Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Uncertainty Quantification of Rainfall-runoff Simulations Using the Copula-based Bayesian Processor: Impacts of Seasonality, Copula Selection and Correlation Coefficient

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The outputs of Rainfall-runoff models are inherently uncertain and quantifying the associated uncertainty is crucial for water resources management activities. This study presents the uncertainty quantification of rainfall-runoff simulations using the copula-based Bayesian processor (CBP) in Danjiangkou Reservoir basin, China. The seasonality of uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modeling is explored, and impacts of copula selection and correlation coefficient on uncertainty quantification results are investigated. Results show that the overall performance of the CBP is satisfactory, which provides a useful tool for estimating the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations. It is also demonstrated that the dry season has higher reliability and greater resolution compared with wet season, which illustrates that the CBP captures the actual uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations more accurately in dry season. Moreover, the performance the CBP highly depends on the selected Copula function and considered Kendall tau correlation coefficient. As a result, great attention should be paid to selecting the appropriate Copula function and effectively capturing the actual dependence between observed and simulated flows in the CBP-based uncertainty quantification of rainfall-runoff simulations practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data available after request from the corresponding author.

References

  • Al-Juboori AM (2022) Solving complex rainfall-runoff processes in semi-arid regions using hybrid heuristic model. Water Resour Manag 36(2):717–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondi D, De Luca DL (2013) Performance assessment of a Bayesian Forecasting System (BFS) for real-time flood forecasting. J Hydrol 479:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondi D, Versace P, Sirangelo B (2010) Uncertainty assessment through a precipitation dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor: An application to a small catchment in southern Italy. J Hydrol 386(1–4):38–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellarin A, Vogel RM, Brath A (2004) A stochastic index flow model of flow duration curves. Water Resour Res 40(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dakhlaoui H, Djebbi K (2021) Evaluating the impact of rainfall–runoff model structural uncertainty on the hydrological rating of regional climate model simulations. J Water Clim Change 12(8):3820–3838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dung NV, Merz B, Bárdossy A, Apel H (2015) Handling uncertainty in bivariate quantile estimation—An application to flood hazard analysis in the Mekong Delta. J Hydrol 527:704–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng K, Zhou J, Liu Y, Lu C, He Z (2019) Hydrological uncertainty processor (HUP) with estimation of the marginal distribution by a Gaussian mixture model. Water Resour Manag 33(9):2975–2990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraga I, Cea L, Puertas J (2019) Effect of rainfall uncertainty on the performance of physically based rainfall–runoff models. Hydrol Process 33(1):160–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaith M, Li Z (2020) Propagation of parameter uncertainty in SWAT: A probabilistic forecasting method based on polynomial chaos expansion and machine learning. J Hydrol 124854

