Abstract
On the basis of energy decomposition analysis, the rotational energy profile of ethane is explained by using two models: rigid rotation with instantaneous geometry relaxations of the eclipsed and staggered conformations and relaxed rotation with continuous geometry relaxations. Both models can be applied to the real system. A distinction between the cause of an initial energy rise and energetic consequences of structural changes accompanying the rotation is made. It is concluded that the increased Pauli repulsion is the main cause for the initial energy rise and geometry changes. However, after the structural changes take place, the Pauli repulsion is not responsible for the higher energy of the eclipsed state. It then originates from energetic consequences of geometry changes, which include decrease in electrostatic and orbital stabilization energies, mainly due to the C–C bond lengthening, and an energy rise due to methyl groups bending.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The preparation energy of the staggered conformer, ΔEprep = 18.49 kcal/mol (Table 2) reflects difference in energy between two CH3 radicals in their prepared state (geometry they adopt in the staggered conformation) and their equilibrium geometry.
Much smaller contribution also comes from the less favourable dispersion interactions.
References
Kemp JD, Pitzer KS (1936) J Chem Phys 4:749
Sovers OJ, Kern CW, Pitzer RM, Karplus M (1968) J Chem Phys 49:2592–2599
Vollhardt KPC (1987) Organic chemistry. Freeman WH and Company, New York
Smith MB (1994) Organic synthesis. McGraw-Hill Inc, Singapore
Eliel EL, Wilen SH, Mander LN (1994) Stereochemistry of organic compounds. Wiley, New York
Bader RFW, Cheeseman JR, Laidig KE, Wiberg KE, Breneman C (1990) J Am Chem Soc 112:6530–6536
Brunck TK, Weinhold F (1979) J Am Chem Soc 101:1700–1709
Reed AE, Weinhold F (1991) Isr J Chem 31:277–285
Goodman L, Gu H (1998) J Chem Phys 109:72–78
Badenhoop JK, Weinhold F (1999) Int J Quantum Chem 72:269–280
Goodman L, Gu H, Pophristic V (1999) J Chem Phys 110:4268–4275
Goodman L, Pophristic V, Weinhold F (1999) Acc Chem Res 32:983–993
Weinhold F (2001) Nature 411:539–541
Pophristic V, Goodman L (2001) Nature 411:565–568
Bickelhaupt FM (2003) Baerends. Angew Chem Int Ed 42:4183–4188
Weinhold F (2003) Angew Chem Int Ed 42:4188–4194
Mo Y, Wu W, Song L, Lin M, Zhang Q, Gao J (2004) Angew Chem Int Ed 43:1986–1990
Song L, Lin Y, Wu W, Zhang Q, Mo Y (2005) J Phys Chem A 109:2310–2316
Mo Y, Gao J (2007) Acc Chem Res 40:113–119
Schreiner P (2002) Angew Chem Int Ed 41:3579–3581
Carey FA, Sundberg RJ (2007) Advanced organic chemistry, part A: structure and mechanisms. Springer, LLC
Martín Pendás A, Blanco MA, Francisco E (2009) J Comput Chem 30:98–109
Liu S (2007) J Chem Phys 126:244103
Liu S, Govind N (2008) J Phys Chem A 112:6690–6699
Liu S, Govind N, Pedersen LG (2008) J Chem Phys 129:094104
Esquivel RO, Liu S, Angulo JC, Dehesa JS, Antolín J, Molina-Espíritu M (2011) J Phys Chem A 115:4406–4415
Liu S (2013) J Phys Chem A 117:962–965
Mo Y (2011) Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Comput Mol Sci 1:164–171
Su P, Li H (2009) J Chem Phys 131:014102
Schmidt MW, Baldridge KK, Boatz JA, Elbert ST, Gordon MS, Jensen JH, Koseki S, Matsunaga N, Nguyen KA, Su SJ, Windus TL, Dupuis M, Montgomery JA, Jr. (1993) J Comput Chem 14:1347–1363; Gamess (2013-R1 version) was used in this work
Kitaura K, Morokuma K (1976) Int J Quantum Chem 10:325–340
Morokuma K (1977) Acc Chem Res 10:294–300
Te Velde G, Bickelhaupt FM, Baerends EJ, Fronseca Guerra C, van Gisbergen SJA, Snijders JG, Ziegler T (2001) J Comput Chem 22:931–967
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA Jr., Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Keith T, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas O, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2013) Gaussian 09 (Revision D.01), Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT
Becke AD (1993) J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652
Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Phys Rev B 37:785–789
Foresman JB, Frisch A (1996) Exploring chemistry with electronic structure methods. Gaussian Inc, Pittsburgh, PA
England W, Gordon MS (1971) J Am Chem Soc 93:4649–4657
Dunning TH Jr (1989) J Chem Phys 90:1007–1024
Pitzer KS (1951) Discuss Faraday Soc 10:66–73
Alabugin IV, Gilmore KM, Peterson PW (2011) Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Comput Mol Sci 1:109–141
Souza FR, Freitas MP, Rittner R (2008) J Mol Struct Theochem 863:137–140
Nori-Shargh D, Boggs JE (2011) Struct Chem 22:253–262
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia to Grant No. 172020 is acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baranac-Stojanović, M. Theoretical analysis of the rotational barrier in ethane: cause and consequences. Struct Chem 26, 989–996 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-014-0557-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-014-0557-5