Skip to main content
Log in

Applications and Contemporary Issues with Adsorption for Water Monitoring and Remediation: A Facile Review

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Topics in Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water is necessary for agriculture, industry, and human consumption. Reportedly, freshwater resources are scarce, and it is obvious that industrial and agricultural activities can contaminate water. Consequently, there is a need to continue searching for affordable and environmentally friendly technologies for treating water. Adsorption is a method that saves money and has become popular because it allows for the least amount of garbage to be disposed of. Hence, the contemporary situation and the primary challenges with adsorption as one of the utmost technologies for water monitoring and remediation are briefly discussed in this review article. A number of significant topics that have been extensively covered in the literature, such as adsorbent materials, adsorption operation mode, modelling, regeneration process, and operation procedure using actual samples, are all highlighted in this paper. Conclusively, the paper also outlined what directions, in the form of future prospects, will probably serve as the next steps needed to advance new perspectives and original research in the application of adsorption techniques for treating water vis-à-vis innovative techniques for water monitoring and remediation.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Completely, data produced or investigated during this work were involved in this submitted article.

References

  1. Dotto G, McKay G (2020) Current scenario and challenges in adsorption for water treatment. J Environ Chem Eng 8(103988):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, Okundaye B, Pal K, Osibote O, Esiekpe E, Kusuma H, Darmokoesoemo H (2022) A facile review on the sorption of heavy metals and dyes using bionanocomposites. Adsorpt Sci Technol 8030175:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. WHO (2019) World Health Organization: drinking water. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.

  4. Denchak M (2018) Water pollution: everything you need to know. NRDC Guide. NRDC

  5. Ukhurebor K, Aidonojie P (2021) The influence of climate change on food innovation technology: review on topical developments and legal framework. Agric Food Secur 10(50):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, Osibote O, Darmokoesoemo H, Kusuma H (2021) Fly ash-based adsorbent for adsorption of heavy metals and dyes from aqueous solution: a review. J Market Res 14:2751–2774

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Nemr M, Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, El Nemr A, Ragab S, Osibote O, Hassaan M (2022) Adsorption of Cr6+ ion using activated pisum sativum peels-triethylenetetramine. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2022:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eldeeb T, Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, El-Nemr M, Hassaan M, Ragab S, Osibote O, El Nemr A (2022) Adsorption of methylene blue (MB) dye on ozone, purified and sonicated sawdust biochars. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 2022:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  9. Onyancha R, Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Kusuma H, Darmokoesoemo H, Osibote O, Pal K (2022) Influence of magnetism-mediated potentialities of recyclable adsorbents of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions—an organized review. Results Chem 4:100452

  10. El-Nemr M, Aigbe U, Hassaan M, Ukhurebor K, Ragab S, Onyancha R, Osibote O, El Nemr A (2022) The use of biochar-NH2 produced from watermelon peels as a natural adsorbent for the removal of Cu(II) ion from water. Biomass Convers Biorefinery

  11. Souza R, Seibert D, Quesada H, Bassetti F, Fagundes-Klen M, Bergamasco R (2020) Occurrence, impacts and general aspects of pesticides in surface water: a review. Proc Saf Environ Prot 135:22–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carmalin S, Lima E (2018) Removal of emerging contaminants from the environment by adsorption. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 150:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaur H, Raveendran A, Athwal S, Verma M, Mutreja V, Ukhurebor K, Kusuma H (2023) Assessment of diabetes biomarker monitoring via novel biosensor activity. Results Chem 5(100777):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kerry R, Ukhurebor K, Kumari S, Maurya G, Patra S, Panigrahi B, Majhi S, Rout J, Rodriguez-Torres M, Das G, Shin H-S, Patra J (2021) A Comprehensive review on the applications of nano-biosensor based approaches for non-communicable disease detention. Biomater Sci 9:3576–3602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, Aigbe U, UK-Eghonghon G, Kerry R, Kusuma H, Darmokoesoemo H, Osibote O, Balogun V (2022) A methodical review on the applications and potentialities of using nanobiosensors for diseases diagnosis. BioMed Res Int 168250:1–20

  16. Yang Y, Ok YS, Kim K, Kwon K, Tsang Y (2017) Occurrences and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in drinking water and water/sewage treatment plants: a review. Sci Tot Environ 596(303–320)

