Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Higher education expansion and differentiation in the Republic of Ireland

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores social class and gender differences in entry to the two main higher education sectors, universities and institutes of technology, among school leavers in Ireland over the period 1980–2006. A rational choice perspective is adopted, with participation hypothesised to reflect the costs and benefits attaching to attending the two types of institution. The initial expansion of higher education resulted in a widening of the participation gap between the higher professional and other groups, with some reduction thereafter as higher professional groups reached near-saturation levels. The removal of higher education tuition fees in 1996 was not sufficient to increase working-class participation in a context where other direct costs remained high and employment represented an attractive option. The period analysed saw a significant shift in the gender composition of higher education entrants, with young women now making up the majority. This article points to the value of taking a dynamic approach to analysing higher education participation, unpacking the effects of expansion in provision and of the costs and benefits attached to higher education entry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Shavit and Blossfeld (1993), however, find little evidence of maximally maintained inequality in their study of 13 countries.

  2. These figures refer to institutions recognised by the Department of Education and Skills and so exclude private colleges.

  3. Entry for those without upper secondary qualifications is generally only possible for those aged 23 years or more rather than for school leavers.

  4. An alternative approach would involve graphing the probabilities of entering higher education sectors over time. In such a figure, both relative and actual participation rates will change over time. Because the focus here is on relative differences in entry by social class, we use odds ratios rather than probabilities to present a clearer picture. Odds ratios are commonly used in social stratification research, including research on higher education entry (see, for example, Roksa 2008).

References

  • Arum, R., Gamoran, A., & Shavit, Y. (2007). More inclusion than diversion: Expansion, differentiation and market structure in higher education. In Y. Shavit, R. Arum, & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Stratification in higher education: A comparative study (pp. 1–35). California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R., & Hecken, A. E. (2009). Why are working-class children diverted from universities? An empirical assessment of the diversion thesis. European Sociological Review, 25(2), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boriani, R., & Strauss, H. (2007). The private internal returns to tertiary education. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. (1997). Explaining educational differentials—Towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society, 9(3), 275–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R., Hannan, D. F., Rottman, D. B., & Whelan, C. T. (1990). Understanding contemporary Ireland. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callender, C., & Jackson, J. (2005). Does the fear of debt deter students from higher education? Journal of Social Policy, 34(4), 509–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, P. (1988). Who goes to college? A second national survey of participation in higher education. Dublin: Higher Education Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, P. (1995). Access to college: Patterns of continuity and change. Dublin: Higher Education Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, P. (2008). The non-university sector in Irish higher education. In J. S. Taylor, et al. (Eds.), Non-university higher education in Europe (pp. 123–145). Amsterdam: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R. (1984). Social class of men, women and families. Sociology, 18(4), 500–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J., Jackson, M., Yaish, M., & Cox, D. R. (2005). On class differentials in educational attainment. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(27), 9730–9733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (1996). Can education be equalised? The Swedish case in comparative perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. (1995). Class analysis and the reorientation of class theory: The case of persisting differentials in educational attainment. British Journal of Sociology, 47(3), 481–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Authority (HEA). (2009). What do graduates do? The class of 2007. Dublin: Higher Education Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (2002). Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E., O’Connell, P. J., & Smyth, E. (2008). The economic returns to field of study and competencies among higher education graduates in Ireland (p. 242). Dublin: ESRI Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, S. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transition, track mobility and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642–1690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mare, R. D. (1980). Social background and school continuation decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75(370), 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, S., Byrne, D., O’Connell, P. J., Kelly, E., & Doherty, C. (2010a). Hidden disadvantage: A study on the low participation in higher education by the non-manual group. Dublin: Higher Education Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, S., Calvert, E., Smyth, E., & Darmody, M. (2010b). Study on the costs of participation in higher education. Dublin: Higher Education Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, S., McGinnity, F., & O’Connell, P. J. (2009). Changing returns to education during a boom? The case of Ireland. Labour, 23(S1), 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, P. J., McCoy, S., & Clancy, D. (2006). Who went to college? Socio-economic inequality in entry to higher education in the Republic of Ireland in 2004. Higher Education Quarterly, 60(4), 312–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A., & Hout, M. (1993). Maximally maintained inequality: Expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education, 1921–75. Sociology of Education, 66(1), 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roksa, J. (2008). Structuring access to higher education: The role of differentiation and privatization. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 26(1), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavit, Y., & Blossfeld, H. P. (1993). Persistent inequality: Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van De Werfhorst, H. G., Sullivan, A., & Cheung, S. Y. (2003). Social class, ability and choice of subject in secondary and tertiary education in Britain. British Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selina McCoy.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 Influence of social background on type of higher education institution among upper secondary leavers, 1980–2006 (odds ratios); base category—did not participate in higher education
Table 4 Influence of social background and educational performance on type of higher education institution among upper secondary leavers, 1984–2006 (odds ratios); base category—did not participate in higher education

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCoy, S., Smyth, E. Higher education expansion and differentiation in the Republic of Ireland. High Educ 61, 243–260 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9375-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9375-x

Keywords

Navigation