Abstract
For a given stiffness tensor (tensor of elastic moduli) of a generally anisotropic medium, we estimate to what extent the medium is transversely isotropic (uniaxial) and determine the direction of its reference symmetry axis expressed in terms of the unit reference symmetry vector. If the medium is exactly transversely isotropic (exactly uniaxial), we obtain the direction of its symmetry axis. We can also calculate the first–order and second–order spatial derivatives of the reference symmetry vector which may be useful in tracing the reference rays for the coupling ray theory. The proposed method is tested using various transversely isotropic (uniaxial) and approximately transversely isotropic (approximately uniaxial) media.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arts R.J., Helbig K. and Rasolofosaon P.N.J., 1991. General anisotropic elastic tensor in rocks: approximation, invariants, and particular directions. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1991, 10, 1534–1537.
Bakker P.M., 2002. Coupled anisotropic shear wave raytracing in situations where associated slowness sheets are almost tangent. Pure Appl. Geophys., 159, 1403–1417.
Bucha V., 2012. Kirchhoff prestack depth migration in 3–D simple models: comparison of triclinic anisotropy with simpler anisotropies. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 56, 533–552.
Bucha V., 2013a. Kirchhoff prestack depth migration in velocity models with and without vertical gradients: Comparison of triclinic anisotropy with simpler anisotropies. Seismic Waves in Complex 3–D Structures, 23, 45–59 (http://sw3d.cz).
Bucha V., 2013b. Kirchhoff prestack depth migration in velocity models with and without rotation of the tensor of elastic moduli: Poorly displayed part of migrated interface in correct model with triclinic anisotropy. Seismic Waves in Complex 3–D Structures, 23, 61–69 (http://sw3d.cz).
Bucha V., 2013c. Kirchhoff prestack depth migration in velocity models with and without rotation of the tensor of elastic moduli: Orthorhombic and triclinic anisotropy. Seismic Waves in Complex 3–D Structures, 23, 71–80 (http://sw3d.cz).
Bucha V., 2014a. Kirchhoff prestack depth migration in orthorhombic velocity models with differently rotated tensors of elastic moduli. Seismic Waves in Complex 3–D Structures, 24, 59–75 (http://sw3d.cz).
Bucha V., 2014b. Kirchhoff prestack depth migration in triclinic velocity models with differently rotated tensors of elastic moduli. Seismic Waves in Complex 3–D Structures, 24, 77–93 (http://sw3d.cz).
Bucha V., 2015. Kirchhoff prestack depth migration in a homogeneous triclinic velocity model for P, Sand converted waves. Seismic Waves in Complex 3–D Structures, 25, 89–102 (http://sw3d.cz).
Bucha V., 2016. Kirchhoff prestack depth migration in simple orthorhombic and triclinic models with differently rotated elasticity tensor: comparison with zero–offset travel–time perturbations. Seismic Waves in Complex 3–D Structures, 26, 81–102 (http://sw3d.cz).
Bucha V. and Bulant P. (Eds), 2015. SW3D–CD–19 (DVD–ROM). Seismic Waves in Complex 3–D Structures, 25, 209–210 (http://sw3d.cz).
Bulant P. and Klimeš L., 2002. Numerical algorithm of the coupling ray theory in weakly anisotropic media. Pure Appl. Geophys., 159, 1419–1435.
Bulant P. and Klimeš L., 2008. Numerical comparison of the isotropic–common–ray and anisotropic–common–ray approximations of the coupling ray theory. Geophys. J. Int., 175, 357–374.
Bulant P. and Klimeš L., 2014. Anisotropic–ray–theory geodesic deviation and two–point ray tracing through a split intersection singularity. Seismic Waves in Complex 3–D Structures, 24, 179–187 (http://sw3d.cz).
Coates R.T. and Chapman C.H., 1990. Quasi–shear wave coupling in weakly anisotropic 3-D media. Geophys. J. Int., 103, 301–320.
Cowin S.C. and Mehrabadi M.M., 1987. On the identification of material symmetry for anisotropic elastic materials. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math., 40, 451–476.
Klimeš L., 2006. Common–ray tracing and dynamic ray tracing for S waves in a smooth elastic anisotropic medium. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 50, 449–461.
Klimeš L. and Bulant P., 2004. Errors due to the common ray approximations of the coupling ray theory. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 48, 117–142.
Klimeš L. and Bulant P., 2006. Errors due to the anisotropic–common–ray approximation of the coupling ray theory. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 50, 463–477.
Klimeš L. and Bulant P., 2012. Single–frequency approximation of the coupling ray theory. Seismic Waves in Complex 3–D Structures, 22, 143–167 (http://sw3d.cz).
Klimeš L. and Bulant P., 2014a. Prevailing–frequency approximation of the coupling ray theory for S waves along the SH and SVreference rays in a transversely isotropic medium. Seismic Waves in Complex 3–D Structures, 24, 165–177 (http://sw3d.cz).
Klimeš L. and Bulant P., 2014b. Anisotropic–ray–theory rays in velocity model SC1–II with a split intersection singularity. Seismic Waves in Complex 3–D Structures, 24, 189–205 (http://sw3d.cz).
Klimeš L. and Bulant P., 2015. Ray tracing and geodesic deviation of the SH and SV reference rays in a heterogeneous generally anisotropic medium which is approximately transversely isotropic. Seismic Waves in Complex 3–D Structures, 25, 187–208 (http://sw3d.cz).
Kochetov M. and Slawinski M.A., 2008. On obtaining effective transversely isotropic elasticity tensors. J. Elast., 94, 1–13.
Mensch T. and Rasolofosaon P., 1997. Elastic–wave velocities in anisotropic media of arbitrary symmetry–generalization of Thomsen’s parameters o, d and Geophys. J. Int., 128, 43–64.
Moakher M. and Norris A.N., 2006. The closest elastic tensor of arbitrary symmetry to an elasticity tensor of lower symmetry. J. Elast., 85, 215–263.
Norris A.N., 2006. Elastic moduli approximation of higher symmetry for the acoustical properties of an anisotropic material. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 119, 2114–2121.
Pšencík I. and Dellinger J., 2001. Quasi–shear waves in inhomogeneous weakly anisotropic media by the quasi–isotropic approach: A model study. Geophysics, 66, 308–319.
Pšencík I., Farra V. and Tessmer E., 2012. Comparison of the FORT approximation of the coupling ray theory with the Fourier pseudospectral method. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 56, 35–64.
Schoenberg M. and Helbig K., 1997. Orthorhombic media: Modeling elastic wave behavior in a vertically fractured earth. Geophysics, 62, 1954–1974.
Shearer P.M. and Chapman C.H., 1989. Ray tracing in azimuthally anisotropic media — I. Results for models of aligned cracks in the upper crust. Geophys. J., 96, 51–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Klimeš, L. Determination of the reference symmetry axis of a generally anisotropic medium which is approximately transversely isotropic. Stud Geophys Geod 60, 391–402 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-0482-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-0482-0