  17. Zhang X, Gu P, Liu Y (2019) Decontamination of radioactive wastewater: state of the art and challenges forward. Chemosphere 215:543–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Taheran M, Naghdi M, Brar S, Verma M, Surampalli R (2018) Emerging contaminants: here today, there tomorrow! Environ Nanotechnol Monitor Manag 10:122–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilkinson J, Hooda P, Barker J, Barton S, Swinden J (2017) Occurrence, fate and transformation of emerging contaminants in water: an overarching review of the field. Environ Pollut 231:954–970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ukhurebor K, Aigbe U, Onyancha R, Nwankwo W, Osibote O, Paumo H, Ama O, Adetunji C, Siloko I (2021) Effect of hexavalent chromium on the environment and removal techniques: a review. J Environ Manag 280:111809

  21. Gkika D, Mitropoulos A, Kyzas G (2022) Why reuse spent adsorbents? The latest challenges and limitations. Sci Total Environ 822:153612

  22. Neolaka Y, Riwu A, Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, Darmokoesoemo H, Kusuma H (2023) Potential of activated carbon from various sources as a low-cost adsorbent to remove heavy metals and synthetic dyes. Resul Chem 5:100711

  23. Aigbe U, Onyancha R, Ukhurebor K, Obodo K (2020) Removal of fluoride ions using polypyrrole magnetic nanocomposite influenced by rotating magnetic field. RSC Adv 10(1):595–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pekel J, Cottam A, Gorelick N, Belward A (2016) High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature 540(7):418–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Anani A, Adama K, Ukhurebor K, Habib A, Abanihi V, Pal K (2023) Application of nanofibrous protein for the purification of contaminated water as a next generational sorption technology: a review. Nanotechnology 34(23200):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  26. Domagalski J, Morway E, Alvarez N, Hutchins J, Rosen M, Coats R (2020) Trends in nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment concentrations and loads in streams draining to Lake Tahoe, California, Nevada, USA. Sci Total Environ 752:141815

  27. Zainurin S, Wan Ismail W, Mahamud S, Ismail I, Jamaludin J, Ariffin K, Kamil WA (2022) Advancements in monitoring water quality based on various sensing methods: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(4)

  28. Mahajan P, Shahane P (2021) An IoT based system for water quality monitoring. SSRN Electron 489–495

  29. Pasika S, Gandla S (2020) Smart water quality monitoring system with cost-effective using IoT. Heliyon 6:e04096

  30. Ighalo J, Adeniyi A, Marques G (2020) Artificial intelligence for surface water quality monitoring and assessment: a systematic literature analysis. Model Earth Syst Environ 7:669–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin H, Liu J, Dong Y, He Y (2019) The effect of substrates on the removal of low-level vanadium, chromium and cadmium from polluted river water by ecological floating beds. Ecotox Environ Safe 169:856–862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou J, Wang Y, Chen Y, Li X, Xie Y (2021) Water quality prediction method based on multi-source transfer learning for water environmental IoT system. Sensors 21(7271)

  33. He Y (2021) Design of water quality monitoring platform based on embedded system. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 631:012020

  34. Chang H-C, Hsu Y-L, Hung S-S, Ou G-R, Wu J-R, Hsu C (2021) Autonomous water quality monitoring and water surface cleaning for unmanned surface vehicle. Sensors 21:1102

  35. Li Y, Wang X-K, Zhang H-Y, Wang J-Q, Li L (2021) An integrated regional water quality assessment method considering interrelationships among monitoring indicators. Environ Monit Assess 193(223)

  36. Manoj M, Kumar V, Arif M, Bulai E-R, Bulai P, Geman O (2022) State of the art techniques for water quality monitoring systems for fish ponds using IoT and underwater sensors: a review. Sensors 22:2088

  37. Zhang H, Zhang L, Wang S, Zhang L (2022) Online water quality monitoring based on UV–Vis spectrometry and artificial neural networks in a river confluence near Sherfield-on-Loddon. Environ Monit Assess 194:630

