Skip to main content
Log in

Convergence of Health Care Expenditures Across the US States: A Reconsideration

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current evidence on the convergence of health care expenditures across the US states into a single convergence club is non-existent. Against this backdrop, we use a modified panel unit root test that accounts for smooth structural changes, spanning the period of 1966–2009. The results illustrate that the ratio of the individual health care expenditures relative to the cross-sectional average is broken trend-stationary, not only in the aggregate panel, but also across all 50 US states. The findings also document that the evidence of convergence is possibly due to the convergence of personal disposable income across the US states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For instance, integration in health care markets and common policies related to the promotion of health, living and working conditions, as well as, coordination of health-related research (Wang 2009).

  2. Enders and Lee (2012) suggest that the frequencies in (2) should be obtained via the minimization of the sum of squared residuals. However, their Monte Carlo experiments suggest that no more than one or two frequencies should be used, due to the loss of power associated with a larger number of frequencies.

  3. For the sake of completeness, we also implemented the IPS test with only a constant, and with and without the Fourier function. In the former case, the null hypothesis of unit root could not be rejected even at the 10 % level of significance, with the test statistic generating a value of −1.4031. In the case we included the Fourier function, the null of a unit root was rejected at the 1 % level of significance, with the value of the IPS test statistic being −2.1655. However, when we implemented the SPSM methodology, we found that only 11 out of the 50 states were showing evidence of convergence in health care expenditures. However, given the data plots which clearly showed a trend in the data, the more accurate specification of the IPS test should include a trend and a stronger rejection of the null in the case where the IPS test equation specification includes a trend vindicates our point.

  4. As a robustness check, using the club clustering methodology of Phillips and Sul (2007), we also obtained strong evidence of convergence in the real per capita health care expenditures, as suggested by the presence of only one convergence club across all 50 states. The time-varying convergence paths also indicated that convergence across the states started to take place quite early in the sample period, with complete convergence taking place towards the end of the same period. Complete details of these results are available upon request from the authors. Note that in the Phillips and Sul (2007) approach, the metric of interest is the natural logarithmic values of real per capita health care expenditures.

  5. Interestingly however, the methodology of Phillips and Sul (2007) indicates that the null hypothesis of a single convergent club for real per capita personal disposable income is rejected, suggesting the presence of three clubs. Complete details of these results are available upon request.

  6. At this stage it is important to specify that given the evidence of cross-sectional dependence, as indicated by Pesaran’s (2004) test for both our metrics on health care expenditures and personal disposable income, the critical values for the modified IPS test are obtained using 10,000 bootstrap replications. The Pesaran (2004) test statistics of cross-sectional dependence obtained for the metric for the health care expenditure and personal disposable income was equal to 2.8036 (p value = 0.0051), and −3.3282 (p-value = 0.0009), respectively, implying the rejection of the null of cross-sectional independence in both cases.

References

  • Abiad, A., Leigh, D., & Mody, A. (2007). International finance and income convergence: Europe is different, IMF working paper, WP/07/64.

  • Aslan, A. (2008). Convergence of per capita health care expenditures in OECD countries. MPRA paper, no. 10592.

  • Becker, R., Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2004). A general test for time dependence in parameters. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19, 899–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David, D. (1996). Trade and convergence among countries. Journal of International Economics, 40, 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In B. H. Baltagi (Ed.), Advances in econometrics: Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels (Vol. 15, pp. 161–178). Amsterdam: JAY Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Canarella, G., Miller, S. M., & Pollard, S. K. (2012). Unit roots and structural change: An application to US house-price indices. Urban Studies, 49, 757–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporale, G. M., Cunado, J., Gil-Alana, L. A., and Gupta, R. (2015). The relationship between health care expenditure and disposable personal income in the US States: A fractional integration and cointegration analysis. Department of Economics, University of Pretoria, Working paper no. 201532.

  • Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L. (2005). Health care expenditure and GDP: Are they broken stationary? Journal of Health Economics, 24, 839–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T., Wu, T. P., & Gupta, R. (2015). Are house prices in South Africa really nonstationary? Evidence from SPSM-based panel KSS test with a Fourier function. Applied Economics, 47, 32–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chortareas, G., & Kapetanios, G. (2009). Getting PPP right: Identifying mean-reverting real exchange rates in panels. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33, 390–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, W. L. (2007). Explaining China’s regional health expenditures using LM-type unit root tests. Journal of Health Economics, 26, 682–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, H., & Saracoglu, B. (2007). International finance and income convergence: Europe is different? International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 12, 160–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2012). A unit root test using a Fourier series to approximate smooth breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74, 574–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallahi, F. (2011). Convergence of total health expenditure as a share of GDP: Evidence from selected OECD countries. MPRA paper no. 51324.

  • Freeman, D. G. (2012). Is health care a necessity or a luxury? New evidence from a panel of US state-level data. Sam Houston State University economics and international business working paper, no. 12-03.

  • Gallant, A. R. (1981). On the bias in flexible functional forms and an essentially unbiased form: The Fourier flexible form. Journal of Econometrics, 15, 211–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitiris, T. (1997). Health care expenditure and integration in the countries of the European Union. Applied Economics, 29, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitiris, T., & Nixon, J. (2001). Convergence of health care expenditure in the EU countries. Applied Economics Letters, 8, 223–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmarcher, M. M., Riedel, M., & Röhrling, G. (2004). Health expenditure in the EU: Convergence by enlargement?. IHS Health System Watch.

  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitila, V. (2004). Convergence of real GDP per capita in the EU15—How do the accession countries fit in? ENEPRI working paper no 25, January.

  • Kerem, K., Pϋss, T., Viies, M., & Maldre, R. (2008). Health and convergence of health care expenditure in EU. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(3), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, C. K. M., Fung, K. W. T., & Pugalis, L. (2014). Is health care expenditures across Europe converging? Eurasian Business Review, 4(2), 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, M. A., & Resende, M. (2007). Convergence of per capita GDP in Brazil: An empirical note. Applied Economic Letters, 14, 333–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S., & Kim, I. M. (1998). Unit roots, cointegration, and structural change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montanari, I., & Nelson, K. (2013). Social services decline and system convergence: How does health care fare? Journal of European Social Policy, 23(1), 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K. (2006). Examining structural breaks and growth rates in international health expenditures. Journal of Health Economics, 25, 877–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K. (2007). Do health expenditures ‘catch-up’? Evidence from OECD countries. Health Economics, 16, 993–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K. (2009). Are health expenditures and GDP characterized by asymmetric behaviour? Evidence from 11 OECD countries. Applied Economics, 41, 531–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K. (2010). Modelling health and output at business cycle horizons for the USA. Health Economics, 19, 872–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2008a). Does environmental quality influence health expenditures? Empirical evidence from a panel of selected OECD countries. Ecological Economics, 65, 367–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2008b). The role of permanent and transitory shocks in explaining international health expenditures. Health Economics, 17, 1171–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K., Narayan, S., & Smyth, R. (2011). Is health care really a luxury in OECD countries? Evidence from alternative price deflators. Applied Economics, 43, 3631–3643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, P. K., & Popp, S. (2012). A nonlinear approach to testing the unit root null hypothesis: An application to international health expenditures. Applied Economics, 44, 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, J. (1999). Convergence analysis of health care expenditure in the EU countries using two approaches. The University of York discussion papers in economics, no. 1999/03.

  • Okunade, A. A., Karakus, M. C., & Okeke, C. (2004). Determinants of health expenditure growth of the OECD countries: Jackknife resampling plan estimates. Health Care Management Science, 7, 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panopoulou, E., & Pantelidis, T. (2011). Convergence in per capita health expenditures and health outcomes in OECD countries. Applied Economics, 44(30), 3909–3920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascalau, R. (2010). Unit root tests with smooth breaks: An application to the Nelson–Plosser data set. Applied Economics Letters, 17, 565–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekkurnaz, D. (2015). Convergence of health expenditure in OECD countries: Evidence from a non-linear asymmetric heterogeneous panel unit root test. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 4, 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, H. M. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge working papers in economics, no. 0435.

  • Phillips, P. C., & Sul, D. (2007). Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica, 75, 1771–1855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rettenmaier, A. J., & Wang, Z. (2006). Persistence in medicare reimbursements and personal medical accounts. Journal of Health Economics, 25, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C., & Starke, P. (2011). Explaining convergence of OECD welfare states: a conditional approach. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(2), 120–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. (2009). The convergence of health care expenditure in the US states. Health Economics, 18, 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank two anonymous referees for many helpful comments and suggestions that significantly improved the quality of this work. Needless to say, any remaining errors are solely ours. We would like to thank Donald G. Freeman, Sam Houston State University, for providing us with the dataset.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Apergis.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 1 and 2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Apergis, N., Chang, T., Christou, C. et al. Convergence of Health Care Expenditures Across the US States: A Reconsideration. Soc Indic Res 133, 303–316 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1357-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1357-7

Keywords

Navigation