Abstract
Carbon stored in soil and vegetative biomass in mangrove swamps, salt marshes, and seagrass flats (“coastal blue carbon”) is a significant component of the coastal carbon budget due to the ability of these ecosystems to sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide as plant biomass and peat. Growing interest in the protection of these essential yet vulnerable coastal ecosystems, as well as recognition of their capacity to sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide, has led to the need for rapid and accurate quantification of location-specific coastal blue carbon stocks. This study provides allometric equations for the calculation of aboveground dry biomass based on plant height for 18 salt marsh species from Tampa Bay, Florida, USA. The 18 plant species were also analyzed for carbon and nitrogen content to determine the appropriate carbon conversion factor to use for blue carbon calculations. The salt marsh plants had an average of 1.2 ± 0.4% nitrogen and 41.1 ± 5.5% carbon. With the exception of Batis maritima, which had a carbon content of only 23.4%, carbon content for all other species ranged from 33.4–47.1%. The four most succulent plant species in this study contained an average of 33.3 ± 7.0% carbon, while the nine graminoid species contained 44.4 ± 2.0% carbon. These species-specific equations and carbon data provide non-destructive methods to rapidly quantify vegetative biomass and carbon stocks for monitoring efforts and blue carbon stock assessments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alongi DM (2014) Carbon cycling and storage in mangrove forests. Ann Rev Marine Sci 6:195–219
Chmura GL, Anisfeld SC, Cahoon DR, Lynch JC (2003) Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Global Biogeochem Cycles 17(22):1–12
Clewell AF (1997) Vegetation. In: Coultas CL, Hsieh Y-P (eds) Ecology and management of tidal marshes: a model from the Gulf of Mexico. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 77–110
Coronado-Molina C, Day JW Jr, Reyes E, Perez BC (2004) Standing crop and aboveground biomass portioning of a dwarf mangrove forest in Taylor River Slough, Florida. Wetl Ecol Manag 12:157–164
Darby FA, Turner RE (2008) Below- and aboveground Spartina alterniflora production in a Louisiana salt marsh. Estuar Coasts 31:223–231
Eleuterius LN, Caldwell JD (1981) Growth Kinetics and Longevity of the Salt Marsh Rush Juncus roemerianus. Gulf Res Rep 7:27–34
Emmer I, von Unger M, Needelman B, Crooks S, Emmett-Mattox S (2015) Coastal blue carbon in practice; a manual for using the VCS methodology for tidal wetland and seagrass restoration. VM0033, V. 1.0, S. Simpson (Ed). Restore America’s Estuaries and Silvestrum, Arlington, VA, USA
Fang J, Liu G, Xu S (1996) Carbon pools in terrestrial ecosystems in China. In: Wang GC, Wen YP (eds) Emissions and their relevant processes of greenhouse gases in China. China Environment Science Press, Beijing, pp 109–128
Gallagher JL (1974) Sampling macro-organic matter profiles in salt marsh plant root zones. Soil Sci Am J 38:154–155
Gallagher JL, Reimold RJ, Linthurst RA, Pfeiffer WJ (1980) Aerial production, mortality, and mineral accumulation-export dynamics in Spartina alterniflora and Juncus roemerianus plant stands in a Georgia salt marsh. Ecology 61:303–312
Gonzalez Trilla GG, Marta Borro M, Soledad Morandeira N, Schivo F, Kandus P, Marcovecchio J (2013) Allometric scaling of dry weight and leaf area for Spartina densiflora and Spartina alterniflora in two southwest Atlantic saltmarshes. J Coastal Res 29:1373–1381
Greening H, Janicki A, Sherwood E, Pribble R, Johansson J (2014) Ecosystem responses to long-term nutrient management in an urban estuary: Tampa Bay, Florida, USA. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 151:A1–A16
Gross MF, Hardisky MA, Wolf PL, Klemas V (1991) Relationship between aboveground and belowground biomass of Spartina alterniflora (smooth cordgrass). Estuaries 14:180–191
Howard J, Hoyt S, Isensee K, Pidgeon E, Telszewski M (Eds) (2014) Coastal blue carbon: methods for assessing carbon stocks and emissions factors in mangroves, tidal salt marshes, and seagrass meadows. Conservation International, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, International Union for Conservation of Nature. Arlington, Virginia, USA
Kauffman JB, Donato DC (2012) Protocols for the measurement, monitoring and reporting of structure, biomass and carbon stocks in mangrove forests. Working Paper 86. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia
Kennish MJ (2002) Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries. Environ Conserv 29:78–107
Komiyama A, Poungparn S, Kato S (2005) Common allometric equations for estimating the tree weight of mangroves. J Trop Ecol 21:471–477
McKee KL (1995) Interspecific variation in growth, biomass partitioning, and defensive characteristics of neotropical mangrove seedlings: response to light and nutrient availability. Am J Bot 82:299–307
Mcleod E, Chmura GL, Bouillon S, Salm R, Björk M, Duarte CM, Lovelock CE, Schlesinger WH, Silliman BR (2011) A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front Ecol Environ 9:552–560
Morris JT, Haskin B (1990) A 5-yr record of aerial primary production and stand characteristics of Spartina alterniflora. Ecology 71:2209–2217
Moyer RP, Radabaugh KR, Powell CE, Bociu I, Chappel AR, Clark BC, Crooks S, Emmett-Mattox S (2016). Quantifying carbon stocks for natural and restored mangroves, salt marshes and salt barrens in Tampa Bay. Appendix C in: Tampa Bay blue carbon assessment: Summary of findings, pp 119–158 https://www.estuaries.org/images/Blue_Carbon/Tampa-Bay-Blue-Carbon-Assessment-Report-final_June2016.pdf
Nellemann C, Corcoran E, Durate CM, Valdes L, DeYoung C, Fonseca L, Grimditch G (2009) Blue carbon. The role of healthy oceans in binding carbon. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal. United Nations Environmental Program. New York, USA
Orson RA, Warren RS, Niering WA (1987) Development of a tidal marsh in a New England river valley. Estuaries 10:20–27
Osland MJ, Spivak AC, Nestlerode JA et al (2012) Ecosystem development after mangrove wetland creation: plant-soil change across a 20-year chronosequence. Ecosystems 15:848–866
Pendleton LH, Sutton-Grier AE, Gordon DR, Murray BC, Victor BE, Griffis RB, Lechuga JAV, Giri C (2013) Considering “coastal carbon” in existing U.S. Federal statutes and policies. Coast Manag 41:439–456
Radabaugh KR, Powell CE, Bociu I, Clark BC, Chappel AR, Moyer RP Coastal blue carbon in mangroves, salt marshes, and salt barrens in Tampa Bay, Florida. Part 1. Vegetative carbon and species composition. In prep a
Radabaugh KR, Powell CE, Bociu I, Clark BC, Chappel AR, Moyer RP Coastal blue carbon in mangroves, salt marshes, and salt barrens in Tampa Bay, Florida. Part 2: Total carbon stocks and soil characteristics. In prep b
Reidenbaugh TG (1983) Productivity of cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora, estimated from live standing crops, mortality, and leaf shedding in a Virginia salt-marsh. Estuaries 6:57–65
Roner M, D’Alpaos A, Ghinassi M, Marani M, Silvestri S, Franceschinis E, Realdon N (2016) Spatial variation of salt-marsh organic and inorganic deposition and organic carbon accumulation: inferences from the Venice lagoon, Italy. Adv Water Resour 93:276–287
Ross MS, Ruiz PL, Telesnicki GJ, Meeder JF (2001) Estimating above-ground biomass and production in mangrove communities of Biscayne National Park, Florida (U.S.A.). Wetl Ecol Manag 9:27–37
Saintilan N, Rogers K, Mazumder D, Woodroffe C (2013) Allochthonous and autochthonous contributions to carbon accumulation and carbon store in southeastern Australian coastal wetlands. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 128:84–92
Schubauer JP, Hopkinson CS (1984) Above- and belowground emergent macrophyte production and turnover in a coastal marsh ecosystem, Georgia. Limnol Oceanogr 29:1052–1065
Sherwood ET, Greening HS (2014) Potential impacts and management implications of climate change on Tampa Bay estuary critical coastal habitats. Environ Manag 53:401–415
Smith TJ III, Whelan KRT (2006) Development of allometric relations for three mangrove species in South Florida for use in the greater Everglades ecosystem restoration. Wetl Ecol Manag 14:409–419
Smith KK, Good RE, Good NF (1979) Production dynamics for above and belowground components of a New Jersey Spartina alterniflora tidal marsh. Estuar Coast Mar Sci 9:189–201
Tobias VD, Williamson MF, Nyman JA (2014) A comparison of the elemental composition of leaf tissue of Spartina patens and Spartina alternifora in Louisiana’s coastal marshes. J Plant Nutr 37:1327–1344
VCS: Verified Carbon Standard (2015) Methodology for tidal wetland and seagrass restoration (VM0033). Methodology developed by Restore America’s Estuaries and Silvestrum, Arlington
Wieski K, Pennings SC (2014) Climate drivers of Spartina alterniflora saltmarsh production in Georgia, USA. Ecosystems 17:473–484
Yates K, Greening H, Morrison G (Eds) (2011) Integrating science and resource management in Tampa Bay, Florida. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1384
Acknowledgements
This study served as a component of the Tampa Bay Blue Carbon Assessment. Field efforts and carbon stock calculations were completed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Funding was provided by Restore America’s Estuaries and the Tampa Bay Environmental Restoration Fund. The authors also wish to thank the Southwest Florida Water Management District (B Henningsen), FWC’s Stock Enhancement Research Facility (C Young), Upper Tampa Bay Regional Park (B Evarts), Hillsborough County (M Barnwell), Pinellas County (P Leasure), Manatee County, Tampa Electric Co., and Suncoast Youth Conservation Center (K Guindon) for providing property access. Field assistance was provided by A Chappel, J Christian, K Guindon, and R Lucas. Plant samples were pulverized in the lab of E Peebles and analyzed in the lab of B Rosenheim at the University of South Florida College of Marine Science.
Funding
This study served as a component of the Tampa Bay Blue Carbon Assessment. Field efforts and carbon stock calculations were completed by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWRI). Funding for this effort was awarded to Dr. Ryan P. Moyer (FWC/FWRI) by Restore America’s Estuaries and the Tampa Bay Environmental Restoration Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radabaugh, K.R., Powell, C.E., Bociu, I. et al. Plant size metrics and organic carbon content of Florida salt marsh vegetation. Wetlands Ecol Manage 25, 443–455 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-016-9527-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-016-9527-6