  38. Urso M, Ussia M, Pumera M (2023) Smart micro- and nanorobots for water purification. Nat Rev Bioeng 2023

  39. Bhardwaj J, Gupta K, Gupta R (2018) Towards a cyber-physical era: Soft computing framework based multi-sensor array for water quality monitoring. Drink Water Eng Sci 11:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee E (2015) The past, present and future of cyber-physical systems: a focus on models. Sensors 15:4837–4869

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mohamed N, Al-Jaroodi J, Jawhar I (2020) Cyber–physical systems forensics: today and tomorrow. J Sens Actuator Netw 9:37

  42. Wang Z, Song H, Watkins DW, Ong KG Xue P, Yang Q Shi X (2015) Cyber-physical systems for water sustainability: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Commun Mag 53:216–222

  43. Imen S, Chang NB (2016) Developing a cyber-physical system for smart and sustainable drinking water infrastructure management. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 13th international conference on networking, sensing, and control (ICNSC), Mexico City, Mexico, 2016.

  44. Wang H, Wang T, Xue G, Zhao J, Ma W, Qian Y, Wu M, Zhang Z, Gao P, Su C. Zong B, Yu J. Guo J, Wang Y (2021) Key technologies and equipment for contaminated surface/groundwater environment in the rural river network area of China: integrated remediation. Environ Sci Eur 33(5)

  45. Wu J, Xu Z, Li H, Li P, Wang M, Xiong L, Zhang J (2019) Long-term effect of water diversion and CSOs on the remediation of heavy metals and microbial community in river sediments. Water Sci Technol 79(12):2395–2406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Adapa L, Azimi Y, Singh S, Porcelli D, Thompson I (2016) Comparative study of chemical and physical methods for distinguishing between passive and metabolically active mechanisms of water contaminant removal by biofilms. Water Res 101:574–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Camacho F, Sousa V, Bergamasco R, Teixeira M (2017) The use of Moringa oleifera as a natural coagulant in surface water treatment. Chem Eng J 313:226–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Song J, Li Q, Dzakpasu M, Wang X, Chang N (2020) Integrating stereo-elastic packing into ecological floating bed for enhanced denitrification in landscape water. Bioresour Technol 299(122601)

  49. MacArthur M, Naylor L, Hansom J, Burrows M (2020), Ecological enhancement of coastal engineering structures: passive enhancement techniques. Sci Total Environ 740:139981

  50. Irwin N, Irwin E, Martin J, Aracena P (2018) Constructed wetlands for water quality improvements: benefit transfer analysis from Ohio. J Environ Manag 206:1063–1071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang H, Li Z, Han H (2017) Comparison of different ecological remediation methods for removing nitrate and ammonium in Qinshui River, Gonghu Bay, Taihu Lake. Environ Sci Pollut R 24(2):1706–1718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sun S, Sheng Y, Zhao G, Li Z, Yang J (2017) Feasibility assessment: application of ecological floating beds for polluted tidal river remediation. Environ Monit Assess 189(12):609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lin J-Y, Tsai H-L, Lyu W-H (2021) An integrated wireless multi-sensor system for monitoring the water quality of aquaculture. Sensors 21:8179

  54. Kumar G, Rao K, Yadav A, Kumar M, Sarathi T (2018) Biosorption of copper (II) and manganese (II) from waste water using low-cost bio adsorbents. J Indian Chem Soc 95:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  55. Priya A, Gnanasekaran L, Dutta K, Rajendran S, Balakrishnan D, Moscoso M (2022) Biosorption of heavy metals by microorganisms: evaluation of different underlying mechanisms. Chemosphere 307:135957

  56. Eleryan A, Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, Eldeeb T, El-Nemr M, Hassaan M, Ragab S, Osibote O, Kusuma H, Darmokoesoemo H, El Nemr A (2022) Copper (II) ion removal by chemically and physically modified sawdust biochar. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 2022:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  57. Eldeeb T, Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, El-Nemr M, Hassaan M, Osibote O, Ragab S, Okundaye B, Balogun V, El Nemr A (2022) Biosorption of acid brown 14 dye to mandarin-biochar-CO-TETA derived from mandarin peels. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 2022:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kusuma H, Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, Okundaye B, Ama O, Darmokoesoemo H, Widyaningrum B, Osibote O, Balogun V (2023) Biosorption of methylene blue using clove leaves waste modified with sodium hydroxide. Results Chem 5(100778):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cheng S, Show P, Lau B, Chang J, Ling T (2019) New prospects for modified algae in heavy metal adsorption. Trends Biotechnol 37:1255–1268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cherkasov N (2020) Liquid-phase adsorption: common problems and how we could do better. J Mol Liq 301:112378

  61. Li W, Mu B, Yang Y (2019) Feasibility of industrial-scale treatment of dye wastewater via bioadsorption technology. Bioresour Technol 277:157–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Diraki A, Abdala A, McKay G, Mackey H (2019) Removal of emulsified and dissolved diesel oil from high salinity wastewater by adsorption onto graphene oxide. J Environ Chem Eng 7:103106

  63. Streit A, Côrtes L, Druzian S, Godinho M, Collazzo G, Perondi D, Dotto G (2019) Development of high-quality activated carbon from biological sludge and its application for dyes removal from aqueous solutions. Sci Tot Environ 660:277–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Zazycki M, Perondi D, Godinho M, Oliveira M, Collazzo G, Dotto G (2020) Conversion of MDF wastes into a char with remarkable potential to remove Food Red 17 dye from aqueous effluents. Chemosphere 250:126248

  65. Kwok K, Koong L, Ansari TA, McKay G (2018) Adsorption/desorption of arsenite and arsenate on chitosan and nanochitosan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:14734–14742

  66. Santos J, Pereira C, Foletto E, Dotto G (2019) Alternative synthesis for ZnFe2O4/chitosan magnetic particles to remove diclofenac from water by adsorption. Int J Biol Macromol 131:301–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Mo J, Yang Q, Zhang N, Zhang W, Zheng Y, Zhang Z (2018) A review on agro-industrial waste (AIW) derived adsorbents for water and wastewater treatment. J Environ Manag 227:395–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Escudero L, Quintas P, Wuilloud R, Dotto G (2019) Recent advances on elemental biosorption. Environ Chem Lett 17:409–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Zubair M, Daud M, McKay G, Shehzad F, Al-Harthi M (2017) Layered double hydroxides nano-hybrids for water purification: a review. Appl Clay Sci 143:279–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Briao G, Foletto E, Jahn S, et al (2018) Adsorption of crystal violet dye onto a mesoporous ZSM-5 zeolite synthesized using chitin as template. J Colloid Interface Sci 508:313–322

  71. Haldar D, Duarah P, Purkait M (2020) MOFs for the treatment of arsenic, fluoride and iron contaminated drinking water: a review. Chemosphere 251:126388

  72. Sudarni D, Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, Kusuma H, Darmokoesoemo H, Osibote O, Balogun V, Widyaningrum B (2021) Malachite green removal by activated potassium hydroxide clove leaves agro-waste biosorbent: characterization, kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamics studies. Adsorpt Sci Technol 1145312:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Tien C (2018) Introduction to adsorption. Elsevier, New York

  74. Patel P (2019) Fixed-bed column adsorption study: a comprehensive review. Appl Water Sci 9:45

  75. Schio R, Salau N, Mallmann E, Dotto G (2019) Fixed bed adsorption of Allura Red dye on chitosan/polyurethane foam. Chem Eng Technol 42:2434–2442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Miraboutalebi S, Nikouzad S, Peydayesh M, Allahgholi N, Vafajoo L, McKay G (2019) Methylene blue adsorption via maize silk powder: Kinetic, equilibrium, thermodynamic studies and residual error analysis. Proc Saf Environ Prot 106:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Karimifard S, Moghaddam M (2018) Application of response surface methodology in physicochemical removal of dyes from wastewater: a critical review. Sci Tot Environ 640–641:772–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Eleryan A, Hassaan M, Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, El Nemr M, Ragab S, Hossain I, El Nemr A (2023) Kinetic and isotherm studies of acid orange 7 dye absorption using sulphonated mandarin biochar treated with TETA. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 2023:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ghaedi A, Vafaei A (2017) Applications of artificial neural networks for adsorption removal of dyes from aqueous solution: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 245:20–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Kalra A, Hadi P, Mackey H, Ansari TA, McKay G (2018) Sorption of heavy metal ions onto e-waste derived ion-exchange material—selecting the optimum isotherm. Des Water Treat 126:196–207

