Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do Spanish Dual-Earner Couples Share Unpaid Work Equally?

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study provides empirical evidence on the relationship between the amount of time devoted to housework and childcare in Spanish dual-earner couples and several observable characteristics, paying particular attention to individual and relative earnings. We use daily data drawn from the latest Spanish Time Use Survey (2009–2010). Results show that the time that women spend on housework depends on their relative income. The time allocated by women to housework decreases until they contribute to half of the household income; however, as women’s earnings rise above those of their partners, the amount of housework they perform increases, which supports the compensatory gender display. There is not a clear relationship between the time devoted to housework and their absolute income. For men, relative income has also a negative association with household chores while absolute income does not affect the time they dedicate to housework. Regarding childcare, the time spent by women and men on caring for their children does not depend on either relative or absolute earnings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These advances in the role played by women in the labor market have also been accompanied by a thorough transformation of the family model. Some of these facts are reflected for instance in a decrease of the fertility rate, delayed maternity, an increase of the divorce rate, a higher number of unmarried couples with children or even single parents. According to the Spanish Statistical Institute (INE), the fertility rate felt from 2.8 in 1975 to 1.4 in 2010; the mean age of women at the birth of their first child was 31.2 years in 2010 (32.1 in 2017) while in 1980 it was 28.9; in 2010 for every 100 weddings there were 70 divorces, however, in 1991 the number of divorces was 12.5; the share of births outside marriage in 1990 was 9.6%, rising to 35.5% in 2010 (46.8% in 2017).

  2. We are aware that working full time can hide big differences in the time spent on paid work. However, the survey does not provide sufficiently reliable information to be able to identify such differences. Therefore, we consider that studying couples who declare to work full-time is a reasonable approach to the purpose of this study.

  3. It is worth mentioning that, as there is a certain amount of missing data on the income variable, we have decided to use only those couples where both members report data on income. We consider that the most appropriate methodological option is not to impute data because data imputation can cause serious problems of underestimation of true variance and standard error. This could be detrimental to the accurate interpretation of the results.

  4. To compute the age-group we have taken into account the presence of at least one child of this age-group.

  5. Capturing time spent on childcare is not easy (Sevilla-Sanz et al. 2010) because a high proportion of childcare time takes place at the same time as other activities. Thus, in many studies, time spent on childcare is considered to be underestimated (Robinson and Godbey 1997; Pacholok and Gauthier 2004).

  6. We have re-estimated our models using as a dependent variable, on the one hand, the time dedicated to tasks normally performed by women and, on the other hand, the time dedicated to tasks normally performed by men. The categorization of tasks as feminine or masculine has been carried out taking into account the time that men and women dedicated to each one of them. Thus, we have considered as typically feminine tasks: cooking, cleaning, and laundry. As masculine tasks are included: gardening and pets, maintenance and repairs, shopping and household management.

    The results show that, in the case of women, domestic service maintains the negative and statistically significant sign only when the dependent variable refers to female tasks. This variable is not statistically significant when only male tasks are considered. In the case of men, domestic service is not statistically significant in either case. These findings confirm the idea that domestic service is primarily used for tasks typically performed by women, which are more routinely and time-intensive. Results from these estimations are available upon request.

  7. Results from Tobit model are slightly different since this variable is not statistically significant.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Research Group by the Basque Government «Institutions, Regulation and Economic Policy» (IT1052-16). The authors thank four anonymous referees and the editor of this journal for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catalina Gálvez-Gálvez.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables

Table 7 VIF multiclolinearity test. Time devoted to housework

7,

Table 8 Estimates of the coefficients of Tobit models. Time devoted to housework

8 and

Table 9 Estimates of the coefficients of Tobit models. Time devoted to childcare

9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altuzarra, A., Gálvez-Gálvez, C. & González-Flores, A. Do Spanish Dual-Earner Couples Share Unpaid Work Equally?. Soc Indic Res 150, 731–763 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02346-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02346-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation