Abstract
We first use the second-order Møller–Plesset theory to optimize β-aminoacrolein, β-thioaminoacrolein and a set of their halogenated derivatives, which involve N–H···O and N–H···S hydrogen bonds. Then, four different methods, namely rotation barrier method (RBM), isodesmic reaction method (IRM), geometry corrected method (GCM) and related rotamers method, (RRM) are utilized to estimate the intramolecular hydrogen bond (IMHB) energies. The linear correlations between the estimated IMHB energies and some hydrogen bond strength descriptors such as geometrical, electron density topological and spectroscopic parameters are obtained. According to our data, RRM and RBM have the best linear correlations with all of the hydrogen bond descriptors, while GCM and IRM do not reveal suitable results. It is assumed that the performance or reliability of the estimating methods is determined based on the value of squared regression coefficients (R 2). By adding the results of the previous studies including OH···O, OH···S and NH···O hydrogen bond units to the present obtained data, the methods can be sorted according to their relative reliability as follows: RRM > RBM ≫ GCM > IRM.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jeffrey GA (1997) An introduction to hydrogen bonding. Oxford University Press, New York
Grabowski SJ (2006) Hydrogen bonding-newinsights. Springer, Berlin
Scheiner S (1997) Hydrogen bonding; a theoretical perspective. University Press, New York
Gilli G, Gilli P (2009) The nature of hydrogen bond. Oxford University Press, New York
Sanz P, Mό O, Yáñez M, Elguero J (2007) Chem Phys Chem 8:1950
Sanz P, Mό O, Yáñez M, Elguero J (2008) Chem-Eur J 14:4225
Alkorta I, Elguero J, Mό O, Yáñez M, Bene JD (2004) Mol Phys 102:2563
Alkorta I, Elguero J, Mό O, Yáñez M, Bene JD (2005) Chem Phys Lett 411:411
Emsley J (1984) Structure and bonding, vol 2. Springer, Berlin
Woodford JN (2007) J Phys Chem 111A:8519
Nowroozi A, Raissi H (2006) J Mol Struct (THEOCHEM) 759:93
Raissi H, Nowroozi A, Roozbeh M, Farzad F (2006) J Mol Struct 787:148
Nowroozi A, Roohi H, Sadeghi MS, Sheibaninia M (2011) Int J Quantum Chem 111:578
Kuldova K, Corval A, Trommsdorff HP, Lehn JM (1997) J Phys Chem 101A:6850
Douhal A, Sastre R (1994) Chem Phys Lett 219:91
Sytnic A, Del Valle JC (1995) J Phys Chem 99:13028
Schuster P, Zundel G (1976) The hydrogen bond. Recent Developmentin Theory and Experiment, Nourth-Holland
Buemi G, Zuccarello F (2004) Chem Phys 306:115
Jablonski M, Kaczmarek A, Sadlej AJ (2006) J Phys Chem A 110:10890
Nowroozi A, Raissi H, Farzad F (2005) J Mol Struct (THEOCHEM) 730:161
Rozas I, Alkorta I, Elguero J (2001) J Phys Chem A 105:10462
Nowroozi A, Raissi H, Hajiabadi H, Mohammadzadeh P (2011) Int J Quantum Chem 111:3040
Nowroozi A, Hajiabadi H, Akbari F (2014) Struct Chem 25:251
Nowroozi A, Roohi H, Hajiabadi H, Raissi H, Khalilinia E, Najafi B (2011) Comput Theo Chem 963:517
Hajiabadi H, Nowroozi A, Hasani H, Mohammadzadeh P, Raissi H (2012) Int J Quantum Chem 112:1384
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Zarzewski VG, Montgomery JA, Stratmann RE, Burant JC, Dapprich S, Millam JM, Daniels AD, Kudin KN, Strain MC, Farkas O, Tomasi J, Barone V, Cossi M, Cammi R, Mennucci B, Pomelli C, Adamo C, Clifford S, Ochterski J, Petersson GA, Ayala PY, Cui Q, Morokuma K, Malick DK, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Cioslowski J, Ortiz JV, Baboul AG, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi I, Gomperts R, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Gonzalez C, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson B, Chen W, Wong MW, Andres JL, Gonzalez C, Head-Gordon M, Replogle ES, Pople JA (2003) Gaussian 03 (Revision B.01). Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA
Biegler-König F, Schönbohm J, Bayles D (2001) AIM 2000: a program to analyze and visualize atoms in molecules. J Comp Chem 22:545
Glendening DE, Reed AE, Carpenter JE, Weinhold F NBO Version3.1
Jablonski M (2010) Chem Phys 376:76
Grabowski SJ (2004) J Phys Org Chem 17:18
Jablonski M (2012) J Phys Chem A 116:3753
Buemi G, Zuccarello F (2002) J Mol Struct (THEOCHEM) 581:71
Musin RN, Mariam YH (2006) J Phys Org Chem 19:425
Koch W, Frenking G, Gauss J, Cremer D, Collins JR (1987) J Am Chem Soc 109:5917
Rozas I, Alkorta I, Elguero J (2000) J Am Chem Soc 122:11154
Espinosa E, Molins M, Lecomte C (1998) Chem Phys Lett 285:170
Bader RFW (1990) Atoms in molecules. A Quantum Theory; Clarendon, Oxford
Grabowski SJ (2001) J Mol Struct 562:137
Grabowski SJ (1999) Chem Phys Lett 312:542
Espinosa E, Molins M (2000) Chem Phys 113:5686
Grabowski SJ (2001) Chem Phys Lett 338:361
Reed AE, Curtis LA, Weinhold FA (1988) Chem Rev 88:899–926
Raissi H, Farzad F, Nowroozi A (2005) J Mol Struct 752:130
Raissi H, Nowroozi A, Farzad F (2006) Spectrochim. Acta. A 63:729
Raissi H, Nowroozi A, Hakimi M (2006) Spectrochim Acta A 65:605
Pratt DA, Heer MI, Mulder P, Ingold KU (2001) J Am Chem Soc 123:5518
Song KS, Liu L, Guo QX (2003) J Org Chem 68:262
Borges DS, Martinho SJA (1998) J Phys Chem Ref Data 1998(27):707
Deshmukh MM, Suresh CH, Gadre SR (2007) J Phys Chem A 111:6472
Jabłonski M, Monaco G (2013) J Chem Inf Model 53:1661
Nowroozi A, Mohammadzadeh Jahani P, Asli N, Hajiabadi H, Dahmardeh S, Raissi H (2012) Int J Quant Chem 112:489
Mohammadzadeh Jahani P, Nowroozi A, Hajiabadi H, Hassani H (2012) Struct Chem 23:1941
Mohammadzadeh Jahani P, Nowroozi A (2013) Int J Quantum Chem 113:102
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the University of Sistan and Baluchestan (USB) for the financial supports.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nowroozi, A., Masumian, E. Comparative study of NH···O and NH···S intramolecular hydrogen bonds in β-aminoacrolein, β-thioaminoacrolein and their halogenated derivatives by some usual methods. Struct Chem 28, 587–596 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-016-0823-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-016-0823-9