  81. Yazidi A, Sellaoui L, Soetaredjo F, Ismadji S, Erto A, Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Dotto G, Lamine AB (2020) Adsorption of amoxicillin and tetracycline on activated carbon prepared from durian shell in single and binary systems: experimental study and modeling analysis. Chem Eng J 379:122320

  82. Zhang L, Sellaoui L, Franco D, Dotto G, Bajahzar A, Belmabrouk H, Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Oliveira M, Li Z (2020) Adsorption of dyes brilliant blue, sunset yellow and tartrazine from aqueous solution on chitosan: analytical interpretation via multilayer statistical physics model. Chem Eng J 382:122952

  83. Rodrigues F, Salau N, et al (2019) New insights about reactive red 141 adsorption onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes using statistical physics coupled with Van der Waals equation. Sep Purif Technol 224:290–294

  84. Lima E, Hosseini-Bandegharaei A, Moreno-Piraján J, et al (2019) A critical review of the estimation of the thermodynamic parameters on adsorption equilibria. Wrong use of equilibrium constant in the Van’t Hoof equation for calculation of thermodynamics parameters of adsorption. J Mol Liq 273: 425–434

  85. Fenti A, Iovino P, Salvestrini S (2019) Some remarks on a critical review of the estimation of the thermodynamic parameters on adsorption equilibria. Wrong use of equilibrium constant in the Van’t Hoof Equation for calculation of thermodynamic parameters of adsorption. J Mol Liq 276:529–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Tran H, You S, Bandegharaei A, Chao H (2017) Mistakes and inconsistencies regarding adsorption of contaminants from aqueous solutions: a critical review. Water Res 120:88–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ahmed M, Hameed B (2018) Removal of emerging pharmaceutical contaminants by adsorption in a fixed-bed column: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 149:257–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Ma A, Abushaikha A, Allen S, McKay G (2019) Ion exchange homogeneous surface diffusion modelling by binary site resin for the removal of nickel ions from wastewater in fixed beds. Chem Eng J 358:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Fröhlich A, Ocampo-Pérez R, Diaz-Blancas V, Salau N, Dotto G (2018) Threedimensional mass transfer modeling of ibuprofen adsorption on activated carbon prepared by sonication. Chem Eng J 341:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Pauletto P, Dotto G, Salau N (2020) Diffusion mechanisms and effect of adsorbent geometry on heavy metal adsorption. Chem Eng Res Des 157:182–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Costa C, Rodrigues A (1985) Intraparticle diffusion of phenol in macroreticular adsorbents: modelling and experimental study of batch and CSTR adsorbers. Chem Eng Sci 40:983–993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Alyasi H, Mackey H, Loganathan K, McKay G (2020) Adsorbent minimisation in a two-stage batch adsorber for cadmium removal. J Ind Environ Chem 81:153–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Vargas V, Paveglio R, Pauletto P, Salau N, Dotto G (2020) Sisal fiber as an alternative and cost-effective adsorbent for the removal of methylene blue and reactive black 5 dyes from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng Commun 207:523–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Barbosa T, Foletto E, Dotto G, Jahn S (2018) Preparation of mesoporous geopolymer using metakaolin and rice husk ash as synthesis precursors and its use as potential adsorbent to remove organic dye from aqueous solutions. Ceram Int 44:416–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Zazycki M, Godinho M, Perondi D, Foletto E, Collazzo G, Dotto G (2018) New biochar from pecan nutshells as an alternative adsorbent for removing Reactive Red 141 from aqueous solutions. J Clean Prod 171:57–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Peres E, Slaviero J, Cunha A, Bandegharaei A, Dotto G (2018) Microwave synthesis of silica nanoparticles and its application for methylene blue adsorption. J Environ Chem Eng 6:649–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Loganathan P, Shim W, Sounthararajah D, Kalaruban M, Nur T, Vigneswaran S (2018) Modelling equilibrium adsorption of single, binary, and ternary combinations of Cu, Pb, and Zn onto granular activated carbon. Environ Sci Poll Res 25:16664–16675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Sellaoui L, Mendoza-Castillo D, Reynel-Ávila H, Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Ben Lamine A, Erto A (2018) A new statistical physics model for the ternary adsorption of Cu2+, Cd2+ and Zn2+ ions on bone char: experimental investigation and simulations. Chem Eng J 343:544–553

