Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of light intensity and stocking density on the performance, egg quality, and feather condition of laying hens reared in a battery cage system over the first laying period

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the effects of varying light intensity (high 121.8, medium 57.4 and low 11.9 lux) and stocking density (high 552.3, medium 736.3, and low 1104.5 cm2 cage floor area per hen) treatments on the performance, egg quality, and certain feather condition traits of Lohmann-Brown hens reared in a battery cage system between 20 and 40 weeks of age. Body weight was determined individually at 19 weeks and at 50% yield age (sexual maturity). Feed intake, egg yield, egg weight, and feed conversion ratio were determined weekly. Feather condition was also evaluated individually at 40 weeks of age. Hens reared under high light intensity and low stocking density reached sexual maturity and peak yield earlier than others. The highest body weight was determined for hens reared under high light intensity (1536.6 g), while the lowest in the medium light intensity group (1461.2 g). Hens reared under high and medium light intensity showed higher egg yield than those reared in low intensity (120.5, 120.0 and 112.8 eggs, respectively). In addition, hens reared at low and medium stocking density had higher egg yield than high density (119.7, 120.7, and 112.9 eggs, respectively). Hens reared under low (61.6 g) and medium (61.0 g) light intensity produced heavier eggs than hens in high light intensity (59.6 g). While feed intake was not affected in any treatment, hens reared at low and medium stocking density had a better feed conversion ratio than hens at high density (2.19, 2.20, and 2.40, respectively). Our study results showed that a sustainable production is possible by maintaining the welfare-performance balance when 50–60 lux light intensity and 700–800 cm2 cage floor area per hen are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Adams, A.W. and Craig, J.V., 1985. Effects of crowding and cage shape on production and profitability of caged layers: a survey, Poultry Science, 64, 238-242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altan, Ö., 2015. Egg: Formation, Quality and Bioactive Components, (Ege University Printing House).

  • Appleby, M.C., 2003. The European Union ban on conventional cages for laying hens: History and prospects, Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 6(2), 103-121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asghar, S.A., Zamani, P., Rahmati, M. and Mahmoudi, H., 2012. The effect of cage density on laying hen performance, egg quality, and excreta minerals, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 21(3), 467-475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, T.F., Bawa, G.S., Adewumi, I. and Olumeyan, D.B., 1997. Effect of age and sex of egg strain chickens and of two stocking densities of broilers on voluntary water intake and performance in a sub-humid environment, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 29(2), 117-123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J.L. and Hemsworth, P.H., 2003. Science and its application in assessing the welfare of laying hens in the egg industry, Australian Veterinary Journal, 81(10), 615-624.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, J.D.S.G., Barros, T.A.D.S., Sartor, K., Raimundo, J.A. and Rossi, L.A., 2020. The effect of linear lighting systems on the productive performance and egg quality of laying hens, Poultry Science, 99(3), 1369-1378.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, M., 2015. Studying the Effect of Light Wavelength on Laying Hens (Gallus gallus), (PhD thesis, University of Guelph), available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10214/8744.

