Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Education and Life Satisfaction in Relation to the Probability of Social Trust: a Conceptual Framework and Empirical Analysis

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We employ cross-sectional microdata from 2010 through 2012 collected by the Italian National Institute of Statistics to investigate the proposed conceptual framework regarding the joint relationship between education, life satisfaction and the probability of social trust. The analysis has been carried out using two alternative specifications of the logit model: parametric and semiparametric. Our findings suggest that (a) both modelling methods that we utilise yield consistent results in terms of the positive effects of education and life satisfaction on social trust; (b) for unsatisfied individuals, social trust is generally low and largely unresponsive to the individual’s education level, whereas for ‘sufficiently satisfied’ individuals, social trust increases strongly with education; (c) there are some gender differences in the joint relationship between education, life satisfaction and social trust and (d) the parametric approach tends to mask some interesting patterns that are captured by the semiparametric specification. This finding implies that the parametric approach leads to a biased interpretation of the results, with an apparent failure of some of the assumptions made in the conceptual framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The macro-areas are as follows: north-western Italy (consisting of the following regions: Piemonte, Valle d’Aosta, Lombardia and Liguria); north-eastern Italy (Trentino Alto-Adige, Veneto, Friuli-Venezia Giulia and Emilia Romagna); central Italy (Toscana, Umbria, Marche and Lazio); southern Italy (Abruzzo, Molise, Campania, Puglia, Basilicata, and Calabria); and the islands (Sicilia and Sardegna).

  2. The variable was categorised during the process of data collection.

  3. Whereas Putnam (1996) argues that the decline in social trust in the US can be attributed in part to increased television viewing, Uslaner (1998) found that when measures of optimism are considered as factors associated with trust, the effects of television vanish. Here, we are not able to control directly for optimism of individuals because of lack of information in this regard.

References

  • Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85, 207–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, B. K., OH, H., & Sharma, S. (2014). ‘Crowding in’ or ‘crowding out’? An examination of the impact of the welfare state on generalized social trust. International Journal of Social Welfare, 23, 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A., & Solnick, S. (2008). Trust and gender: An examination of behavior and beliefs in the investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68, 466–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buetell, N. (2006). Life satisfaction, a Sloan Work and Family Encyclopedia entry. Retrieved May 10, 2007, from the Sloan Work and Family Research Network website: https://workfamily.sas.upenn.edu/glossary/l/life-satisfaction-definition.

  • Busseri, M. A. (2012). How dispositional optimists and pessimists evaluate their past, present, and anticipated future life satisfaction: A lifespan approach. European Journal of Personality, 27, 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busseri, M. A., Malinowski, A., & Choma, B. L. (2013). Are optimists oriented uniquely toward the future? Investigating dispositional optimism from a temporally-expanded perpective. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 533–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Eisenberg, N., & Alessandri, G. (2016). Positivity: The dispositional basis of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi:10.1007/s10902-016-9728-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A., Paichayontvijit, T., & Shen, L. (2013). Gender differences in trust and trustworthiness: Individuals, single sex and mixed sex groups. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C., Gelfand, M. J., Yamagishi, T., Shteynberg, G., & Wan, C. (2010). Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective perceptions in cross cultural research. Perspective on Psychological Science, 5, 482–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, S. A., & Mishra, V. (2016). Trust, social network and subjective wellbeing in China. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-1220-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Aquino, J. A. (2015). The meaning of trust for Brazilians with higher education. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-1178-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearmon, J., & Grier, K. (2009). Trust and development. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 71, 210–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2003). Who trusts? The origins of social trust in seven societies. European Societies, 5, 93–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrache, C. G., Windle, G., & Herrera, R. R. (2015). Do social resources explain the relationship between optimism and life satisfaction in community-dwelling older people? Testing a multiple mediation model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 633–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurofound. (2012). Third European quality of life survey–Quality of life in Europe: Impacts of the crisis. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrouste, C. (2011). 100 Years of educational reforms in Europe: A contextual database. MPRA Paper No. 31853.

  • Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, M., & Jordahl, H. (2008). Inequality and trust in Sweden: Some inequalities are more harmful than others. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 348–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haselhuhn, M. P., Kennedy, J. A., Kray, L. J., Van Zant, A. B., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2015). Gender differences in trust dynamics: Women trust more than men following a trust violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 104–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1990). Generalized additive models. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (1995). Economic growth and social capital in Italy. Eastern Economic Journal, 21, 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359, 1435–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2007). Education and social capital. Eastern Economic Journal, 33, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herreros, F., & Criado, H. (2008). The state and the development of social trust. International Political Science Review, 29, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., van de Brink, H. M., & Groot, W. (2009). A meta-analysis of the effect of education on social capital. Economics of Education Review, 28, 454–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., van de Brink, H. M., & Groot, W. (2011). College education and social trust: An evidence-based study on the causal mechanisms. Social Indicators Research, 104, 287–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT (2013). Noi Italia: Deprivation synthetic index. http://noi-italia2013en.istat.it/. Accessed December 27, 2013.

