Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

An Engineering View for Social Systems: Agency as an Operational Principle for Designing Higher Education Access Policies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Access to higher education (HE) has been a persistent concern for governments, practitioners and researchers. Access to HE has been widely studied from scientific perspectives that have focussed on the factors that contribute to the problem; however, authors have highlighted the need for systemic and design perspectives on education systems. The need to connect research with policy remains one of the most challenging issues for education researchers. In view of this gap, this paper argues that engineering thinking and methods represent an opportunity for the design of HE access policies because engineering rationality (distinct from scientific rationalities) matches the concerns and goals of any policymaking attempt. Engineers design artefacts to meet particular goals. These artefacts are artificial systems, tangible or intangible, such as hammers, bridges or whole organizations, which are designed in particular contexts to meet precise goals. Policies for access to HE are good examples of artefacts that seek to fulfil specific needs under concrete constraints inherent to a country or region. More specifically, HE systems are social systems; in other words, they are created and recreated by the interactions and decisions of diverse actors. Hence, to change, redesign or improve such types of systems involves engineering their very interactions that are the outcomes of institutional and human actions. In particular, engineering design requires operational principles. Thus, we propose agency as a fundamental design concept for the improvement of HE systems, which opens new possibilities for a distinct type of policy-making that takes excellent advantage of what engineering can offer, while at the same time expanding on traditional expectations for engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL (1994) Systems thinking and thinking systems. Syst Dyn Rev 10:175–188. doi:10.1002/sdr.4260100206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff RL, Gharajedaghi J (1996) Reflections on systems and their models. Syst Res 13:13–23. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1735(199603)13:1<13::aid-sres66>3.0.co;2-o

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander KL, Eckland BK (1977) High school context and college selectivity: institutional constraints in educational stratification. Social Forces 56:166–188. doi:10.2307/2577419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach P, Bozeman L, Janashia N, Rumbley L (2006) Higher education: a worldwide inventory of centers and programs. Global perspectives on higher education, vol 5. Sense Publishers, Massachussetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai A (2004) The capacity to aspire: culture and the terms of recognition. Culture Pub Act 59:84

    Google Scholar 

  • Asplund R, Adbelkarim OB, Skalli A (2008) An equity perspective on access to, enrolment in and finance of tertiary education. Educ Econ 16:261–274. doi:10.1080/09645290802338102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banathy BH (1988) Systems inquiry in education. Syst Pract 1:193–212. doi:10.1007/bf01059858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie IR (2002) Are all "adolescent econometricians" created equal? Racial, class, and gender differences in college Enrollment. Sociol Educ 75:19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergerson AA (2009) College choice and access to college: moving policy, research and practice to the 21st century. ASHE High Educ Rep 35:1–141. doi:10.1002/aehe.3504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum R (2000) Policy scholars are from Venus; policy makers are from Mars. Rev High Educ 23:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok J (2010) The capacity to aspire to higher education: ‘It's like making them do a play without a script’. Critic Stud Ed 51:163–178. doi:10.1080/17508481003731042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges D, Watts M (2008) Educational research and policy: epistemological considerations. J Philos Educ 42:41–62. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00628.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera AF, La Nasa SM (2000) Understanding the college-choice process. New Direct Institut Res 2000:5. doi:10.1002/ir.10701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron SV, Heckman JJ (1998) Life cycle schooling and dynamic selection bias: models and evidence for five cohorts of American males. J Polit Econ 106:262–333. doi:10.1086/250010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron SV, Heckman JJ (2001) The dynamics of educational attainment for black, Hispanic, and white males. J Polit Econ 109:455–499. doi:10.1086/321014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford M, Miller T, Stasz C, Goldman C, Sam C, Kumar K (2013) How effective are different approaches to higher education provision in increasing access, quality and completion for students in developing countries? Does this differ by gender of students? A systematic review

