Skip to main content
Log in

Improving quantum-to-classical data decoding using optimized quantum wavelet transform

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the challenges facing current noisy-intermediate-scale-quantum devices is achieving efficient quantum circuit measurement or readout. The process of extracting classical data from the quantum domain, termed in this work as quantum-to-classical (Q2C) data decoding, generally incurs significant overhead, since the quantum circuit needs to be sampled repeatedly to obtain useful data readout. In this paper, we propose and evaluate time-efficient and depth-optimized Q2C methods based on the multidimensional, multilevel-decomposable, quantum wavelet transform (QWT) whose packet and pyramidal forms are leveraged and optimized. We also propose a zero-depth technique that uses selective placement of measurement gates to perform the QWT operation. To demonstrate their efficiency, the proposed techniques are quantitatively evaluated in terms of their temporal complexity (circuit depth and execution time), spatial complexity (total gate count), and accuracy (fidelity/similarity) in comparison to existing Q2C techniques. Experimental evaluations of the proposed Q2C methods are performed on a 27-qubit state-of-the-art quantum computing device from IBM Quantum using real high-resolution multispectral images. The proposed QHT-based Q2C method achieved up to \(15\times\) higher space efficiency than the QFT-based Q2C method, while the proposed zero-depth method achieved up to 14% and 78% improvements in execution time compared to conventional Q2C and QFT-based Q2C, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Rønnow TF, Wang Z, Job J, Boixo S, Isakov SV, Wecker D, Martinis JM, Lidar DA, Troyer M (2014) Defining and detecting quantum speedup. Science 345(6195):420–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shor PW (1999) Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM Rev 41(2):303–332

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Grover LK (1997) Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack. Phys Rev Lett 79(2):325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guan W, Perdue G, Pesah A, Schuld M, Terashi K, Vallecorsa S, Vlimant J-R (2021) Quantum machine learning in high energy physics. Mach Learn Sci Technol 2(1):011003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Preskill J (2018) Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond. Quantum 2:79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Weigold M, Barzen J, Leymann F, Salm M (2020) Data encoding patterns for quantum computing. In HILLSIDE Proc of Conf on Pattern Lang of Prog. 22

  7. Lanzagorta M, Uhlmann J (2008) Is quantum parallelism real? In quantum information and computation VI, volume 6976, page 69760W. International Society for Optics and Photonics

  8. Mahmud N, Jeng MJ, Nobel M, Chaudhary M, Islam SM, Levy D, El-Araby E (2022) Time-efficient quantum-to-classical data decoding. In: The International Conference on Emergent Quantum Technologies (ICEQT 2022), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, July 2022. To appear in Transactions on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence, Springer Nature—Research Book Series

  9. Fijany A, Williams CP (1998) Quantum wavelet transforms: Fast algorithms and complete circuits. In NASA International Conference on Quantum Computing and Quantum Communications, pages 10–33. Springer

  10. Li HS, Fan P, Peng H, Song S, Long GL (2021) Multilevel 2-D quantum wavelet transforms. IEEE Trans Cybern 52(8):8467–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahmud N, MacGillivray A, Chaudhary M, El-Araby E (2022) Decoherence-optimized circuits for multi-dimensional and multi-level decomposable quantum wavelet transform. IEEE Internet Comput 26(01):15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahmud N, Haase-Divine B, MacGillivray A, El-Araby E (2020) Quantum dimension reduction for pattern recognition in high-resolution spatio-spectral data. IEEE Trans Comput 71(1):1–12

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. IBM Quantum (2021) Qiskit: An open-source framework for quantum computing

  14. Williams CP, Clearwater SH (1998) Explorations in quantum computing. Springer

  15. IBM Quantum (2023) QuantumCircuit.depth() [computer software]. https://qiskit.org/documentation/stubs/qiskit.circuit.QuantumCircuit.depth.html, Accessed 23 May 2023

  16. Zhang C, Chen Y, Jin Y, Ahn W, Zhang Y, Zhang EZ (2020) A depth-aware swap insertion scheme for the qubit mapping problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.07289

  17. El-Araby E, El-Ghazawi T, Le Moigne J, Gaj K (2004) Wavelet spectral dimension reduction of hyperspectral imagery on a reconfigurable computer. In Proceedings. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology (IEEE Cat. No. 04EX921), pp 399–402. IEEE

  18. Wickerhauser MV (1994) Adapted wavelet analysis: from theory to software. Routledge

  19. Kaewpijit S, Le Moigne J, El-Ghazawi T (2003) Automatic reduction of hyperspectral imagery using wavelet spectral analysis. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 41(4):863–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pearson K (1895) Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proc R Soc Lond 58:240–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. IBM Quantum (2023) QFT [computer software]. https://qiskit.org/documentation/stubs/qiskit.circuit.library.QFT.html. Accessed 23 May 2023

  22. IBM Quantum (2023) https://quantum-computing.ibm.com/. Accessed 23 May 2023

  23. IBM Quantum (2023) Initialize [computer software]. https://qiskit.org/documentation/stubs/qiskit.extensions.Initialize.html. Accessed 23 May 2023

  24. IBM Quantum (2023) StatePreparation [computer software]. https://qiskit.org/documentation/stubs/qiskit.circuit.library.StatePreparation.html. Accessed 23 May 2023

  25. Shende VV, Bullock SS, Markov IL (2006) Synthesis of quantum-logic circuits. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 25(6):1000–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. IBM Quantum (2023) QuantumCircuit.count_ops() [computer software]. https://qiskit.org/documentation/stubs/qiskit.circuit.QuantumCircuit.count_ops.html. Accessed 23 May 2023

  27. Han D, Guo C, Wang X (2022) Density matrix reconstruction using non-negative matrix product states. Phys Rev A 106(4):042435

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Cramer M, Plenio MB, Flammia ST, Somma R, Gross D, Bartlett SD, Landon-Cardinal O, Poulin D, Liu YK (2010) Efficient quantum state tomography. Nature Commun 1(1):149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pivoluska M, Plesch M (2022) Implementation of quantum compression on ibm quantum computers. Sci Rep 12(1):5841

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors, particularly DL, VJ, JB, and AM, participated in preparing the figures and tables. The lead author, MJ, lead the effort of conducting the experimental work with SIUI, MC, MAIN, and DK. The lead author, MJ, and AR, participated in developing the analytical models, writing the coding scripts, and analyzing and discussing the experimental data. EEA and NM generated the idea for this work, and developed the initial system design and code. EEA guided the direction of the paper and ensured that the quality of its contribution was sufficient for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingyoung Jeng.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeng, M., Islam, S.I.U., Levy, D. et al. Improving quantum-to-classical data decoding using optimized quantum wavelet transform. J Supercomput 79, 20532–20561 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05433-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-023-05433-7

Keywords

Navigation