  99. Lima D, Gomes A, Lima E, Umpierres C, Thue P, Panzenhagen J, Dotto G, El-Chaghaby G, Alencar W (2019) Evaluation of efficiency and selectivity in the sorption process assisted by chemometric approaches: removal of contaminants from water. Spectroscopy 218:366–373

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Georgin J, Franco D, Drumm F, Grassi P, Netto M, Allasia D, Dotto G (2020) Powdered biosorbent from the mandacaru cactus (cereus jamacaru) for discontinuous and continuous removal of Basic Fuchsin from aqueous solutions. Powder Technol 364:584–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Michael S, Michael-Kordatou I, Beretsou V, Jäger T, Michael C, Schwartz T, Fatta-Kassinos D (2019) Solar photo-Fenton oxidation followed by adsorption on activated carbon for the minimisation of antibiotic resistance determinants and toxicity present in urban wastewater. Appl Cat B 244:871–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. You N, Wang X, Li J, Fan H, Shen H, Zhang Q (2019) Synergistic removal of arsanilic acid using adsorption and magnetic separation technique based on Fe3O4@ graphene nanocomposite. J Ind Eng Chem 70:346–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Santos J, Pereira C, Pinto L, Frantz T, Lima E, Foletto E, Dotto G (2019) Synthesis of a novel CoFe2O4/chitosan magnetic composite for fast adsorption of indigotine blue dye. Carbohydr Polym 217:6–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Fröhlich A, Foletto E, Dotto G (2019) Preparation and characterization of NiFe2O4/activated carbon composite as potential magnetic adsorbent for removal of ibuprofen and ketoprofen pharmaceuticals from aqueous solutions. J Clean Prod 229:828–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Foletto V, Ferreira A, Severo E, Collazzo G, Foletto E, Dotto G (2017) Ironbased adsorbent prepared from Litchi peel biomass via pyrolysis process for the removal of pharmaceutical pollutant from synthetic aqueous solution. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:10547–10556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Netto M, Rossatto D, Jahn S, Mallmann E, Dotto G, Foletto E (2020) Preparation of a novel magnetic geopolymer/zero-valent iron composite with remarkable adsorption performance towards aqueous Acid Red 97. Chem Eng Commun 2020

  107. Rossatto D, Netto M, Jahn S, Mallmann E, Dotto G, Foletto E (2020) Highly efficient adsorption performance of a novel magnetic geopolymer/Fe3O4 composite towards removal of aqueous acid green 16 dye. J Environ Chem Eng 8:103804

  108. Zhao X, Zheng J, You S, Liu C, Du L, Chen K, Liu Y, Ma L (2021) Selective adsorption of Cr (VI) onto amine-modified passion fruit peel biosorbent. Processes 9(5):790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Amaku J, Ogundare S, Akpomie K, Ibeji C, Conradie J (2021) Functionalized MWCNTs-quartzite nanocomposite coated with Dacryodes edulis stem bark extract for the attenuation of hexavalent chromium. Sci Rep 11(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Guarin J, Moreno-Pirajan J, Giraldo L (2018) Kinetic Study of the bioadsorption of methylene blue on the surface of the biomass obtained from the Algae D. Antarctica. J Chem 2124845

  111. Phuengphai P, Singjanusong T, Kheangkhun N, Wattanakornsiri A (2021) Removal of copper (II) from aqueous solutions using chemically modified fruit peels as efficient low-cost biosorbents. Water Sci Eng 14(4):286–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Bai X, Xing L, Liu N, Ma N, Huang K, Wu D, Yin M, Jiang K (2021) Humulus scandens-derived biochars for the effective removal of heavy metal ions: Isotherm/kinetic study, column adsorptions and mechanism investigations. Nanomaterials 11:3255

  113. El Nemr A, Shoaib A, El Sikaily A, Mohamed A, Hassan A (2021) Evaluation of cationic methylene blue dye removal by high surface area mesoporous activated carbon derived from Ulva Lactuca. Environ Process 8(1):311–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Nworie F, Nwabue F, Oti W, Mbam E, Nwali B (2019) Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution using activated rice husk biochar: adsorption isotherms, kinetics and error analysis. J Chilean Chem Soc 64:4365–4376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Sobhanardakani S, Zandipak R (2015) Removal of anionic dyes (direct blue 106 and acid green 25) from aqueous solutions using oxidized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Iran J Health Sci 3(3):48–57