  • Cooper G (2008) Conceptualising social life. In: Gilbert N (ed) Researching social life. Sage Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Engberg ME, Allen DJ (2011) Uncontrolled destinies: improving opportunity for low-income students in American higher education. Res High Educ 52:786–807. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9222-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engberg ME, Wolniak GC (2010) Examining the effects of high school contexts on postsecondary Enrollment. Res High Educ 51:132–153. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9150-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnie R, Lascelles E, Sweetman A (2005) Who goes? The direct and indirect effects of family background on access to post-secondary education, vol Catalogue no. 11F0019MIE — No. 237. Statistics Canada, Otawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman K (1997) Increasing African Americans' participation in higher education: African American high-school Students' perspectives. J Higher Educ 68:523–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Frempong G, Ma X, Mensah J (2012) Access to postsecondary education: can schools compensate for socioeconomic disadvantage? High Educ 63:19–32. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9422-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharajedaghi J, Ackoff RL (1984) Mechanisms, organisms and social systems. Strateg Manag J 5:289–300. doi:10.1002/smj.4250050308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman S (1990) Philosophy, engineering, and western culture. In: Durbin P (ed) Broad and narrow interpretations of philosophy of Technology, vol 7. Philosophy and Technology, Springer Netherlands, pp 125–152. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-0557-3_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman S (2004) Why we need a philosophy of engineering: a work in progress. Interdiscip Sci Rev 29:163–176. doi:10.1179/030801804225012572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González KP, Stoner C, Jovel JE (2003) Examining the role of social Capital in Access to College for Latinas: toward a college opportunity framework. J Hisp High Educ 2:146–170. doi:10.1177/1538192702250620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson SO (2007) What is technological science? Stud Hist Philo Sci Part A 38:523–527. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson SO (2009) From the casino to the jungle. Synthese 168:423–432. doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9444-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller DE (1997) Student price response in higher education: an update to Leslie and brinkman. J Higher Educ 68:624–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman NW, Tandberg DA, Sponsler BA (2015) Public policy and higher education: strategies for framing a research agenda. ASHE High Educ Rep 41:1–98. doi:10.1002/aehe.20020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ion G, Iucu R (2015) Does research influence educational policy? The perspective of researchers and policy-makers in Romania. In: Matei L, Pricopie R, Salmi J, Scott P (eds) Curaj A. Springer International Publishing, The European Higher Education Area, pp 865–880. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_52

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek M, Romme AGL, Boland RJ (2008) Introduction to the special issue: organization studies as a science for design: creating collaborative artifacts and research. Organ Stud 29:317–329. doi:10.1177/0170840607088016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks CL (2004) The well-being of social systems. Syst Res Behav Sci 21:209–217. doi:10.1002/sres.616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane TJ (1994) College entry by blacks since 1970: the role of college costs, family background, and the returns to education. J Polit Econ 102:878–911. doi:10.2307/2138651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane TJ (1995) Rising public college tuition and college entry: how well do public subsidies promote access to college? Research, National Bureau of Economic

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karen D (2002) Changes in access to higher education in the United States: 1980-1992. Sociol Educ 75:191–210. doi:10.2307/3090265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettley N (2007) The past, present and future of widening participation research. Br J Sociol Educ 28:333–347. doi:10.1080/01425690701252531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J (2012) Exploring the relationship between state financial aid policy and postsecondary Enrollment choices: a focus on income and race differences. Res High Educ 53:123–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koen BV (2003) Discussion of the method: conducting the Engineer's approach to problem solving. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York

  • Koen BV (2009) The engineering method and its implications for scientific, philosophical, and universal methods monist 92:357-386 doi:10.5840/monist200992321

  • Kroes P (2009) Foundational issues of engineering design. In: Meijers A (ed) Philosophy of Technology and engineering sciences. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 513–541. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50023-9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kroes P (2012) Engineering design. In: Kroes P (ed) Technical artefacts: creations of mind & matter. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 127–161

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson NO (2001) A design view on research in social sciences. Syst Pract Action Res 14:383–405. doi:10.1023/a:1011399918214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layton ET Jr (1974) Technology as knowledge. Technol Cult 15:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layton ET Jr (1984) Science and engineering design. ANYAS 424:173–181. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23502.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liz T (2001) Forum: power, assumptions and prescriptions: a critique of widening participation policy-making. Higher Educ Pol 14:361–376. doi:10.1016/s0952-8733(01)00026-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski CF (1993) Dynamic choice in social settings: learning from the experiences of others. J Econ 58:121–136. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(93)90115-L

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March S, Vogus T (2010) Design science in the management disciplines. In: design research in information systems, vol 22. Integrated series in information systems. Springer US, pp 195-208. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8_14

  • McCowan T (2011) Human rights, capabilities and the normative basis of ‘education for all’. Theory Res Educ 9:283–298. doi:10.1177/1477878511419566

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy S, Smyth E (2011) Higher education expansion and differentiation in the Republic of Ireland. High Educ 61:243–260. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9375-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough PM (1997) Choosing colleges. How social class and schools structure opportunity. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijers AM, Kroes P (2013) Extending the scope of the theory of knowledge. In: de Vries MJ, Hansson SO, Meijers AWM (eds) Norms in Technology, vol 9. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, Springer Netherlands, pp 15–34. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5243-6_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moore M (1983) Social science and policy analysis. In: Callahan D, Jennings B (eds) Ethics, the social sciences, and policy analysis. The Hastings center series in ethics. Springer, US, pp 271–291. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7015-4_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ness E (2010) The role of information in the policy process: implications for the Examination of research utilization in higher education policy. In: Smart JC (ed) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, vol 25. Higher Education, Handbook of Theory and Research. Springer Netherlands, pp 1–49. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8598-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nora A (2004) The role of habitus and cultural Capital in Choosing a college, transitioning from high school to higher education, and persisting in college among minority and nonminority students. J Hisp High Educ 3:180–208. doi:10.1177/1538192704263189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor N (2009) Hispanic origin, socio-economic status, and community college Enrollment. J Higher Educ 80:121–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olaya, C. (2012). The importance of being atheoretical: management as engineering. In Systemic Management for Intelligent Organizations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 21-46. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29244-6_2

  • Paulsen MB (1990) College choice: understanding student Enrollment behavior. The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen MB, Smart JC (2001) The finance of higher education: implications for theory, research, policy and practice. In: Paulsen MB, Smart JC (eds) The finance of higher education: theory. Policy and Practice. Agathon Press, Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen MB, St. John EP (2002) Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. J Higher Educ 73:189–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna LW (2006) Studying college access and choice: a proposed conceptual model. High Educ 21:99–157. doi:10.1007/1-4020-4512-3_3

    Google Scholar 

  • Perna LW, Thomas SL (2008) Theoretical perspectives on student success: understanding the contributions of the disciplines. ASHE High Educ Rep 34:1–87. doi:10.1002/aehe.3401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perna LW, Titus MA (2005) The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college Enrollment: an Examination of racial/ethnic group differences. Journal of higher education 76:485-Oct

  • Pitt JC (2010) Philosophy, engineering, and the sciences. In: Ivd P, Goldberg DE (eds) Philosophy and Engineering:: An Emerging Agenda, vol 2. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, Springer Netherlands, pp 75–82. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2804-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt JC (2011) What engineers know doing philosophy of Technology. In: In, vol 3. Philosophy of engineering and Technology. Springer, Netherlands, pp 165–174. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0820-4_15

    Google Scholar 

  • Poel I (2010) Philosophy and engineering: setting the stage. In: Poel Ivd, Goldberg DE (eds), vol 2. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, Springer Netherlands, pp 1–11. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2804-4_1

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1962) Personal knowledge: toward a post-Crithical Philosphy,Routledge, London

  • Popper K (1963) Conjectures and refutations. The growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K (1968) The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1972) Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer D, Pollak R (2010) Educational expansion and its consequences for vertical and horizontal inequalities in access to higher education in West Germany. Eur Sociol Rev 26:415–430. doi:10.1093/esr/jcp029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remington R, Boehm-Davis D, Folk C (2012) Natural and engineered systems. In: Introduction to humans in engineered systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp 7–13. doi:10.1002/9781118393758.ch1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns I (2006) Three models of education: rights, capabilities and human capital. Theory Res Educ 4:69–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Romme AGL (2003) Making a difference: organization as design organization. Science 14:558–573. doi:10.1287/orsc.14.5.558.16769

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle G (1945) Knowing how and knowing that. P Aristotelian Soc 46:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahni R, Shankar VK (2012) Girls' higher education in India on the road to inclusiveness: on track but heading where? High Educ 63:237–256. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9436-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito M (2003) Amartya Sen's capability approach to education: a critical exploration. J Philos Educ 37:17–33. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.3701002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmi J (2015) Evidence-based policies in higher education: data analytics, impact assessment and reporting [overview paper]. In: Curaj A, Matei L, Pricopie R, Salmi J, Scott P (eds) The European Higher Education Area. Springer International Publishing, pp 807–813. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_49

  • Sen A (1985) Well-being, agency and freedom: the Dewey lectures 1984. J Philos 82:169–221. doi:10.2307/2026184

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Anchor Books, Nueva York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1988) The science of design: creating the artificial. Design Issues 4:67–82. doi:10.2307/1511391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1996a) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1996b) Understanding the natural and the artificial worlds. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, London, In

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John EP, Paulsen MB, Carter DF (2005) Diversity, college costs, and postsecondary opportunity: an Examination of the financial nexus between college choice and persistence for African Americans and whites. J Higher Educ 76:545–569. doi:10.2307/3838839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman J (2000) Business dynamics. Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. MA, USA, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler U (2003) The future of higher education and the future of higher education research. Tert Educ Manag 9:171–185. doi:10.1080/13583883.2003.9967102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichler U (2015) Higher education research in Europe. In: Curaj A, Matei L, Pricopie R, Salmi J, Scott P (eds) The European Higher Education Area. Springer International Publishing, pp 815–847. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_50

  • The Royal Academy of Engineering (2007) Creating systems that work: principles of engineering systems for the 21st century. The Royal Academy of Engineering, London

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2009a) Global education digest 2009: comparing education statistics across the world

  • UNESCO (2009b) Trends in global higher education: tracking an academic revolution

  • UNESCO (2010) Engineering: issues, challenges and opportunities for development. France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincenti WG (1990) What engineers know and how they know it : analytical studies from aeronautical history. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker M, Unterhalter E (2007) The capability approach: its potential for work in education. In: Walker M, Unterhalter E (eds) Amartya Sen's capability approach and social justice in education [recurso electrónico] Basingstoke. Macmillan, 2007, Palgrave

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watts M (2009) Sen and the art of motorcycle maintenance: adaptive preferences and higher education. Stud Philos Educ 28:425–436. doi:10.1007/s11217-009-9127-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts M, Bridges D (2006) The value of non-participation in higher education. J Educ Pol 21:267–290. doi:10.1080/02680930600600267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimer DL (2009) Making education research more policy-analytic. In: Sykes G, Schneider B, Plank DN (eds) Handbook of education policy research. Routledge, New York, pp 93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Young J (2004) "becoming different": accessing university from a low socioeconomic community - barriers and motivators. Syst Pract Action Res 17:425–469. doi:10.1007/s11213-004-5788-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Z (2010) Higher education access and equality among ethnic minorities in China. Chin Educ Soc 43:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation of Colombia “Colciencias” (Convocatoria 567 de 2012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Grupo TESO, Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1 Este # 19A-40, Bogotá, Colombia

    Adriana Díaz & Camilo Olaya

Authors
  1. Adriana Díaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Camilo Olaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriana Díaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Díaz, A., Olaya, C. An Engineering View for Social Systems: Agency as an Operational Principle for Designing Higher Education Access Policies . Syst Pract Action Res 30, 627–649 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9412-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9412-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation