Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Modular Three-Dimensional Scenario-Based Numerical Modelling of Groundwater Flow

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater flow modelling is an important technique which is used to study the dynamics of groundwater systems. Although, complex groundwater system with large set of parameters and associated uncertainty with those parameters makes modelling exercise difficult. In this study, development of groundwater model for Varanasi city and near around area was prompted to understand the groundwater dynamics and future groundwater resource scenarios in the region. The model was developed for the area of 2785 km2, where aquifer thickness varied up-to 150 m. The model grid consisted of 210 rows and 210 columns with each cell size of 250 m × 250 m. To realize the different type of underground formations, model was built for five layers with recharge entering the aquifer from surface infiltration through the overlying confining unit and from seepage through riverbeds. The maximum part of the model domain is surrounded by the Ganga River, which was taken as a hydrologic boundary for the model. Model simulations were made to quantify groundwater flow within the alluvial aquifer as well as flow into and out of the system. The groundwater model was developed for the transient state condition for the year of 2006 to 2017. Several criteria were used during model development and calibration to determine how fine the model simulated conditions in the aquifer. Model calibration was done on the values of hydraulic conductivity and recharge rates. A root-mean-square error analysis was performed during calibration to serve as a criterion to minimize differences between observed and model computed water levels. Further, calibrated model was used to analyze different scenarios to understand the future scenario of water resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asghar MN, Prathapar SA, Shafique MS (2002) Extracting relatively fresh groundwater from aquifers underlain by salty groundwater. Agric Water Manag 52:119–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer S, Liedl R, Sauter M (2005) Modeling the influence of epikarst evolution on karst aquifer genesis: A time-variant recharge boundary condition for joint karst–epikarst development. Water Resour Res 41:W09416. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003321

  • Bear J, Verruijt A (1987) Modeling groundwater flow and pollution. Springer, Berlin (432p)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi RS (1973) A note on the investigation of ground water resources in western districts of Uttar Pradesh. Annual Report, UP Irrigation Research Institute, 1973, pp. 86–122

  • City Development Plan For Varanasi (JNNURM) (2006) Final report. Municipal Corporation, Varanasi

    Google Scholar 

  • Csoma R (2001) The analytic element method for groundwater flow modelling. Period Polytech Ser Civ Eng 45(1):43–62

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Agnese FA (1994) Using geoscientific information systems for three-dimensional modeling of regional groundwater flow systems, Death Valley region, Nevada and California. PhD thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO

  • Faunt CC, D’Agnese FA, O’Brien GM (2004) Hydrology, Chapter D of Death Valley Regional groundwater flow system, Nevada and California- Hydrogeological framework and transient groundwater flow model. U.S. Geological Survey. Scientific Investigation Report 2004–5205

  • Franke OL, Reilly TE, Bennett GD (1987) Definition of boundary and initial conditions in the analysis of saturated ground-water flow systems – An introduction: techniques of water-resources investigations of the United States Geological Survey, Book 3, Chapter B5, 15 p

  • Garg SK (2016) Irrigation Engineering and Hydraulics Structures, 31st edn. Khanna Publishers, New Delhi, Chap. 02

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaur S, Chahar BR, Graillot D (2011) Analytic elements method and particle swarm optimization based simulation–optimization model for groundwater management. J Hydrol 402(3–4):217–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick SM (1984) A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods. Water Resour Res 19(2):305–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh A, McDonald M (1996) User’s documentation for MODFLOW-96, an update to the U.S. Geological Survey modular finite-difference ground-water flow model: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96–485, 56 p

  • Hill M (2006) The practical use of simplicity in developing groundwater models. Ground Water J 44(6):775–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt RJ, Anderson MP, Kelson VA (1998) Improving a complex Finite difference groundwater flow model through the use of Analytic element screening model. U.S Geological Survey, 8505 Research Way, Middeton, WI53562

  • Igboekwe MU, Gurunadha Rao VVS, Okwueze EE (2008) Groundwater flow modelling of Kwa Ibo River watershed, southeastern Nigeria. Hydrol Process 22(10):1523–1531

    Google Scholar 

  • Igboekwe MU, Achi NJ (2011) Finite Difference Method of Modelling Groundwater Flow. J Water Resour Prot 3:192–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadri SFR, Pande C (2016) Ground water flow modeling for calibrating steady state using MODFLOW software: a case study of Mahesh River basin, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 2(1):39

