Skip to main content
Log in

Fracture Energy Characteristics of High-Strength Steels Penetrated with Armor-Piercing Strikers at Velocities Up to 1000 m/s

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

High-strength and armored steels are used in different structural elements and in the development of new military equipment operating under extreme conditions, including high-velocity impact interaction and explosive loading. Under such conditions, the fracture is induced by the combination of different mechanisms that depend on the mechanical properties of materials, strain rate, stress state, temperature, etc. Experimental and computational research methods combine to gain additional information on the behavior of high-strength materials essential for modern military equipment in operation. The test results for the penetration of ARMOX 500T steel target 10 mm thick at different loading rates using a ballistic pendulum are presented. The results of a set of piercing tests with the strikers of three types became the basis for evaluating the integral energy characteristics of material deformation and fracture induced by impact interaction; the target penetration pulse against loading rate was constructed and used in the numerical simulation of impact interaction and validation of model material parameters. The finite element method was employed to numerically simulate the processes of dynamic target penetration with the Johnson-Cook material deformation model. The loading and strain rate effects on the results are estimated. The calculation results are compared with experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. V. Astainin and G. V. Stepanov, “Energy characteristics of failure for an aluminum plate with punching by a steel striker,” Strength Mater, 15, 1468–1471 (1983). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01523330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Popławski, P. Kędzierski, and A. Morka, “Identification of Armox 500T steel failure properties in the modeling of perforation problems,” Mater Design, 190, 1–28 (2020).

  3. M. A. Iqbal, K. Senthil, P. Sharma, and N. K. Gupta, “An investigation of the constitutive behavior of Armox 500T steel and armor piercing incendiary projectile material,” Int J Impact Eng, 96, 146–164 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Choudhary, P. Singh, S. Khare, et al., “Ballistic impact behaviour of newly developed armour grade steel: An experimental and numerical study,” Int J Impact Eng, 140, 103557 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. V. Stepanov and V. I. Zubov, “Analysis of the aluminum alloy resistance to the penetration of a steel rod at impact velocities of up to 500 m/s,” Strength Mater, 30, 536–539 (1998). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02522637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. S. Burov, Design and Calculation of Tanks [in Russian], VA BTV, Moscow (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. V. Stepanov and V. V. Kharchenko, “Influence of the dynamic behavior of materials on the penetration of long rods at elevated velocities. Discussion,” Strength Mater, 30, 383–392 (1998). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02524713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. A. Zukas, T. Nicholas, H. F. Swift, et al., Impact Dynamics, Wiley (1982).

  9. G. R. Johnson and W. H. Cook, “Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures,” Eng Fract Mech, 21, 31–48 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Cowper and P. Symonds, Strain-Hardening and Strain-Rate Effects in the Impact Loading of Cantilever Beam, Technical Report No. 28, Brown University, Division of Applied Mathematics, Providence, RI (1957), pp. 11–28.

  11. V. Tvergaard and A. Needleman, “Effect of material rate sensitivity on failure modes in the Charpy V-notch test,” J Mech Phys Solids, 34, No. 3, 213–241 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Bisht, M. A. Iqbal, K. Kamran, et al., “Numerical study of thin UHPC targets response against ballistic impact,” Mater Phys Mech, 50, No. 1, 74–88 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Lesmana, F. Arifurrahman, A. Hameed, et al., “On the importance of the bullet jacket during the penetration process: reversed-ballistic experimental and numerical study,” J Mech Sci Technol, 34, No. 5, 1871–1877 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Deng, Y. Zhang, X. Xiao, et al., “Experimental and numerical study on the ballistic impact behavior of 6061-T651 aluminum alloy thick plates against blunt-nosed projectiles,” Int J Impact Eng, 144, 103659 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. S. Pisarenko and G. V. Stepanov, “Experimental technique for determining the integral parameters of interaction,” Prikl. Mekh., 17, 1–3 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Tenggren, How Bending Affects the Ballistic Properties of Armox, Degree Project, in Materials Science and Engineering, Second level, Sweden (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. A. Prasob, M. Sasikumar, N. Bardiya, and P. Vasundhra, “Projectile penetrating multilayer composite armor,” Indian J Sci Technol, 9, No. 47, 1–7 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Børvik, S. Dey, and A. H. Clausen, “Perforation resistance of five different high-strength steel plates subjected to small-arms projectiles,” Int J Impact Eng, 36, 948–964 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Saleh, M. M. Kariem, V. Luzin, et al., “High strain rate deformation of ARMOX 500T and effects on texture development using neutron diffraction techniques and SHPB testing,” Mater Sci Eng A, 709, 30–39 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Scazzosi, M. Giglio, and A. Manes, “Experimental and numerical investigation on the perforation resistance of double-layered metal shield under high-velocity impact of armor-piercing projectiles,” Materials, 14, 626 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. O. Kondryakov.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Mitsnosti, No. 2, pp. 12 – 22, March – April, 2023

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kondryakov, E.O., Danylyuk, V.E. & Kharchenko, V.V. Fracture Energy Characteristics of High-Strength Steels Penetrated with Armor-Piercing Strikers at Velocities Up to 1000 m/s. Strength Mater 55, 245–253 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-023-00519-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-023-00519-2

Keywords

Navigation