Skip to main content
Log in

Is the science citation index US-biased?

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Western European science policy establishment often claims that US articles are more frequently cited than articles of the European Union's scientists because they are published in journals with a large number of US publications and that these journals are forming the ‘core’ of the SCI.

For the disciplines covered by the SCI, no significant correlation has been found between the ratio of the average number of citations per publication for publications with at least one EU address and at least one US address, respectively, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, the ratio of the corresponding number of publications per journal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vanden Berghe, H., Houben J.A., de Bruin R.E., Moed H.F., Kint A., Luwel M., Spruyt E.H.J., Bibliometric indicators of university research performance in Flanders,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49 (1998) 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garfield, E., A statistically valid definition of bias is needed to determine whether thescience Citation Index discriminates against third world journals,Current Science, 73(8) (1997) 639–641.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Garfield, E., The diverse roles of citation indexes in scientific research,Rev. Invest. Clin., 50(6) (1998) 497–504.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carpenter, M. P., Narin F., The adequacy of theScience Citation Index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(6) (1981) 430–439.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zitt, M., Perrot, F., Barré R., The transition from ‘National’ to ‘Transnational’ model and related measures of countries' performance,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(1) (1998), 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bekavac A., Petrak J., Buneta, Z., Citation behaviour and place of publication in the authors from the scientific periphery,Information Processing & Management, 30(1) (1994) 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanz, E., Aragon I., Mendez A., The function of national journals in disseminating applied science,Journal of Information Science, 21(4) (1995) 319–323.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moed, H. F. Vriens M., Possible inaccuracies occurring in citation analysis,Journal of Information Science, 15(2) (1989) 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moed, H. F., Van Leeuwen T. N., Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Information's Journal Impact factors,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6) (1994) 461–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luwel, M. Is the science citation index US-biased?. Scientometrics 46, 549–562 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459611

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459611

Keywords

Navigation