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaviyarasan R, Seshadri H, Sasidhar P (2013) Assessment of groundwater flow model for an unconfined coastal aquifer. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 2:12–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar Anandha KJ, kumar V (2005) Groundwater Management options-a case study of Western Yamuna Canal Command Haryana. National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar Pradeep GN, Kumar Anil P (2014) Development of Groundwater Flow Model using Visual MODFLOW. Int J Adv Res 2(6):649–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran R, Khosa R, Gosain AK, Lahari S, Sinha SK, Chahar BR, Dhanya CT (2016) Regional scale groundwater modelling study for Ganga River basin. J Hydrol 541:727–741

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. Technical report, US Geological Survey

  • Modi PN (1998) Water Supply Engineering. Standard Book House, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Muteraja KN (1986) Applied Hydrology; Tata MGraw-Hill. New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishikawa T (1998) Water resources optimization model for Santa Barbara, California. J Water Resour Plan Manage ASCE 124(5):252–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsthoorn T (1985) The power of the electronic worksheet- modelling without special programs. Ground Water J 23:381–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsthoorn TN (1999) A comparative review of analytic and finite difference models used at Amsterdam Water Supply. J Hydrol 226:139–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar PJ, Gaur S, Dwivedi SB, Dikshit PKS (2019) Groundwater modelling using an analytic element method and finite difference method: An insight into Lower Ganga river basin. J Earth Syst Sci 128(7):195

    Google Scholar 

  • Prudicet DE, Harrill JR, Burbey TJ (1993) Conceptual evaluation of regional ground-water flow in the carbonate-rock province of the Great Basin. Nevada, Utah, and adjacent states. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 93–170

  • Rao NH (1993) Aquifer recharge by seepage losses from canals. Sadhana 18(6):999–1008

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly T, Harbaugh A (2004) Guidelines for evaluating Ground-Water flow. Scientific Investigations Report 2004–5038. U.S. Department of Interior,. U.S. Geological Survey

  • Senthilkumar M, Elango L (2004) Three-dimensional mathematical model to simulate groundwater flow in the lower Palar River basin, southern India. Hydrogeol J 12(2):197–208

  • Strategic P– 2011–2022 (2009) Ensuring Drinking Water Security In Rural India, Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India

  • Surinaidu L, Charles GD, Bacon, Pavelic P (2013) Agricultural Groundwater Management in the Upper Bhima Basin, India: Current Status and Future Scenarios. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:507–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamma Rao G, Gurunadha Rao VVS, Surinaidu L, Mahesh J, Padalu G (2012) Application of numerical modeling for groundwater flow and contaminant transport analysis in the basaltic terrain, Bagalkot, India. Arab J Geosci 6(6):1819–1833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-011-0461-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting CS, Zhou Y, Vries JJ de., Simmers (1998) Development of a preliminary groundwater flow model for water resources management in the Pingtung Plain, Taiwan. Ground Water 35(6):20–35

  • Aquaveo website (2010) URL: http://www.aquaveo.com/gms. The New Groundwater Modeling System, 2010

  • Umar R, Ahmed I, Alam, F, Muqtada Khan M (2008) Hydrochemical characteristics and seasonal variations in groundwater quality of an alluvial aquifer in parts of Central Ganga Plain, Western Uttar Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 58(6):1295–1300

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Jin J, Li Y (2009) Prediction of inflow at Three Gorges Dam in Yangtze River with wavelet network model. Water Resour Manag 23(13):2791–2803

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Li W (2011) A review of regional groundwater flow modeling. Geosci Front 2(2):205–214

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, IIT (BHU), 221005, Varanasi, India

    Padam Jee Omar, Shishir Gaur, S. B. Dwivedi & P. K. S. Dikshit

Authors
  1. Padam Jee Omar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shishir Gaur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. B. Dwivedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. K. S. Dikshit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Padam Jee Omar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omar, P.J., Gaur, S., Dwivedi, S.B. et al. A Modular Three-Dimensional Scenario-Based Numerical Modelling of Groundwater Flow. Water Resour Manage 34, 1913–1932 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02538-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02538-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation