Abstract
The two most important citation indexes used by the global science community contain marked regional disparities in their representation of academic journals. Existing work on the geographical coverage of Web of Science and Scopus citation indexes compared their coverage of journals in a small sample of ‘top’ countries. This paper offers the first regional analysis of journal representation in these two indexes across all eight UNESCO world regions, compared to the total number of active Ulrich’s directory academic journals in these regions. Journal lists from 239 countries/territories were collected from Ulrich’s periodical directory and analyzed by region. This enables a comparison of the regional distribution of journals within Web of Science (20,255 matched journals) and Scopus (23,348 matched journals) with those in Ulrich’s directory (83,429 journals). Journals published in Europe, Oceania and North America were more likely to be indexed in Scopus and Web of Science compared to other world regions. Journals published in sub-Saharan Africa were the most underrepresented and were four times less likely to be indexed than those published in Europe. The analysis also offers a quantitative breakdown of journal publication languages, highlighting how Scopus and Web of Science disproportionately index English language publications in all world regions. Finally, the analysis shows how field coverage by Web of Science and Scopus differs between the regions, with the Social Sciences and Humanities still under-represented, in comparison to Natural Sciences and Medical & Health Science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data is available through this DOI: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17632/cvx3f5bk4p.2
References
Abrizah, A., Zainab, A. N., Kiran, K., & Raj, R. G. (2013). LIS journals scientific impact and subject categorization: A comparison between Web of Scinece and Scopus. Scientometrics, 94(2), 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0813-7
Aksnes, D. W., & Sivertsen, G. (2019). A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0001
Aksnes, D. W., Sivertsen, G., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Wendt, K. K. (2017). Measuring the productivity of national R&D systems: Challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicators. Science and Public Policy, 44(2), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw058
Algañaraz, V., Prado, F., & Rossomando, M. P. (2023). Indicators of research circulation: Localization and internationalization under scrutiny—The Cuyo manual and its exploratory case study in Argentina. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(1), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00229
Archambault, E., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320–1326.
Arunachalam, S., & Garg, K. C. (1986). Science on the periphery—A scientometric analysis of science in the ASEAN countries. Journal of Information Science, 12(3), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158601200303
Asubiaro, T. (2019). How collaboration type, publication place, funding and author’s role affect citations received by publications from Africa? A bibliometric study of LIS research from 1996 to 2015. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1261–1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03157-1
Asubiaro, T. V. (2023). Sub-Saharan Africa’s biomedical journal coverage in scholarly databases: A comparison of Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, African index medicus, and African journals online. Journal of the Medical Library Association. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2023.1448
Asubiaro, T. V., & Onaolapo, S. (2023). A comparative study of the coverage of african journals in Web of Science, Scopus and crossref. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology., 74, 745. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24758
Asubiaro, T. V., & Shaik, H. (2021). Sub-Saharan African countries’ COVID-19 Research: An analysis of the external and internal contributions, collaboration patterns and funding sources. Open Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2020-0125
Aydinli, E., & Mathews, J. (2000). Are the core and periphery irreconcilable? The curious world of publishing in contemporary international relations. International Studies Perspectives, 1(3), 289–303.
Barnett, P., & Lascar, C. (2012). Comparing unique title coverage of Web of Science and Scopus in earth and atmospheric sciences. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1558
Bartol, T., Budimir, G., Dekleva-Smrekar, D., Pusnik, M., & Juznic, P. (2014). Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1491–1504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1148-8
Beigel, F., Almeida, A. M., Gallardo, O., Digiampietri, L., Gomez, S., Candido, M. R., Ciriza, A., Rossomando, P., Moschkovich, M., & Pecheny, M. (2023). Scientific production and gender inequalities in two academic elites: Brazil and Argentina. Revue D’histoire Des Sciences Humaines. https://doi.org/10.4000/rhsh.8374
Bhakuni, H., & Abimbola, S. (2021). Epistemic injustice in academic global health. The Lancet Global Health, 9(10), e1465–e1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00301-6
Bohórquez, D. A. C. (2016). Universalism and Particularism: Explaining the Emergence and Growth of Regional Journal Indexing Systems [Doctoral Thesis]. University of Sussex.
Boshoff, N., & Akanmu, M. A. (2017). Scopus or Web of Science for a bibliometric profile of pharmacy research at a Nigerian university? South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.7553/83-2-1682
Céspedes, L. (2021). Latin America and the Caribbeann journals and hegemonic languages for academic publishing in Scopus and Web of Science. Trabalhos Em Linguística Aplicada, 60, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1590/010318138901311520201214
Chataway, J., Dobson, C., Daniels, C., Byrne, R., Hanlin, R., & Tigabu, A. (2019). Science granting councils in Sub-Saharan Africa: Trends and tensions. Science and Public Policy, 46(4), 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz007
Chavarro, D., Tang, P., & Ràfols, I. (2017). Why researchers publish in non-mainstream journals: Training, knowledge bridging, and gap filling. Research Policy, 46(9), 1666–1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.002
Colavizza, G., Peroni, S., & Romanello, M. (2022). The case for the Humanities Citation Index (HuCI): A citation index by the humanities, for the humanities. International Journal on Digital Libraries. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-022-00327-0
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. M. (2014). Strategies and tactics in academic knowledge production by multilingual scholars. Education Policy Analysis Archives. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n32.2014
Csiszar, A. (2023). Provincializing impact: From imperial anxiety to algorithmic universalism. Osiris, 38, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1086/725131
de Moya-Anegón, F., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., Corera-Álvarez, E., Muñoz-Fernández, F. J., González-Molina, A., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2007). Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach. Scientometrics, 73(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1681-4
Englander, K., & Smith, S. (2013). The role of policy in constructing the peripheral scientist in the era of globalization. Language Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9268-1
Feng, H., Beckett, G. H., & Huang, D. (2013). From ‘import’ to ‘import—export’ oriented internationalization: The impact of national policy on scholarly publication in China. Language Policy, 12(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9285-8
Frame, J. D., & Narin, F. (1988). The national self-preoccupation of American scientists: An empirical view. Research Policy, 17(4), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(88)90049-2
Frenken, K., Heimeriks, G. J., & Hoekman, J. (2017). What drives university research performance? An analysis using the CWTS Leiden Ranking data. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 859–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.006
Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.546100
Gallagher, E. J., & Barnaby, D. P. (1998). Evidence of methodologic bias in the derivation of the science citation index impact factor. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 31(1), 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70286-0
Garfield, E. (1971). The mystery of the transposed journal lists—Wherein Bradford’s Law of Scattering is generalized according to Garfield’s Law of Concentration. Current Comments, 17, 222–223.
Garfield, E. (1983). Mapping science in the third world. Science and Public Policy, 10(3), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/10.3.112
Garfield, E. (1997). A statistically valid definition of bias is needed to determine whether the Science Citation Index® discriminates against third world journals. Current Science, 73(8), 639–641.
Gibbs, W. W. (1995). Lost Science in the third world. Scientific American, 273(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0895-92
Gingras, Y., & Khelfaoui, M. (2018). Assessing the effect of the United States’ “citation advantage” on other countries’ scientific impact as measured in the Web of Science (WoS) database. Scientometrics, 114(2), 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2593-6
Goodwin, J., & Garfield, E. (1980). Citation Indexing-Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. Technology and Culture, 21(4), 714. https://doi.org/10.2307/3104125
Haddawy, P., Hassan, S.-U., Abbey, C. W., & Lee, I. B. (2017). Uncovering fine-grained research excellence: The global research benchmarking system. Journal of Informetrics, 11(2), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.004
Harsh, M., Bal, R., Weryha, A., Whatley, J., Onu, C. C., & Negro, L. M. (2021). Mapping computer science research in Africa: Using academic networking sites for assessing research activity. Scientometrics, 126(1), 305–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03727-8
Harzing, A. W. (2016). Do google scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science speak your language? Harzing.Com. https://harzing.com/publications/white-papers/do-google-scholar-scopus-and-the-web-of-science-speak-your-language
Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
Hedt-Gauthier, B. L., Jeufack, H. M., Neufeld, N. H., Alem, A., Sauer, S., Odhiambo, J., Boum, Y., Shuchman, M., & Volmink, J. (2019). Stuck in the middle: A systematic review of authorship in collaborative health research in Africa, 2014–2016. BMJ Global Health, 4(5), e001853. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001853
Horton, R. (2022). Offline: The scramble for science. The Lancet, 400(10357), 983. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01750-0
Huang (Karl), C.-K., Neylon, C., Brookes-Kenworthy, C., Hosking, R., Montgomery, L., Wilson, K., & Ozaygen, A. (2020). Comparison of bibliographic data sources: Implications for the robustness of university rankings. Quantitative Science Studies. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00031
Kasprowicz, V. O., Chopera, D., Waddilove, K. D., Brockman, M. A., Gilmour, J., Hunter, E., Kilembe, W., Karita, E., Gaseitsiwe, S., Sanders, E. J., & Ndung’u, T. (2020). African-led health research and capacity building- is it working? BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08875-3
Korytkowski, P., & Kulczycki, E. (2019). Examining how country-level science policy shapes publication patterns: The case of Poland. Scientometrics, 119(3), 1519–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03092-1
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital Era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
Lee, H., & Lee, K. (2013). Publish (in international indexed journals) or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a Korean university. Language Policy, 12(3), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9267-2
López-Illescas, C., de Moya-Anegón, F., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001
Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology, Human Values, 17(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700106
Luwel, M. (1999). Is the science citation index US-biased? Scientometrics, 46(3), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459611
Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018a). Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A multidisciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 116(3), 2175–2188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2820-9
Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018b). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002
Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2021). Google scholar, microsoft academic, Scopus, dimensions, Web of Science, and opencitations’ COCI: A multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126(1), 871–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4
Mills, D., Kingori, P., Branford, A., Chatio, S., Robinson, N., & Tindana, P. (2023). Who Counts? Ghanaian academic publishing and global science—African Minds. African Minds. https://www.africanminds.co.za/who-counts/
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Nagano, R. L., & Spiczéné, E. B. (2017). 3 PhD publication requirements and practices: A multidisciplinary case study of a Hungarian university. In M. J. Curry & T. Lillis (Eds.), 3 PhD Publication requirements and practices: A Multidisciplinary Case Study of a Hungarian University. Multilingual Matters.
Narin, F., & Carpenter, M. P. (1975). National publication and citation comparisons. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26(2), 80–93.
Nielsen, M. W., & Andersen, J. P. (2021). Global citation inequality is on the rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(7), e2012208118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012208118
Nwagwu, W. (2008, January 1). Online Journals and Visibility of Science in Africa: A role for African Social Science Citation Index. Conference on Electronic Publishing and Dissemination “Putting African Journals On Line: Opportunities, Implications and Limits, Dakar, Senegal. https://www.academia.edu/769627/for_African_Social_Science_Citation_Index
Onyancha, O. B., & Maluleka, J. R. (2011). Knowledge production through collaborative research in sub-Saharan Africa: How much do countries contribute to each other’s knowledge output and citation impact? Scientometrics, 87(2), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0330-5
Pouris, A., & Ho, Y.-S. (2014). Research emphasis and collaboration in Africa. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2169–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1156-8
Powell, K. R., & Peterson, S. R. (2017). Coverage and quality: A comparison of Web of Science and Scopus databases for reporting faculty nursing publication metrics. Nursing Outlook, 65(5), 572–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.03.004
Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
Rabkin, Y. M., Eisemon, T. O., Lafitte-Houssat, J.-J., & Rathgeber, E. M. (1979). Citation visibility of Africa’s science. Social Studies of Science, 9(4), 499–506.
Rafols, I., Ciarli, T., & Chavarro, D. (2020). Under-reporting research relevant to local needs in the global south. Database biases in the representation of knowledge on rice. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/3kf9d
Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9%3c628::AID-ASI5%3e3.0.CO;2-0
Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Uddin, A., Arora, P., & Bhattacharya, S. (2022). Exploring the relationship between journals indexed from a country and its research output: An empirical investigation. Scientometrics, 127, 2933–2966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04366-x
Smirnova, N. V., Lillis, T., & Hultgren, A. K. (2021). English and/or Russian medium publications? A case study exploring academic research writing in contemporary Russian academia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53, 101015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101015
Tennant, J. P. (2020). Web of Science and Scopus are not global databases of knowledge. European Science Editing, 46, e51987. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2020.e51987
Thelwall, M., & Sud, P. (2022). Scopus 1900–2020: Growth in articles, abstracts, countries, fields, and journals. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00177
Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007). Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: New analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators. Scientometrics, 71(2), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1658-3
Van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51(1), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010549719484
Vanderstraeten, R., & Vandermoere, F. (2021). Inequalities in the growth of Web of Science. Scientometrics, 126(10), 8635–8651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04143-2
Vera-Baceta, M.-A., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2019). Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z
Vessuri, H., Guédon, J.-C., & Cetto, A. M. (2014). Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and the Caribbean and its implications for development. Current Sociology, 62(5), 647–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113512839
Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, dimensions, crossref, and microsoft academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112
Xu, X. (2020). China ‘goes out’ in a centre–periphery world: Incentivizing international publications in the humanities and social sciences. Higher Education, 80(1), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00470-9
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the participations of Professor Gbenga Adejare of the University of Calgary at the beginning of data collections for this study. We also acknowledge the use of ChatGPT for copyediting during the preparation of the manuscript. The use of ChatGPT was subjected to human verification.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Toluwase Asubiaro; Data Curation: Sodiq Onaolapo, Toluwase Asubiaro; Methodology: Toluwase Asubiaro; Formal analysis and investigation: Toluwase Asubiaro, Sodiq Onaolapo; Writing—original draft preparation: Toluwase Asubiaro, David Mills; Writing—review and editing: David Mills, Toluwase Asubiaro.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Asubiaro, T., Onaolapo, S. & Mills, D. Regional disparities in Web of Science and Scopus journal coverage. Scientometrics 129, 1469–1491 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04948-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04948-x