Skip to main content
Log in

Pan Evaporation Simulation Based on Daily Meteorological Data Using Soft Computing Techniques and Multiple Linear Regression

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaporation, a major component of hydrologic cycle, is an important parameter to many applications in water resource management, irrigation scheduling, and environmental studies. In this study, two soft computing techniques: (a) Artificial Neural Network (ANN), (b) Co-active Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (CANFIS); and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) were used to simulate daily pan evaporation (Ep) at Pantnagar, located at the foothills of Himalayas in the Uttarakhand state of India. Daily meteorological data such as maximum and minimum air temperature, relative humidity in the morning (7 AM) and afternoon (2 PM), wind speed, sun shine hours and pan evaporation form January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2004 were used for developing the ANN, CANFIS and MLR models. A comparison based on statistical indices such as root mean squared error (RMSE), coefficient of efficiency (CE) and correlation coefficient (r) was made among the estimated magnitudes of Ep by the ANN, CANFIS and the MLR models. The architecture of ANN and CANFIS were managed by NeuroSolutions 5.0 software produced by NeuroDimension, Inc., Florida. The architecture of ANN was designed with hyperbolic tangent activation function and Delta-Bar-Delta learning algorithm and similarly the architecture of CANFIS was designed with Gaussian membership function, Takagi-Sugeno-Kang fuzzy model, hyperbolic tangent activation function and Delta-Bar-Delta learning algorithm. The results indicated that the performance of ANN model with 6-9-1 architecture in general was superior to the CANFIS and MLR models; however, the performance of CANFIS models was better than MLR models. The ANN model with all input variables and single hidden layer was found to be the best in simulating Ep at Pantnagar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aytek A (2008) Co-active neuro fuzzy inference system for evapotranspiration modelling. Soft Comput 13(7):691–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton JM, Mcclendon RW, Hoogenboom G (2000) Estimating daily pan evaporation with artificial neural networks. Trans ASAE 43(2):491–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burman RD (1976) Intercontinental comparison of evaporation estimates. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 102:109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu TW, Shirmohammadi A (2004) Evaluation of the SWAT model’s hydrology component in the piedmont physiographic region of Maryland. Trans ASAE 47(4):1057–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulomb CV, Legesse D, Gasse F, Travi Y, Chernet T (2001) Lake evaporation estimates in tropical Africa (Lake Ziway, Ethiopia). J Hydrol 245:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson CW, Abrahart RJ, Shamseldin AY, Wilby RL (2006) Flood estimation at ungauged sites using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol 319:391–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deswal S, Pal M (2008) Artificial neural network based modeling of evaporation losses in reservoirs. Proc World Acad Sci Eng Tech 29:279–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinpashoh Y (2006) Study of reference crop evapotranspiration in I.R of Iran. Agric Water Manag 84:123–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eslamian SS, Gohari SA, Biabanaki M, Malekian R (2008) Estimation of monthly pan evaporation using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. J Appl Sci 8(19):3497–3502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frevert DK, Hill RW, Braaten BC (1983) Estimation of FAO evapotranspiration coefficients. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 109(2):265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavin H, Agnew CA (2004) Modelling actual, reference and equilibrium evaporation from a temperate wet grassland. Hydrol Process 18:229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Googhari SK (2012) Daily pan evaporation estimation using a neuro-fuzzy-based model. J Agric Sci Tech 2:223–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Haciismailoglu MC, Kucuk I, Derebasi N (2009) Prediction of dynamic hysteresis loops of nano-crystalline cores. Expert Syst Appl 36:2225–2227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heydari M, Talaee PH (2011) Prediction of flow through rockfill dams using a neuro-fuzzy computing technique. J Math Comput Sci 2(3):515–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Irmak S, Haman D, Jones JW (2002) Evaluation of class A pan coefficients for estimating reference evapotranspiration in a humid location. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 128(3):153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishak S, Trifiro F (2007) Neural networks, transportation research circular EC113. Artif Intell Transp 17–32

  • Jang JSR, Sun CT, Mizutani E (1997) Neuro fuzzy and soft computing: a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence. Prentice-Hall, NJ, p 607

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen ME (1974) Consumptive use of Water and Irrigation Requirements. Report by the Technical Committee of the Irrigation Water Requirements of the Irrig Drain Division, ASCE, New York

  • Keskin ME, Terzi O (2006) Artificial neural network models of daily pan evaporation. J Hydrol Eng 11(1):65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskin ME, Terzi O, Taylan D (2004) Fuzzy logic model approaches to daily pan evaporation estimation in Western Turkey. Hydrol Sci J 49(6):1001–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanikar PG, Nath KK (1998) Relationship of open pan evaporation rate with some important meteorological parameters. J Agric Sci Soc 11(1):46–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Kim HS (2008) Neural networks and genetic algorithm approach for nonlinear evaporation and evapotranspiration modeling. J Hydrol 351:299–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O (2006) Daily pan evaporation modeling using a neuro-fuzzy computing technique. J Hydrol 329:636–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O (2009) Modeling monthly evaporation using two different neural computing techniques. Irrig Sci 27:417–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Raghuvanshi NS, Singh R, Wallender WW, Pruitt WO (2002) Estimating evapotranspiration using artificial neural network. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 128(4):224–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenters JD, Kratz TK, Bowser CJ (2005) Effects of climate variability on lake evaporation: results from a long-term energy budget study of Sparkling Lake, Northern Wisconsin (USA). J Hydrol 308:168–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linarce ET (1967) Climate and the evaporation from crops. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 93:61–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman R (1987) An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE ASSP Mag 4:4–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohani AK, Goel NK, Bhatia KKS (2007) Deriving stage–discharge–sediment concentration relationships using fuzzy logic. Hydrol Sci J 52(4):793–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marofi S, Tabari H, Zare AH (2011) Predicting spatial distribution of snow water equivalent using multivariate nonlinear regression and computational intelligence methods. Water Resour Manag 25(5):1417–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part 1. A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbayoglu G, Ozbayoglu ME (2006) A new approach for the prediction of ash fusion temperatures: a case study using Turkish lignites. Fuel 85:545–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozlem T, Evolkesk M (2005) Modeling of daily pan evaporation. J Appl Sci 5(2):368–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimikhoob A (2009) Estimating daily pan evaporation using artificial neural network in a semi-arid environment. Theor Appl Climatol 98(1–2):101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis RJ, Dias NL (1998) Multi-season lake evaporation: energy-budget estimates and CRLE model assessment with limited meteorological observations. J Hydrol 208:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representation by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (eds) Parallel distributed processing foundations, vol. 1. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabziparvar AA, Tabari H (2010) Comparison of artificial neural network models and non-linear regression methods for estimation of potato crop evapotranspiration in a semi-arid region of Iran. The International Conference on Intelligent Network and Computing, November 26–28, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

  • Sabziparvar AA, Tabari H, Aeini A, Ghafouri M (2010) Evaluation of class A pan coefficient models for estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration in cold-semi arid and warm arid climates. Water Resour Manag 24(5):909–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saemi M, Ahmadi M (2008) Integration of genetic algorithm and a coactive neuro-fuzzy inference system for permeability prediction from well logs data. Transp Porous Media 71:273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirgure PS (2011) Evaporation modeling with neural networks-A research review. Int J Res Rev Soft Intell Comput 1(2):37–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirgure PS, Rajput GS (2012) Prediction of daily pan evaporation using neural networks models. Sci J Agric 1(5):126–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirsath PB, Singh AK (2010) A comparative study of daily pan evaporation estimation using ANN, regression and climate based models. Water Resour Manag 24:1571–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava SK, Sahu AK, Dewangan KN, Mishra SK, Upadhyay AP, Dubey AK (2001) Estimating pan evaporation from meteorological data for Jabalpur. Indian J Soil Cons 29(3):224–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Prakash O, Khicher ML, Singh R, Prakash O (1995) Estimation of evaporation from different meteorological parameters. Ann Arid-Zone 34(4):63–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder RL (1993) Equation for evaporation pan to evapotranspiration conversions. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 118(6):977–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens JC, Stewart EH (1963) A comparison of procedures for computing evaporation and evapotranspiration. Publication 62, International Association of Scientific Hydrology. International Union of Geodynamics and Geophysics, Berkeley, pp 123–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Rangan D, Saheb SM (2002) Modeling evaporation using an artificial neural network algorithm. Hydrol Process 16:3189–3202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Ramasastri KS (2003) Estimating actual evapotranspiration from limited climate data using neural computing technique. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 129(3):214–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabari H, Marofi S, Sabziparvar AA (2010) Estimation of daily pan evaporation using artificial neural network and multivariate nonlinear regression. Irrig Sci 28:399–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabari H, Sabziparvar AA, Ahmadi M (2011) Comparison of artificial neural network and multivariate linear regression methods for estimation of daily soil temperature in an arid region. Meteorog Atmos Phys 110:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabari H, Talaee PH, Abghari H (2012) Utility of coactive neuro-fuzzy inference system for pan evaporation modeling in comparison with multilayer perceptron. Meteorol Atmos Phys 116:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Manag Cybern 15(1):116–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzi O, Keskin ME (2005) Modelling of daily pan evaporation. J Appl Sci 5(2):368–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres M, Hervas C, Amador F (2005) Approximating the sheep milk production curve through the use of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Comput Oper Res 32:2653–2670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajkovic S, Todorovic B, Stankovic M (2003) Forecasting of reference evapotranspiration by artificial neural network. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 129(6):454–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vining KC (2003) Estimation of monthly evaporation from Lake Ashtabulain North Dakota, Orwell Lake in Minnesota, and LakeTraverse in Minnesota and South Dakota, 1931–2001. Water-Resources Investigations Report, US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey

  • Xing-Jie JI, Ji-Jun W, Wan-Long GU, Ye-Yu Z, Feng-Xiu LI (2010) Trends in annual and seasonal pan evaporation in the Lower Yellow River Basin from 1961 to 2010. Adv Clim Change Res 3(4):195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuhe J, Guangsheng Z (2011) Important factors governing the incompatible trends of annual pan evaporation, evidence from a small scale region. Clim Chang 106:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malik, A., Kumar, A. Pan Evaporation Simulation Based on Daily Meteorological Data Using Soft Computing Techniques and Multiple Linear Regression. Water Resour Manage 29, 1859–1872 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0915-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0915-0

Keywords

Navigation