  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R. (2010). In Italy, north-south differences in IQ predict differences in income, education, infant mortality, stature, and literacy. Intelligence, 38, 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marra, G., Miller, D. L., & Zanin, L. (2012). Modelling the spatiotemporal distribution of the incidence of residence foreign population. Statistica Neerlandica, 66, 133–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, S. (1994). Optimism and pessimism in trust. In Proceedings of the Ibero-American conference on artificial intelligence (IBERAMIA 1994). McGraw-Hill Publishing.

  • Mayer, A. (2015). Recession and life satisfaction in 35 countries. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 2, 118–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. (1996). Trust in modern societies: The search for the bases of social order. New York: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohd Arif, L.-S., Rahim Khan, F., & Idid, S. A. (2012). Explaining social capital: A study of the effects of satisfaction with life on social capital. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 42, 181–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platow, M. J., Foddy, M., Yamagishi, T., Lim, L., & Chow, A. (2012). Two experimental tests of trust in group strangers: The moderating role of common knowledge of group membership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1996). The strange disappearance of civic America. The American Prospect, 34–48.

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Political science. Washington, DC: Association of American Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rampichini, C., & Schifini d’Andrea, S. (1998). A hierarchical ordinal probit model for the analysis of life satisfaction in Italy. Social Indicators Research, 44, 41–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, S. (2010). The impact of corruption on social trust. American Politics Research, 38, 676–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B., & Eek, D. (2009). Political corruption and social trust: An experimental approach. Rationality and Society, 21, 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of wellbeing: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strassle, C. G., McKee, E. A., & Plant, D. D. (1999). Optimism as an indicator of psychological health: Using psychological assessment wisely. Journal of Personality Assessment, 72, 265–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torpe, L., & Lolle, H. (2011). Identifying social trust in cross-country analysis: Do we really measure the same? Social Indicators Research, 103, 481–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (1998). Social capital, television, and the ‘mean world’: Trust, optimism, and civic participation. Political Psychology, 19, 441–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deth, J., Maraffi, M., Newton, K., & Whiteley, P. (1999). Social capital and European democracy. London: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, M. R., Rivera, R. E. N., Conway, B. P., Yonkoski, J., Lupton, P. M., & Giancola, R. (2005). Determinants and consequences of social trust. Sociological Inquiry, 75, 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. N. (2015). Mixed GAM computation vehicle with GCV/AIC/REML smoothness estimation. Software R, Package: mgcv 1.8-11

  • Yamagishi, T., Kikuchi, M., & Kosugi, M. (1999). Trust, gullibility and social intelligence. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal, 111, 295–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanin, L. (2013). Detecting unobserved heterogeneity in the relationship between subjective well-being and satisfaction in various domains of life using the REBUS-PLS path modelling approach: A case study. Social Indicators Research, 110, 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanin, L., & Marra, G. (2012). A comparative study of the use of generalized additive models and generalized linear models in tourism research. International Journal of Tourism Research, 14, 451–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanin, L., Radice, R., & Marra, G. (2013). Estimating the effect of perceived risk of crime on social trust in the presence of endogeneity bias. Social Indicators Research, 114, 523–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanin, L., Radice, R., & Marra, G. (2015). Modelling the impact of women’s education on fertility in Malawi. Journal of Population Economics, 28, 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for many suggestions that have helped to improve the presentation and quality of the article. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not reflect those of the institution of affiliation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Zanin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 6 and 7.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Distribution of the predicted probabilities of social trust obtained using model (1). Plots (a, b) show boxplots of the predicted probabilities of social trust among highly educated men (≥18 years of education) who are extremely satisfied (life satisfaction ≥8) or unsatisfied (life satisfaction ≤4) with life, respectively, given the other control variables at their observed values. Plots (c, d) show the results for the same combinations for the sample of women. Plots (e, f) show boxplots of the predicted probabilities of social trust among individuals who have a basic educational level (≤5 years of education) and are extremely satisfied (life satisfaction ≥8) or unsatisfied (life satisfaction ≤4) with life, respectively, given the other control variables at their observed values. Plots (g, h) show the results for the same combinations for the sample of women

Fig. 7
figure 7

Distribution of the predicted probabilities of social trust obtained using model (2). Plots (a, b) show boxplots of the predicted probabilities of social trust among men who are highly educated (≥18 years of education) and extremely satisfied (life satisfaction ≥8) or unsatisfied (life satisfaction ≤4) with life, respectively, given the other control variables at their observed values. Plots (c, d) show the results for the same combinations for the sample of women. Plots (e, f) show boxplots of the predicted probabilities of social trust among individuals who have a basic educational level (≤5 years of education) and are extremely satisfied (life satisfaction ≥8) or unsatisfied (life satisfaction ≤4) with life, respectively, given the other control variables at their observed values. Plots (g, h) show the results for the same combinations for the sample of women

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zanin, L. Education and Life Satisfaction in Relation to the Probability of Social Trust: a Conceptual Framework and Empirical Analysis. Soc Indic Res 132, 925–947 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1322-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1322-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation