 12:95–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB, Acreman MC, Knowler D (1997) Economic valuation of wetlands: a guide for policy makers and planners. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell K, Fahmy E, Gordon D (2016) Quantitative conversations: the importance of developing rapport in standardised interviewing. Qual Quant 50:193–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belle JA, Collins N, Jordaan A (2018) Managing wetlands for disaster risk reduction: a case study of the eastern free state, South Africa. JÃ mbá: J Disast Risk Stud 10:400

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikangaga S, Picchi MP, Focardi S, Rossi C (2007) Perceived benefits of littoral wetlands in Uganda: a focus on the Nabugabo wetlands. Wetlands Ecol Manage 15:529–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P (2006) Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: the case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece. Ecol Econ 60:45–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T (2004) Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ 328:1312–1315

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown HCP (2018) An assessment of institutional capacity for integrated landscape management in eastern Cameroon. Environ Manage 62:118–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter RA (1995) Communicating environ-mental science uncertainties. Environ Prof 17:127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson BR, Ausseil AE, Gerbeaux P (2013) Wetland ecosystem services. In: Dymond JR (ed) Ecosystem services in New Zealand—conditions and trends. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins NB (2005) Wetlands: the basics and some more. Free State Department of Tourism, Environmental and Economic Affairs, Bloemfontein

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove WJ, Loucks DP (2015) Water management: current and future and research directions. Water Resour Res 51:4823–4839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalu T, Wasserman RJ (2022) Fundamentals of tropical freshwater wetlands: from ecology to conservation management. Elsevier, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalu T, Wasserman RJ, Dalu MT (2017) Agricultural intensification and drought frequency increases may have landscape-level consequences for ephemeral ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 23:983–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darradi Y, Grelot F, Morardet S (2006) Analysing stakeholders for sustainable wetland management in the Limpopo River basin: the case of Ga–Mampa wetland, South Africa. The 7th WATER–NET/WARFSA/GWP–SA Symposium on Mainstreaming IWRM in the Development Process. 1–3 November 2006. Lilongwe, Malawi

  • Davies B, Day J (1998) Vanishing waters. University of Cape Town Press, Cape Town

  • Davidson NC (2014) How much wetland has the world lost? Long–term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar Freshw Res 65:934–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dettori J (2010) The random allocation process: two things you need to know. Evid Based Spine Care J 1:7–9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson CM (2012) Forty years of wetland conservation and wise use. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 22:139–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman PS (2003) Protected area management and its effectiveness in South Africa. In: Cowan GI, Yawitch J, Swift M (eds) StrategicI in biodiversity conservation: the South African experience. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourbesville P (2008) Challenges for integrated water resources management. Phys Chem Earth 33:284–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guppy L, Anderson K (2017) Water crisis report. United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health, Hamilton Canada

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons: the population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science 162:1243–1248

  • Harte J (2007) Human population as a dynamic factor in environmental degradation. Popul Environ 28:223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst DL (2015) Wetlands: an ecosystem service South Africa can afford to protect A critical evaluation of the current legal regime and mechanisms to facilitate the use of payment for ecosystem services to the conservation of wetlands in South Africa. Mphil Thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town

  • Hu S, Niu Z, Chen Y, Li L, Zhang H (2017) Global wetlands potential distribution, wetland loss, and status. Sci Total Environ 586:319–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hushulong Q (2012) The problems of wetlands in our country and the researches. Energy Procedia 17:462–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jogo W (2010) Managing the trade–off between conservation and exploitation of wetland services for economic well–being: the case of the Limpopo wetland in southern Africa. PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria

  • Jogo W, Hassan R (2010) Determinants of rural household labour allocation for wetland and other livelihood activities: the case of the Limpopo wetland in South Africa. Agrekon 49(2):195–216

  • Kingsford RT, Basset A, Jackson L (2016) Wetlands: Conservation’s poor cousins. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 26:892–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kometa SS, Kimengsi JN, Petiangma DM (2018) Urban Development and its Implications on Wetland Ecosystem Services in NDOP, Cameroon. Environ Manage Sustain Dev 7:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamsal PK, Pant P, Kumar L, Atreya K (2015) Sustainable livelihoods through conservation of wetland resources: a case of economic benefits from Ghodaghodi Lake, western Nepal. Ecol Soc 20:10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbe BA (2003) Tourism management in Southern Africa. Maskew Miller Longman, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane DM, Kotze DC, Ellery WN, Walters D, Koopman V, Goodman P, Goge C (2007) A technique for rapidly assessing wetland health: WET-Health. WRC Report TT 340/08. Water Research Commission, Pretoria

  • Macfarlane D, Holness SD, von Hase A, Brownlie S, Dini AJ, Kilian V (2016) Wetland offsets: a best practice guideline for South Africa. South African National Biodiversity Institute, WRC Report No.TT 660/16. Water Research Commission, Pretoria

  • Mancosu N, Snyder RL, Kyriakakis G, Spano D (2015) Water scarcity and future challenges for food production. Water 7:975–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marambanyika T (2015) An analysis of the impacts of human activities and management strategies on wetland processes in southern Zimbabwe. PhD Thesis, University of KwaZulu–Natal, Pietermaritzburg

  • Marambanyika T, Beckedahl H, Ngetar NS (2016) Community strategies to promote sustainable wetland–based food security in rural areas of Zimbabwe. Geo J 82:987–1003

