Skip to main content
Log in

Academic careers in Computer Science: continuance and transience of lifetime co-authorships

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scholarly publications reify fruitful collaborations between co-authors. A branch of research in the science studies focuses on analyzing the co-authorship networks of established scientists. Such studies tell us about how their collaborations developed through their careers. This paper updates previous work by reporting a transversal and a longitudinal studies spanning the lifelong careers of a cohort of researchers from the DBLP bibliographic database. We mined 3,860 researchers’ publication records to study the evolution patterns of their co-authorships. Two features of co-authors were considered: (1) their expertise, and (2) the history of their partnerships with the sampled researchers. Our findings reveal the ephemeral nature of most collaborations: 70 % of the new co-authors were only one-shot partners since they did not appear to collaborate on any further publications. Overall, researchers consistently extended their co-authorships (1) by steadily enrolling beginning researchers (i.e., people who had never published before), and (2) by increasingly working with confirmed researchers with whom they already collaborated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/.

  2. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/~ley/faq/Data+in+dblp.html.

References

  • Abiteboul, S., Alstrup, S., Kaplan, H., Milo, T., & Rauhe, T. (2006). Compact labeling scheme for ancestor queries. SIAM Journal on Computing, 35(6), 1295–1309. doi:10.1137/s0097539703437211.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Abiteboul, S., & Bonner, A. (1991). Objects and views. SIGMOD Record, 20(2), 238–247. doi:10.1145/119995.115830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abiteboul, S., Gawlick, D., Gray, J., Haas, L., Halevy, A., Hellerstein, J., et al. (2005). The Lowell database research self-assessment. Communications of the ACM, 48(5), 111–118. doi:10.1145/1060710.1060718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., & Vianu, V. (2005). In memory of Seymour Ginsburg 1928–2004. SIGMOD Record, 34(1), 5–12. doi:10.1145/1058150.1058152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education, 57(2), 155–171. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9139-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3–4), 590–614. doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 1(1), 65–84. doi:10.1007/BF02016840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Publication and cooperation patterns of the authors of neuroscience journals. Scientometrics, 50(3), 499–510. doi:10.1023/A:1012774206340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabanac, G. (2012). Shaping the landscape of research in information systems from the perspective of editorial boards: A scientometric study of 77 leading journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5), 977–996. doi:10.1002/asi.22609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabanac, G. (2013). Experimenting with the partnership ability φ-index on a million computer scientists. Scientometrics, 96(1), 1–9. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0862-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavero, J. M., Vela, B., & Cáceres, P. (2014). Computer science research: More production, less productivity. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2103–2111. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1178-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Konstan, J. A. (2010). Conference paper selectivity and impact. Communications of the ACM, 53(6), 79–83. doi:10.1145/1743546.1743569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, M. Y., Hen, K. W., Tan, H. P., & Fok, K. F. (2013). Patterns of co-authorship and research collaboration in Malaysia. Aslib Proceedings, 65(6), 659–674. doi:10.1108/AP-12-2012-0094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. In M. W. Steinkempt & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 217–258). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (1979). Age and scientific performance. American Journal of Sociology, 84(4), 958–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Bordons, M. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1564–1581. doi:10.1002/asi.21348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotta, C., & Merelo, J.-J. (2006). The complex network of EC authors. SIGEVOlution, 1(2), 2–9. doi:10.1145/1147192.1147193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & Barre, K. L. (2004). Visible, less visible, and invisible work: Patterns of collaboration in 20th century chemistry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2), 160–168. doi:10.1002/asi.10353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, H., King, I., Lyu, & M. R. (2008). Formal models for expert finding on DBLP bibliography data. In: ICDM’08: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE international conference on data mining (pp. 163–172). IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/ICDM.2008.29

  • de Souza, C. G., & Azevedo Ferreira, M. L. (2013). Researchers profile, co-authorship pattern and knowledge organization in Information Science in Brazil. Scientometrics, 95(2), 673–687. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0882-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmacioglu, E., & Lee, D. (2005). On six degrees of separation in DBLP-DB and more. SIGMOD Record, 34(2), 33–40. doi:10.1145/1083784.1083791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. S., Lambiotte, R., & Panzarasa, P. (2011). Community structure and patterns of scientific collaboration in business and management. Scientometrics, 89(1), 381–396. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0439-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., Hölzl, W., & de Vor, F. (2005). The citation impact of research collaborations: The case of European biotechnology and applied microbiology (1988–2002). Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 22(1–2), 9–30. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2004.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freyne, J., Coyle, L., Smyth, B., & Cunningham, P. (2010). Relative status of journal and conference publications in Computer Science. Communications of the ACM, 53(11), 124–132. doi:10.1145/1839676.1839701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1996). What is the primordial reference for the phrase ‘Publish or Perish’? The Scientist, 10(12), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genuth, J., Chompalov, I., & Shrum, W. (2000). How experiments begin: The formation of scientific collaborations. Minerva, 38(3), 311–348. doi:10.1023/A:1026573717027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingras, Y., Larivière, V., Macaluso, B., & Robitaille, J.-P. (2008). The effects of aging on researchers publication and citation patterns. PLoS ONE, 3(12), e4048. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257–276). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, T. H., & Sauer, R. D. (1995). Life cycle productivity in academic research: Evidence from cumulative publication histories of academic economists. Southern Economic Journal, 61(3), 728–743. doi:10.2307/1060993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J., & Turner, L. (2007). Identifying age, cohort, and period effects in scientific research productivity: Discussion and illustration using simulated and actual data on French physicists. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 159–177. doi:10.1080/10438590600983010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horlings, E., & Gurney, T. (2013). Search strategies along the academic lifecycle. Scientometrics, 94(3), 1137–1160. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0789-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Zhuang, Z., Li, J., Giles, C. L. (2008). Collaboration over time: Characterizing and modeling network evolution. In: WSDM’08: Proceedings of the international conference on web search and web data mining (pp. 107–116). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1341531.1341548.

  • Ioannidis, Y., Maier, D., Abiteboul, S., Buneman, P., Davidson, S., Fox, E., Weikum, G. (2005). Digital library information-technology infrastructures. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 5(4), 266-–274. doi: 10.1007/s00799-004-0094-8

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossinets, G., & Watts, D. J. (2009). Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. American Journal of Sociology, 115(2), 405–450. doi:10.1086/599247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S., & Olsen, T. B. (2008). Does the aging of tenured academic staff affect the research performance of universities? Scientometrics, 76(3), 439–455. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1767-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, R., & Amara, N. (1998). The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research. Research Policy, 27(9), 901–913. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00098-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee D., Goh K.-I., Kahng B., Kim D. (2010) Complete trails of coauthorship network evolution. Physical Review E 82(2):026112–1-026112-9. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.82.026112.

  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702. doi:10.1177/0306312705052359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1989). Age and research productivity of academic scientists. Research in Higher Education, 30(5), 531–549. doi:10.1007/BF00992202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley, M. (2002). The DBLP computer science bibliography: Evolution, research issues, perspectives. In: Laender, A. H. F., Oliveira, A. L. (eds), SPIRE’02 : Proceedings of the 9th international conference on String Processing and Information Retrieval (Vol. 2476, pp. 1–10). Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/3-540-45735-6_1.

  • Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Over, R. (1982). Does research productivity decline with age? Higher Education, 11(5), 511–520. doi:10.1007/BF00194416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özsu, M.T., Valduriez, P., Abiteboul, S., Kemme, B., Jiménez-Péris, R., Ooi, B.C. (2011). Distributed data management in 2020? ICDE’11 Proceedings of the 27th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering. doi:10.1109/icde.2011.5767962.

  • Pitoura, E., Abiteboul, S., Pfoser, D., Samaras, G., & Vazirgiannis, M. (2003). DBGlobe: A service-oriented P2P system for global computing. SIGMOD Record, 32(3), 77–82. doi:10.1145/945721.945737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. d. S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5), 292–306. doi:10.1002/asi.4630270505.

  • Price, D. d. S, & Gürsey, S. (1975). Studies in scientometrics I: Transience and continuance in scientific authorship. Ciência da Informação, 4(1), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, F., Hoffmann, O. (2010). An analysis of the evolving coverage of computer science sub-fields in the DBLP digital library. In: Lalmas, M., Jose, J., Rauber, A., Sebastiani, F., Frommholz, I. (eds.), ECDL’10: Proceedings of the 14th European conference on research and advanced technology for digital libraries (Vol. 6273, pp. 216–227). Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15464-5_23.

  • Reitz, F., Hoffmann, O. (2013). Learning from the past: An analysis of person name corrections in the DBLP collection and social network properties of affected entities. In: Özyer T, Rokne J, Wagner G, Reuser A H (eds) The Influence of Technology on Social Network Analysis and Mining (Vol. 6, pp. 427–453). Springer, Berlin. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1346-2_19

  • Reuther, P., Walter, B., Ley, M., Weber, A., Klink, S. (2006). Managing the quality of person names in DBLP. In: Gonzalo, J., Thanos, C., Verdejo, M. F., Carrasco, R. C. (eds.), ECDL’06: Proceedings of the 10th European conference on research and advanced technology for digital libraries (Vol. 4172, pp. 508–511). Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/11863878_55.

  • Schubert, A. (2012). A Hirsch-type index of co-author partnership ability. Scientometrics, 91(1), 303–308. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0559-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Glänzel, W. (1991). Publication dynamics: Models and indicators. Scientometrics, 20(1), 317–331. doi:10.1007/BF02018161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, R. T., Abiteboul, S., Cluet, S., Franklin, M. J., Lohman, G. M., Lomet, D. B., et al. (1999). Reminiscences on influential papers. SIGMOD Record, 28(1), 110–114.

  • Solomon, J. (2009). Programmers, professors, and parasites: Credit and co-authorship in Computer Science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(4), 467–489. doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9119-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, W. (2010). The graying of academia: Will it reduce scientific productivity? American Psychologist, 65(7), 660–673. doi:10.1037/a0021086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stvilia, B., Hinnant, C. C., Schindler, K., Worrall, A., Burnett, G., Burnett, K., Kazmer, M. M., Marty, P. F. (2011). Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 270-283. doi:10.1002/asi.21464.

  • Sugimoto, C. R., & Cronin, B. (2012). Biobibliometric profiling: An examination of multifaceted approaches to scholarship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 450–468. doi:10.1002/asi.21695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velden, T., Haque, A.-U., & Lagoze, C. (2010). A new approach to analyzing patterns of collaboration in co-authorship networks: Mesoscopic analysis and interpretation. Scientometrics, 85(1), 219–242. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0224-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. L., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2012). A small world of citations? The influence of collaboration networks on citation practices. PLoS ONE, 7(3), e33339. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., & Glänzel, W. (2012). Where demographics meets scientometrics: Towards a dynamic career analysis. Scientometrics, 91(2), 617–630. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0590-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the French National Agency for Research (ANR-11-BSH1-0013). We acknowledge the feedback of James Hartley and András Schubert on an earlier version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Cabanac.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cabanac, G., Hubert, G. & Milard, B. Academic careers in Computer Science: continuance and transience of lifetime co-authorships. Scientometrics 102, 135–150 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1426-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1426-0

Keywords

Navigation