  • Baxter, M., Joseph, N., Osborne, V.R. and Bedecarrats, G.Y., 2014. Red light is necessary to activate the reproductive axis in chickens independently of the retina of the eye, Poultry Science, 93(5), 1289-1297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D.D., 2003. Historical and current molting practices in the US table egg industry, Poultry Science, 82(6), 965-970.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bilcik, B. and Keeling, L.J., 2000. Relationship between feather pecking and ground pecking in laying hens and the effect of group size, Applied Animal Behavior Science, 68(1), 55-66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blatchford, R.A., Klasing, K.C., Shivaprasad, H.L., Wakenell, P.S., Archer, G.S. and Mench, J.A., 2009. The effect of light intensity on the behavior, eye and leg health, and immune function of broiler chickens, Poultry Science, 88(1), 20-28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bovera, F., Iannaccone, F., Piccolo, G., Meo, C.D., Russo, F., Piscitelli, D., Attia, Y.A., Hassan, S.S. and Nizza, A., 2014. Effect of group size on performance and egg quality of laying hens during 20 to 36 weeks of age, Italian Journal of Animal Science, 13(1), 3148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braastad, B.O., 1986. Rearing pullets in cages: high crowding has unfortunate effects. Poultry, 2, 38-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, N.L., Walker, A.W. and Hughes, B.O., 1999. Laying hens in large flocks in a perchery system: influence of stocking density on location, use of resources and behavior, British Poultry Science, 40, 165-176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cayan, H. and Erener, G., 2015. Effect of olive leaf (Olea europaea) powder on laying hens performance, egg quality and egg yolk cholesterol levels, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 28(4), 538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Huang, R.L., Zhang, H.X., Di, K.Q., Pan, D. and Hou, Y.G., 2007. Effects of photoperiod on ovarian morphology and carcass traits at sexual maturity in pullets, Poultry Science, 86(5), 917-920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone, N.A., Dunn, I.C., Boswell, T., Tsutsui, K., Ubuka, T., Ukena, K. and Sharp, P.J., 2004. Gonadotrophin inhibitory hormone depresses gonadotrophin α and follicle-stimulating hormone β subunit expression in the pituitary of the domestic chicken, Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 16(12), 999-1006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Y.M., Wang, J., Hai-Jun, Z., Feng, J., Wu, S.G. and Qi, G.H., 2019. Effect of photoperiod on ovarian morphology, reproductive hormone secretion, and hormone receptor mRNA expression in layer ducks during the pullet phase, Poultry Science, 98(6), 2439-2447.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, K.M., Lien, R.J., Hess, J.B., Bilgili, S.F. and Dozier III, W.A., 2006. The effects of photoperiod length, light intensity, and feed energy on growth responses and meat yield of broilers, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 15(3), 406-416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • England, A. and Ruhnke, I., 2020. The influence of light of different wavelengths on laying hen production and egg quality, World's Poultry Science Journal, 76(3), 443-458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Er, D., Wang, Z., Cao, J. and Chen, Y., 2007. Effect of monochromatic light on the egg quality of laying hens, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 16(4), 605-612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT, 2020. Production: Livestock Primary: Eggs Primary, available from: http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E.

  • Feddes, J.J., Emmanuel, E.J. and Zuidhof, M.J., 2002. Broiler performance, body weight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities, Poultry Science, 81(6), 774-779.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, P., 2016. Egg innovations and strategies for improvements, (Academic press), ISBN: 9780128008799.

  • Hy-Line, 2020. Hy-Line W-36 Commercial Layers Management Guide, Hy-Line International, Iowa, USA, accessed on March 10, 2021.

  • IEC, 2016. Industry analysis and country statistics, Annual Review 2016, International Egg Commission, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacome, I.M.T.D., 2009. Diferentes sistemas de iluminação artificial usados no alojamento de poedeiras leves, (PhD thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas).

  • Jacome, I.M.T.D., Rossi, L.A. and Borille, R., 2014. Influence of artificial lighting on the performance and egg quality of commercial layers: a review, Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 16(4), 337-344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, L., 2019. The effects of stocking density on the growth, behavior, and welfare of layer pullets in two cage systems, (PhD thesis, University of Guelph), available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10214/14771.

  • Kamanli, S., Durmus, I., Demir, S. and Tarim, B., 2015. Effect of different light sources on performance and egg quality traits in laying hens, European Poultry Science, 79, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H.K., Park, S.B., Kim, S.H. and Kim, C.H., 2016. Effects of stock density on the laying performance, blood parameter, corticosterone, litter quality, gas emission and bone mineral density of laying hens in floor pens, Poultry Science, 95(12), 2764-2770.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H.K., Park, S.B., Jeon, J.J., Kim, H.S., Park, K.T., Kim, S.H., Hong, E.C. and Kim, C.H., 2018. Effect of increasing levels of apparent metabolizable energy on laying hens in barn system, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 31(11), 1766.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, J.B. and Sørensen, P., 2002. Feather pecking and cannibalism in free-range laying hens as affected by genotype, dietary level of methionine + cystine, light intensity during rearing and age at first access to the range area, Applied Animal Behavior Science, 76(1), 21-39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, J.B. and Vestergaard, K.S., 1999. Development of feather pecking in relation to light intensity, Applied Animal Behavior Science, 62(2-3), 243-254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, H.H., 2008. The effects of light intensity, gradual changes between light and dark and definition of darkness for the behaviour and welfare of broiler chickens, laying hens, pullets and turkeys, Scientific Report for the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety, 1-44.

  • Kühn, J., Schutkowski, A., Kluge, H., Hirche, F. and Stangl, G.I., 2014. Free-range farming: a natural alternative to produce vitamin D-enriched eggs, Nutrition, 30(4), 481-484.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P.D. and Morris, T.R., 1999. Light intensity and performance of domestic pullets, World's Poultry Science Journal, 55(3), 241-250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P.D., Sharp, P.J., Wilson, P.W. and Leeson, S., 2004. Changes in light intensity can influence age at sexual maturity in domestic pullets, British Poultry Science, 45(1), 123-132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P.D., Danisman, R. and Gous, R.M., 2008. Illuminance, sexual maturation, and early egg production in female broiler breeders, British Poultry Science, 49(6), 649-653.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann Guide, 2019. Lohmann Brown-Classic management guide (cage housing), available at http://www.ltz.de/en/downloads/management-guides.php#anchor_0955c6a8_Accordion-1-Cage, accessed on March 11, 2021.

  • Manser, C.E., 1996. Effects of light on the welfare of domestic poultry: A review, Animal Welfare, 5, 341-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mench, J., 2017. Advances in poultry welfare, (Woodhead Publishing), ISBN: 9780081009154.

  • Meng, F., Chen, D., Li, X., Li, J. and Bao, J., 2015. Effects of large or small furnished cages on performance, welfare and egg quality of laying hens, Animal Production Science, 55(6), 793-798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D.C., 2017. Design and analysis of experiments, (John Wiley and Sons), ISBN: 978-1-119-32093-7.

  • Morris, T.R., 2004. Environmental control for layers, World's Poultry Science Journal, 60(2), 163-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, T.R., Midgley, M. and Butler, E.A., 1988. Experiments with the Cornell intermittent lighting system for laying hens, British Poultry Science, 29(2), 325-332.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, C.J., Brown, S.N., Glen, E., Pope, S.J., Short, F.J., Warriss, P.D, Zimmerman, P.H. and Wilkins, L.J., 2006. Effects of stocking density, flock size and management on the welfare of laying hens in single-tier aviaries, British Poultry Science, 47(2), 135-146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, E.A., Parker, M.O., Davey, E.L., Grist, H., Owen, R.C., Szladovits, B., Demmers, T.G.M., Wathes, C.M. and Abeyesinghe, S.M., 2011. Effect of low light and high noise on behavioural activity, physiological indicators of stress and production in laying hens, British Poultry Science, 52(6), 666–674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parvin, R., Mushtaq, M.M.H., Kim, M.J. and Choi, H.C., 2014. Light emitting diode (LED) as a source of monochromatic light: a novel lighting approach for behaviour, physiology and welfare of poultry, World’s Poultry Science Journal, 70(3), 543–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renema, R.A. and Robinson, F.E., 2001. Effects of light intensity from photostimulation in four strains of commercial egg layers: 1. Ovarian morphology and carcass parameters, Poultry Science, 80(8), 1112-1120.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renema, R.A., Robinson, F.E., Feddes, J.J.R., Fasenko, G.M. and Zuidhof, M.J., 2001. Effects of light intensity from photostimulation in four strains of commercial egg layers: 2. Egg production parameters, Poultry Science, 80(8), 1121–1131.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodenburg, T.B., Komen, H., Ellen, E.D., Uitdehaag, K.A. and van Arendonk, J.A., 2008. Selection method and early-life history affect behavioural development, feather pecking and cannibalism in laying hens: a review, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 110(3-4), 217-228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodenburg, T.B., de Haas, E.N., Nielsen, B.L. and Buitenhuis, A.B., 2010. Fearfulness and feather damage in laying hens divergently selected for high and low feather pecking, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 128(1-4), 91-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarıca, M. and Erensayın, C., 2018. Poultry science: production. Nutrition and Diseases, (Bey Ofset, Ankara).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarıca, M., Boga, S. and Yamak, U.S., 2008. The effects of space allowance on egg yield, egg quality and plumage condition of laying hens in battery cages, Czech Journal of Animal Science, 53(8), 346-353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarıca, M., Yamak U.S. and Boz, M.A., 2010. Changes in egg quality parameters due to age in laying hens from two commercial and three local layer genotypes, Journal of Poultry Research, 9(1), 11-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarıca, M., Yeter, B., Oğuzhan, E., Erensoy, K., Çağlak, S., Özkan, İ. and Yavuz, R., 2020. Effects of Light Stimulation Age on Body Weight and Egg Production Traits of Broiler Pure-lines in the Laying Period, Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 8(12), 2702-2707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanawany, M.M., 1988. Broiler performance under high stocking densities, British Poultry Science, 29(1), 43-52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, P.J., 1993. Photoperiodic control of reproduction in the domestic hen, Poultry Science, 72(5), 897-905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, H., Li, B., Tong, Q., Zheng, W., Zeng, D. and Feng, G., 2019. Effects of LED light color and intensity on feather pecking and fear responses of layer breeders in natural mating colony cages, Animals, 9(10), 814.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Siopes, T.D., 1991. Light intensity effects on reproductive performance of turkey breeder hens, Poultry Science, 70(10), 2049-2054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanislaus, C., 2016. Feather Pecking in Poultry, Animal Welfare Essay, 13.