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini U, Buffa F, Notaro S (2017) Community participation, natural resource management and the creation of innovative tourism products: evidence from Italian networks of reserves in the Alps. Sustainability 9:2314–2330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maze K, Barnett M, Botts EA (2016) Making the case for biodiversity in South Africa: re–framing biodiversity communications. Bothalia 46:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh ML (2013) The chi-square test of independence. Biochem Med 23(2):143–149

  • Melendez-Pastor I, Navarro-Pedreno J, Gómez I, Koch M (2010) Detecting drought induced environmental changes in a Mediterranean wetland by remote sensing. Appl Geogra 30(2):254–262

  • Milder JC, Hart AK, Dobie P, Minai J, Zaleski C (2014) Integrated landscape initiatives for African agriculture, development, and conservation: a region-wide assessment. World Develop 54:68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollis DJ, Snaddon CD, Job NM, Mbona N (2013) Classification system for wetlands and other aquatic ecosystems in South Africa. User manual: inland systems, vol 22. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Phethi MD, Gumbo JR (2019) Assessment of impact of land use change on the wetland in Makhitha village, Limpopo province, South Africa. JÃ mbá: J Disast Risk Stud 11:693

    Google Scholar 

  • Raburu P, Okeyo-Owuor J, Kwena F (2012) Community Based Approach to the Management of Nyando Wetland. Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya

  • Rebelo LM, McCartney MP, Finlayson CM (2010) Wetlands of Sub–Saharan Africa: distribution and contribution of agriculture to livelihoods. Wetlands Ecol Manage 18:557–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodda N, Stenström TA, Schmidt S, Dent M, Bux F, Hanke N, Buckley CA, Fennemore C (2016) Water security in South Africa: perceptions on public expectations and municipal obligations, governance and water re–use. Water SA 42:456–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuyt K (2005) Economic consequences of wetland degradation for local populations in Africa. Ecol Econ 53:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skourtos MS, Troumbis AY, Kontogiami A, Langford IH, Bateman AJ, Georgiou S (2003) Ecological and socio–economic evaluation of wetlands conservation scenarios. In: Turner RK, van den Bergh JC, Brouwer R (eds) Managing wetlands: an ecological economics approach. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Skowno AL, Poole CJ, Raimondo DC, Sink KJ, van Deventer H, Van Niekerk L, Harris LR, Smith–Adao LB, Tolley KA, Zengeya TA, Foden WB, Midgley GF, Driver A (2019) National biodiversity assessment 2018: the status of South Africa’s ecosystems and biodiversity. Synthesis Report. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) (2012) Census 2011, Statistical release (Revised) P0301. 4. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria. http://www. statssa.gov.za/Publications pp. 3014. Accessed 13 Jun 2019

  • Thamaga KH, Dube T (2018) Remote sensing of invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): a review on applications and challenges. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ 10:36–46

  • Trisurat Y (2006) Community–based wetland management in Northern Thailand. Int J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustain 2:49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Turyahabwe N, Kakuru W, Tweheyo M, Tumusiime DM (2013) Contribution of wetland resources to household food security in Uganda. Agric Food Secur 2:2–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turyahabwe N, Tumusiime DM, Yikii F, Kakuru W, Barugahare V (2017) Awareness, perceptions and implementation of policy and legal provisions on wetlands in Uganda. Afr J Rural Devel 2:161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Verones F, Saner D, Pfister S, Baisero D, Rondinini C, Hellweg S (2013) Effects of consumptive water use on biodiversity in wetlands of international importance. Environ Sci Technol 47:12248–12257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteoak K, Binney J (2012) Literature review of the economic value of ecosystem services that wetlands provide. Marsden Jacob Associates, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Wondie A (2018) Ecological conditions and ecosystem services of wetlands in the Lake Tana Area, Ethiopia. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 18:231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xulu S (2014) Land degradation and settlement intensification in Umhlathuze Municipality. MSc Thesis, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch

Download references

Acknowledgements

TD and RC greatly acknowledge the fellowship support received from the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin Institute for Advanced Study / Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study, and Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, respectively.

Funding

We greatly acknowledge the financial support of the University of Venda Research Grant (SES/19/ERM/01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MTBD: Conceptualization, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, supervision, writing—original draft, review and editing; TD: Conceptualization, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, supervision, funding acquisition, writing—original draft, review and editing; OM: Investigation, formal analysis, data curation, methodology, funding acquisition, writing—original draft, review and editing; RNC: Visualisation, methodology, writing—original draft, review & editing; TM: Visualisation, methodology, writing—review and editing; AWG: Visualisation, methodology, writing—review and editing; FMM: Visualisation, methodology, supervision, writing – review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatenda Dalu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict or financial interests exist for the manuscript.

Ethics approval

The University of Venda Research Ethics Committee provided clearance for the research under ethics number SES/18/ERM/20/0312.

Consent for publication

Not applicable, all data was collected by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 20 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dalu, M.T.B., Mukhuwana, O., Cuthbert, R.N. et al. Understanding communities’ perceptions, demographics and uses of wetlands in Vhembe Biosphere Reserve, South Africa. Wetlands Ecol Manage 30, 1231–1244 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-022-09892-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-022-09892-2

Keywords

Navigation