Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Study on Behavior of RPC Filled Steel Tubular Stub Columns Under Axial Compression

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

Reactive powder concrete (RPC) with compressive strength higher than 170 MPa was prepared by using ordinary Portland cement, silica fume, ground granulated blast-furnace slag or fly ash. RPC shows high strength, constant Poisson’s ratio, high compressive peak strain but post-peak brittle failure. Based on the RPC mechanical behavior study, investigation of the interaction between steel tubes and core RPC was performed, in view of its effect on the bearing capacity and deformability of RPC filled steel tubular (RPCFT) stub columns subjected to axial loading. RPCFT stub columns have very high ductility and alleviate the RPC disadvantage of brittle failure. However, the confinement effect of steel tubes on RPC is lower than that of normal strength concrete and thus, it can be neglected during the design process for convenience and safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Richard and M. Cheyrezy, “Composition of reactive powder concretes,” Cement Concrete Res., 25, No. 7, 1501–1511 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. V. H. Perry and D. Zakariasen, “Overview of UHPC technology, materials, properties, markets and manufacturing,” in: Proc. of the 3rd Int. Symp. on High Performance Concrete/PCI National Bridge Conference (October 19–22, 2003, Orlando, FL), Paper 60 (2003).

  3. M. Alkaysi, S. El-Tawil, Z. C. Liu, and W. Hansen, “Effects of silica powder and cement type on durability of ultra high performance concrete (UHPC),” Cement Concrete Comp., No. 66, 47–56 (2016).

  4. Y. Su, J. Li, C. Q. Wu, et al., “Effects of steel fibres on dynamic strength of UHPC,” Constr. Build. Mater., 114, 708–718 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. P. Collins, D. Mitchell, and J. G. MacGregor, “Structural design considerations for high strength concrete,” Concr. Int. Des. Constr., 15, 27–34 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. R. Razvi and M. Saatcioglu, “Strength and deformability of confined high-strength-concrete columns,” ACI Struct. J., 91, No. 6, 678–687 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Y. Blais and M. Couture, “Precast, prestressed pedestrian bridge – world’s first reactive powder concrete structure,” PCI J., 44, No. 5, 60–71 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Z. Y. Lin, Research on Behavior of RPC Filled Circular Steel Stub Axial Columns, Dissertation, Fu Zhou University, Fuzhou, China (2004).

  9. X. C. Pu, H. J. Pu, and Y. W. Wang, “Preparation and study on kilometer compressed material,” Concrete, No. 3, 3–9 (2003).

  10. P. Y. Yan and J. W. Feng, “Mechanical behavior of UHPC and UHPC filled steel tubular stub columns,” in: E. Fehling, M. Schmidt, and S. Stürwald (Eds.), Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC), Proc. of the 2nd Int. Symp. on Ultra High Performance Concrete (March 5–7, 2008, Kassel, Germany), Kassel University Press GmbH, Kassel (2008), pp. 355–362.

  11. J. Zhang, Experiment Investigation on Behavior of Reactive Powder Concrete Filled Steel Stub-Columns, Dissertation, Fu Zhou University, Fuzhou, China (2003).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51208391).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. H. Liu.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 1, pp. 149 – 155, January – February, 2017.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, S.H., Li, L.H. & Wang, L. Study on Behavior of RPC Filled Steel Tubular Stub Columns Under Axial Compression. Strength Mater 49, 133–138 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-017-9851-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-017-9851-y

Keywords

Navigation