Abstract
Many see trust as an important social resource for the welfare of individuals as well as nations. It is therefore important to be able to identify trust and explain its sources. Cross-country survey analysis has been an important tool in this respect, and often one single variable is used to identify social trust understood as trust in strangers, namely: “Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you can’t be too careful in dealing with people?” The question, however, is whether this variable captures the meaning of social trust equally well in all countries. This is investigated by comparing different measurements of trust across five clusters of countries in all parts of the world. The analysis shows that there are considerable problems associated with the use of the variable of “most can be trusted” as an indicator of trust in strangers, both in terms of strangers understood as “people you meet for the first time” and in terms of strangers understood as people of a different nationality and religion. These results question the validity of previous investigations of social trust based on international survey material. The analysis furthermore reveals that a new survey question about trust in people one is meeting for the first time is better suited as indicator of social trust in comparative analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
(.504–.251)/.504 = .501.
References
Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trust others? Journal of Public Economics, 85, 207–234.
Anderson, C. J., & Paskeviciute, A. (2006). How ethnic and linguistic heterogeneity influence theprospect for civil society: A comparative study of citizenship behavior. The Journal of Politics, 68, 783–802.
Banting, K., Johnston, R., Kymlicka, W., & Soroka, S. (2009). Do multiculturalism policies erode the welfare state? An empirical analysis. In K. Banting & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), Multiculturalism and the welfare state: Recognition and redistribution in contemporaty democracies (pp. 49–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bjørnskov, C. (2006). Determinant of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison. Public Choice, 130, 1–21.
Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national level of social trust: Global pattern or nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(3), 311–327.
Freitag, M., & Tranmüller, R. (2009). Spheres of trust: An empirical analysis of the foundation of particularized and generalized trust. European Journal of Political Research, 48(6), 782–803.
Harding, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Harding, R. (2006). Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Herreros, F., & Criado, H. (2008). The state and the devopment of social trust. International Political Science Review, 29(1), 53–71.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization. Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Prindeton: Princeton University Press.
Miller, A. S., & Mitamura, T. (2003). Are surveys on trust trustworthy? Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 62–70.
Nannestad, P. (2008). What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything? The Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 413–436.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collaps and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Reeskens, T., & Hooghe, M. (2008). Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of generalized trust. Evidence from European Social Survey (2002 and 2004). Social Indicator Research, 85, 515–532.
Rothstein, B. (2003). Sociala fällor och tillitens problem. Stockholm: SNS-förlag.
Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2003). Social capital in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Political Studies, 26(1), 1–26.
Sturgis, P., & Smith, P. (2010). Assessing the validity of generalized trust questions: What kind of trust are we measuring? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(1), 74–92.
Sztompka, P. (1998). Trust, distrust and two paradoxes of democracy. European Journal of Social Theory, 1, 19–38.
Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundation of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A
See Table 7.
Appendix B
See Table 8.
Appendix C
See Table 9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Torpe, L., Lolle, H. Identifying Social Trust in Cross-Country Analysis: Do We Really Measure the Same?. Soc Indic Res 103, 481–500 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9713-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9713-5