  • Thogerson, C.M., Hester, P.Y., Mench, J.A., Newberry, R.C., Okura, C.M., Pajor, E.A., Talaty, P.N. and Garner, J.P., 2009. The effect of feeder space allocation on productivity and physiology of Hy-Line W-36 hens house in conventional cages, Poultry Science, 88, 1793-1799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, S.L., Robison, C.I., Tempelman, R.J., Jones, D.R. and Karcher, D.M., 2019. Laying hen production and welfare in enriched colony cages at different stocking densities, Poultry Science, 98(9), 3578-3586.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Widowski, T.M., Classen, H., Newberry, R.C., Petrik, M., Schwean-Lardner, K., Cottee, S.Y. and Cox, B., 2013. Scientists Committee Report on Priority Welfare Issues for Laying Hens, National Farm Animal Care Council.

  • Widowski, T.M., Hemsworth, P.H., Barnett, J.L. and Rault, J.L., 2016. Laying hen welfare I. Social environment and space, World's Poultry Science Journal, 72(2), 333-342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamak, U.S. and Sarıca, M., 2012. Relationships between feather score and egg production and feed consumption of different layer hybrids kept in conventional cages, Archiv fur Geflügelkunde, 76, 31-37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamak, U.S., Sarica, M., Erensoy, K. and Ayhan, V., 2021. The effects of storage conditions on quality changes of table eggs, Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, 16(1), 71-81.

  • Yetişir, R. and Sarıca, M., 2018. Poultry science: production. Nutrition and Diseases (Ed.: Türkoğlu, M., Sarıca, M.), (Bey Ofset, Ankara), 293-343.

  • Yildiz, A., Laçin, E., Hayirli, A. and Macit, M., 2006. Effects of cage location and tier level with respect to light intensity in semiconfined housing on egg production and quality during the late laying period, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 15, 335–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the administration of the Faculty of Agriculture of Ondokuz Mayıs University and the working staff in the research farm for their assistance in the management of the hens in conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Science, Agricultural Faculty, Ondokuz Mayis University, 55139, Samsun, Turkey

    Kadir Erensoy, Musa Sarıca, Mete Dur & Resul Aslan

  2. National High Institute of Sciences and Techniques, Institut National Supérieur des Sciences et Techniques d’Abéché (INSTA), 40823, Abeche, Chad

    Moise Noubandiguim

Authors
  1. Kadir Erensoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Musa Sarıca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Moise Noubandiguim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mete Dur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Resul Aslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the listed authors have made substantial contributions to the research design, analysis, or interpretation of data and drafting the manuscript. All the authors have approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kadir Erensoy.

Ethics declarations

Ethical statement

All methods and procedures were approved by Ondokuz Mayis University Ethical Committee for Experimental Animals (Samsun, Turkey).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erensoy, K., Sarıca, M., Noubandiguim, M. et al. Effect of light intensity and stocking density on the performance, egg quality, and feather condition of laying hens reared in a battery cage system over the first laying period. Trop Anim Health Prod 53, 320 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02765-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02765-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation