Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Wetland plant growth under contrasting water regimes associated with river regulation and drought: implications for environmental water management

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An important characteristic of many wetland plants in semi-arid regions is their capacity to withstand fluctuations between extended dry phases and floods. However, anthropogenic river regulation can reduce natural flow variability in riverine wetlands, causing a decline in the frequency and duration of deep flooding as well as extended droughts, and an increase in shallow flooding and soil saturation. Our aim in this paper was to use an experimental approach to examine whether reductions in flooding and drought disadvantage species adapted to both these extremes, and favours those with water requirements that match the new regime of frequent low-level flooding. We compared the growth characteristics and biomass allocation of three native Australian aquatic macrophytes (Pseudoraphis spinescens, Juncus ingens and Typha domingensis), which co-occur at Barmah Forest, south-eastern Australia, under three water treatments: drought, soil saturation and deep flooding. The responses of species to the treatments largely reflected changes in their relative abundance at Barmah Forest since river regulation. Typha domingensis, which has remained uncommon, performed relatively poorly in all treatments, while J. ingens, which has increased its range, exhibited more vigorous growth under soil saturation. Pseudoraphis spinescens, which was once widespread but has declined markedly in its distribution, grew strongly under all water treatments. These findings suggest that a return to more natural, variable river flow regimes can potentially be an important conservation and restoration strategy in ecosystems characterised by species that have adaptations to extreme hydrological growing conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel N, Roberts J, Reid J, Overton I, O’Connell D, Harvey J and Bickford S (2006) Barmah Forest: a review of its values, management objectives, and knowledge base. Report to the Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority. CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship, Canberra

  • Blanch SJ, Walker KF, Ganf GG (2000) Water regimes and littoral plants in four weir pools of the River Murray, Australia. Regulated Rivers 16:445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger TP, Rivelli AR, Garden DL (2005) Drought resistance of native and introduced perennial grasses of south-eastern Australia. Aust J Agric Res 56:1261–1267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bren LJ (1988) Effects of river regulation on flooding of a riparian red gum forest on the River Murray, Australia. Regulated Rivers 2:65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bren LJ (1992) Tree invasion of an intermittent wetland in relation to changes in the flooding frequency of the River Murray, Australia. Aust J Ecol 17:395–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock MA, Casanova MT (1997) Plant life at the edge of wetlands: ecological responses to wetting and drying patterns. In: Klomp N, Lunt ID (eds) Frontiers in ecology: building the links. Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, pp 181–192

  • Casanova MT (2011) Using water plant functional groups to investigate environmental water requirements. Freshw Biol 56:2637–2652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catford JA, Downes BJ, Gippel CJ, Vesk PA (2011) Flow regulation reduces native plant cover and facilitates exotic invasion in riparian wetlands. J Appl Ecol 48:432–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesterfield EA (1986) Changes in the vegetation of the river red gum forests at Barmah, Victoria. Aust For 49:4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong J, Ladson AR (2003) Analysis and management of unseasonal flooding in the Barmah–Millewa Forest, Australia. River Res Appl 19:161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colloff MJ, Baldwin DS (2010) Resilience of floodplain ecosystems in a semi-arid environment. Rangeland J 32:305–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Colloff MJ, Ward KW, Roberts J (2014) Ecology and conservation of grassy wetlands dominated by spiny mud grass Pseudoraphis spinescens in the southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Aquat Conserv 24(2):238–255

  • Davidson AM, Jennions M, Nicotra AB (2011) Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 14:419–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter BD, Rose HJ, Davies N (1986) River regulation and associated forest management problems in the River Murray red gum forests. Aust For 49:16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z-I, Knowler DJ, Leveque C, Naiman RJ, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81:162–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AL, Lee DW, Richards JH (2003) Responses to a fluctuating environment: effects of water depth on growth and biomass allocation in Eleocharis cellulosa Torr. (Cyperaceae). Can J Bot 81:964–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson CM, Davidson NJ, Pritchard D, Milton GR, MacKay H (2011) The Ramsar convention and ecosystem-based approaches to the wise use and sustainable development of wetlands. J Int Wildl Law Policy 14:176–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Greneli W, Weisner SEB, Sytsma MD (1992) Rhizome dynamics and resource storage in Phragmites australis. Wetlands Ecol Manage 1:247–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudon C (2004) Shift in wetland plant composition and biomass following low-level episodes in the St. Lawrence River: looking into the future. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:603–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen A, Robertson AI (2001) Relationships between livestock management and the ecological condition of riparian habitats along an Australian floodplain river. J Appl Ecol 38:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemly D, Kingsford RT, Thompson JR (2000) Irrigated agriculture and wildlife conservation: conflict on a global scale. Environ Manage 25:485–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lunt ID, Jansen A, Binns DL (2012) Effects of flood timing and livestock grazing on exotic annual plants in riverine floodplains. J Appl Ecol 49:1131–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lytle DA, Poff NL (2004) Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends Ecol Evol 19:94–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayence CE, Marshall DJ, Godfree R (2010) Hydrological and mechanical control for an invasive wetland plant, Juncus ingens, and implications for rehabilitating and managing Murray River floodplain wetlands, Australia. Wetlands Ecol Manage 18:717–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie N, Coughlan K, Cresswell H (2002) Soil physical measurement and interpretation for land evaluation. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne

  • MDBA (2010) Guide to the proposed basin plan, vol. 1: overview; vol. 2: technical background part ii appendices. Publication nos. 60 and 61/10. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra

  • MDBA (2012) Assessment of environmental water requirements for the proposed basin plan: Barmah–Millewa Forest. Publication No. 16/12. Murray–Darling Basin Authority, Canberra

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, vol 1. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman S, Grace JB, Koebel JW (1996) Effects of nutrients and hydroperiod on Typha, Cladium, and Eleocharis: implications for Everglades restoration. Ecol Appl 6:774–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol JM, Ganf GG (2000) Water regimes, seedling recruitment and establishment in three wetland plant species. Mar Freshw Res 51:305–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson C, Svedmark M (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of changing water regimes: riparian plant communities. Environ Manage 30:468–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peintinger M, Prati D, Winkler E (2007) Water level fluctuations and dynamics of amphibious plants at lake Constance: long-term study and simulation. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 8:179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittock J, Finlayson CM (2011) Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin: freshwater ecosystem conservation options in an era of climate change. Mar Freshw Res 62:232–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Zimmerman JKH (2010) Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshw Biol 55:194–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  • Rasband W (1997–2009) ImageJ. National Institutes of Health, USE, Bethesda, MD. http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/

  • Raulings E, Morris K, Roache MC, Boon PI (2010) The importance of water regimes operating at small spatial scales for the diversity and structure of wetland vegetation. Freshw Biol 55:701–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JT (1981) Soil water availability. Plant Soil 58:327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J, Marston F (2011) Water regime for wetland and floodplain plants, a sourcebook for the Murray–Darling Basin. National Water Commission, Canberra

  • Rogers K, Saintilan N, Colloff MJ, Wen L (2013) Application of thresholds of potential concern and limits of acceptable change in the condition assessment of a significant wetland. Environ Monit Assess 185:8583–8600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saintilan N, Rogers K, Ralph T (2013) Matching research and policy tools to scales of climate change adaptation in the Murray–Darling, a large Australian river basin: a review. Hydrobiologia 708:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MA, Rodgers JD, Dodd JL, Skinner QD (1992) Habitat selection by cattle along an ephemeral channel. J Range Manag 45:385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes K, Ward K, Colloff MJ (2010) Alterations in flood frequency increase exotic and native species richness of understorey vegetation in a temperate floodplain eucalypt forest. Plant Ecol 211:219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg JC (2001) Restoration of riparian vegetation in the south-western United States: importance of flow regimes and fluvial dynamism. J Arid Environ 49:17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg JC, Lite SJ, Marler R, Paradzik C, Shafroth PB, Shorrock D, White J, White M (2007) Altered stream-flow regimes and invasive plant species: the Tamarix case. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:381–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk AG, Squires L, Welling CH (1994) Assessing the impacts of an increase in water level on wetland vegetation. Ecol Appl 4:525–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivian LM, Marshall DJ, Godfree RC (2014) Response of an invasive native wetland plant to environmental flows: implications for managing regulated floodplain ecosystems. J Environ Manage 132(1):268–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Liermann CR, Davies PM (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vretare V, Weisner SEB, Strand JA, Graneli W (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in Phragmites australis as a functional response to water depth. Ann Bot 69:127–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker KF, Sheldon F, Puckridge JT (1995) A perspective on dryland river ecosystems. Regulated Rivers 11:85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward K (2005) Water management in the changing Barmah–Millewa wetlands. Proc R Soc Victoria 117:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • White SD, Deegan BM, Ganf GG (2007) The influence of water level fluctuations on the potential for convective flow in the emergent macrophytes Typha domingensis and Phragmites australis. Aquat Bot 86:369–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler JB, Kercher SM (2004) Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:431–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler JB, Kercher SM (2005) Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:39–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship. We thank Keith Ward (Goulburn-Broken Catchment Management Authority) for advice and assistance and staff of Parks Victoria and Department of Sustainability and Environment Victoria for research permits. We also thank four anonymous reviewers for providing feedback on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lyndsey M. Vivian.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Froend.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vivian, L.M., Godfree, R.C., Colloff, M.J. et al. Wetland plant growth under contrasting water regimes associated with river regulation and drought: implications for environmental water management. Plant Ecol 215, 997–1011 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0357-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0357-4

Keywords

Navigation