  • Gopalan SP, Kawamura A, Amaguchi H, Takasaki T, Azhikodan G (2019) A bootstrap approach for the parameter uncertainty of an urban-specific rainfall-runoff model. J Hydrol 579:124195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo SL, Guo J, Zhang J, Chen H (2009) VIC distributed hydrological model to predict climate change impact in the Hanjiang Basin. Sci China Ser E 52(11):3234–3239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han S, Coulibaly P, Biondi D (2019) Assessing hydrologic uncertainty processor performance for flood forecasting in a semiurban watershed. J Hydrol Eng 24(9):05019025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking JRM (1990) L-moments: analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order statistics. J R Stat Soc B 52(1):105–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang X, Liang Z, Qian M, Zhang X, Chen Y, Li B, Fu X (2019) Method for probabilistic flood forecasting considering rainfall and model parameter uncertainties. J Hydrol Eng 24(12):04019056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoben WJM, Freer JE, Peel MC, Fowler KJA, Woods RA (2020) A brief analysis of conceptual model structure uncertainty using 36 models and 559 catchments. Water Resour Res 56(9):e2019WR025975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzysztofowicz R, Kelly KS (2000) Hydrologic uncertainty processor for probabilistic river stage forecasting. Water Resour Res 36(11):3265–3277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Zhou JZ, Sun HW, Feng KL, Zhang HR, Tayyab M (2017) Impact of distribution type in bayes probability flood forecasting. Water Resour Manag 31:961–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Guo S, Xiong F, Wang J, Xie Y (2022) Comparative study of flood coincidence risk estimation methods in the mainstream and its tributaries. Water Resour Manag 36(2):683–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZJ, Guo SL, Xiong LH, Xu CY (2018) Hydrological uncertainty processor based on a copula function. Hydrolog Sci J 63(1):74–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZJ, Guo SL, Zhang HG, Liu DD, Yang G (2016) Comparative study of three updating procedures for real-time flood forecasting. Water Resour Manag 30(7):2111–2126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moges E, Demissie Y, Larsen L, Yassin F (2021) Review: Sources of hydrological model uncertainties and advances in their analysis. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motevali BNE, Akhoond-Ali AM, Radmanesh F, Koupai JA, Soltaninia S (2021) Comparison of the calculated drought return periods using tri-variate and bivariate copula functions under climate change condition. Water Resour Manag 35(14):4855–4875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappenberger F, Ramos MH, Cloke HL, Wetterhall F, Alfieri L, Bogner K, Salamon P (2015) How do I know if my forecasts are better? Using benchmarks in hydrological ensemble prediction. J Hydrol 522:697–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragab R, Alexandra K, Muhammad A, Ioanna P (2020) Application of Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) at different temporal scales to reduce the uncertainty level in modelled river flows. Hydrolog Sci J 65(11):1856–1871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razmi A, Mardani-Fard HA, Golian S, Zahmatkesh Z (2022) Time-varying univariate and bivariate frequency analysis of nonstationary extreme sea level for New York City. Environ Process 9(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safarpour H, Tabesh M, Shahangian SA (2022) Environmental assessment of a wastewater system under water demand management policies. Water Resour Manag 36(6):2061–2077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepúlveda UM, Mendoza PA, Mizukami N, Newman AJ (2022) Revisiting parameter sensitivities in the variable infiltration capacity model across a hydroclimatic gradient. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 26(13):3419–3445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Liu D, Yin J, Xiong L, Liu P (2020) Integrating hybrid runoff generation mechanism into variable infiltration capacity model to facilitate hydrological simulations. Stoch Env Res Risk 34(12):2139–2157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Yeh PJF, Che YY, Lv W, Hu BX, Huang G (2021) Copula-based risk evaluation of global meteorological drought in the 21st century based on CMIP5 multi-model ensemble projections. J Hydrol 598:126265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong L, Du T, Xu CY, Guo S, Jiang C, Gippel CJ (2015) Non-Stationary annual maximum flood frequency analysis using the norming constants method to consider non-Stationarity in the annual daily flow series. Water Resour Manag 29(10):3615–3633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang G, Guo SL, Li LP, Hong XJ, Wang L (2016) Multi-objective operating rules for Danjiangkou Reservoir under climate change. Water Resour Manag 30(3):1183–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Zhou J, Fang W, Wang Y (2020) An ensemble flow forecast method based on autoregressive model and hydrological uncertainty processor. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao S, Chen N, Du W, Wang C, Chen C (2021) A cellular automata based rainfall-runoff model for urban inundation analysis under different land uses. Water Resour Manag 35(6):1991–2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Liang Z, Zhao W, Jiang X, Li B (2019) Performance assessment of hydrologic uncertainty processor through integration of the principal components analysis. J Water Clim Change 10(2):373–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou JZ, Feng KL, Liu Y, Zhou C, He FF, Liu GB, He ZZ (2020) A hydrologic uncertainty processor using linear derivation in the normal quantile transform space. Water Resour Manag 34:3649–3665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Wang Y, Li Z, Chang J, Guo A (2021) Quantifying the uncertainty interaction between the model input and structure on hydrological processes. Water Resour Manag 35(12):3915–3935

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51909112), Major Discipline Academic and Technical Leaders Training Program of Jiangxi Province (20212BCJ23016) and Jiangxi Provincial Water Resources Science and Technology Project (202023ZDKT02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and writing original draft preparation, Zhangjun Liu; Data curation, Writing, review and editing, Jingwen Zhang; Resources, Supervision and updating some parts, Tianfu Wen and Jingqing Cheng.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingqing Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent to Participate

The authors declare that they are aware and consent with their participation on this paper.

Consent to Publish

The authors declare that they are consent with the publication of this paper.

Competing Interests

There is not any competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Wen, T. et al. Uncertainty Quantification of Rainfall-runoff Simulations Using the Copula-based Bayesian Processor: Impacts of Seasonality, Copula Selection and Correlation Coefficient. Water Resour Manage 36, 4981–4993 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03287-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03287-x

Keywords

Navigation