Skip to main content
Log in

How do undergraduate students’ perceptions of professor cultural competence and growth mindset relate to motivation to engage in intercultural interactions?

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we explore associations among undergraduate students’ perceptions of professor cultural competence, students’ perceptions of professor growth mindset, and students’ motivation to engage in intercultural interactions. In two studies (Nstudy 1 = 351, Nstudy 2 = 277), we find that when students perceive their professor to be more culturally competent, they report higher self-efficacy, value, and mastery-approach orientation toward intercultural interactions. However, somewhat unexpectedly, students who perceive their professors to have higher cultural competence also report higher performance-avoidance orientation toward intercultural interactions. When students perceive their professors to have a stronger growth mindset, they report lower emotional costs toward intercultural interactions. Further, in Study 1 but not Study 2, we find interactions between perceived professor cultural competence and perceived professor mindset such that the combination of perceiving high cultural competence and high growth mindset led to the highest student-reported self-efficacy and the lowest emotional cost toward engaging in intercultural interactions. Although exploratory and preliminary in nature, these findings suggest that students in classes where professors demonstrate high cultural competence may be more motivated to engage in intercultural interactions; however, it may be important for professors to also communicate a growth mindset if they want to reduce potential threats associated with engaging in intercultural interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and study materials are available at https://osf.io/8qfmj/?view_only=fd127cd2527645529ec5eada8884ad48.

Notes

  1. The term “cultural competence” and “intercultural competence” are used interchangeably as they both refer to the ability to be in contact with people from different cultures (Barrett et al., 2013; Schwarzenthal et al., 2020).

  2. In our measures, we used the term “cross-cultural” rather than “intercultural” and defined it for participants as stated above. However, throughout the rest of the paper, we used the term “intercultural” to be more consistent with the literature in this area. Since the term “cross-cultural” typically refers to interactions between people from two different countries (Matsumoto & Van de Vijver, 2011; Norenzayan & Heine, 2005), we use the term “intercultural interactions” in the rest of our paper to avoid confusion and to be more consistent with how we actually defined these interactions in our study.

  3. See Supplemental Materials for all models without covariates (Table S1 and S2).

  4. Because it is possible that the opportunities for intercultural interactions may vary by domain (e.g., a language course versus a biology course), we report a model in the Supplemental Materials (Table S3) that includes dummy codes for social sciences, hard sciences (which included human health sciences), and business courses, with humanities courses/exploratory study courses being the comparison group. Only one finding changed: perceived professor cultural competence no longer significantly predicted performance-avoidance goals toward intercultural interactions in this model.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank to members of the S-LAMB Lab for their useful comments.

Funding

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiqiu Yan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 34 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, Y., Muenks, K., Mata, R.A. et al. How do undergraduate students’ perceptions of professor cultural competence and growth mindset relate to motivation to engage in intercultural interactions?. Soc Psychol Educ 27, 299–334 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09840-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09840-9

Keywords

Navigation