Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound in male

  • Nephrology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The pelvic floor (PF) is a highly complex structure which may be affected by various stimulating factors like decreased PF support. As ultrasound can dynamically observe the position and mobility of anatomical structures, However, there are very few studies on PF ultrasound in males.

Materials and methods

Twenty-one male patients with normal conditions underwent transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound (TPFU) examination. Ultrasound was performed in a supine lithotomy position. The probe was pressed on the sagittal plane of the perineum and adjusted till the anorectal angle, as well as bladder, were located and the median prostate and pubic symphysis were visible on the sagittal plane. TPFU was carried out to observe the patterns of pelvic floor movement during different phases, measure ultrasound parameters of the PF in men, and assess the potential applications and prospects of the male PF.

Results

Two-dimensional male PF ultrasound can detect the bladder, prostate, male urethra, anus, rectum. Resting, Valsalva, and contraction phases of the PF are clearly shown, the pelvic organs in the Valsalva phase shift to the dorsal foot side, and shift to the cephalic ventral side when the levator ani muscle (LAM) contracts. Three-dimensional male PF ultrasound can visually show the shape and structure of the levator ani muscle hiatus.

Conclusion

It is a feasible examination tool for detecting PF disorders. However, there are still many fields to explore in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Cohen D, Gonzalez J, Goldstein I (2016) The role of PF muscles in male sexual dysfunction and pelvic pain. Sex Med Rev 4(1):53–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stoker J, Taylor SA, DeLancey JOL (2003) Imaging PF Disorders. Springer, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  3. García del Salto L, de Miguel CJ, Aguilera del Hoyo LF et al (2014) MR imaging-based assessment of femalePF. Radiographics 34(5):1417–1439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cowley D, Stafford RE, Hodges PW (2021) The repeatability of measurements of male PF anatomy and function made from transperineal ultrasound images of healthy men and those before and after prostatectomy. Neurourol Urodyn 40(6):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gozzi C, Bauer RM, Becker AJ et al (2008) Functional retrourethral sling. A change of paradigm in the treatment of stress incontinence after radical prostatectomy. UrologeA 47:1224–1228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Myers RP (2002) Detrusor apron, associated vascular plexus, and avascular plane: relevance to radical retropubic prostatectomy–anatomic and surgical commentary. Urology 59:472–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Rabenalt R et al (2006) Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy–effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur Urol 49:103–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dietz HP, Clarke B (2001) The influence of posture on perineal ultrasound imaging parameters. Int Urogynecol J PF Dysfunct 12(2):104–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Andersson KE, Wein AJ (2004) Pharmacology of the lower urinary tract: basis for current and future treatments of urinary incontinence. Pharmacol Rev 56:581–631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hocaoglu Y, Roosen A, Herrmann K et al (2012) Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): anatomical changes during physiological voiding in men. BJU Int 109:234–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirschner-Hermanns R, Anding R, Stief CG, Najjari L (2013) Bildgebende diagnostik des männlichen beckenbodens. Urologe 52:527–532

  12. Kirschner-Hermanns R, Anding R, Stief CG, Najjari L, Bauer RM (2013) Imaging diagnostics of [in German]. UrologeA 52(4):527–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dorschner W, Stolzenburg JU, Neuhaus J. (2001) Structure and function of the bladder neck. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol, 159: III–XII, 1–109

  14. Park YJ, Bae KH, Jin BS, Jung HJ, Park JS (2012) Is increased prostatic urethral angle related to lower urinary tract symptoms in males with benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms? Korean J Urol 53:410–413

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Guneyli S, Ward E, Peng Y et al (2017) MRI evaluation of benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation with international prostate symptom score. J Magn Reson Imaging 45(3):917–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mungovan SF et al (2017) Preoperative membranous urethral length measurement and continence recovery following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 71(3):368–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koraitim MM (2008) Male urethral sphincter complex revisited. J Urol 179:1683–1689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mungovana SF, Luiting HB, Graham PL (2018) The measurement of membranous urethral length using transperineal ultrasound prior to radical prostatectomy. Scand J urol 52(4):263–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Piotr K, Rafał M, Marcin K (2021) Transperineal ultrasound as a reliable tool in the assessment of membranous urethra length in radical prostatectomy patients. Sci rep 11(1):1759

  20. Stafford RE, Ashton-Miller JA, Constantinou CE et al (2013) A new method to quantify male pf displacement from 2D transperineal ultrasound images. Urology 81(3):685–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goh V, Halligan S, Kaplan G, Healy JC, Bartram CI (2000) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor in asymptomatic. Am J Roentgenol 174(3):661–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis SN, Binik YM, Carrier S (2009) Sexual dysfunction and pelvic pain in men: a male sexual pain disorder? J Sex Marital Ther 35(3):182–205

  23. Cohen D, Gonzalez J, Goldstein I (2016) The role of pelvic floor muscles in male sexual dysfunction and pelvic pain sexual medicine reviews 4(1):53–62

  24. Raizada V, Mittal RK (2008) Pelvic floor anatomy and applied physiology. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 37:493–509

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson JA, O’Sullivan PB, Briffa K, Neumann P, Court S (2005) Assessment of PF movement using transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound. Int Urogynecology J PF Dysfunct 16:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brækken IH, Majida M, Ellstrøm-Engh M, Dietz HP, Umek W, Bø K (2008) Test–retest and intra-observer repeatability of two- three- and four-dimensional perineal ultrasound of pelvic floor muscle anatomy and function. Int Urogynecol J 19(2):227–235

  27. Volloyhaug I, Morkved S, Salvesen O, Salvesen KA (2016) Assessment of pelvicfloor muscle contraction with palpation, perineometry and transperineal ultrasound: a cross-sectional study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 47:768–773

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LW put forward the idea of the article, collected and analyzed the data, wrote the manuscript. YL supervised the progress and revised the manuscript. PX collected the data. MY supervised the progress and analyzed the data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, L., Liu, Y., Xu, P. et al. Transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound in male. Int Urol Nephrol 55, 3261–3268 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03617-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-023-03617-x

Keywords

Navigation