    Google Scholar 

  116. Krishnappa B, Shivanna JM, Naik M, Padova P, Hegde G (2021) Acid orange-7 uptake on spherical-shaped nanocarbons. Nanomater Nanotechnol 11

  117. Sillanpää M, Mahvi A, Balarak D, Khatibi A (2021) Adsorption of acid orange 7 dyes from aqueous solution using polypyrrole/nanosilica composite: experimental and modelling. Int J Environ Anal Chem 2021.

  118. Mustapha R, Ali A, Subramaniam G, Zuki A, Awang M, Harun M, Hamzah S (2021) Removal of malachite green dye using oil palm empty fruit bunch as a low-cost adsorbent. Biointerface Res Appl Chem 11(6):4998–15008

    Google Scholar 

  119. Sharifpour E, Dil E, Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Goudarzi A (2019) Optimizing adsorptive removal of malachite green and methyl orange dyes from simulated wastewater by Mn-doped CuO-Nanoparticles loaded on activated carbon using CCD-RSM: mechanism, regeneration, isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Appl Organomet Chem 33(3):e4768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Younas F, Mustafa A, Farooqi Z, Wang X, Younas S, Mohy-Ud-Din W, Hameed MA, Abrar MM, Maitlo A, Noreen A, Hussain M (2021) Current and emerging adsorbent technologies for wastewater treatment: trends, limitations, and environmental implications. Water 13:215

  121. Adetunji C, Olaniyan O, Anani O, Inobeme A, Ukhurebor K, Bodunrinde R, Adetunji J, Singh K, Nayak VPW, Singh R (2021) Bionanomaterials for green bionanotechnology. In: Singh R, Singh K (eds) Bionanomaterial for green bionanotechnology. IOP Publishing, London, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  122. Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, Ama M, Okundaye B, Esiekpe E, Osibote O, Kusuma H, Osifo P (2021) Utility of bionanocomposite for wastewater treatment. In: Singh R, Singh K (eds) Bionanomaterials for environmental and agricultural applications. IOP Publishing, London, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  123. Onyancha R, Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Osibote O, Balogun V, Kusuma H (2022) Current existing techniques for environmental monitoring. In: Singh R, Ukhurebor K, Singh J, Adetunji C, Singh K (eds) Nanobiosensors for environmental monitoring: fundamental and applications. Springer, Berlin pp 239–262.

  124. Wong J, Tan H, Lau S, Yap P-S, Danquah M (2019) Potential and challenges of enzyme incorporated nanotechnology in dye wastewater treatment: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 7:103261

  125. Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, Ama M, Osibote O, Kusuma H, Okanigbuan P, Azi S, Osifo P (2022) Dendrimers for environmental remediation. In: Sabu T, et al. (eds) Nanotechnology for environmental remediation. Wiley, New York.

  126. Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, Okundaye B, Osibote O (2023) Green nanomaterials in wastewater treatment. In: Pal K (ed) Green nanoarchitectonics. Jenny Stanford Publishing, Boca Raton

  127. Aigbe U, Ukhurebor K, Onyancha R, Ama M, Okundaye B, Esiekpe E, Osibote O, Kusuma H, Osifo P (2021) Utility of bionanocomposite for wastewater treatment. In: Singh R, Singh K (eds) Bionanomaterials for environmental and applications. IOP Publishing, London, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  128. Paepae T, Bokoro P, Kyamakya K (2021) From fully physical to virtual sensing for water quality assessment: a comprehensive review of the relevant state-of-the-art. Sensors 21:6971

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate their respective institutions and the Africa Centre of Excellence on Technology Enhanced Learning (ACETEL), National Open University of Nigeria, Abuja, for supporting this research.

Funding

This study has not received any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to this study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kingsley Eghonghon Ukhurebor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict whatsoever to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ukhurebor, K.E., Hossain, I., Pal, K. et al. Applications and Contemporary Issues with Adsorption for Water Monitoring and Remediation: A Facile Review. Top Catal 67, 140–155 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-023-01817-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-023-01817-4

Keywords

Navigation