Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perceived benefits of littoral wetlands in Uganda: a focus on the Nabugabo wetlands

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetlands, commonly called swamps in Uganda, are estimated to cover about 13% of the total land surface area (about 30,000 km2) of the country and represent a considerable ecological, social and economic value. In 1989, the Ugandan government formerly recognised that wetlands need to be conserved and contribute considerably to the National economy and rural livelihood. The present analysis is focused on the Nabugabo wetland ecosystem. Located in Central Uganda, it is an important part of the extensive system of wetlands that surround Lake Victoria. The Nabugabo wetland is a source of important resources that are basic to the local economy, including fishing, water utilization, agriculture, livestock, wetland plants for construction and more recently, tourism. Investment in the area is low and a large percentage of the local community depends on the wetland resources for basic sustenance needs. After achieving Ramsar status, demarcation and conservation activities were initiated by the local and national leaders. However, these conservation efforts have provoked conflicts between the land owners and the policy makers, in particular to the demarcation of areas for conservation In the present analysis, we examine the benefits, perceived by local leaders and community members, of the wetland and its services, as well as views towards its conservation and management. The results show that differences between the community leaders and member exist regarding the perceived benefits of the wetlands. Tourism, while providing some opportunities for local persons is not always viewed positively. Conservation activities are viewed positively but some questions remain as to whether such efforts help or hinder the local population, in particular regarding access to basic resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balirwa JS (1995) The Lake Victoria environment: its fisheries and wetlands—a review. Wetlands Ecol Manage 3:209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DJ, Gichohi H, Mwangi A, Chege L (2000) Land use conflict in Kajiado District. Kenya Land Use Policy 17(4):337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter GS (1954) The papyrus swamps of Uganda. W. Heffer and Sons Ltd., Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman LJ, Chapman CA, Ogutu-Ohwayo R, Chandler M, Kaufman L, Keiter A (1996) Refugia for endangered fishes from an introduced predator in Lake Nabugabo, Uganda. Conserv Biol 10:554–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman LJ, Chapman CA, Nordlie FG, Rosenberger AE (2002) Physiological refugia: swamps, hypoxia tolerance and maintenance of fish biodiversity in the Lake Victoria region. Comp Biochem Physiol 133(A):421–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny P (1993) Wetlands of Africa. In: Whigham DF, Dykyjova, Hejny S (eds) Wetlands of the world 1. Inventory, ecology and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 1–128

  • Denny P (1997) Implementation of constructed wetlands in developing countries. Water Sci Technol 35(5):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilys R (2004) The Millennium development goals and natural resources management: reconciling sustainable livelihoods and resource conservation or fuelling a divide?

  • Greenwood PH (1965) The cichlid fishes of Lake Nabugabo, Uganda. Bulletin of the British museum (natural history). Zoology 12:315–355

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN, Assessment of the economic value of wetlands of Bushenyi district in western Uganda, 2004

  • Kansiime F, Nalubega M, van Bruggen JJ, Denny P (2003) The effect of wastewater discharge on biomass production and nutrient content of Cyperus papyrus and Miscanthidium violaceum in the Nakivubo wetland, Kampala, Uganda. Water Sci Technol 48(5):233–240

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kansiime F, Nalubega M, van Bruggen (2001) Distribution and retention of faecal coliforms in the Nakivubo wetland in Kampala, Uganda. Water Sci Technol 44(11–12):199–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of land waters and the environment (2001) Wetland Sector Strategic Plan 2001–2010

  • Muramira TE (2004) Assessment of the economic value of the wetlands of Bushenyi district in Western Uganda, Ministry of the Environment, Uganda

  • Ogutu-Ohwayo R (1993) The effects of predation by Nile perch, Lates niloticus, with suggestions for conservation of endangered endemic cichlids. Conserv Biol 10:701–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuyt KD (2005) Economic consequences of wetland degradation for local populations in Africa. Ecol Econ 53(2):177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith D, Gordon A, Meadows K, Zwick K (2001) Livelihood diversification in Uganda: patterns and determinants of change across two rural districts. Food Policy 26:421–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolossa D, Baudouin A (2004) Access to natural resources and conflicts between farmers and agro-pastoralists in Borkena wetland, north-eastern Ethiopia. Nor Geogr Tidsskr 58(3):97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNWCM (1989) The national wetland conservation and management programme

  • UNWCM (1995) The national policy for conservation and management of wetland resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam Bikangaga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bikangaga, S., Picchi, M.P., Focardi, S. et al. Perceived benefits of littoral wetlands in Uganda: a focus on the Nabugabo wetlands. Wetlands Ecol Manage 15, 529–535 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-007-9049-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-007-9049-3

Keywords

Navigation