Abstract
As most of the unenriched cages will soon switch to enriched cages, it is important to characterize all the effects in the laying hens for sustainable production. Laying hens can be used in several production periods by applying molting. The aim of this study was to determine the cage type (unenriched and enriched) on performance, welfare, and microbiological properties of laying hens during the molting period and the second production cycle. Overall, 840 brown laying hybrids were used in the experiment. Laying hens were reared on two different cage types (unenriched cage (UEC) and enriched cage (EC)) in the same poultry house. When the hybrids were 75 weeks old, they were subjected to force molting with whole grain barley. Performance, welfare, microbiological, and serological data of laying hens were obtained from 73 to 107 weeks of age. Egg production, egg weight, feed conversion ratio, breaking strength, albumen and yolk index, Haugh unit, feather condition, and breaking force of femur and metatarsus were better in the post-molting period. However, keel bone deformities and Newcastle disease virus antibody titers are the worst in the post-molting period. Stiffness of femur and metatarsus was increased with period. These results indicate that necessary precautions should be taken against the problems that may occur in the direction of bone and health. During the molting period, hens kept in EC had lower egg production but they returned to egg production at a high rate. EC type had a positive effect on egg production, feed conversion ratio, feather and foot condition, and breaking force of metatarsus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahammed, M., Chae, B. J., Lohakare, J., Keohavong, B., Lee, M. H., Lee, S. J., Kim, D.M., Lee, J. Y. and Ohh, S. J., 2014. Comparison of aviary, barn and conventional cage raising of chickens on laying performance and egg quality. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27, 1196.
AOAC, 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. AOAC International, Maryland.
Barnett, J. L., Tauson, R., Downing, J. A., Janardhana, V., Lowenthal, J. W., Butler, K. L. and Cronin, G. M., 2009. The effects of a perch, dust bath, and nest box, either alone or in combination as used in furnished cages, on the welfare of laying hens. Poultry Science 88, 456-470.
Carpenter, K. and Clegg, K., 1956. The metabolizable energy of poultry feeding stuffs in relation to their chemical composition. The Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 7, 45-51.
Casey-Trott, T., Heerkens, J. L. T., Petrik, M., Regmi, P., Schrader, L., Toscano, M. J. and Widowski, T., 2015. Methods for assessment of keel bone damage in poultry. Poultry Science 94, 2339-2350.
Clavijo, V. and Vives Florez, M.J., 2018 Non-invited review the gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production: a review. Poultry Science 97, 1006–1021.
Dawson, B. and Trapp, R.G., 2000. Basic and Clinical Biostatistics. 3rd ed. Appleton and Lange, USA.
Farese, G., Schmidt, J.L. and Mager, M., 1967. An automated method for the determination of serum calcium with glyoxal bis (2-hydroxyanil). Clinical Chemistry 13, 515-520.
Ferretti, J.L., 1998. Biomechanical properties of bone. In: Bone densitometry and osteoporosis (pp. 143-161). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Hester, P. Y., 2014. The effect of perches installed in cages on laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 70, 247-264.
Hester, P. Y., Enneking, S. A., Haley, B. K., Cheng, H. W., Einstein, M. E. and Rubin, D. A., 2013. The effect of perch availability during pullet rearing and egg laying on musculoskeletal health of caged White Leghorn hens. Poultry Science 92(8), 1972-1980.
Huneau-Salaün, A., Guinebretière, M., Huonnic, D. and Michel, V., 2011. Impacts of furnished cage design on cage floor hygiene and egg quality. In Animal hygiene and sustainable livestock production. Proceedings of the XVth International Congress of the International Society for Animal Hygiene, Vienna, Austria, 3-7 July 2011, Volume 1 (pp. 251-253). Tribun EU.
Keshavarz, K. and Quimby, F. W., 2002. An investigation of different molting techniques with an emphasis on animal welfare. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 11, 54-67.
Kolakshyapati, M., Flavel, R. J., Sibanda, T. Z., Schneider, D., Welch, M. C. and Ruhnke, I., 2019. Various bone parameters are positively correlated with hen body weight while range access has no beneficial effect on tibia health of free-range layers. Poultry Science 98, 6241-6250.
Li, J. Y., Liu, W., Ma, R. Y., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Qi, R. R. and Zhan, K., 2019. Effects of cage size on growth performance, blood biochemistry, and antibody response in layer breeder males during rearing stage. Poultry Science 98, 3571-3577.
Meng, F., Chen, D., Li, X., Li, J. and Bao, J., 2015. Effects of large or small furnished cages on performance, welfare and egg quality of laying hens. Animal Production Science 55, 793–798.
Neijat, M., Casey-Trott, T. M., Robinson, S., Widowski, T. M. and Kiarie, E., 2019. Effects of rearing and adult laying housing systems on medullary, pneumatic and radius bone attributes in 73-wk old Lohmann LSL lite hens. Poultry Science, 98, 2840-2845.
Onbaşılar E.E. and Aksoy F.T., 2005. Stress parameters and immune response of layers under different cage floor and density conditions. Livestock Production Science 95, 255-263.
Onbaşılar, E. E. and Erol, H., 2007. Effects of different forced molting methods on postmolt production, corticosterone level, and immune response to sheep red blood cells in laying hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16, 529-536.
Onbaşılar, E. E., Ünal, N., Erdem, E., Kocakaya, A. and Yaranoğlu, B., 2015. Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages. Poultry Science 94, 559-564.
Onbaşılar, E. E., Ünal, N. and Erdem, E., 2018. Some egg quality traits of two laying hybrids kept in different cage systems. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 65, 51-55.
Philippe, F. X., Mahmoudi, Y., Mars, D. C., Lefrançois, M., Moula, N., Palacios, J. and Godbout, S., 2020. Comparison of egg production, quality and composition in three production systems for laying hens. Livestock Science 103917.
Price, C. P. and Thompson, P. W., 1995. The role of biochemical tests in the screening and monitoring of osteoporosis. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 32, 244-260.
Relić, R., Sossidou, E., Dedousi, A., Perić, L., Božičković, İ. and Đukić-stojčić, M., 2019. Behavioral and health problems of poultry related to rearing systems. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 66, 423-428.
Ricke, S. C., 2003. The gastrointestinal tract ecology of Salmonella Enteritidis colonization in molting hens. Poultry Science 82, 1003-1007.
Rodriguez-Navarro, A. B., McCormack, H. M., Fleming, R. H., Alvarez-Lloret, P., Romero-Pastor, J., Dominguez-Gasca, N. and Dunn, I. C., 2018. Influence of physical activity on tibial bone material properties in laying hens. Journal of Structural Biology 201, 36-45.
Sevil Kilimci, F. and Kara, M.E., 2013. Kemiklerin mekanik özelliklerin değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan temel biyomekanik kavramlar. Animal Health Production and Hygiene 2, 235-239.
Shi, S., Qi, Z., Gu, B., Cheng, B., Tu, J., Song, X., Shao, Y., Liu, H., Qi, K. and Li, S., 2019. Analysis of high-throughput sequencing for cecal microbiota diversity and function in hens under different rearing systems. 3 Biotech 9, 438.
Süzer, B., Tüfekçi, K., Arıcan, İ., Petek, M., Abdourhamane, İ., Özbek, M. and Yıldız, H., 2019. Effects of genotype and housing system on some bone biomechanical characteristics in broiler chickens. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 66, 237-246.
Tactacan, G. B., Guenter, W., Lewis, N. J., Rodriguez-Lecompte, J. C. and House, J. D., 2009. Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages. Poultry Science 88, 698-707.
Tauson, R. and Abrahamsson, P., 1996. Foot and keel bone disorders in laying hens – effects of artificial perch material and hybrid. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A — Animal Science 46, 239 – 246
Vits, A., Weitzenbürger, D., Hamann, H. and Distl, O., 2005. Production, egg quality, bone strength, claw length, and keel bone deformities of laying hens housed in furnished cages with different group sizes. Poultry Science 84, 1511-1519.
Waite, D. W. and Taylor, M., 2015. Exploring the avian gut microbiota: current trends and future directions. Frontiers in Microbiology 6, 673.
Webster, A. B., 2003. Physiology and behavior of the hen during induced molt. Poultry Science 82, 992-1002.
Weimer, S. L., Robison, C. I., Tempelman, R. J., Jones, D. R. and Karcher, D. M., 2019. Laying hen production and welfare in enriched colony cages at different stocking densities. Poultry Science 98, 3578-3586.
Wilkins, L. J., Brown, S. N., Zimmerman, P. H., Leeb, C. and Nicol, C. J., 2004. Investigation of palpation as a method for determining the prevalence of keel and furculum damage in laying hens. Veterinary Record 155, 547-549.
Yalçın, S., Eser, H., Onbaşılar, İ. and Yalçın, S., 2020. Effects of dried thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) leaves on performance, some egg quality traits and immunity in laying hens. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 67, 303-311.
Yılmaz Dikmen, B., İpek, A., Şahan, Ü., Petek, M. and Sözcü, A., 2016. Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range). Poultry Science, 95, 1564-1572.
Funding
This study was supported by TUBITAK (2170349).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards
This study was approved by the Ankara University Animal Care and Use Committee (2017-21-165).
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Onbaşılar, E.E., Kahraman, M., Güngör, Ö.F. et al. Effects of cage type on performance, welfare, and microbiological properties of laying hens during the molting period and the second production cycle. Trop Anim Health Prod 52, 3713–3724 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02409-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02409-0