Abstract
Floral morphology can determine the type of animal that can be an effective pollinator. In flowers with nocturnal anthesis long-tubed flowers may attract long-tongued insects such as hawkmoths. However, flowers with more open morphology have nectar that can be more easily accessed by bats and short-tongued moths. These contrasting conditions may have consequences on nectar characteristics, since bats can mediate the selection of copious nectar with low to medium sugar concentration values, contrary to what occurs in hawkmoth-pollinated flowers that show comparatively lower nectar volumes with medium sugar concentrations. Here we describe an overview of the nectar features, secretion patterns and removal effects in a guild of plants with crepuscular-nocturnal anthesis in the Atlantic Forest, Northeastern Brazil. Such a plant set encompassed both species with restricted and easy access to nectar, i.e., long-tube flowers and brush-type flowers, respectively. We found a marked difference between attributes of nectar between both groups. Long-tube flowers offer nectar of higher sugar concentration at specific periods of the night that can be reabsorbed later if it has not been removed, the brush-type flowers provide nectar of low sugar concentrations, throughout the night, and may increase their production in response to consumption. These differences can play an important role in mechanisms related to the sharing of resources in the community, ensuring an even more intimate relationship between long-tube flowers and hawkmoths, and allowing brush-type flowers to deal with consumption by different nocturnal pollinators.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
Amorim FW, Galetto L, Sazima M (2013) Beyond the pollination syndrome: nectar ecology and the role of diurnal and nocturnal pollinators in the reproductive success in Inga sessilis (Fabaceae). Plant Biol 15:317–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00643.x
Andrade-Lima D (1960) Estudos Fitogeográficos de Pernambuco. Arquivos Do IPA 5:305–341
Avila R, Pinheiro M, Sazima M (2015) The generalist Inga subnuda subsp. luschnathiana (Fabaceae): negative effect of floral visitors on reproductive success? Plant Biol 17:728–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12291
Baker HG, Baker I (1983a) A brief historical review of the chemistry of floral nectar. In: Bentley B, Elias TS (eds) The biology of nectaries. Columbia University Press, Cambridge, pp 126–152
Baker HG, Baker I (1983b) Floral nectar sugars constituents in relation to pollination type. In: Jones CE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 117–141
Barberis M, Bogo G, Bortolotti L, Conte L, Alessandrini M, Nepi M, Galloni M (2021) Gender-biased nectar targets different behavioural traits of flower visitors. Plant Ecol 222:233–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-020-01101-5
Bernardello LM, Galetto L, Rodriguez IG (1994) Reproductive biology, variability of nectar features and pollination of Combretum fruticosum (Combretaceae) in Argentina. Bot J Linn Soc 114:293–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1994.tb01938.x
Bobrowiec PED, Oliveira PE (2012) Removal effects on nectar production in bat-pollinated flowers of the Brazilian Cerrado. Biotropica 44:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00823.x
Bogo G, Fisogni A, Rabassa-Juvanteny J, Bortolotti L, Nepi M, Guarnieri M, Conte L, Galloni M (2021) Nectar chemistry is not only a plant’s affair: floral visitors affect nectar sugar and amino acid composition. Oikos 130:1180–1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.08176
Bolten AB, Feinsinger P (1978) Why do hummingbird flowers secrete dilute nectar? Biotropica 10:307–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/2387684
Borges RM, Somanathan H, Kelber A (2016) Patterns and process in nocturnal and crepuscular pollination services. Q Rev Biol 91:389–418. https://doi.org/10.1086/689481
Brzosko E, Bajguz A (2019) Nectar composition in moth-pollinated Platanthera bifolia and P. chlorantha and its importance for reproductive success. Planta 250:263–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-019-03168-5
Burdon RC, Raguso RA, Kessler A, Parachnowitsch AL (2015) Spatiotemporal floral scent variation of Penstemon digitalis. J Chem Ecol 41:641–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-015-0599-1
Búrquez A, Corbet SA (1991) Do flowers reabsorb nectar? Funct Ecol 5:369–379. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389808
Carlson JE, Harms KE (2006) The evolution of gender-biased nectar production in hermaphroditic plants. Bot Rev 72:179–205. https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2006)72[179:TEOGNP]2.0.CO;2
Castellanos MC, Wilson P, Thomson JD (2002) Dynamic nectar replenishment in flowers of Penstemon (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 89:111–118. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.1.111
Cocucci AA, Galetto L, Sersic A (1992) El síndrome floral de Caesalpinia gilliesii (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae). Darwiniana 31:111–135
Cruden RW, Hermann SM (1983) Studying nectar? Some observations on the art. In: Bentley B, Elias TS (eds) The biology of nectaries. Columbia University Press, Cambridge, pp 223–242
Cruden RW, Hermann SM, Peterson S (1983) Patterns of nectar production and plant-pollinator coevolution. In: Bentley B, Elias TS (eds) The biology of nectaries. Columbia University Press, Cambridge, pp 80–125
Cruz-Neto O, Machado IC, Galetto L, Lopes AV (2015) The influence of nectar production and floral visitors on the female reproductive success of Inga (Fabaceae): a field experiment. Bot J Linn Soc 177:230–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12236
Dafni A, Eisikowitch D, Ivri Y (1987) Nectar flow and pollinators’ efficiency in two co-occurring species of Capparis (Capparaceae) in Israel. Plant Syst Evol 157:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00936196
Domingos-Melo A, Nadia TL, Wiemer AP, Cocucci AA, Machado IC (2019) Beyond taxonomy: anther skirt is a diagnostic character that provides specialized noctuid pollination in Marsdenia megalantha (Asclepiadoideae–Apocynaceae). Plant Syst Evol 305:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-018-1555-7
Domingos-Melo A, Diniz UM, Chalegre SL, Machado IC (2021) “Sweet Rain” from bat-pollinated flowers: how does sugar concentration modulate nectar retention? Int J Plant Sci 182:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1086/711080
FIDEM (1987) Reservas Ecológicas—Região Metropolitana do Recife. Série de Desenvolvimento Urbano e Meio Ambiente. Alcântara Promoções e Publicidade S/A, Recife
Galetto L, Bernardello LM (1992) Extrafloral nectaries that attract ants in Bromeliaceae: structure and nectar composition. Can J Bot 70:1101–1106. https://doi.org/10.1139/b92-136
Galetto L, Bernardello LM (1993) Nectar secretion pattern and removal effects in three species of Solanaceae. Can J Bot 71:1394–1398. https://doi.org/10.1139/b93-167
Galetto L, Bernardello LM (1995) Characteristics of nectar secretion by Lycium cestoides, L. ciliatum (Solanaceae) and their hybrid. Plant Species Biol 11:157–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1996.tb00141.x
Galetto L, Bernardello G (2004) Floral nectaries, nectar production dynamics and chemical composition in six Ipomoea species (Convolvulaceae) in relations to pollinators. Ann Bot 94:269–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch137
Galetto L, Bernardello G (2005) Rewards in flowers. Nectar. In: Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband BC (eds) Practical pollination biology. Enviroquest, Cambridge, pp 261–312
Galetto L, Bernardello LM, Juliani HR (1994) Characteristics of secretion of nectar in Pyrostegia venusta (Ker-Gawl.) Miers (Bignoniaceae). New Phvtologist 127:465–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb03964.x
Galetto L, Bernardello G, Rivera GL (1997) Nectar, nectaries, flower visitors and breeding systems of five terrestrial Orchidaceae from central Argentina. J Plant Res 110:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506798
Galetto L, Bernardello G, Isele IC, Vesprini J, Speroni G, Berduc A (2000) Reproductive biology of Erythrina crista-galli (Fabaceae). Ann Mo Bot Gard 87:127–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666157
Gleiser G, Internicola AI, Austerlitz F, Bernasconi G (2014) Stabilizing selection on nectar concentration in wild Petunia axillaris, as revealed by genetic analysis of pollen dispersal. Evol Ecol 28:869–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9714-y
Gonçalves VF, de Castro VF (2017) Biologia floral e ecologia da polinização de Ipomoea alba L. (Convolvulaceae) em uma área de restinga no Rio de Janeiro. Revista Dissertar 1(26 e 27):76–79. https://doi.org/10.24119/16760867ed11327
Heithaus ER, Fleming TH, Opler A (1975) Foraging patterns and resource utilization in seven species of bats in a seasonal tropical forest. Ecology 56:841–854. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936295
Helversen OV (1993) Adaptations of flowers to the pollination by glossophagine bats. In: Barthlott W, Naumann CM, Schimidt-Loske L, Schuchmann KL (eds) Animal-plant interactions in tropical environments. Results of the Annual Meeting of the German Society for Tropical Ecology, Bonn, pp 41–59
Johnson SD, Raguso RA (2016) The long-tongued hawkmoth pollinator niche for native and invasive plants in Africa. Ann Bot 117:25–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv137
Johnson SD, Moré M, Amorim FW, Haber WA, Frankie GW, Stanley DA, Cocucci AA, Raguso RA (2017) The long and the short of it: a global analysis of hawkmoth pollination niches and interaction networks. Funct Ecol 31:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12753
Koptur S (1983) Flowering phenology and floral biology of Inga (Fabaceae–Mimosoideae). Syst Bot 8:354–368. https://doi.org/10.2307/2418355
Kumar SS, Aluri JSR (2021) Pollination ecology of the rare tropical deciduous tree species, Maerua apetala (Roth) M. Jacobs (Capparaceae) in the southern eastern Ghats forest of Andhra Pradesh, India. Annali Di Botanica 11:33–42. https://doi.org/10.13133/2239-3129/16891
Lautenschleger A, Vizentin-Bugoni J, Cavalheiro LB, Iserhard CA (2021) Morphological matching and phenological overlap promote niche partitioning and shape a mutualistic plant–hawkmoth network. Ecol Entomol 46:292–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12961
Machado IC, Sazima I, Sazima M (1998) Bat pollination of the terrestrial herb Irlbachia alata (Gentianaceae) in northeastern Brazil. Plant Syst Evol 209:231–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985230
Mangiafico S, Mangiafico MS (2017). Package ‘rcompanion’. Cran Repos, 20, 1–71. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rcompanion/rcompanion.pdf
Marín-Gómez OH (2008) Consumo de néctar por Aotus lemurinus y su rol como posible polinizador de las flores de Inga edulis (Fabales: Mimosoideae). Neotropical Primates 15:30–32. https://doi.org/10.1896/044.015.0108
Moré M, Amorim FW, Benitez-Vieyra S, Medina AM, Sazima M, Cocucci AA (2012) Armament imbalances: match and mismatch in plant-pollinator traits of highly specialized long-spurred orchids. PLoS ONE 7(7):e41878. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041878
Musicante M L, Galetto L (2008) Características del néctar de Cologania broussonetii (Balb.) DC. (Fabaceae) y su relación con los visitantes florales. Ecología Austral 18: 195–204. http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/ecoaus/v18n2/v18n2a04.pdf
Nachev V, Stich KP, Winter C, Bond A, Kamil A, Winter Y (2017) Cognition-mediated evolution of low-quality floral nectars. Science 355:75–78. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah4219
Nassar JM, Ramirez N, Linares O (1997) Comparative pollination biology of Venezuelan columnar cacti and the role of nectar-feeding bats in their sexual reproduction. Am J Bot 84:918–927. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446282
Nepi M, Stpiczyńska M (2008) The complexity of nectar: secretion and resorption dynamically regulate nectar features. Naturwissenschaften 95:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0307.2
Nicolson SW (2007) Nectar consumers. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E (eds) Nectaries and nectar. Springer, Dordecht, pp 289–342
Nicolson SW, Thornburg RW (2007) Nectar chemistry. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E (eds) Nectaries and nectar. Springer, Dordecht, pp 215–264
Oksanen J (2015) Vegan: an introduction to ordination. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vignettes/introvegan.pdf, 8, 19.
Oliveira PE, Gibbs PE, Barbosa AA (2004) Moth pollination of woody species in the Cerrados of Central Brazil: a case of so much owed to so few. Plant Syst Evol 245:41–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-003-0120-0
Oliveira R, Araújo Duarte Jr J, Rech AR, de Avila JRS (2014) Polinização por lepidopteros. In: Rech AR, Agostini K, Oliveira PE, Machado IC (eds) Biologia da polinização. Projeto Cultural, Rio de Janeiro
Oliveira-Barros EC, Weber AC, Machado IC (2013) Pollinator limitation and late-acting self-incompatibility mechanism as causes of low fruit set in two sympatric species of Inga (Fabaceae—Mimosoideae) in the Central Amazon. Rodriguesia 64:37–47. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2175-78602013000100005
Ollerton J, Killick A, Lamborn E, Watts S, Whiston M (2007) Multiple meanings and modes: on the many ways to be a generalist flower. Taxon 56:717–728. https://doi.org/10.2307/25065855
Opler A (1983) Nectar production in a tropical ecosystem. In: Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband BC (eds) Practical pollination biology. Enviroquest, Cambridge, pp 30–79
Ordano M, Ornelas JF (2004) Generous-like flowers: nectar production in two epiphytic bromeliads and a meta-analysis of removal effects. Oecologia 140:495–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1597-0
Ornelas JF, Lara C (2009) Nectar replenishment and pollen receipt interact in their effects on seed production of Penstemon roseus. Oecologia 160:675–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1337-6
Petanidou T, Van Laere AJ, Smets E (1996) Change in floral nectar components from fresh to senescent flowers of Capparis spinosa (Capparidaceae), a nocturnally flowering Mediterranean shrub. Plant Syst Evol 199:79–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985919
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Heisterkamp S, Van Willigen B, Maintainer R (2017) Package ‘nlme’. Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models, version, 3(1)
Pyke GH (1991) What does it cost a plant to produce floral nectar? Nature 350:58–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/350058a0
Pyke GH, Kalman JR, Bordin DM, Blanes L, Doble PA (2020) Patterns of floral nectar standing crops allow plants to manipulate their pollinators. Sci Rep 10:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58102-7
Queiroz JA, Quirino ZGM, Lopes AV, Machado IC (2016) Vertebrate mixed pollination system in Encholirium spectabile: a bromeliad pollinated by bats, opossum and hummingbirds in a tropical dry forest. J Arid Environ 125:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.09.015
Queiroz JA, Diniz UM, Vázquez DP, Quirino ZM, Santos FA, Mello MA, Machado IC (2021) Bats and hawkmoths form mixed modules with flowering plants in a nocturnal interaction network. Biotropica 53:596–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12902
R Core Team (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found. Stat. Comput. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. page R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Ragusa-Netto J (2007) Nectar, fleshy fruits and the abundance of parrots at a gallery forest in the southern Pantanal (Brazil). Neotropical Fauna and Environment 42:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650520600979643
Rifell JA, Alarcón R, Abrell L (2008) Floral trait associations in hawkmoth-specialized and mixed pollination systems. Commun Integr Biol 1:6–8. https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.1.1.6350
Rocha EA, Domingos-Melo A, Zappi DC, Machado IC (2019) Reproductive biology of columnar cacti: are bats the only protagonists in the pollination of Pilosocereus, a typical chiropterophilous genus? Folia Geobot 54:239–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-019-09357-0
Rosas-Guerrero V, Aguilar R, Martén-Rodríguez S, Ashworth L, Lopezaraiza-Mikel M, Bastida JM, Quesada M (2014) A quantitative review of pollination syndromes: do floral traits predict effective pollinators? Ecol Lett 17:388–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12224
Sazatornil FD, More M, Benitez-Vieyra S, Cocucci AA, Kitching IJ, Schlumpberger BO, Oliveira PE, Sazima M, Amorim FW (2016) Beyond neutral and forbidden links: morphological matches and the assembly of mutualistic hawkmoth–plant networks. J Anim Ecol 85:1586–1594. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12509
Sazima M, Buzato S, Sazima I (1999) Bat-pollinated flower assemblages and bat visitors at two Atlantic forest sites in Brazil. Ann Bot 83:705–712. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.0876
Silberbauer-Gottsberger I (1972) Anthese und Bestäubung der Rubiaceen Tocoyena brasiliensis und T. formosa aus dem Cerrado Brasiliens. Österreichische Botanische Zeitschrift 120:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01373254
SUDENE (1990) Dados pluviométricos do Nordeste—Estado de Pernambuco. Série Pluviométrica 6. Superintendência do Desenvolvimento do Nordeste (SUDENE), Recife
Torres C, Galetto L (2002) Are nectar sugar composition and corolla tube length related to the diversity of insects that visit Asteraceae flowers? Plant Biol 4:360–366. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-32326
Torres C, Mimosa M, Galetto L (2013) Nectar ecology of Datura ferox (Solanaceae): an invasive weed with nocturnal flowers in agro-ecosystems from central Argentina. Plant Syst Evol 299:1433–1441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-013-0805-y
Tschapka M (2004) Energy density patterns of nectar resources permit coexistence within a guild of Neotropical flower-visiting bats. J Zool 263:7–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836903004734
Veiga Blanco T, Galetto L, Machado IC (2013) Nectar regulation in Euphorbia tithymaloides L., a hummingbird-pollinated Euphorbiaceae. Plant Biol 15:910–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00695.x
Veloso HP, Rangel-Filho ALR, Lima JCA (1991) Classificação da vegetação brasileira adaptada a um sistema universal. IBGE, Departamento de Recursos Naturais e Estudos Ambientais, Rio de Janeiro
Vesprini JL, Galetto L (2000) The reproductive biology of Jaborosa integrifolia (Solanaceae): Why its fruits are so rare? Plant Syst Evol 225:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985456
Witt T, Jürgens A, Gottsberger G (2013) Nectar sugar composition of European Caryophylloideae (Caryophyllaceae) in relation to flower length, pollination biology and phylogeny. Evol Biol 26:2244–2259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12224
Acknowledgement
We thank Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, through Paulo Martins, for logistic support and the possibility to develop this research at the Tapacurá Ecological Station and Edinaldo Mendes (Nado) for his help during fieldwork.
Funding
CAPES (Programa PEC/PG) for the scholarship to LMP and Financial Code 001; CNPq for financial support to ICM (310508/2019-3); FACEPE for financial support to ADM (APQ-0226-2.03/21); Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (SECyT-UNC) and CONICET for financial support to LG.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The study was conceived and designed by LMP, ICM and LG. Field sampling was performed by LMP, and data analyses were performed by LMP and AD-M. The first draft was written by LMP and revised by ICM and LG. A final version was written by AD-M with the collaboration and revision of all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest and have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Communicated by William E. Rogers.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Primo, L.M., Domingos-Melo, A., Galetto, L. et al. Nectar secretion patterns are associated to nectar accessibility in a guild of crepuscular-nocturnal flowering plants. Plant Ecol 223, 951–964 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-022-01250-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-022-01250-9